Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

3rd HIV Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Child Workshop July 23, 2017

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "3rd HIV Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Child Workshop July 23, 2017"— Presentation transcript:

1 3rd HIV Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Child Workshop July 23, 2017
Mitochondrial DNA and neurodevelopmental disorders in HEU children – observations from the CARMA cohort Hélène Côté, PhD Pathology & Laboratory Medicine The University of British Columbia Canada 3rd HIV Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Child Workshop July 23, 2017

2 HIV Epidemiology 72,000 17,000 200 11,000 ~25 1,850 All 34 M 17 M

3 CARMA cohort Children and Women: AntiRetrovirals and Markers of Aging
Initiated in 2008, ongoing Enroll adults (primarily women), children, pregnant women & infants Enrolled HIV+ and HEU children (0-19y) in four cities in Canada Collect demographic and clinical data + bio-specimens ~4000 HEU children born in Canada since 1990 CARMA counts: ~150 HIV+ children (1-19y) ~300 HEU children (1-19y) ~230 HEU infants (0-3m) ~75 HUU infants (0-3m) CARMA cohort Children and Women: AntiRetrovirals and Markers of Aging Vancouver Ottawa Toronto Montreal CARMA

4 Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
Neurodevelopmental disorder Diagnosed by 2-3 years of age Heterogeneous symptoms Multi-hit (genetic/environment) Prevalence in general population ~1.5% Variable severity Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) Childhood disintegrative disorder Asperger’s Syndrome Classic autism

5 Factors associated with ASD
Substance use during pregnancy Maternal infections ↑ age Genetic susceptibility Sex Gastrointestinal abnormalities Hypotonia Intellectual disability Seizures/epilepsy Mitochondrial dysfunction

6 mtDNA as a marker of mitochondrial dysfunction
High prevalence of ASD among HEUs at one clinic (9/158 = 5.7%) Brophy et al., CAHR (2013) Elevated blood mtDNA content in HEU infants compared to HIV- unexposed uninfected (HUU ) Cote et al., J Infect Dis (2008) mtDNA as a marker of mitochondrial dysfunction mitochondrion mtDNA Mitochondria contain circular DNA (mtDNA) – 16.5kb Independent replication – polymerase  Changes in mtDNA content – marker of mitochondrial function/health

7 mtDNA damage and mutations
ARVs and mtDNA mtDNA content Clonal expansion of existing mutations PI Adaptive mitochondrial biogenesis Oxidative stress (Reactive oxygen species (ROS)) mtDNA damage and mutations mitochondrial dysfunction Telomerase mitophagy NRTI (mitochondria elimination) NRTI mitochondrial polymerase γ mtDNA content Telomere shortening

8 Anonymous pediatric HUU
Hypothesis: Blood mtDNA content will be different in HEU children diagnosed with ASD compared to 1:3 matched HEU children without ASD, HUU children with ASD, and HUU controls ASD in HEU Study design CARMA cohort HUU controls n=51 Anonymous pediatric HUU n=500 HUU non-ASD siblings n=9 HEU with ASD n=14 Pediatric HEU n=299 without ASD n=42 Matched 1:3 for age, sex, and ethnicity as best possible HUU with ASD n=42 (BC Autism Spectrum Interdisciplinary Research Program): ASPIRE ASPIRE DNA biobank

9 Study group characteristics
HEU with ASD n=14 without ASD n=42 HUU n=51 Male sex 10 (71) 30 (71) 36 (71) Age at sample collection (years) 6 [4 – 8] (2 – 16) 6 [4 – 9] Self-reported ethnicity Black/African Canadian 11 (79) 33 (79) 4 (10) White/Caucasian 3 (21) 9 (21) 20 (48) 5(10) Asian/South Asian 6 (14) 4 (8) Other/Mixed Ethnicity 12 (29) Unknown (anonymous) 42 (82) Maternal cART regimen taken in pregnancy None 2 (5) - NRTIs only 1 (7) 1 (2) Dual NRTI + PI 7 (50) 26 (62) Dual NRTI + NNRTI Other/unknown 2 (14) 10 (24) Length of maternal cART exposure (weeks) 11 [6 – 35] (0 – 38) 33 [20 – 39] (0 – 41) Received AZT prophylaxis 13 (93) 42 (100) Study group characteristics

10 Comparing blood mtDNA content between groups
*mtDNA data not obtained for 2 participants * Isolated blood mtDNA Measured mtDNA content by qPCR p = 0.2 Comparing blood mtDNA content between groups p < p = 0.004 p = p = 0.02 p = 0.03 Possible cumulative effect of HEU status and ASD on mtDNA? t-test Mann Whitney U test

11 ASD may show a higher prevalence among HEU in our cohort – but could be subject to recruitment bias
MtDNA effects are associated with both HEU status and ASD diagnosis Did not detect any relationship with perinatal ARV exposure but our study sample is small HEU may get a “multi-hit”, perhaps increasing susceptibility There may be confounder(s) we were not able to consider Summary

12 Neuro developmental outcomes in BC’s HEU
Possible causal pathways Neuro developmental outcomes in BC’s HEU ARV exposure ? HEU status Preterm birth Neurodevelopmental disorders Maternal factors A pilot study (n=103) conducted in BC suggested that a high proportion of HEU children required special aid in school Substance use Socioeconomic status, environment HIV disease (CD4 cell count, viral load) Infections in pregnancy

13 Study design Study objectives
To compare the frequency of neurodevelopmental disorders (ND) among HEU children compared to matched HUU To examine possible associations with exposure to maternal ARVs Study design: retrospective controlled cohort study HEU (n = 446) Born in BC PH number on record HUU (n = 1323) Matched (98%) on: Age, Sex, Geocode matched 1:3 Dataset collected by Data sources: BC ministry of Health (ICD-9 codes), Perinatal Service BC, Oak Tree Clinic, BC Vital Statistics

14 Population Data BC statement
“All inferences, opinions, and conclusions drawn in this presentation are those of the authors, and do not reflect the opinions or policies of the Data Steward(s).”

15 Frequency of ND among HEU and matched HUU 1990-2012 mean age 8.8 years
Neurodevelopmental disorder (ND) % HEU/ % HUU Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value ≥ 1 neurodevelopmental disorder 30 / 13 2.8 (2.2 – 3.6) <0.0001 Infantile autism (aka ASD) 2 / 0.7 3.0 (1.2 – 7.6) 0.02 Disturbance of emotions 9 / 3 2.9 (1.9 – 4.6) Hyperkinetic Syndrome (aka ADHD) 14 / 5 3.3 (2.3 – 4.7) Developmental Delay 18 / 6 3.5 (2.5 – 4.9) Intellectual Disability Undisclosed (n < 6) 1.0 (0.2 – 4.9) 0.99 Epilepsy 5 / 3 1.6 (0.9 – 2.6) 0.08 Frequency of ND among HEU and matched HUU mean age 8.8 years Other conditions Neoplams (any) 6 / 9 0.68 (0.4 – 1.0) 0.06 Asthma 22 / 21 1.0 (0.8 – 1.3) 0.90

16 Maternal and child characteristics
Entire sample( ) Maternal and child characteristics Characteristics (missing variables removed in HEU + HUU pairs) HEU n = 411 HUU n = 1224 P value Maternal age (years) 29.9 ± 5.6 30.5 ± 5.6 0.02 Age of child at follow-up (years) 8.4 ± 5.6 0.9 Male sex 190 (46.2%) 573 (46.8%) 0.8 Gestational age at birth (weeks) 37.7 ± 3.1 38.9 ± 1.8 <0.0001 Preterm birth (<37 weeks) 83 (21%) 85 (7%) Birth weight (kg) 2.98 ± 0.62 3.38 ± 0.57 APGAR 1 min 7.9 ± 1.8 8.1 ± 1.5 0.4 Data shown as mean ± SD or n (%) P values calculated from Mann Whitney U test or Chi square test

17 Multivariable logistic regression for any ND 1990-2012
Model 1 ( ) Multivariable logistic regression for any ND HEU (vs. HUU) p < Preterm birth (vs. term) p < Age at follow-up >11 years (vs. ≤11) p < Male sex (vs. female) p < Odds ratio (95% CI) of having at least one ND Influence of maternal smoking/substance use?

18 Maternal substance use *2000-2012 mean age at follow-up now 6 years
Model 2 ( ; shorter follow-up) Maternal substance use * mean age at follow-up now 6 years Characteristics (missing variables removed in HEU + HUU pairs) HEU n = 309 HUU n = 917 P value Maternal age (years) 30.2 ± 5.4 30.7 ± 5.6 0.08 Gestational age at birth (weeks) 37.7 ± 2.4 38.8 ± 1.8 <0.0001 Preterm birth (<37 weeks) 61 (20%) 63 (7%) Birth weight (kg) 2.99 ± 0.59 3.38 ± 0.58 APGAR 1 min 7.9 ± 1.9 8.2 ± 1.5 0.03 Smoking during pregnancy (any) 107 (35%) 78 (9%) 0.0001 Alcohol use (identified as a risk) 26 (8%) 12 (1%) Substance (illicit drug) use (any) 111 (36%) 24 (3%) Data shown as mean ± SD or n (%) P values calculated from Mann Whitney U test or Chi square test

19 Multivariable logistic regression for any ND 2000-2012
Model 2.0 ( ) Multivariable logistic regression for any ND HEU (vs. HUU) p = 0.011 Age at follow-up >6 years (vs. ≤6) p < Male sex (vs. female) p < Maternal smoking & substance use p < either or both (vs. never) Odds ratio (95% CI) of having at least one ND Influence of maternal smoking/substance use? Important

20 Model 2.1 ( ) Multivariable logistic regression for any ND (all variables included) HEU (vs. HUU) p = 0.055 Age at follow-up >6 years (vs. ≤6) p < Male sex (vs. female) p < Maternal smoking & substance use p < Either or both (vs. never) Preterm birth (vs. term) p < Odds ratio (95% CI) of having at least one ND If we also include preterm birth in the model, OR still borderline significant in HEU

21 Maternal ARV HEU births, and diagnoses of any ND in BC
Shorter follow-up Maternal ARV HEU births, and diagnoses of any ND in BC Percentage (%) n

22 Frequency of ND and preterm birth relative to duration of ARV exposure
Percentage (%) – 95% CI No ARV n = 76 n = 56 1-13 weeks n = 95 n = 89 14-26 weeks n = 162 n = 156 ≥27 weeks n = 107 n = 104 Any ND Preterm Birth Children with longer in utero exposure to ARV may have a lower risk of ND and preterm birth

23 Type of in utero ARV exposure (univariate association)
Preterm birth Any ND Type of in utero ARV exposure (univariate association) No ARV 1-3 NRTIs NRTIs + NNRTI NRTIs + PI (unboosted) NRTIs + PI (boosted) Odds ratio (95% CI) of having at least one ND Children whose mother was treated with combination ART (cART) may have a lower risk of ND No evidence of higher risk of ND with boosted PI but maybe higher risk of preterm birth

24 Summary of preliminary analyses
Model 1 ( ) HEU  odds than HUU for 4 or the 6 ND studied (~3 times) But…they do not have higher odds of being diagnosed with asthma After adjusting for sex and age at follow-up, the OR of any ND in HEU is ~3 HEU are also more likely to: be born preterm (~2.8 times) have a mother who used substances during her pregnancy (~4-12 times), although this is likely underreported among HUU mothers No evidence in this dataset that ARV exposure increases the risk of ND Model 2 ( ; shorter follow-up) After further adjusting for smoking/substance use, the odds ratio for: having any ND  by 35% (from 2.3 to 1.5) = largest confounder being born preterm decrease OR by 20% (from 3.3 to 2.7) but remain high Higher risk of ND persist after all adjustments Summary of preliminary analyses

25 Possible pathways to ND
ARV exposure ? ? HEU status Preterm birth Neurodevelopmental disorders Maternal factors A pilot study (n=103) conducted in BC suggested that a high proportion of HEU children required special aid in school Did not consider possible confounders such as maternal HIV disease state (CD4, viral load) as these data were not available

26 Acknowledgements CARMA participants CARMA Funding Cote Lab
Matthew Budd Micah Piske Patricia Janssen Joel Singer Jason Brophy Lindy Samson Acknowledgements Hugo Soudeyns Fatima Kakkar Valerie Lamarre Normand Lapointe CARMA CARMA participants Ari Bitnun Stanley Read Ariane Alimenti John Forbes Laura Sauve Deborah Money Evelyn Maan Funding

27


Download ppt "3rd HIV Exposed Uninfected (HEU) Child Workshop July 23, 2017"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google