Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Labs Put your name on your labs! Layouts: Site 1 Photos Title Legend

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Labs Put your name on your labs! Layouts: Site 1 Photos Title Legend"— Presentation transcript:

1 Labs Put your name on your labs! Layouts: Site 1 Photos Title Legend
Scale bar North arrow Your name Export as jpeg then paste into your report sheet. Site 1 Photos Lecture 14

2 – Spatial Interpolation –Part 1 Chapter 12
Lecture 14

3 INTERPOLATION Procedure to predict values of attributes at unsampled points Why? Can’t measure all locations: Time Money Impossible (physical- legal) Changing cell size Missing/unsuitable data Past date (eg. temperature) Lecture 14

4 Sampling Sampling Techniques:
A shortcut method for investigating a whole population Data is gathered on a small part of the whole parent population or sampling frame, and used to inform what the whole picture is like Techniques: Systematic Random Cluster Adaptive Stratified Lecture 14

5 Difficult to stay on lines
Systematic sampling pattern Easy Samples spaced uniformly at fixed X, Y intervals Parallel lines Advantages Easy to understand Disadvantages All receive same attention Difficult to stay on lines May be biases Lecture 14

6 Advantages Disadvantages Random Sampling
Select point based on random number process Plot on map Visit sample Advantages Less biased (unlikely to match pattern in landscape) Disadvantages Does nothing to distribute samples in areas of high Difficult to explain, location of points may be a problem Lecture 14

7 Advantages Cluster Sampling
Cluster centers are established (random or systematic) Samples arranged around each center Plot on map Visit sample (e.g. US Forest Service, Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) Clusters located at random then systematic pattern of samples at that location) Advantages Reduced travel time Lecture 14

8 Advantages Disadvantages Adaptive sampling
More sampling where there is more variability. Need prior knowledge of variability, e.g. two stage sampling Advantages More efficient, homogeneous areas have few samples, better representation of variable areas. Disadvantages Need prior information on variability through space Lecture 14

9 Stratified A wide range of data and fieldwork situations can lend themselves to this approach - wherever there are two study areas being compared, for example two woodlands, river catchments, rock types or a population with sub-sets of known size, for example woodland with distinctly different habitats. Random point, line or area techniques can be used as long as the number of measurements taken is in proportion to the size of the whole. Lecture 14

10 Example if an area of woodland was the study site, there would likely be different types of habitat (sub-sets) within it. Random sampling may altogether ‘miss' one or more of these. Stratified sampling would take into account the proportional area of each habitat type within the woodland and then each could be sampled accordingly; if 20 samples were to be taken in the woodland as a whole, and it was found that a shrubby clearing accounted for 10% of the total area, two samples would need to be taken within the clearing. The sample points could still be identified randomly (A) or systematically (B) within each separate area of woodland. Lecture 14

11 INTERPOLATION Many methods - All combine information about the sample coordinates with the magnitude of the measurement variable to estimate the variable of interest at the unmeasured location Methods differ in weighting and number of observations used Different methods produce different results No single method has been shown to be more accurate in every application Accuracy is judged by withheld sample points Lecture 14

12 INTERPOLATION Raster surface
Outputs typically: Raster surface Values are measured at a set of sample points Raster layer boundaries and cell dimensions established Interpolation method estimate the value for the center of each unmeasured grid cell Contour Lines Iterative process From the sample points estimate points of a value Connect these points to form a line Estimate the next value, creating another line with the restriction that lines of different values do not cross. Lecture 14

13 Sampled locations and values
Example Base Lecture 14 Elevation contours Sampled locations and values

14 INTERPOLATION 1st Method - Thiessen Polygon
Assigns interpolated value equal to the value found at the nearest sample location Conceptually simplest method Only one point used (nearest) Often called nearest sample or nearest neighbor Lecture 14

15 INTERPOLATION Thiessen Polygon Advantage: Ease of application
Accuracy depends largely on sampling density Boundaries often odd shaped as transitions between polygons are often abrupt Continuous variables often not well represented Lecture 14

16 Thiessen Polygon Draw lines connecting the points to their nearest neighbors. Find the bisectors of each line. Connect the bisectors of the lines and assign the resulting polygon the value of the center point Source: Lecture 14

17 Thiessen Polygon Start: 1) 2) 3) Draw lines connecting the points to their nearest neighbors. Find the bisectors of each line. Connect the bisectors of the lines and assign the resulting polygon the value of the center point 1 2 3 5 4 Lecture 14

18 Lecture 14

19 Lecture 14

20 Lecture 14

21 Lecture 14

22 Lecture 14

23 Sampled locations and values Thiessen polygons
Lecture 14

24 INTERPOLATION Fixed-Radius – Local Averaging
More complex than nearest sample Cell values estimated based on the average of nearby samples Samples used depend on search radius (any sample found inside the circle is used in average, outside ignored) Specify output raster grid Fixed-radius circle is centered over a raster cell Circle radius typically equals several raster cell widths (causes neighboring cell values to be similar) Several sample points used Some circles many contain no points Search radius important; too large may smooth the data too much Lecture 14

25 Fixed-Radius – Local Averaging
INTERPOLATION Fixed-Radius – Local Averaging Lecture 14

26 Fixed-Radius – Local Averaging
INTERPOLATION Fixed-Radius – Local Averaging Lecture 14

27 Fixed-Radius – Local Averaging
INTERPOLATION Fixed-Radius – Local Averaging Lecture 14

28 INTERPOLATION Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)
Estimates the values at unknown points using the distance and values to nearby know points (IDW reduces the contribution of a known point to the interpolated value) Weight of each sample point is an inverse proportion to the distance. The further away the point, the less the weight in helping define the unsampled location Lecture 14

29 INTERPOLATION Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)
Zi is value of known point Dij is distance to known point Zj is the unknown point n is a user selected exponent Lecture 14

30 INTERPOLATION Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) Lecture 14

31 INTERPOLATION Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW)
Factors affecting interpolated surface: Size of exponent, n affects the shape of the surface larger n means the closer points are more influential A larger number of sample points results in a smoother surface Lecture 14

32 INTERPOLATION Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) Lecture 14

33 INTERPOLATION Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) Lecture 14

34 INTERPOLATION Splines
Name derived from the drafting tool, a flexible ruler, that helps create smooth curves through several points Spline functions are use to interpolate along a smooth curve. Force a smooth line to pass through a desired set of points Constructed from a set of joined polynomial functions Lecture 14

35 Spline Surface created with Spline interpolation
Passes through each sample point May exceed the value range of the sample point set                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Lecture 14

36 INTERPOLATION : Splines
Lecture 14

37 Interpolation vs. Prediction
Spatial prediction is more general than spatial interpolation. Both are used to estimate values of a variable at unknown locations. Interpolation use only the measured target variable and sample coordinates to estimate the variable at unknown locations. Prediction methods address the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Lecture 14

38 Tobler’s Law Tobler's First Law of Geography.
A formulation of the concept of spatial autocorrelation by the geographer Waldo Tobler (1930-), which states: "Everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things." Lecture 14

39 Trend Surface Interpolation
Fitting a statistical model, a trend surface, through the measured points. (typically polynomial) Where Z is the value at any point x Where ais are coefficients estimated in a regression model Lecture 14

40 Trend Surface Interpolation
Lecture 14

41 Global Mathematical Functions Polynomial Trend Surface
Lecture 14

42 Global Mathematical Functions Polynomial Trend Surface
Lecture 14

43 Similar to Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW)
INTERPOLATION Kriging Similar to Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) Kriging uses the minimum variance method to calculate the weights rather than applying an arbitrary or less precise weighting scheme Lecture 14

44 Cross-correlation – two variables change in concert (positive or negative)
Lecture 14

45 Prediction Kriging Method relies on spatial autocorrelation
Higher autocorrelations, points near each other are alike. Lecture 14

46 Similar to Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW)
Prediction Kriging Similar to Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) A statistically based estimator of spatial variables Kriging uses the minimum variance method to calculate the weights rather than applying an arbitrary or less precise weighting scheme Lecture 14

47 INTERPOLATION Kriging
A statistical based estimator of spatial variables Components: Spatial trend Autocorrelation Random variation Creates a mathematical model which is used to estimate values across the surface Lecture 14

48 Semivariogram Lecture 14

49 Lag Distance Kriging uses the concept of lag distance
Lecture 14

50 Lag Distance and Autocorelataion
The semivariance at a given lag distance is a measure of the spatial autocorrelation at that distance. The variogram is used to determine the weights used in the kriging process. Lecture 14

51 SemiVariogram Range: The distance where the model first flattens out is known as the range. Sample locations separated by distances closer than the range are spatially autocorrelated, whereas locations farther apart than the range are not. Lecture 14

52 SemiVariogram Nugget:
Theoretically, at zero separation distance (lag = 0), the semivariogram value is 0. However, at an infinitesimally small separation distance, the semivariogram often exhibits a nugget effect, which is some value greater than 0. The nugget effect can be attributed to measurement errors or spatial sources of variation at distances smaller than the sampling interval or both. Lecture 14

53 Semivariogram Nugget Effect:
Measurement error occurs because of the error inherent in measuring devices. Natural phenomena can vary spatially over a range of scales. Variation at microscales smaller than the sampling distances will appear as part of the nugget effect. Before collecting data, it is important to gain some understanding of the scales of spatial variation. Lecture 14

54 Types of Kriging Depending on the stochastic properties of the random field and the various degrees of stationarity assumed, different methods for calculating the weights can be deducted, i.e. different types of kriging apply. Classical methods are: Ordinary Kriging assumes stationarity (flat/no trend)of the first moment of all random variables Simple Kriging assumes a known stationary mean. Universal Kriging assumes a general polynomial trend model, such as linear trend model . Lecture 14

55 Kriging A surface created with Kriging can exceed the value range of the sample points but will not pass through the points. Lecture 14

56 Lecture 14

57 INTERPOLATION (cont.) Exact/Non Exact methods
Exact – predicted values equal observed Theissen IDW Spline Non Exact-predicted values might not equal observed Fixed-Radius Trend surface Kriging Lecture 14

58 INTERPOLATION Kriging
A statistical based estimator of spatial variables Components: Spatial trend Autocorrelation Random variation Creates a mathematical model which is used to estimate values across the surface Lecture 14

59 Lecture 14

60 INTERPOLATION (cont.) Exact/Non Exact methods
Exact – predicted values equal observed Theissen IDW Spline Non Exact-predicted values might not equal observed Fixed-Radius Trend surface Kriging Lecture 14

61 Which method works best for this example?
Thiessen Polygons Fixed-radius – Local Averaging IDW: squared, 12 nearest points Original Surface: Trend Surface Spline Kriging Lecture 14

62 Interpolation vs. Prediction
Spatial prediction is more general than spatial interpolation. Both are used to estimate values of a variable at unknown locations. Interpolation use only the measured target variable and sample coordinates to estimate the variable at unknown locations. Prediction methods address the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Lecture 14

63 Tobler’s Law Tobler's First Law of Geography.
A formulation of the concept of spatial autocorrelation by the geographer Waldo Tobler (1930-), which states: "Everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things." Lecture 14

64 Prediction Kriging Method relies on spatial autocorrelation
Higher autocorrelations, points near each other are alike. Lecture 14

65 Cross-correlation – two variables change in concert (positive or negative)
Lecture 14

66 Similar to Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW)
Prediction Kriging Similar to Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) A statistically based estimator of spatial variables Kriging uses the minimum variance method to calculate the weights rather than applying an arbitrary or less precise weighting scheme Lecture 14

67 INTERPOLATION Kriging
A statistical based estimator of spatial variables Components: Spatial trend Autocorrelation Random variation Creates a mathematical model which is used to estimate values across the surface Lecture 14

68 Lag Distance Kriging uses the concept of lag distance
Lecture 14

69 Semivariogram Lecture 14

70 SemiVariogram Range: The distance where the model first flattens out is known as the range. Sample locations separated by distances closer than the range are spatially autocorrelated, whereas locations farther apart than the range are not. Lecture 14

71 SemiVariogram Nugget:
Theoretically, at zero separation distance (lag = 0), the semivariogram value is 0. However, at an infinitesimally small separation distance, the semivariogram often exhibits a nugget effect, which is some value greater than 0. The nugget effect can be attributed to measurement errors or spatial sources of variation at distances smaller than the sampling interval or both. Lecture 14

72 Semivariogram Nugget Effect:
Measurement error occurs because of the error inherent in measuring devices. Natural phenomena can vary spatially over a range of scales. Variation at microscales smaller than the sampling distances will appear as part of the nugget effect. Before collecting data, it is important to gain some understanding of the scales of spatial variation. Lecture 14

73 Lag Distance and Autocorelataion
The semivariance at a given lag distance is a measure of the spatial autocorrelation at that distance. The variogram is used to determine the weights used in the kriging process. Lecture 14

74 Types of Kriging Depending on the stochastic properties of the random field and the various degrees of stationarity assumed, different methods for calculating the weights can be deducted, i.e. different types of kriging apply. Classical methods are: Ordinary Kriging assumes stationarity (flat/no trend)of the first moment of all random variables Simple Kriging assumes a known stationary mean. Universal Kriging assumes a general polynomial trend model, such as linear trend model . Lecture 14

75 Kriging A surface created with Kriging can exceed the value range of the sample points but will not pass through the points. Lecture 14

76 Lecture 14

77 INTERPOLATION (cont.) Exact/Non Exact methods
Exact – predicted values equal observed Theissen IDW Spline Non Exact-predicted values might not equal observed Fixed-Radius Trend surface Kriging Lecture 14


Download ppt "Labs Put your name on your labs! Layouts: Site 1 Photos Title Legend"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google