1. TGu Process Date: 2005-01-18 Authors: January 2005 January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
TGu Process
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

2. January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Abstract
Presentation of a possible TGu process, indicating what the goals of the TG are and what work has to be done, by when.
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

3. Generic Process of Getting to Letter Ballot
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Generic Process of Getting to Letter Ballot
Adoption of PAR and 5 Criteria
Technical Presentations and Discussions
Specify Any Additional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, or Other Documents
Call For Proposals
Select/Combine from Submitted Complete/Partial Proposals to Produce a Draft
Refine Draft
Letter Ballot
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

4. Historical 802.11 Project Timelines
January 2005
Historical Project Timelines
Time from PAR approval to first Letter Ballot – average of 6.6 meetings / 13 months
TGe-7, TGf-7, TGg-9, TGh-4, TGi-6
Time from first Letter Ballot to first Sponsor Ballot – average of 9 meetings / 18 months
TGe-12, TGf-9, TGg-6, TGh-8, TGi-10
(above data compiled by Bruce Kraemer)
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

5. 802.11u Project Timelines PAR approval was on 15 September 2004
January 2005
802.11u Project Timelines
PAR approval was on 15 September 2004
At the normal pace for a Task Group, our first Letter Ballot would open in October 2005 and our first Sponsor Ballot in July 2006.
Requirements and Selection Criteria
Work on these procedural documents should be completed by May 2005, so that we can then have a call for proposals in July 2005.
Things will generally happen slower than what we aim for.
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

6. January 2005
802.11u Project Timelines
December 2004: call for input for January 2005:
use cases
requirements
January 2005: Define selection criteria, formal scope and requirements
January 2005: Define set of external entities to liaise with. Compile liaison letter requesting requirement input.
January 2005: Call for informal preliminary presentations for March 2005 (on server by February 12th 2005)
March 2005: Finish supporting documents
March 14th 2005: Informal preliminary presentations
March 2005: Call for formal proposals to be presented May 2005 (on server by April 15th 2005)
May 16th, 2004: give preliminary one hour presentations; carry out first step of selection procedure
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

7. January 2005
802.11u Project Timelines
June 15, 2005: Preliminary draft text and presentations available on server
July 18, 2005: Extensive presentations (preliminary draft text), with feedback from group; carry out second step in selection procedure
August 15, 2005: Extensive draft text and slides available on server.
September 19, 2005: Give final proposals (final draft text and slides); carry out next step in selection procedure.
September 2005: Start draft version 0
November 2005: Internal Task Group letter ballot on draft
January 2006: Address comments from letter ballot
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

8. Ad Hoc Subgroups and TGs Working Documents
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Ad Hoc Subgroups and TGs Working Documents
Ad Hoc Subgroups
Have no special status unless TGs votes on them or their output.
Any group of members can get together and make submissions.
Within the Policies and Procedures (11-04/510r0), we can do what we want internally:
“Adopted” internal TGs motions/documents can be amended, replaced, or un-adopted.
We can have a “Functional Requirements” document that is as general or specific as we like.
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

9. Documentation Procedure
January 2005
Documentation Procedure
Scenarios
Requirements
Selection Criteria
Proposals
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

10. Example Problem Breakdown
January 2005
Example Problem Breakdown
Network Selection
Problem
Additional information is required for STAs regarding the characteristics of the network to support network selection decisions (e.g. roaming capabilities)
Requirements
To enable network selection decisions to be made prior to the commencement of the authentication procedure
Selection Criteria
Must not contain secure information
Solutions ?
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

11. Possible Documents Functional Requirements and Scope – coordinator xxx
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Possible Documents
Functional Requirements and Scope – coordinator xxx
“Functional Requirements & Scope”, 11-05/1583r0
Selection Criteria – coordinator xxx
“Selection Criteria”, 11-05/xxxxr0
Definitions – coordinator xxx
“Terms and Definitions”, 11-05/1619r0
Usage Models – coordinator xxx
“Usage Models”, 11-05/xxxxr0
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

12. Informal Ad Hoc Subgroups
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Informal Ad Hoc Subgroups
Form Ad Hoc subgroups for each document:
Functional Requirements and Scope
Comparison Criteria
Definitions
Usage Models
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

13. Internal Co-ordination
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Internal Co-ordination
TGs
Support for interfacing an ESS Mesh with other IEEE 802 LANs using 802.1D. E.g. something along the lines of Annex F
Advanced Security Group
Portal Page requirement, MAC address anonymity
TGr
Network Detection and Selection requirement
TGk
ARID requirement
TGe
External QoS Mapping
IEEE
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

14. External Co-ordination
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
External Co-ordination
INTRWRK_SCP3Support for interfacing an ESS Mesh with other IEEE 802 LANs using 802.1DE.g. something along the lines of Annex F
Requirements capture from:
3GPP
3GPP2
WiFi Alliance
GSMA
TiSPAN
Spacewire/IEEE 1394
UMA
Etc
Form External Entities Requirements Capture Ad Hoc subgroup
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

15. Schedule Projected at Monterey Meeting
January 2005
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Schedule Projected at Monterey Meeting
January 2005 (Monterey, California)
Initial Work on procedural documentation:
Functional Requirements and Scope
Comparison Criteria
Definitions
Usage Models
Call for preliminary presentations issued immediately after meeting with deadline for submission of two weeks before the March meeting.
March 2005 (Atlanta, Georgia)
Work on functional requirements and other documents that may be referenced in a future Call for Proposals
Preliminary presentations, refinement of selection criteria
Call for formal presentations issued immediately after meeting with deadline for submission of two weeks before the May meeting.
May 2005 (Beijing, China)
Presentation of proposals, refinement of selection criteria
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

16. Possibilities Between the January 2005 and March 2005 Meetings
doc.: IEEE /1584r1
January 2005
Possibilities Between the January 2005 and March 2005 Meetings
Possibilities for TGs Activity Between January 2005 and March 2005 Meetings to accelerate action :
Multiple Teleconferences (require 10 days notice, cannot be held more often than weekly (P&P clause 3.6.3))
One Teleconference
Additional official face to face meeting is probably not practical due to holidays and requirement for 30 days notice (P&P clause 3.6.2)
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor

17. Teleconferences Motion
January 2005
Teleconferences Motion
Teleconferences Motion:
Moved, that TGs have teleconferences at 11:00 Eastern Standard Time on 4 January, 5 January and 6 January Notice will be given, including UTC time, at least 10 days in advance.
Stephen McCann, Siemens Roke Manor