Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWinfred Bridges Modified over 6 years ago
1
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 8th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors Siena, 21 – 24 October 2002 Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
2
SIENA is located in Tuscany about 50km south of Florence
Ancient Etruscan settlement, became Roman colony under the name of Sena Julia Its importance grew in Middle Ages until became a municipality in 12th century: flourished in XIV century Frequent confrontations with neighbouring towns: taken over by Florence in 16th century Still retains an authentic medieval atmosphere
3
Piazza del Campo 14th century, is the heart of the city
Location of the ancient roman forum, boasts 14th century gothic buildings Palazzo pubblico e Torre del mangia Fonte Gaia by Jacopo della Quercia The horse race (Palio) is held here, 2nd of July and 16th of August Of medieval origin, sees the 10 of the 17 contrade competing against each other: the winner gets the Palio (banner)
4
The Dome,XIV century: one of the best roman-gothic architectural examples
Masterpieces by Nicola Pisano, Donatello,Pinturicchio Floor consisting of 56 different mosaics, depicting sacred scenes, required more than 150 years to be completed
5
High Energy Neutrino Astronomy
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 High Energy Neutrino Astronomy Christian Spiering, Siena, October 2002 Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
6
Physics Goals A. High Energy Neutrino Astrophysics B. Particle Physics
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Physics Goals A. High Energy Neutrino Astrophysics Weakly interacting neutrinos reach us from very distant sources: possible invaluable instrument for high-energy astrophysics B. Particle Physics Magnetic Monopoles, Oscillations, Neutrino Mass ... C. Others Supernova Bursts, CR composition, Black Holes, ... Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
7
Cosmic Rays 1 TeV GZK cut-off
8
up to 1-10 PeV Crab nebula Supernova shocks expanding in
interstellar medium up to 1-10 PeV Crab nebula
9
Active Galaxies: accretion disk and jets
up to eV VLA image of Cygnus A
10
Underwater Air showers Underground Radio,Acoustic pp core AGN
p blazar jet log(E2 Flux) Top-down WIMPs Oscillations GZK GRB (W&B) Microquasars etc. log(E/GeV) TeV PeV EeV
11
Diffuse Fluxes: Predictions and Bounds
Mannheim & Learned, 2000 1 pp core AGN (Nellen) 2 p core AGN Stecker & Salomon) 3 p „maximum model“ (Mannheim et al.) 4 p blazar jets (Mannh) 5 p AGN (Rachen & Biermann) 6 pp AGN (Mannheim) 7 GRB (Waxman & Bahcall) 8 TD (Sigl) 9 GZK Macro Baikal Amanda 9
12
Detection Methods and Projects
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Detection Methods and Projects Underwater/Ice Cerenkov Telescopes Acoustic Detection Radio Detection Detection by Air Showers Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
13
Underwater/Ice Cerenkov Telescopes
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Strings of widely spaced PMT put in deep water 4-string stage (1996) AMANDA: Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
14
Cerenkov radiation in H2O : v0.75c, = tg-1[(n2 v2/c2-1)1/2]
High-energy neutrinos through the earth may interact and create muons which emit Cherenkov light muon cascade
15
resolution Amanda-B10 ~ 3.5°
1 km 2 km SPASE air shower arrays resolution Amanda-B10 ~ 3.5° results in ~ 3° for upward moving muons (Amanda-II: < 2°)
16
AMANDA Amanda-II: 677 PMTs at 19 strings (1996-2000) 80PMTs Super-K
DUMAND Amanda-II: 677 PMTs at 19 strings ( ) AMANDA-II
17
Point Sources Amanda II (2000)
1328 events Preliminary limits (in units of muons cm-2 s-1): Cas A: Mk421: Mk501: Crab: SS433: 10.5
18
Expected sensitivity AMANDA 97-02 data
m cm-2 s-1 southern sky northern sky 4 years Super-Kamiokande 10-14 170 days AMANDA-B10 8 years MACRO SS-433 10-15 Expected sensitivity AMANDA data Mk-421 / ~ 1 -90 -45 90 45 declination (degrees)
19
IceCube - 80 Strings - 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3
AMANDA South Pole IceTop IceCube - 80 Strings PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 Installation: ~ atm. per year
20
mediterraneum Mediterranean Projects 2400m ANTARES 4100m 3400m NEMO
NESTOR
21
Site: Pylos (Greece), 3800m depth
towers of 12 titanium floors each supporting 12 PMTs
22
40 km Submarine cable m
23
ANTARES Design 10 strings 12 m between storeys Shore station float
active Electro-optic submarine cable ~40km Junction box Readout cables Shore station anchor float Electronics containers ~60m Compass, tilt meter hydrophone Optical module Acoustic beacon ~100m 10 strings 12 m between storeys
24
NEMO Neutrino Mediterranean Observatory
abs. length ~70 m 80 km from coast 3400 m deep
25
Summer 2002 Deployment 2 floors
NESTOR R & D, Site Evaluation Summer Deployment 2 floors Winter Recovery & re-deployment with 4 floors Autumn Full Tower deployment Add 3 DUMAND strings around tower ? Deployment of 7 NESTOR towers ANTARES R&D, Site Evaluation Demonstrator line Start Construction September Deploy prototype line December (12?) line detector complete ? Construction of km3 Detector NEMO Site selection and R&D Prototyping at Catania Test Site ? Construction of km3 Detector
26
R Suitable for UHE Threshold > 10 PeV d ACOUSTIC DETECTION 50s
Particle shower ionization heat perpendicular pressure wave Maximum of emission at ~ 20 kHz d R P t 50s Attenuation of sea water → given a large initial signal, huge detection volumes can be achieved.
27
AUTEC array in Atlantic existing sonar array for submarine detection
Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center 52 sensors on 2.5 km lattice (250 km2) 4.5 m above surface 1-50 kHz ! Threshold ~ 100 EeV
28
RADIO DETECTION: Askaryan process
Interaction in ice:e + n p + e- e- ... cascade relativist. pancake ~ 1cm thick, ~10cm each particle emits Cherenkov radiation C signal is resultant of overlapping Cherenkov cones Coherent Cherenkov signal for >> 10 cm (radio) C-signal ~ E2 nsec Compton scattered electrons shower develops negative net charge Qnet ~ 0.25 Ecascade (GeV). Threshold > 10 PeV
29
South Pole E 2 · dN/dE < 10-4 GeV · cm-2 · s-1 · sr-1
Showers in RF-transparent media (ice, rock salt) RICE Radio Ice Cherenkov Experiment South Pole firn layer (to 120 m depth) 20 receivers + transmitters UHE NEUTRINO DIRECTION E 2 · dN/dE < 10-4 GeV · cm-2 · s-1 · sr-1 at 100 PeV 300 METER DEPTH
30
AntarcticImpulsiveTransientArray
Flight in 2006
31
Extensive Air Showers for E > 10 EeV produce Ionization trails
Far inclined showers ( thousand per year) Hard s Atmosphere Flat and thin shower front Narrow signals Time alignment Deep inclined showers (~ one per year?) Atmosphere Soft s + e.m. Curved and thick shower front Broad signals el.-magn. cascade from e hard muons from CR Extensive Air Showers for E > 10 EeV produce Ionization trails
32
Need an observation from above (satellite)
Observation of upward going optical Cherenkov radiation emitted by tau neutrino -induced air-showers Need an observation from above (satellite)
33
Horizontal Air Showers seen by Satellite
500 km 60 ° E > 1019 eV Area up to 106 km2 Mass up to 10 Tera-tons Horizontal air shower initiated deep in atmosphere GZK ev./y
34
OWL Orbiting Wide-angle Light-collectors
Extreme Universe Space Observatory OWL Orbiting Wide-angle Light-collectors
35
RICE AGASA Amanda, Baikal 2002 2004 GLUE AUGER nt Anita AABN 2007 2012 km3 EUSO Auger Salsa
36
Most promising: point sources
Conclusions Most promising: point sources 0.1 km3 and 1 km3 detectors underwater and ice Huge step in GZK region Exciting decade ahead Contacts: Christian Spiering
37
Solar Neutrino Spectrometer with InP Detectors
P.G. Pelfer University of Florence and INFN, Firenze, Italy F. Dubecky Institute of Electrical Engineering, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava, Slovakia A.Owens ESA/ESTEC Noordwijk,Netherland
38
Why InP Solar Neutrino Experiment ?
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Why InP Solar Neutrino Experiment ? Semi Insulating InP Material base material for: Hard X-Ray Detectors Fast Electronics and Optoelectronics InP Spectrometer, the Smallest, Real Time, Lower Energy pp Solar Neutrino Spectrometer The Solar Neutrino Spectrometer from/for R&D on InP X-Ray Detectors ? Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
39
DETECTOR APPLICATIONS
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 DETECTOR APPLICATIONS BASIC KNOWLEDGE Solar Neutrino Physics X-ray astronomy X-ray physics MEDICINE Digital X-ray radiology (stomatology, mammography, ...) Positron emission tomography Dosimetry NONDESTRUCTIVE ON-LINE PROCESS CONTROL Material defectoscopy MONITORING Environmental control Radioactive waste management Metrology (testing of radioactive sources, spectrometry...) NATIONAL SECURITY Contraband inspections: cargo control Detection of drugs and plastic explosives Cultural heritage study Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
40
Requirements for Hard X-Ray Detectors of the New Generation >10keV
Room temperature (RT) operation Portability Fast reaction rate Universal detection ability Good detection parameters: CCE, FWHM, DE Radiation hardness Well established material technology Well established device technology (10 m) FE Electronics and Optoelectronics integration on the Detector LOW COST RT OPERATION: EG > 1.2 eV POLARISATION EFFECT: EG < 2.5 eV HIGH ENERGY RESOLUTION: EG small HIGH STOPPING POWER: Z > 30 HIGH CARRIER MOBILITY: > 2000 cm2/Vs CANDIDATES CdTe, HgI2, GaAs, InP
41
Attenuation and mobility
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Attenuation and mobility Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
42
Neutrino from the Sun Water Kamioka, SuperK x + e- x + e- (ES)
Gallium SAGE, Gallex, GNO e + 71Ga 71Ge + e- Chlorine Homestake e + 37Cl 37Ar + e- D2O SNO x + e- x + e- (ES) e + d p + p + e- (CC) x + d n + p + e- (NC)
43
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
44
Requirements for Indium Solar Neutrino Spectrometer
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Requirements for Indium Solar Neutrino Spectrometer 1. Indium incorporated into the detector 2. Energy resolution ∆E/E of the order of 25% at 600 keV Important for spectrometry as well as background reduction. 3. Time resolution of the order of 100 ns for ~ 100 keV radiations. 4. Position resolution ∆V/V 10-7 at a reasonable cost. Very important for background reduction 5. Good energy resolution for low energy radiations ( ~ 50 keV ) 6. Made with materials of high radiactive purity Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
45
Neutrino Detection by In Target
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Neutrino Detection by In Target 1/2= 4.76 sec 7/2+ keV e 9/2+ 1 3/2+ keV 115In (95.7%) - 2 1/2=6x1014 y 1/2+ 115Sn E e(E keV ) Sn* Delay = 4.76 sec 115Sn* 115Sn + e-(88 112 keV)/1 (115.6 keV) + 2( keV) Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
46
Solar Neutrino Event in InP Detector
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 “ delayed event “ in a 27 cm3 macrocell Solar Neutrino Event in InP Detector " prompt event “ in a “1 cm3 cell” 3 4 5 2 2 1 6 1 3 4 5 9 8 7 time 2 1 6 e 9 8 7 10 s 1 cm3 cell Detector made up of many ‘basic cells’ 106 InP “1 cm3 cell” Calorimeter Module Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
47
FULL NEUTRINO SPECTROMETER Spectrometer Building Block
Nmodules 125 Spectrometer Module 100 mm 200 mm Pad Detectors V microcell 1 mm3 N microcell /cm3 1000 1 neutrino event once a day for background events
48
SemiInsulating InP Wafer Neutrino Spectrometer
6” diameter, 1 mm thick Pad Detectors Basic Component of Neutrino Spectrometer Present InP Material and Detector Technology
49
SI InP Material and Detector Technology
Producer: JAPAN ENERGY Co., Japan Growth Technique: LEC High-Temperature Wafer Annealing Resistivity (300 K): x107 cm Hall Mobility (300K): cm2/Vs Fe Content: x1015 cm-3 Orientation: <100> Final Wafer Thickness: ~ 200 m Original BUFFERS realised using ion implantation in backside (PATENTED) Symmetrical circular contact configuration, 2mm , using both-sided photolithography Final metallisation: TiPtAu on top and AuGeNi on backside Surface passivation by Silicon Nitride
50
InP Detector Test Setup
3.142 mm2 x 200 m
51
Energy Resolution vs Shaping Time and
Spectral Response in InP Laboratory Measurements E=2.4 keV at 5.9 keV : 8.5 keV at keV
52
Linearity and Resolution vs X Ray Energy
in InP Laboratory Measurements
53
InP Spatial Distributions
The detectors spatial response measured at HASYLAB using a 50 50 m2, 15 keV X-ray beam. InP Spatial Distributions contact bond wire Count rate Peak centroid Resolving power
54
Summary and Conclusions
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Summary and Conclusions Present Radiation Detectors based on Bulk SI InP Fe doped have very good Detection Parameters for the X ray Detection from HASYLAB SR Facilty FWHM from 2.5 KeV at 5.9 KeV to 5.5 KeV at 100 KeV DE 10% at 100 KeV for 200 m thick Detector due to Better Material from Japan Energy and to Improved Interface Technology Some Problems for Detector Polarisation Detectors performances good for Solar Neutrino Spectrometer Optimisation is our next research goal Contacts: Pier Giovanni.Pelfer Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
55
Application of nanotechnologies in High Energy Physics
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 Application of nanotechnologies in High Energy Physics A.Montanari, F.Odorici INFN Bologna & Bologna University Italy Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
56
Nanotechnologies characteristics
Technologies for processing material on a nanometric scale: 1-100nm Interests in many field of research: biology, chemistry, nanoelectronic,science of material Nano-objects very attractive also in terms of application to a new generation of position particle detectors Mask, dies Contacts, probes Nano-holes, nanochannels Nano-wires, nanotubes
57
Nanotubes introduction
Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes (SWNT) discovered in 1991 Essentially long thin cylinders of carbon
58
price list from Bucky USA website buckyusa@flash.net
Single-wall nanotubes are formed in a carbon arc in the presence of a metal catalyst. The tubes are found in the matted soot deposited on the reaction chamber wall low yield The As-Produced Soot contains tubes that are nm in diameter and 2-20 µm in length. The product contains 10-40% tubes, the remainder is carbon-coated metal nanoparticles and amorphous and carbon nanoparticles price list from Bucky USA website
59
SWNT are truly 1D objects
NT can have very broad range of electrical, optical, mechanical, thermal characteristics depending on their geometrical properties (diameter, length and chirality) SWNT are truly 1D objects Beside SWNT it is possible to grow Multiple Walls Nano Tubes (MWNT) Energy gap dependency on diameter and chirality Quantum conductance of MWNT G0 = 2e2/h 1/12.9 k -1
60
Nanotransistor FET using NT as channel
NT applications Nanotransistor FET using NT as channel Microphotograph from IBM website At low temperature, it becomes a Single Electron Transistor (SET)
61
FIELD EMISSION FROM ARRAYS OF CARBON NANOTUBES
The aligned Nanotube field emitter are grown on a silicon substrate, by CVD Nanotubes array grown by CVD 20 left 2 right 1 separation min from NanoLab website
62
2 atoms crystal KI within 1.4nm SWNT
Peculiar properties expected by the nanodimensions associated with NT filling: Superconductive phenomena (reported for K,Rb,Cs) at rel. high temp 50K TEM image of hybrid material 2 atoms crystal KI within 1.4nm SWNT
63
New concept: bundles of NT used for position detectors
Readout electronics Radiation Filling of nanotubes already possible Nanopixel detector
64
Require uniform and reproducible structure: using catalysts in chemical vapour deposition straight nanotubes are possible Anodization of iperpure Aluminum sheets ( mm thick ) under controlled conditions produces an oxide (Al2 O3 , Alumina) with self-organized regular honeycomb structure The size and pitch of nanochannels depend on the parameters of the process (voltage, acid type, acid concentration, temperature): Pitch: 40 -> 400 nm
65
· Alumina nanochannels used to grow nanotubes
Alumina nanochannels can be used to grow CNs, after the deposition of the catalyst (Ni, Fe, Co) at the bottom of each single pore Growth of CN by Chemical Vapor Deposition of a hydrocarbur at o C Temperature, gas concentration and duration of the process determine the CN structure (SWNT or MWNT, metallic or semiconductor)
66
Alumina nanochannels growing
67
NANO CHANNEL ACTIVE LAYER DETECTOR CONCEPT
68
Contacts: Alessandro.Montanari@bo.infn.it
Conclusions · NanoChant project (INFN & CNR) started as an R&D study aimed at improving by one order of magnitude the spatial resolution of position particle detectors, by using nanotechnologies (Carbon Nanotubes grown inside Alumina Nanochannels) Present state: building of the Alumina Nanochannels pore size 40nm pitch 100nm Immediate next step: growing of CN inside Nanochannels Future step: study of properties of CN, to optimise their use as charge collectors and their coupling to active medium Contacts:
69
Resistive Plate Chambers as thermal neutron detectors
DIAMINE Collaboration WP-2 BARI, Italy M. Abbrescia, G. Iaselli, T. Mongelli, A. Ranieri, R. Trentadue, V. Paticchio
70
Reasons for new thermal neutron detectors
The humanitarian demining problem Neutron Backscattering Technique (NBT) Metal Detectors not effective against anti- personnel mines: Neutron backscattering method: moderation of high-energy neutrons produced by radio-isotopic source or generator
71
Low (thermal) energy neutrons reflected from the soil is a direct indication of the amount of hydrogen The amount of hydrogen in a plastic landmine is much higher (40-65%) than that of the surrounding soil even in case this is wet A thermal neutron detector in combination with a neutron source is scanned across the soil, the presence of a landmine will be indicated by an increase in the number of thermal neutrons
72
RPCs for thermal neutron detection
1) Bakelite electrodes 2) Gap: 2 mm 3) HV electrodes: graphite 100 m 4) High resistivity layer 5) Pick-up strips 6)&7) readout electronics Operating pressure: ~ 1 Atm bakelite resistivity cm electrodes treated with linseed oil RPCs are easy to build, mechanically robust, light-weighted, cheap, can cover large surfaces, are adapt for industrial production, etc. particularly suitable for “on-field” applications
73
Neutron Detection Neutrons can be revealed only
after the interaction in a suitable material Production of secondary ionising particles The choice of the converter is crucial for the performance of the detector
74
Choice of the converter
Gd Natural Gd is characterized by a thermal neutron (50 kbarn) 12 times larger than 10B (3840 barn) Produced electron range (15-30 m) is >than ’s (3-4 m) Beyond E=100 meV, Gd cross section decreases much more rapidly than the one of 10B E1 eV it is smaller than the one of 10B. For application concerning only thermal neutron detection Gd is preferable to 10B
75
Layer of the converter consists of Gd2O3 mixed with linseed oil; the mixture is sprayed onto the bakelite electrodes, which are used to build standard RPC It is possible to obtain extremely uniform layers, with very constant thickness and density HV Gas RPCs 10x10 cm2 in dimensions one without Gd2O3, used as a reference and two with a different concentration of the oil Gd2 O3 mixture Signal readout: copper pad Signal input to: NIM discriminator, Vthr=30 Operating voltage 10-11kV (streamer mode) gas mixture The electric properties (surface resistivity) of bakelite electrodes are not altered
76
Schematic diagram of test system
RPC with Gd-oil TDC2 2 layers of 10B 0.35μm U e- RPC CI TDC1 t0 start DAQ tn stop to a multihit TDC TOA of e- plus delay start signal for two multihit TDC Neutron energy computed
77
· ‘raw’ data show already the higher efficiency achieved using this method
Background noise (of the chamber, out of time neutrons) to be taken into account Relative efficiency of conversion: around times better
78
Conclusions Contacts: marcello.abbrescia@ba.infn.it
Demonstrated the feasibility of this approach to build Gd-RPC for thermal neutrons Both detectors have an efficiency > 2.5 eff. CI ( 6%) RPC-Gd experimental efficiency is > 10B theoretical maximum efficiency >> 10B-RPC experimental efficiency Coupling two of these detectors together efficiency reaches about eff. CI (analysis in progress) Performances of various types of detectors have been evaluated by a technical board of EC together with Monte Carlo analysis of the signal generated by a APL. Decision on when and how to really test a device is being under consideration. Contacts:
79
Brunel University, London, UK
Giulio Villani 20/11/2002 ADVANCES IN SEMICONDUCTOR DETECTORS FOR PARTICLE TRACKING IN EXTREME RADIATION ENVIRONMENTS Cinzia Da Via’ Brunel University, London, UK Giulio Villani 20/11/2002
80
SUCCESS OF THE EXPERIMENTS REQUIRE PRECISE MEASUREMENT OF
INTRODUCTION PHYSICS REQUIREMENTS AT LHC AND SHLC (1035 cm2s-1) p p H b Higgs channel SUCCESS OF THE EXPERIMENTS REQUIRE PRECISE MEASUREMENT OF MOMENTUM RESOLUTION TRACK RECONSTRUCTION B-TAGGING EFFICIENCY POSSIBLE WITH SILICON, HOWEVER…
81
RADIATION ENVIRONMENT AT LHC AND
EXPECTED AT SLHC 5*1015 5*1014
82
PRESENT STATUS OF RAD HARD
SILICON DETECTORS NORMALLY USED IN HEP
83
EFFECTS OF RADIATION DAMAGE IN SILICON DETECTORS
Generation of charge traps by displacement damage of bulk silicon (interstitials and vacancies) Nuclear interactions Secondary processes from energetic displaced lattice atoms Non Ionizing Energy Loss: Energy loss due to collision with lattice nuclei depends on mass of the particle
84
RADIATION INDUCED BULK DAMAGE
85
RADIATION DEFECTS AND MACROSCOPIC EFFECTS
V,I mobile migrate until meet impurities and dopants to form stable defects: Charge defects: Neff,Vbias Deep traps, recombination centers: signal charge loss Generation centers: Ileak noise Oxygen-Vacancy complex forms an acceptor state in the upper half of band-gap (acts as a trapping center) Neff
86
MACROSCOPIC PARAMETERS CHANGES AT 1015 n/cm2
87
SPACE CHARGE AFTER IRRADIATION
88
Leff= t*Vdrift COLLECTION DISTANCE DETERMINED BY DRIFT LENGTH
Also effect of charge sharing due to low field region after type inversion
89
MAIN DETECTORS STRATEGIES FOR SURVIVAL BEYOND 1015 n/cm2
90
OXYGEN AND STANDARD SILICON
Defect engineering:influence the defect kinetics by incorporation of impurities Higher O content: less donor removal O VO not room T V Vfd reduced 3 times No improvements for neutrons P VP donor removal
91
SHORT DRIFT LENGTH USING 3D DETECTOR
92
3D VERSUS PLANAR APPROACH
93
Contacts: Cinzia.DaVia@brunel.ac.uk
CONCLUSIONS: Contacts:
94
Analysis and Simulation of Charge Collection in Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
E.Giulio Villani, Renato Turchetta, Mike Tyndel Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
95
MAPS CONCEPTS AND CHARACTERISTICS
R C e o a n d t o r u o t l Reset Column line Row sel Column parallel ADCs I2 C Data processing – output stage Charge generated by impinging radiation in sensitive element D diffuses towards the cathode. The related voltage variation is buffered by the source follower and transmitted further down the line once the row is selected. One row at a time is readout
96
P+ P Sensitive volume (2 – 20 μm thick) P++ Substrate (300 – 500 μm thick) N+ electronics Ionisation- generated charge remains confined within the potential well in the epitaxial layer and moves by thermal diffusion towards the cathode
97
Typical results F 20ns Typical diffusion time for 5m active area is about 20ns, with 600e- collected (simulation performed with ISE-TCAD on device with 5m epitaxial thickness >10m substrate 2V bias) Sufficiently fast for Linear Collider: however, LHC would require faster and more radiation tolerant device
98
To be solved within the regions of the device
New concept design and analysis: introduction of N-layer to extend electric field into active region N layer Cathode Active area To be solved within the regions of the device
99
Simulation results: Electric field comparison
DEVICE DESIGN Simulation results: Electric field comparison NEW STANDARD
100
Superposition of voltage variations at the collecting cathode: new structure shows smaller swing than the standard structure but is faster regardless of the hit point τF 2ns τF 17ns Fall time τF (0 to 90% of full swing) approximately 8.5 times smaller
101
NEW STANDARD τF 2ns Charge collection time shows the same fast behavior with fall time τF 2ns Total capacitance C 6.63fF
102
CONCLUSIONS Results of 2D simulations on standard MAPS compare favorably with what amply reported in literature New structure proposal: analysis suggests the possibility of performances improvements Design and simulation: results show shorter collection time and better efficiency which pave the way for improved radiation tolerance Next steps: o Full 3D simulation of a device with side implants o Fabrication and test o Implementation of readout electronics
103
New device structure PWy PWx DNWy X Y Z DSUB
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.