Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byZoe Marsh Modified over 7 years ago
1
Intermediate Microeconomics and Its Application 9th Edition by Walter Nicholson, Amherst College
© 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
2
Chapter 1 Economic Models © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
3
What is Microeconomics?
The study of the allocation of scarce resources among alternative uses Microeconomics The study of the economic choices individuals and firms make and how those choices create markets 3
4
Economic Models Simple theoretical descriptions that capture the essentials of how the economy works Used because the “real world” is too complicated to describe in detail Models tend to be “unrealistic” but useful While they fail to show every detail (such as houses on a map) they provide enough structure to solve the problem (such as how a map provides you with a way to solve how to drive to a new location) 4
5
The Production Possibility Frontier
A graph showing all possible combinations of goods that can be produced with a fixed amount of resources Figure 1.1 shows a production possibility frontier where the good goods are food and clothing produced per week At point A, 10 units of food and 3 units of clothing can be produced 5
6
FIGURE 1.1: Production Possibility Frontier
Amount of food per week A 10 B 4 Amount of clothing per week 3 12 6
7
The Production Possibility Frontier
At point B, 4 units of food can be produced and 12 units of clothing Without more resources, points outside the frontier are unattainable This demonstrates a basic fact that resources are scarce 7
8
Opportunity Cost The cost of a good or service as measured by the alternative uses that are foregone by producing the good or service 8
9
Opportunity Cost Example
As shown in Figure 1.1, if the economy produces one more unit of clothing beyond the 10 that it produces at point A, the amount of food produced decreases by 1/2 from 10 to 9.5 Thus, the opportunity cost of one unit of clothing is 1/2 unit of food at point A 9
10
FIGURE 1.1: Production Possibility Frontier
Amount of food per week Opportunity cost of clothing = ½ pound of food A 10 9.5 Amount of clothing per week 3 4 10
11
Opportunity Cost Example
Figure 1.1 also shows that the opportunity cost of clothing is much higher at point B (1 unit of clothing costs 2 units of food) The increasing opportunity costs of producing even more clothing is consistent with Ricardo’s and Marshall’s ideas of increasing marginal cost 11
12
FIGURE 1.1: Production Possibility Frontier
Amount of food per week Opportunity cost of clothing = 2 pounds of food B 4 2 Amount of clothing per week 12 13 12
13
FIGURE 1.1: Production Possibility Frontier
Amount of food per week Opportunity cost of clothing = ½ pound of food A 10 9.5 Opportunity cost of clothing = 2 pounds of food B 4 2 Amount of clothing per week 3 4 12 13 13
14
APPLICATION 1.1: Do Animals Understand Economics?
Nature provides examples of where animals have scarcity affect their choices Birds of prey recognize a trade-off between spending time and energy in one area and moving to another location To avoid using too much energy, animals will leave an area before the food supply is exhausted 14
15
Uses of Microeconomics
While the uses of microeconomics are varied, one useful way to categorize is by types of users Individuals making decisions regarding jobs, purchases, and finances Businesses making decisions regarding the demand for their product or their costs Governments making policy decisions regarding laws and regulations 15
16
APPLICATION 1.2: Is It Worth Your Time to Be Here?
The typical U.S. college student pays about $18,000 per year in tuition, fees, and room and board charges. One might conclude then, that the “cost” of 4 years of college is about $72,000. A number of studies have suggested that college graduates earn more than those without such an education. 16
17
APPLICATION 1.3: Saving Blockbuster
The largest video rental company incurred a huge financial loss primarily because of the high price of first-run movies A large part of the “price” of the movie to the customer was not finding the movie in stock. Blockbuster reached an agreement to guarantee availability and reverse its losses. 17
18
APPLICATION 1.4: Microsoft and Antitrust
The central issue of this case is whether or not Microsoft is illegally “monopolizing” various segments of the software industry in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. MIT professor Franklin Fisher suggests that the real danger is allowing Microsoft to dominate the internet browser market which would eliminate competition. 18
19
APPLICATION 1.4: Microsoft and Antitrust
MIT professor Richard Schmalensee argues that Microsoft has not acted like a monopoly in the pricing of the Windows operating system The judge’s decision will have to try to strike a balance between the operating system monopoly and the ability of Microsoft to be innovative 19
20
The Basic Supply-Demand Model
A model describing how a good’s price is determined by the behavior of the individual’s who buy the good and the firms that sell it. Economists argue that market behavior can generally be explained by this model that captures the relationship between consumers’ preferences and firms’ costs. 20
21
Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand
Adam Smith ( ) saw prices as the force that directed resources into activities where they were most valuable Prices told both consumers and firms the “worth” of the good. Smith’s somewhat incomplete explanation for prices was that they were determined by the costs to produce the goods. 21
22
Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand
Since labor was the primary resource used, this led Smith to embrace a labor-based theory of prices. If catching deer took twice as long as catching a beaver, one deer should trade for two beaver (the relative price of a deer is two beaver’s). In Figure 1.1(a), the horizontal line at P* shows that any number of deer can be produced without affecting the relative cost 22
23
FIGURE 1.2(a): Smith’s Model
Price P* Quantity per week 23
24
David Ricardo and Diminishing Returns
David Ricardo ( ) believed that labor and other costs would rise with the level of production for example, as new less fertile land was cultivated, it would require more labor This increasing cost argument is now referred to as the law of diminishing returns 24
25
David Ricardo and Diminishing Returns
The relative price of a good could be practically any amount, depending upon how much was produced The level of production represented the quantity the country needed to survive In Figure 1.2(b), as the needs of the country increase from Q1 to Q2 prices increase from P1 to P2 25
26
FIGURE 1.2(b): Ricardo’s Model
Price P1 Q1 Quantity per week 26 26
27
FIGURE 1.2(b): Ricardo’s Model
Price P2 P1 Q1 Q2 Quantity per week 27 27
28
FIGURE 1.2: Early Views of Price Determination
Quantity per week Q1 Q2 Quantity per week (a) Smith model ’ (b) Ricardo model ’ 28
29
Marginalism and Marshall’s Model of Supply and Demand
Ricardo’s model was unable to explain the fall in the relative prices of good during the nineteenth century so a more general model was needed Economists argued the willingness of people to pay for a good will decline as they have more of it 29
30
Marginalism and Marshall’s Model of Supply and Demand
People will be willing to consume more of a good only if the price is lower The focus of the model was on the value of the last, or marginal, unit purchased Alfred Marshall ( ) showed how the forces of demand and supply simultaneously determined price 30
31
Marginalism and Marshall’s Model of Supply and Demand
In Figure 1.3, the amount of a good purchased per period is shown on the horizontal axis and the price of the good is shown on the vertical axis The demand curve shows the amount people want to buy at each price and is negatively sloped reflecting the marginalism principle 31
32
Marginalism and Marshall’s Model of Supply and Demand
The upward sloping supply curve reflects the idea of increasing cost of making one more unit of a good as total production increases Supply reflects increasing marginal costs and demand reflects decreasing marginal usefulness 32
33
FIGURE 1.3: The Marshall Supply-Demand Cross
Price Supply Demand Quantity per week 33
34
Market Equilibrium In Figure 1.3, the demand and supply curve intersect at the market equilibrium point P*, Q* P* is the equilibrium price: The price at which the quantity demanded by buyers of a good is equal to the quantity supplied by sellers of the good 34
35
. FIGURE 1.3: The Marshall Supply-Demand Cross 35 Price Demand Supply
Equilibrium point Quantity per week Q* 35
36
Market Equilibrium Both demanders and suppliers are satisfied at this price, so there is no incentive for either to alter their behavior unless something else happens Marshall compared the roles of supply and demand in establishing market equilibrium to the two blades of a pair of scissors working together in order to make a cut 36
37
Nonequilibrium Outcomes
If something causes the price to be set above P*, demanders would wish to buy less than Q* while suppliers would produce more than Q* If something causes the price to be set below P*, demanders would wish to buy more than Q* while suppliers would produce less than Q* 37
38
Change in Market Equilibrium: Increased Demand
Figure 1.4 shows the case where people’s demand for the good increases as represented by the shift of the demand curve from D to D’ A new equilibrium is established where the equilibrium price has increased to P** 38
39
FIGURE 1.4: An increase in Demand Alters Equilibrium Price and Quantity
per week 39
40
FIGURE 1.4: An increase in Demand Alters Equilibrium Price and Quantity
per week 40
41
Change in Market Equilibrium: decrease in Supply
In Figure 1.5 the supply curve has shifted leftward reflecting a decrease in supply brought about because of an increase in supplier costs (say an increase in wages) At the new equilibrium price P** consumers respond by reducing quantity demanded along the Demand curve D 41
42
FIGURE 1.5: A shift in Supply Alters Equilibrium Price and Quantity
Quantity per week 42
43
FIGURE 1.5: A shift in Supply Alters Equilibrium Price and Quantity
Quantity per week 43
44
How Economists Verify Theoretical Models
Two methods are used Testing Assumptions: Verifying economic models by examining validity of the assumptions on which they are based Testing Predictions: Verifying economic models by asking if they can accurately predict real-world events 44
45
Testing Assumptions One approach would be to determine if the assumptions are reasonable The obvious problem is that people have differing opinion regarding reasonable Empirical evidence can also be used Results of such methods have had problems similar to those found in opinion polls 45
46
Testing Predictions Economists, such as Milton Friedman argue that all theories require unrealistic assumptions The theory is only useful if it can be used to predict real-world events Even if firms state they don’t maximize profits, if their behavior can be predicted by using this assumption, the theory is useful 46
47
Models of Many Markets Marshall's model of supply and demand is a partial equilibrium model: An economic model of a single market To show the effects of a change in one market on others requires a general equilibrium model: An economic model of a complete system of markets 47
48
APPLICATION 1.5: Economics According to Bono
The Spring 2002 trip to Africa by the Irish rock star Bono and U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill sparked much interesting dialogue about economics Bono claimed that recently enacted agricultural subsidies in the U.S. were harming struggling farmers in Africa 48
49
APPLICATION 1.5: Economics According to Bono
In Figure 1 U.S. farm subsidies reduce the world price of this crop from P* to P**. Exports from this African country fall from QS – QD to Q’S – Q’D 49
50
Figure 1: U.S. Subsidies Reduce African Exports
QD Q’D Q’S QS Q 50
51
The Positive-Normative Distinction
Distinction between theories that seek to explain the world as it is and theories that postulate the way the world should be To many economists, the correct role for theory is to explain the way the world is (positive) rather than the way it should be (normative) Positive economics is the primary approach of the text 51
52
APPLICATION 1.6: Do Economists Ever Agree?
Many jokes and popular opinion suggest that economists do not agree on many issues This belief arises primarily because people fail to distinguish between positive and normative issues As Table 1 shows, there is much agreement regarding positive issues but much less agreement with normative issues 52
53
TABLE 1: Percentage of Economists Agreeing with Various Propositions in Three Nations
53
54
Chapter 2 Utility and Choice © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
55
Theory of Choice The interaction of preferences and constraints that causes people to make the choices they do 55
56
Utility The pleasure, satisfaction, or need fulfillment that people get from their economic activity. To identify all of the factors that affect utility would be virtually impossible Much economic analysis is based on the ceteris paribus assumption. 56
57
Ceteris Paribus Assumption
In economic analysis, holding all other factors constant so that only the factor being studied is allowed to change Other factors are held constant so that we may choice is a simple setting that isolates the economic factors that affect behavior 57
58
Utility from Consuming Two Goods
In this chapter we assume that a person receives utility from the consumption of two goods “X” and “Y” which we can show in functional notation by The other things that appear after the semicolon are assumed to be held constant. 58
59
Measuring Utility Two problems make it difficult to measure utility directly. Because the real-world is constantly in flux, the ceteris paribus assumption is difficult to impose. There is no unit of utility measurement. However, it is possible to do a fairly complete job of studying choices without having to measure utility. 59
60
Assumptions about Utility
Basic Properties of Preferences Preferences are complete : The assumption that an individual is able to state which of any two options is preferred. Preferences are transitive: The property that if A is preferred to B, and B is preferred to C, then A must be preferred to C. 60
61
Application 2.1: Can Money Buy Health and Happiness?
The relationship between health and income has been intensely studied Virtually all of these studies conclude that people who have higher incomes have better health People with higher incomes tend to report that they are happier than are those with lower incomes. 61
62
More Is Better: Defining an Economic “Good”
An economic good is one that yields positive benefits to people. Thus, more of a good is, by definition, better. This is shown in Figure 2.1 where all points in the darkly shaded area are preferred to the amounts of X* of good X and Y* of good Y. Movement into the shaded area is unambiguously better since the person gets more of one good without the loss of another. 62
63
FIGURE 2.1: More of a Good Is Preferred to Less
Quantity of Y per week ? Y* ? Quantity of X per week X* 63
64
Voluntary Trades and Indifference Curves
The areas marked with question marks in Figure 2.1 are difficult to compare to X*, Y* since they involve more of one good but less of another. Trading one good (such as money) for another good (such as a candy bar) is the essence of demand. 64
65
Indifference Curves A curve that shows all the combinations of goods or services that provide the same level of utility. In Figure 2.2, the horizontal axis measures the quantity of soft drinks consumed by the individual per week while the vertical axis measures the quantity of hamburgers consumed per week. 65
66
Indifference Curves The curve U1 in Figure 2.2 includes all combinations of hamburgers and soft drinks that yield the same level of utility. Point A, with 6 hamburgers and 2 soft drinks, has the same utility as point B, 4 burgers and 3 drinks. Since all points on the curve yield the same utility, the person has no reason to prefer one point over another. 66
67
FIGURE 2.2: Indifference Curve
Hamburgers per week A 6 B 4 3 C D 2 U1 Soft drinks per week 2 3 4 5 6 67
68
Points Above an Indifference Curve
In Figure 2.2, points such as E are above (to the northeast) of U1. Since E has more of both goods than point C, E is preferred to C (more is better). Because of transitivity, E is preferred to any point on U1. Points above an indifference curve are preferred to points on the curve. 68
69
FIGURE 2.2: Indifference Curve
Hamburgers per week A 6 B 4 E 3 C D 2 U1 69 Soft drinks per week 2 3 4 5 6
70
Points Below an Indifference Curve
In Figure 2.2, points such as F are below (to the southeast) of an indifference curve. Point C is preferred to point F since it contains more of both goods. Because of transitivity, all points on U1 are preferred to point F. Points on an indifference curve are preferred to points below it. 70
71
FIGURE 2.2: Indifference Curve
Hamburgers per week A 6 B 4 E 3 C D F 2 U1 Soft drinks per week 2 3 4 5 6 71
72
Movements Along an Indifference Curve
The negative slope of an indifference curve shows that, if a person must give up some hamburgers, the only way he/she can be as happy as before is if they get more soft drinks. In Figure 2.2, in giving up one hamburger to go from point B to point C means that the person receives one soft drink to compensate him or her. 72
73
The Slope of an Indifference Curve
In Figure 2.2, going from point A to point B, the person willingly gives up two hamburgers to gain one soft drink since they are equally happy at either point. The slope of U1 is approximately -2 between points A and B since hamburgers decline by two units to gain one unit of soft drinks. 73
74
Indifference Curves and the Marginal Rate of Substitution
Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS): The rate at which an individual is willing to reduce consumption of one good when he or she gets one more unit of another good. Also, the negative of the slope of an indifference curve. The MRS between points A and B on U1 in Figure 2.2 is (approximately) 2. 74
75
Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution
On indifference curve U1 in Figure 2.3 the person is willing to only give up one hamburger to gain one more soft drink between points B and C. Between points C and D, the consumer is only willing to give up ½ a hamburger to gain one more soft drink. 75
76
FIGURE 2.3: Balance in Consumption Is Desirable
Hamburgers per week A 6 B G 4 3 C D 2 U1 Soft drinks per week 2 3 4 6 76
77
Diminishing Marginal Rate of Substitution
The MRS diminishes along an indifference curve moving from left to right. This reflects the idea that consumers prefer a balance in consumption. Point G in Figure 2.3 reflects a bundle that is “between” points A and D. Since it is above U1 point G is preferred to any bundle on the indifference curve. 77
78
Indifference Curve Maps
Since every combination of hamburgers and soft drinks must yield some level of utility, every point must have one (and only one) indifference curve passing through it. An indifference curve map shows the utility an individual obtains from all possible consumption options. Figure 2.4 shows three of the infinite number of indifference curves in the map. 78
79
Labeling Indifference Curves
Since utility can not be measured, the labeling of indifference curves has no meaning except to indicate that utility increases from U1 to U2 and then to U3 in Figure 2.4. In any indifference curve map, all we can assume is that utility increases as we move to higher indifference curves. 79
80
FIGURE 2.4: Indifference Curve Map for Hamburgers and Soft Drinks
per week A 6 H 5 B G 4 U3 3 C U2 D 2 U1 Soft drinks per week 2 3 4 5 6 80
81
Application 2.2:Product Positioning in Marketing
One practical application of utility theory is marketing is the positioning of products in comparison with competitors. Assume consumers have preferences for taste and crunchiness in breakfast cereal as represented by U1 in Figure 1. 81
82
Application 2.2:Product Positioning in Marketing
If points X and Y represent competitors, positioning, a cereal at point Z would increase utility to consumers. If competitors have similar costs, this should offer good market prospects for the new cereal. 82
83
FIGURE 1: Product Positioning
Taste X Z U1 Y Crunchiness 83
84
Illustrating Particular Preferences
In Figure 2.5(a) the good on the vertical axis (smoke grinders) is useless so that the consumers only gains utility from more of the good on the horizontal axis (food). In Figure 2.5(b) the good on the vertical axis is an economic bad (houseflies) so the consumer only gets more utility from consuming less of the bad. 84
85
FIGURE 2.5: Illustrations of Specific Preferences
Smoke Houseflies grinders per week per week U 1 U 2 U 3 U 1 U 2 U 3 10 Food per week 10 Food per week (a) A useless good (b) An economic bad Gallons Right shoes of Exxon per week per week 4 U 4 3 U 3 2 U 2 1 U 1 U 1 U 2 U 3 85 Gallons of Mobil 1 2 3 4 Left shoes per week per week (c) Perfect substitute (d) Perfect complements
86
Particular Preferences
In Figure 2.5(c) the two goods are perfect substitutes in that the consumer views them as essentially the same. In this example the MRS = 1. In Figure 2.5(d) the two goods are perfect complements in that they must be used together (like left and right shoes) to gain utility. 86
87
Utility Maximization: An Initial Survey
Economists assume that when a person is faced with a choice among several possible options, he or she will choose the one that yields the highest utility- utility maximization. Economists assume that people know their own minds and make choices consistent with their preferences. 87
88
Choices are Constrained
People are constrained in their choices by the size of their incomes. Of the choices the individual can afford, the person will choose the one that yields the most utility. 88
89
A Simple Case When choosing to allocate income between two goods (e.g. hamburgers and soft drinks) the consumer will: spend his or her entire income on the two goods, and choose a combination of goods for which the marginal rate of substitution between the two goods is equal to the ratio of their prices. 89
90
A Simple Case Since both goods (and only these goods) provide more utility with increased consumption the consumer will spend his or her entire income on the goods. The only other alternative is to throw the income away which does not increase utility. 90
91
Equality of MRS with the Ratio or Prices
Suppose the individual is currently consuming where MRS = 1. Assume the price of hamburgers is $1 and the price of soft drinks is $.50. This yields a price ratio (PH/PS) of ($.50/$1) = ½. 91
92
Equality of MRS with the Ratio or Prices
The person could give up one hamburger (freeing $1) and purchase one soft drink using $.50. Since his or her MRS =1, the person would be just as happy as before but would now have an additional $.50 to spend which would enable him or her to increase utility. The only way utility can not be increased further is when MRS = price ratio. 92
93
Graphic Analysis of Utility Maximization
An individual’s budget constraint is the limit that income places on the combinations of goods and services that a person can buy. In Figure 2.6 the individual has a fixed amount of income that can be spend on two goods, X and Y. 93
94
Budget Constraint from Figure 2.6
If all income is spent on X, Xmax can be purchased. If all income is spent on Y, Ymax can be purchased. The line joining Xmax and Ymax represents the various mixed bundles of good X and Y that can be purchased using all income. 94
95
FIGURE 2.6: Individual’s Budget Constraint for Two Goods
Quantity of Y per week Xmax Quantity of X per week 95
96
FIGURE 2.6: Individual’s Budget Constraint for Two Goods
Quantity of Y per week Ymax 96 Xmax Quantity of X per week
97
FIGURE 2.6: Individual’s Budget Constraint for Two Goods
Quantity of Y per week Ymax Income Not affordable Affordable 97 Xmax Quantity of X per week
98
Budget Constraint The downward slope of the budget line reflects the fact that more X can be purchased only if less Y is purchased. If Y is expensive relative to X the line will be relatively flat. If Y is relatively inexpensive compared to X the line will be relatively steep. 98
99
Budget Constraint Algebra
Assume an individual has I dollars of income to spend on goods X and Y. Suppose the price of X is Px and the price of Y is PY. The total amount spent on X and Y are Px·X and PY·Y respectively. 99
100
Budget Constraint Algebra
Since all income must be spent on either X or Y we have Amount spent on X + Amount spent on Y = I or 100100
101
Budget Constraint Algebra
Solving equation 2.3 for Y, so that it is expressed in the standard form for a linear equation, we have 101101
102
Budget Constraint Algebra
Equation 2.4 shows that if all income is spent on Y, I/PY will be purchased, and if all income is spent on X, I/PX will be purchased. The slope of the budget line (-PX/PY) represents the opportunity cost of X in terms of foregone Y. 102102
103
Utility Maximization An individual can afford all bundles of X and Y that fall within the budget constraint represented by the shaded area in Figure 2.6. Point A is affordable but not all of the consumer’s income would be spent. Point B is affordable but is not on the highest indifference curve that can be reached by the consumer. 103103
104
FIGURE 2.7: Graphic Demonstration of Utility Maximization
Hamburgers per week B Income A U1 Soft drinks per week 104104
105
Utility Maximization Point D is on a higher indifference curve than C, but is not affordable given the budget constraint. Point C, where the consumer chooses X*, Y* is the point that is affordable that lies on the highest indifference curve, so it represents utility maximization. 105105
106
FIGURE 2.7: Graphic Demonstration of Utility Maximization
Hamburgers per week B D Income U3 A U1 Soft drinks per week 106106
107
FIGURE 2.7: Graphic Demonstration of Utility Maximization
Hamburgers per week B D Income U3 Y* C U2 A U1 107107 X* Soft drinks per week
108
Utility Maximization At point C all income is spent.
At point C indifference curve U2 is tangent to the budget line so that the or 108108
109
APPLICATION 2.3: Ticket Scalping
When rationed by some means other than prices often a secondary market such as ticket “scalping” occurs. Since Super Bowl tickets are rationed at one per consumer, the individual maximizes utility at point B in Figure 1, but would be happier if he or she could be at point A purchasing 4 tickets. 109109
110
APPLICATION 2.3: Ticket Scalping
The person would be willing to pay a great deal (measured by the vertical distance between points C and D in Figure 1) to a ticket scalper for a second ticket. Most economists view ticket scalping as voluntary activity that improves the welfare of both parties, even though many laws have been passed to stop these types of sales. 110110
111
FIGURE 1: Rationing of Tickets Leads to Scalping
Other goods B C Income D A U2 U1 1 2 3 4 5 Super Bowl tickets 111111
112
Numerical Example of Utility Maximization
Assume the individual can choose between hamburgers (Y) and soft drinks (X) whose prices are PY = $1.00 and PX=$.50. The individual has $10.00 to spend (I). The individual gets measurable utility from X and Y as follows 112112
113
Using The Model of Choice
Table 2.1 lists several possible ways that this person can spend the $10.00 on hamburgers and soft drinks and the level of utility associated with each choice. The choice of 5 hamburgers and 10 soft drinks yields the most utility as is also demonstrated graphically in Figure 2.8. 113113
114
Using the Model of Choice
The utility maximization model can be used to explain many common observations. Figure 2.8 shows people with the same income still consume different bundles of goods. 114114
115
FIGURE 2.8: Differences in Preferences Result in Differing Choices
Hamburgers per week Hamburgers per week Hamburgers per week U2 U1 U2 U0 U1 U0 U2 U1 Income 8 Income Income U0 2 Soft drinks per week Soft drinks per week Soft drinks per week 4 20 16 (a) Hungry Joe (b) Thirsty Teresa (c) Extra-thirsty Ed 115115
116
Using the Model of Choice
Figure 2.9 shows the four indifference curve maps with a budget constraint and the utility maximizing choice labeled E. Panel (a) shows that people will not buy useless goods and (b) shows they will not buy bads. Panel (c) shows that people will buy the least expensive of the two perfect substitutes while (d) shows that perfect complements will be purchased together. 116116
117
FIGURE 2.9: Utility-Maximizing Choices for Special Types of Goods
Smoke Houseflies grinders per week per week U 1 U 2 U 3 U 1 Income U 2 Income U 3 E E 10 Food per week 10 Food per week (a) A useless good (b) An economic bad Gallons Right shoes of Exxon per week per week E Income U 3 E 2 U 2 U 1 U 1 U Income 2 U 3 Gallons of Mobil 2 Left shoes 117117 per week per week (c) Perfect substitute (d) Perfect complements
118
APPLICATION 2.4: The Sad Tale of Willie and His Uncle
Figure 1 shows Willie’s choice between “sin” (i.e. smoking, drinking, and gambling) on the X- axis and his spending on everything else on the Y-axis. Willie would prefer to consume at point A— which involves some sin along with other things Willie’s uncle is offering him point B 118118
119
FIGURE 1:Willie’s Utility and His Uncle’s Promises
Other Goods Budget constraint B C A U3 U2 U1 119119 Sin
120
APPLICATION 2.5: Quantity Discounts and Frequent-Flier Programs
When consumers receive quantity discounts or have to pay excessive use fees, the budget line is no longer straight. In Figure 1, the consumer pays regular price for good X up to XD but receive a quantity discount beyond that as shown by the flatter budget line after consuming XD. 120120
121
APPLICATION 2.5: Quantity Discounts and Frequent-Flier Programs
Since the consumer is indifferent between points A and B, a slightly larger discount would cause the consumer to reach a higher indifference curve by using the discount. All major airlines use frequent-flier programs that provide such quantity discounts and enable the airlines to gain revenues on seats that otherwise would remain empty. 121121
122
FIGURE 1: Kinked Budget Constraint Resulting from a Quantity Discount
Quantity of Y per period A B U1 X0 Quantity of X per period 122122
123
Composite Goods A Composite Good is obtained by combining expenditures on several different goods whose relative prices do not change into a single good for convenience in analysis. This is a common graphing procedure that is used when many goods are involved but you want to study one good. 123123
124
Individual Demand Curves
Chapter 3 Individual Demand Curves © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
125
Individual Demand Curves
This chapter studies how people change their choices when conditions such as income or changes in the prices of goods affect the amount that people choose to consume. This chapter then compares the new choices with those that were made before conditions changed The main result of this approach is to construct an individual’s demand curve 125125
126
Demand Functions If we knew a person’s preferences and all the economic forces that affect his or her choices, we could predict how much of each good would be chosen. This summarizes this information in a demand function: a representation of how quantity demanded depends on prices, income, and preferences. 126126
127
Demand Function The three elements that determine the quantity demanded are the prices of X and Y, the person’s income (I), and the person’s preferences for X and Y. Preferences appear to the right of the semicolon because we assume that preferences do not change during the analysis. 127127
128
Homogeneous Demand Function
Individual demand functions are homogeneous since quantity demanded does not change when prices and income increase in the same proportion. The budget constraint PXX + PYY = I is identical to the budget constraint 2PXX + 2PYY = 2I. Graphically the lines are the same. 128128
129
Changes in Income When a person’s income increase, while prices remain the same, the quantity purchased of each good might increase. This situation is shown in Figure 3.1 where the increase in income is shown as the budget line shifts out from I1 to I2 to I3. The slope of the budget lines are the same since the prices have not changed . 129129
130
FIGURE 3.1: Effect of Increasing Income on Quantities of X and Y Chosen
Quantity of Y per week Y1 U1 I1 Quantity of X per week 130130 X1
131
FIGURE 3.1: Effect of Increasing Income on Quantities of X and Y Chosen
Quantity of Y per week Y2 U2 Y1 U1 I1 I2 Quantity of X per week 131131 X1 X2
132
FIGURE 3.1: Effect of Increasing Income on Quantities of X and Y Chosen
Quantity of Y per week Y3 Y2 U3 U2 Y1 U1 I1 I2 I3 Quantity of X per week 132132 X1 X2 X3
133
Changes in Income In response to the increase in income the quantity of X purchased increases from X1 to X2 and X3 while the quantity purchased of Y also increases from Y1 to Y2 to Y3. Increases in income make it possible for a person to consume more reflected in the outward shift in the budget constraint that allows an increase in overall utility. 133133
134
Normal Goods A normal good is one that is bought in greater quantities as income increases. If the quantity increases more rapidly than income the good is called a luxury good as with good Y in Figure 3.1. If the quantity increases less rapidly than income the good is called a necessity good as with good X in Figure 3.1. 134134
135
APPLICATION 3.1: Engel’s Law
One important generalization about consumer behavior is that the fraction of income spent on food tends to decline as income increases. This finding was discovered by Prussian economists Ernst Engel ( ). Table 1 show Engel’s data with Table 2 showing recent data for U.S. consumers. 135135
136
TABLE 1: Percentage of Total Expenditures of Various Items in Belgian Families in 1853
136136
137
TABLE 2: Percentage of Total Expenditures by U. S
TABLE 2: Percentage of Total Expenditures by U.S. Consumers on Various Items, 2000 137137
138
Inferior Goods An inferior good is one that is bought in smaller quantities as income increases. In Figure 3.2 as income increases from I1 to I2 to I3, the consumption of inferior good Z decreases. Goods such as “rotgut” whiskey, potatoes, and secondhand clothing are examples of inferior goods. 138138
139
FIGURE 3.2: Indifference Curve Map Showing Inferiority
Quantity of Y per week Y1 U1 Z1 I1 Quantity of Z per week 139139
140
FIGURE 3.2: Indifference Curve Map Showing Inferiority
Quantity of Y per week Y2 U2 Y1 U1 I2 I1 Z2 Z1 Quantity of Z per week 140140
141
FIGURE 3.2: Indifference Curve Map Showing Inferiority
Quantity of Y per week Y3 U3 Y2 U2 Y1 U1 I1 I2 I3 Z2 Z1 Z3 Quantity of Z per week 141141
142
Changes in a Good’s Price
A change in the price of one good causes both the slope and an intercept of the budget line to change. The change also involves moving to a new utility-maximizing choice on another indifference curve with a different MRS. The quantity demanded of the good whose price has changed changes. 142142
143
Substitution Effect The part of the change in quantity demanded that is caused by substitution of one good for another is called the substitution effect. This results in a movement along an indifference curve. Consumption has to be changed to equate MRS to the new price ratio of the two goods. 143143
144
Income Effect The part of the change in quantity demanded that is caused by a change in real income is called the income effect. The price change also changes “real” purchasing power and consumers will move to a new indifference curve that is consistent with this new purchasing power. 144144
145
Substitution and Income Effects from a Fall in Price
As shown in Figure 3.3, when the price of good X falls, the budget line rotates out from the unchanged Y axis so that the X intercept lies father out because the consumer can now buy more X with the lower price. The flatter slope means that the relative price of X to Y (PX/PY) has fallen. 145145
146
Substitution Effect from a Fall in Price
The consumer was originally maximizing utility at X*, Y* in Figure 3.3. After the fall in the price of good X, the new utility maximizing choice is X**, Y**. The substitution effect is the movement on the original indifference curve to point B. 146146
147
FIGURE 3.3: Income and Substitution Effects of a Fall in Price
Quantity of Y per week Y* U1 X* Quantity of X per week 147147
148
FIGURE 3.3: Income and Substitution Effects of a Fall in Price
Quantity of Y per week Old budget constraint Y* B New budget constraint U1 X* XB Quantity of X per week Substitution effect 148148
149
FIGURE 3.3: Income and Substitution Effects of a Fall in Price
Quantity of Y per week Old budget constraint Y** Y* U2 B New budget constraint U1 X* XB X** Quantity of X per week Substitution effect Income effect 149149 Total increase in X
150
Substitution Effect from a Fall in Price
If the individual had to stay on the U1 with the new price ratio, the consumer would choose B since that is the point where the MRS is equal to the slope of the new budget line (shown by the dashed line). Staying on the same indifference curve is the same as holding “real” income constant. The consumer buys more good X. 150150
151
Income Effect The movement from point B to X**, Y** results from the increase in purchasing power. Because PX falls but nominal income (I) remains the same, the individual’s “real” income increases so that he or she can be on utility level U3. The consumer buys more good X. 151151
152
The Effects Combined Using the hamburger-soft drink example from Chapter 2, suppose the price of soft drinks falls from $.50 to $.25. Previously the consumer could purchase up to 20 soft drinks, but now he or she can purchase up to 40. This price decrease shifts the budget line outward and increases utility. 152152
153
The Effects Combined If the consumer bought his or her previous choice it would now cost $7.50 so that $2.50 would be unspent. If the individual stayed on the old indifference curve he or she would equate MRS to the new price ratio (consuming 1 hamburger and 4 soft drinks). This move is the substitution effect. 153153
154
The Effects Combined Even with constant real income the consumer will buy more soft drinks since the opportunity cost of eating a burger in terms of the soft drinks forgone is now higher. Since real income has increased the person will choose to buy more soft drinks so long as soft drinks are a normal good. 154154
155
Substitution and Income Effects from an Increase in Price
An increase in PX will shift the budget line in as shown in Figure 3.4. The substitution effect, holding “real” income constant, is the move on U2 from X*, Y* to point B. Because the higher price causes purchasing power to decrease, the movement from B to X**, Y** is the income effect. 155155
156
FIGURE 3.4: Income and Substitution Effects of an Increase in Price
Quantity of Y per week U2 New budget constraint Y* Old budget constraint X* Quantity of X per week 156156
157
FIGURE 3.4: Income and Substitution Effects of an Increase in Price
Quantity of Y per week U2 U1 B New budget constraint Y* Old budget constraint XB X* Quantity of X per week Substitution effect 157157
158
FIGURE 3.4: Income and Substitution Effects of an Increase in Price
Quantity of Y per week U2 U1 B Y** New budget constraint Y* Old budget constraint Quantity of X per week X** XB X* Income effect Substitution effect 158158 Total reduction in X
159
Substitution and Income Effects from an Increase in Price
In Figure 3.4, both the substitution and income effects cause the individual to purchase less soft drinks do to the higher price of soft drinks. 159159
160
Substitution and Income Effects for a Normal Good: Summary
As shown in Figures 3.3 and 3.4, the substitution and income effects work in the same direction with a normal good. When the price falls, both the substitution and income effects result in more purchased. When the price increases, both the substitution and income effects result in less purchased. 160160
161
Substitution and Income Effects for a Normal Good: Summary
This provides the rational for drawing downward sloping demand curves. This also helps to determine the steepness of the demand curve. If either the substitution or income effects are large, the change in quantity demanded will be large with a given price change. 161161
162
Substitution and Income Effects for a Normal Good: Summary
If the substitution and income effects are small, the effect of a given price change in the quantity demanded will also be small. This kind of analysis also offers a number of insights about some commonly used economic statistics. 162162
163
APPLICATION 3.2: The Consumer Price Index and Its Biases
The Bureau of Labor Statistics monthly calculates the Consumer Price Index (CPI) which is a principal measure of inflation in the U.S.. To construct the CPI, a typical market basket of commodities purchased by consumers in the base year (currently 1982) is calculated. 163163
164
APPLICATION 3.2: The Consumer Price Index and Its Biases
The ratio of the current cost of the basket to the base year price is the measure of the value of the CPI. The rate of change in the CPI between two periods is the reported rate of inflation. 164164
165
An Algebraic Example Suppose the 1982 typical market basket contained X82 of good X and Y82 of good Y. The prices of these goods are and The cost of this bundle in the 1982 base year would be written as 165165
166
An Algebraic Example To compute the cost of the same bundle of goods in, say 2002, requires that we compute the cost of the bundle using current prices 166166
167
An Algebraic Example The CPI is defined as the ratio of the costs of these two market baskets If the basket cost $100 in 1982 prices and $180 in 2002, the value of the CPI would be and with a measured 80 percent increase in prices over the 20 year period. 167167
168
Substitution Bias in the CPI
The CPI does not take into account the real possibility that consumers would substitute among commodities because of changes in relative prices. In Figure 1, the typical individual is initially consuming X82, Y82 maximizing utility on U1 with 1982 constraint I. 168168
169
FIGURE 1: Substitution Bias of the Consumer Price Index
Quantity of Y per year Y82 U1 I I’ I” X82 Quantity of X per year 169169
170
Substitution Bias in the CPI
Suppose the 2002 relative prices change so that PX/PY falls. The cost of the 1982 bundle in terms of prices is reflected in the constraint I’ which is flatter and goes though the 1982 bundle. The consumer would substitute X for Y and stay on U1 on budget line I’’. 170170
171
Substitution Bias in the CPI
Since I’’ is inside I’ (which is used to compute the CPI), the CPI tends to overstate the inflation rate. Unfortunately, adjusting the CPI to take such substitution into account is difficult because it would require that we know the utility function of the typical consumer. 171171
172
New Product Bias in the CPI
New products typically experience sharp declines in prices and rapidly grow in rates of acceptance. If the CPI does not include these new products, this source of welfare increase is omitted. The CPI basket is revised but not rapidly enough to eliminate this bias. 172172
173
Outlet Bias in the CPI The typical basket is bought at the same retail outlets every month. This method can omit the benefits of sales or other bargains. The CPI does not currently take such price- reducing strategies and thus tends to overstate inflation. 173173
174
Consequences of the CPI Biases
Measuring and correcting for these biases is not an easy task. The CPI is such a widely used measure of inflation that any change becomes a hot political issue. However, there is a general agreement that the CPI overstates inflation by as much as 0.75 to 1.0 percent per year. 174174
175
Consequences of the CPI Biases
Politicians have proposed caps on Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs) tied to the CPI on government programs, but none have yet been enacted. However, the private sector has adjusted so that few private COLAs provide full offsets to inflation measured by the CPI. 175175
176
Substitution and Income Effects for Inferior Goods
With an inferior good, the substitution effect and the income effects work in opposite directions. The substitution effect results in decreased consumption for a price increase and increased consumption for a price decrease. 176176
177
Substitution and Income Effects for Inferior Goods
The income effect results in increased consumption for a price increase and decreased consumption for a price decrease. Figure 3.5 shows the two effects for an increase in PX. The substitution effect, holding real income constant, is shown by the move from X*, Y* to point B both on U2. 177177
178
FIGURE 3.5: Income and Substitution Effects for an Inferior Good
Quantity of Y per week Y* U2 Old budget constraint 178178 Quantity of X per week X*
179
FIGURE 3.5: Income and Substitution Effects for an Inferior Good
Quantity of Y per week B New budget constraint Y* U2 Y** Old budget constraint U1 179179 Quantity of X per week X*
180
FIGURE 3.5: Income and Substitution Effects for an Inferior Good
Quantity of Y per week B New budget constraint Y* U2 Y** Old budget constraint U1 180180 Quantity of X per week X** X*
181
Substitution and Income Effects for Inferior Goods
The income effect reflects the reduced purchasing power due to the price increase. Since X is an inferior good, the decrease in income results in an increase in the consumption of X shown by the move from point B on U1 to the new utility maximizing point X**, Y** on U1. 181181
182
Substitution and Income Effects for Inferior Goods
Since X** is less than X* the price increase in X results in a decrease in the consumption of X. This occurs because the substitution effect, in this example, is bigger than the income effect. Thus, if the substitution effect dominates, the demand curve is negatively sloped. 182182
183
Giffen’s Paradox If the income effect of a price change is strong enough with an inferior good, it is possible for the quantity demanded to change in the same direction as the price change. Legend has it that this phenomenon was observed by English economist Robert Giffen. 183183
184
Giffen’s Paradox When the price of potatoes rose in Ireland the consumption of potatoes also increased. Potatoes were not only an inferior good but constituted the source of a large portion of Irish people’s income. The situation I which an increase in a good’s price leads people to consume more of the good is called Giffen’s paradox. 184184
185
The Lump Sum Principle The “lump-sum principle” hold that taxes that are imposed on general purchasing power will have a smaller welfare costs than will taxes imposed on a narrow selection of commodities. Consider Figure 3.6 where the individual initially has I dollars to spend and chooses to consume X* and Y* yielding U3 utility. 185185
186
FIGURE 3.6: The Lump-Sum Principle
Quantity of Y I Y* U3 186186 Quantity of X per week X*
187
The Lump Sum Principle A tax on only good X raises its price resulting in budget constraint I’ and consumption reduced to X1, Y1 and utility level U1. A general income tax that generates the same total tax revenue is represented by budget constraint I’’ that goes though X1, Y1. 187187
188
FIGURE 3.6: The Lump-Sum Principle
Quantity of Y I Y1 Y* I’ Y2 U3 U1 Quantity of X per week X1 X* 188188
189
FIGURE 3.6: The Lump-Sum Principle
Quantity of Y I Y1 Y* I’ I” Y2 U3 U2 U1 Quantity of X per week X1 X2 X* 189189
190
The Lump Sum Principle The utility maximizing choice on I’’ is X2, Y2 yielding utility level U2. The lump-sum general income tax generates the same amount of tax revenue but leaves the consumer on a higher utility level (U2) than the utility level associated with the tax only on good X (U1). 190190
191
The Lump Sum Principle The intuitive explanation of the lump-sum principle is that a single-commodity tax affects people in two ways: it reduces their purchasing power, it directs consumption away from the good being taxed. The lump-sum tax only has the first of these two effects. 191191
192
Generalizations of the Lump-Sum Principle
The utility lass associated with the need to collect a certain amount of tax revenue will be minimized by taxing goods for which the substitution effect is small. Even though the tax will reduce purchasing power, it will minimize the impact of directing consumption away from the good being taxed. 192192
193
APPLICATION 3.3: Wouldn’t Cash Be a Better Way to Help Poor People?
The lump-sum principle suggests that the trends in expanding in-kind programs may be unfortunate These programs do not generate as much welfare for people as would the spending of the same funds in a cash program 193193
194
APPLICATION 3.3: Wouldn’t Cash Be a Better Way to Help Poor People?
In Figure 1 a subsidy on good X (constraint I’) raises utility to U2 For the same funds, an income grant (I’’) raises utility to U3 194194
195
FIGURE 1: The Superiority of an Income Grant
Y per period I’’ U3 B I’ U2 I U1 X per period 195195
196
Changes in the Price of Another Good
When the price of one good changes, it usually has an affect on the demand for the other good. In Figure 3.3, the increase in the price of X (a normal good) caused both an income and substitution effect that caused a reduction in the quantity demanded of X. 196196
197
Changes in the Price of Another Good
In addition, the substitution effect caused a decrease in the demand for good Y as the consumer substituted good X for good Y. However, the increase in purchasing power brought about by the price decrease causes an increase in the demand for good Y (also a normal good). 197197
198
Changes in the Price of Another Good
Since, in this case, the income effect had a dominant effect on good Y, the consumption of Y increased due to a decrease in the price of good X. With flatter indifference curves as shown in Figure 3.7, the situation is reversed. A decrease in the price of good X causes a decrease in good Y, as before. 198198
199
FIGURE 3.7: Effect on the Demand for Good Y of a Decrease in the Price of Good X
Quantity of Y per week Old budget constraint Y* U1 199199 Quantity of X per week X*
200
FIGURE 3.7: Effect on the Demand for Good Y of a Decrease in the Price of Good X
Quantity of Y per week Old budget constraint A Y* B New budget constraint U2 U1 200200 Quantity of X per week X*
201
FIGURE 3.7: Effect on the Demand for Good Y of a Decrease in the Price of Good X
Quantity of Y per week Old budget constraint A Y* C Y** B New budget constraint U2 U1 201201 Quantity of X per week X* X**
202
Changes in the Price of Another Good
However, in this case, the income effect is much smaller than the substitution effect so that the consumer ends up consuming less of good Y at Y** after the decrease in the price of X. Thus, the effect of a change in the price of one good has an ambiguous effect on the demand for the other good. 202202
203
Complements Complements are goods that go together in the sense that people will increase their use of both goods simultaneously. Two goods are complements if an increase in the price of one causes a decrease in the demanded of the other or a decrease in the price of one good causes an increase in the demand for the other. 203203
204
Substitutes Substitutes are goods that are goods that are used for essentially the same purpose. Two goods such that if the price of one increases, the demand for the other rises are substitutes. If the price of one good decreases and the demand for the other good decreases, they are also substitutes. 204204
205
APPLICATION 3.4: Why Are So Many “Trucks” on the Road?
There has been a huge gain in truck registrations over the past 10 years The Department of Transportation regards a wide variety of automobile-like vehicles as “trucks” (like vans, minivans, and SUVs) One of the most important reasons in the trend toward SUVs has been a sharp decline in real gasoline prices There has been a substitution away from more traditional automobiles. 205205
206
Construction of Individual Demand Curves
An individual demand curve is a graphic representation between the price of a good and the quantity of it demanded by a person holding all other factors (preferences, the prices of other goods, and income) constant. Demand curves limit the study to the relationship between the quantity demanded and changes in the own price of the good. 206206
207
Construction of Individual Demand Curves
In Panel a of Figure 3.8 an individual’s indifference curve map is drawn using three different budget constraints in which the price of X decreases. The decreasing prices are P’X, P”X, and P’’’X respectively. The individual’s utility maximizing choices of X are X’, X’, and X’’’ respectively. 207207
208
FIGURE 3.8: Construction of an Individual’s Demand Curve
Quantity of Y per week Budget constraint for P X 9 U 1 X’ Quantity of X per week (a) Individual s indifference curve map ’ Price P’X 208208 X’ Quantity of X per week (b) Demand curve
209
FIGURE 3.8: Construction of an Individual’s Demand Curve
Quantity of Y Budget constraint for P’X per week Budget constraint for P’’X U 2 U 1 X’ X” X’” Quantity of X per week (a) Individual s indifference curve map ’ Price P’X P’’X 209209 X’ X” Quantity of X per week (b) Demand curve
210
FIGURE 3.8: Construction of an Individual’s Demand Curve
Quantity of Y Budget constraint for P’X per week Budget constraint for P’’X Budget constraint for P’’’X U 3 U 2 U 1 X’ X” X’” Quantity of X per week (a) Individual s indifference curve map ’ Price P 9 X P X P - X 210210 X’ X” X’” Quantity of X per week (b) Demand curve
211
FIGURE 3.8: Construction of an Individual’s Demand Curve
Quantity of Y Budget constraint for P’X per week Budget constraint for P’’X Budget constraint for P’’’X U 3 U 2 U 1 X’ X” X’” Quantity of X per week (a) Individual s indifference curve map ’ Price P 9 X P X P - X d X 211211 X’ X” X’” Quantity of X per week (b) Demand curve
212
Construction of Individual Demand Curves
These three choices show that the quantity demanded of X increases as the price of X falls. Panel b shows how the three price and quantity choices can be used to construct the demand curve. 212212
213
Construction of Individual Demand Curves
The price of X is shown on the vertical axis and the quantity of X is shown on the horizontal axis. The demand curve (dX) is downward sloping showing that when the price of X falls, the quantity demanded of X increases. As previously shown, this result follows from the substitution and income effects. 213213
214
Shape of the Demand Curve
If a good, say X, has close substitutes, a increase in its price will cause a large decrease in the quantity demanded as the substitution effect will be large. The demand curve for a type of breakfast cereal will likely be relatively flat due to the strong substitution effect. 214214
215
Shape of the Demand Curve
If the good has few substitutes, the substitution effect of a price increase or decrease will be small and the demand curve will be relatively steep. Water is an example of a good with few substitutes. 215215
216
Shape of the Demand Curve
Food has no substitutes so it might be thought that no change in consumption would occur with a price increase. But food constitutes a large part of an individual’s budget so that price changes will cause relatively larger effects on the quantity demanded that might be thought due to the income effect. 216216
217
Shifts in an Individual’s Demand Curve
When one of the variables that are held constant (price of another good, income or preferences) on a demand curve changes, the entire curve shifts. Figure 3.9 shows the kinds of shifts that might take place. If X is a normal good and income increases, demand increases as shown in Panel a. 217217
218
FIGURE 3.9: Shifts in Individual’s Demand Curve
PX PX PX P1 P1 P1 X1 X2 X X1 X2 X X2 X1 X (a) (b) (c) 218218
219
FIGURE 3.9: Shifts in Individual’s Demand Curve
PX PX PX P1 P1 P1 X1 X2 X X1 X2 X X2 X1 X (a) (b) (c) 219219
220
Shifts in an Individual’s Demand Curve
If X and Y are substitutes and the price of Y increases, the demand for X increases as shown in Panel b. Alternatively, if X and Y are complements, the increase in the price of Y will cause a decrease in the demand for X as shown in Panel c. 220220
221
Shifts in an Individual’s Demand Curve
Changes in preferences can also shift demand curves. Panel b could represent an increased preference for cold drinks when a sudden hot spell occurs. Increased environmental consciousness during the 1980’s and 1990s increased the demand for recycling and organic food. 221221
222
APPLICATION 3.5: Fads, Seasons, and Health Scares
Fads (sometimes termed bandwagon effects) are when preferences cause extremely large increases in demand followed later by large decreases in demand. While fads are hard to predict, seasonal items are easy to predict. Increased demand for turkeys in November and Christmas trees are examples. 222222
223
APPLICATION 3.5: Fads, Seasons, and Health Scares
Health scares can cause large decreases in the demand for products. Examples include the long term decline in smoking and the decreased demand for Chinese food because of the concern for its fat content. Recent “scientific” studies have also affected demand such as the increase in the demand for tomatoes in 1998. 223223
224
Be Careful in Using Terminology
A movement downward along a stationary demand curve in response to a fall in price is called an increase in quantity demanded while a rise in the price of the good results in a decrease in quantity demanded. A rightward shift in a demand curve is called an increase in demand while a leftward shift is a decrease in demand. 224224
225
Consumer Surplus The extra value individuals receive from consuming a good over what they pay for it is called consumer surplus. Consumer surplus is also what people would be willing to pay for the right to consume a good at its current price. This concept is used to study the welfare effects of price changes. 225225
226
Consumer Surplus The demand curve for T-shirts is shown in Figure 3.10. At the price of $11 the individual chooses to consume ten T-shirts. In other words, the individual is willing to pay $11 for the tenth T-shirt that they buy. With a price of $9, the individual chooses fifteen T-shirts, so implicitly they value the fifteenth shirt at only $9. 226226
227
Consumer Surplus Because a good is usually sold at a single market price, people choose to buy additional units of the good up to the point at which their marginal valuation is equal to the price. In Figure 3.10, if T-shirts sell for $7, the individual will buy twenty shirts because the twentieth T-shirt is worth precisely $7. They will not buy the twenty-first T-shirt because it is worth less than $7. 227227
228
Consumer Surplus Because the individual would be willing to pay more than $7 for the tenth or fifteenth T-shirt, it is clear that they get a “surplus” on those shirts because the individual is actually paying less than the maximal amount that they would be willing to pay. Consumer surplus is the difference between the maximal amounts a person would pay for a good and what he or she actually pays. 228228
229
Consumer Surplus In graphical terms, consumer surplus is given by the area below the demand curve and above the market price. In Figure 3.10, total consumer surplus is given by area AEB ($80). 229229
230
FIGURE 3.10: Consumer Surplus from T-Shirt Demand Price ($/shirt)
15 11 9 E B d Quantity (shirts) 230230 10 15 20
231
Consumer Surplus and Utility
Figure 3.11 illustrates the connection between consumer surplus and utility Initially, the person is at E with utility U1. He or she would need to be compensated by amount AB in other goods to get U1 if T-shirts were not available. 231231
232
Consumer Surplus and Utility
In Figure 3.11, the individual would be willing to pay BC for the right to consume T-shirts rather than spending I only on other goods. Both distance AB and BC approximate the consumer surplus area in Figure 3.10. 232232
233
FIGURE 3.11: Consumer Surplus and Utility
Price ($/shirt) A B C E U1 I U0 I’ Quantity (shirts) 233233 20
234
APPLICATION 3.6: Valuing Clean Air
By looking at the ceteris paribus relationship between air pollution levels in various locations and the prices of houses in these locations, it is possible to infer the amount that people will pay to avoid dirty air. This information allows the computation of a compensated demand curve for clean air. 234234
235
APPLICATION 3.6: Valuing Clean Air
In Figure 1, the vertical axis shows the price home buyers are willing to pay to avoid air pollution and the horizontal axis shows the quantity of clean air purchased. The national average is reflected at point E as home buyers pay $50 and consume an average of 55 micrograms of suspended particulates per cubic meter. 235235
236
FIGURE 1: Compensated Demand Curve for Clean Air
Price ($) 85 80 60 E 50 40 20 D Air quality (mg/m3) 100 75 50 25 55 236236
237
APPLICATION 3.6: Valuing Clean Air
Consumers are paying $2,250 ($50 times 45 micrograms) extra to avoid dirty air. At E0 consumers also receive a consumer surplus equal to the shaded area in Figure 1. This consumer surplus of 788 per household can be multiplied by the total number of households to estimate total consumer surplus from clean air. 237237
238
Market Demand and Elasticity
Chapter 4 Market Demand and Elasticity © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
239
Market Demand Curves The market demand is the total quantity of a good or service demanded by all potential buyers. The market demand curve is the relationship between the total quantity demanded of a good or service and its price, holding all other factors constant. 239239
240
Construction of the Market Demand Curve
The market demand curve is constructed by horizontally summing the demands of the individual consumers Assume the market consists of only two buyers as shown in Figure 4.1 At any given price, such as P*X, individual 1 demands X*1 and individual 2 demands X*2. 240240
241
FIGURE 4.1: Constructing a Market Demand Curve from Individual Demand Curves
PX P* X X* 1 (a) Individual 1 241241
242
FIGURE 4.1: Constructing a Market Demand Curve from Individual Demand Curves
PX PX P* X X* X* 1 2 (a) Individual 1 (b) Individual 2 242242
243
Construction of the Market Demand Curve
The total quantity demanded at the market at P*X is the sum of the two amounts: X* = X*1 + X*2 . The point X*, P*X is one point on the market demand curve. The other points on the curve are similarly plotted. 243243
244
FIGURE 4.1: Constructing a Market Demand Curve from Individual Demand Curves
PX PX PX P* X D X* X* X* X 1 2 (a) Individual 1 (b) Individual 2 (c) Market Demand 244244
245
Shifts in the Market Demand Curve
To discover how some event might shift a market demand curve, we must first find out how this event causes individual demand curves to shift and then compare the horizontal sum of these new demand curves with the old demand curve. 245245
246
Shifts in the Market Demand Curve
For example consider the two buyer case where both consumers regard X as a normal good. An increase in income for each consumer would shift their individual demand curves out so that the market demand curve, would also shift out This situation is shown in Figure 4.2 246246
247
FIGURE 4.2: Increases in Each individual’s Income Cause the Market Demand Curve to Shift Outward
PX PX PX D P* X X* X* X* X 1 2 (a) Individual 1 (b) Individual 2 (c) Market Demand 247247
248
FIGURE 4.2: Increases in Each individual’s Income Cause the Market Demand Curve to Shift Outward
PX D’ PX PX D P* X X* X** X* X** X* X** X 1 1 2 2 (a) Individual 1 (b) Individual 2 (c) Market Demand 248248
249
Shifts in the Market Demand Curve
However, some events result in ambiguous outcomes. If one consumer’s demand curve shifts out while another’s shifts in, the net effect depends on the size of the relative shifts. An increase in income for pizza lovers would increase the market demand for pizza so long as it is a normal good. 249249
250
Shifts in the Market Demand Curve
On the other hand, if the increase in income was for people who don’t like pizza, there would be no significant effect on the market demand curve for pizza. Changes in the prices of related goods, substitutes or complements, will also shift the individual and market demand curves. 250250
251
Shifts in the Market Demand Curve
If goods X and Y are substitutes, an increase in the price of Y will increase the demand for X. Similarly, a decrease in the price of Y will decrease the demand for X. If goods X and Y are complements, an increase in the price of Y will decrease the demand for X. A decrease in the price of Y will increase the demand for X. 251251
252
APPLICATION 4.1: Consumption and Income Taxes
People’s ability to purchased goods and services is dependent upon their after tax income. In the 1950’s Milton Friedman argued that people’s consumption decisions are based mostly on their long-term (permanent) income. 252252
253
APPLICATION 4.1: Consumption and Income Taxes
One implication of the permanent-income hypothesis is that temporary tax changes will have little effect on the demand for consumption goods This prediction is supported by the small impact on consumption by both the temporary tax surcharge during the Nixon administration and the Ford administration’s temporary income tax rebate 253253
254
APPLICATION 4.1: Why the 2001 Tax Cut Was a Dud
In May 2001, Congress passed one of the largest cuts in personal income taxes in history. Our discussion of demand theory showed that changes in personal incomes shift demand curves outward. However, Milton Friedman viewed that spending decisions are based on a person’s “permanent” income. 254254
255
APPLICATION 4.1: Why the 2001 Tax Cut Was a Dud
This insight suggests that the 2001 tax cut had little impact for two reasons. First, The $300 checks were too small to stimulate spending on any major goods, so they were largely saved. Second, Most of the tax cuts do not begin until 2006, and the largest cuts are reserved until 255255
256
A Word on Notation and Terms
When looking at only one market, Q is used for the quantity of the good demanded, and P is used for its price. When drawing the demand curve, all non-price factors are assumed to not change. Movements along the curve are changes in quantity demanded, while shifts are changes in demand. 256256
257
Elasticity Goods are often measured in different units (steak is measured in pounds while oranges are measured in dozens). It can be difficult to make simple comparisons between goods when trying to determine which is more responsive to changes in price. 257257
258
Elasticity Elasticity is a measure of the percentage change in one variable brought about by a 1 percent change in some other variable. Since it is measured in percentages, the units cancel out so that it is a unit-less measure of responsiveness. 258258
259
Price Elasticity of Demand
The price elasticity of demand is the percentage change in the quantity demanded of a good in response to a 1 percent change in its price 259259
260
Price Elasticity of Demand
The price elasticity records how Q changes in percentage terms in response to a percentage change in P. Since, on a typical demand curve, P and Q move oppositely, eQ,P will be negative. For example, if eQ,P = -2, a 1 percent increase in price leads to a 2 percent decline in quantity. 260260
261
Values of the Price Elasticity of Demand
When eQ,P < -1, a price increase causes more than a proportional quantity decrease and the curve is called elastic. When eQ,P = -1, a price increase causes a proportional quantity decrease, and the curve is called unit elastic. When eQ,P > -1, a price increase causes less than a proportional quantity decrease, and the curve is called inelastic. 261261
262
TABLE 4.1: Terminology for the Ranges of eQ,P
262262
263
Price Elasticity and the Shape of the Demand Curve
We often classify market demand curves by their elasticities For example, the market demand curve for medical services is inelastic (nearly vertical) since there is little quantity response to changes in price. Alternatively, the market demand curve for a single type of candy bar is very responsive to price change (nearly flat) and is very elastic. 263263
264
Price Elasticity and the Substitution Effect
Goods which have many close substitutes are subject to large substitution effects from a price change so their market demand curve is likely to be relatively elastic. Goods with few close substitutes, on the other hand, will likely be relatively inelastic. 264264
265
Price Elasticity and the Substitution Effect
There is also an income effect that will determine how responsive quantity demanded is to changes in price. However, since changes in the prices of most goods have a small effect on individuals’ real incomes, the income effect will likely not have as large an impact on elasticity as the substitution effect. 265265
266
Price Elasticity and Time
Some items can be quickly substituted for, such as a brand of breakfast cereal, others, such as heating fuel, may take several years. Thus, in some situations, it is important to make the distinction between the short-term and long-term elasticities of demand. 266266
267
APPLICATION 4.2: Brand Loyalty
Substitution due to price changes will likely take a longer time if individual’s develop spending habits. Such brand loyalties are rational since they reduce decision making costs. Over the long term, however, price differences may cause buyers to try other brands. 267267
268
APPLICATION 4.2: Brand Loyalty
It took several years, but by the 1970s the price differences between U.S. and Japanese cars eventually convinced Americans to buy the Japanese cars. Brand name Licensing, such as Coca-Cola sweatshirts and Mickey Mouse watches, makes products that were previously nearly perfect substitutes, now much less so. 268268
269
Price Elasticity and Total Expenditures
Total expenditures on a good are found by multiplying the good’s price (P) times the quantity purchased (Q). When demand is elastic, price increases will cause total expenditures to fall. The given percentage increase in price is more than counterbalanced by the decrease in quantity demanded. 269269
270
Price Elasticity and Total Expenditures
For example suppose price elasticity = -2. Suppose people buy 1 million automobiles at $1000 each for a total expenditure of $10 billion. A price increase to $11,000 (10 percent) would cause a 20 percent decline in quantity to 800,000 vehicles. Total expenditures after the price increase would now be only $8.8 billion 270270
271
Price Elasticity and Total Expenditures
Of course, when demand is elastic and prices fall, total expenditures increase. With unit elasticity, total expenditures remain the same with a price change. The movement in one direction by the price is fully offset by the movement in the other direction with the quantity demanded. 271271
272
Price Elasticity and Total Expenditures
When demand is inelastic, a price increase will cause total expenditures to increase too. Suppose the price elasticity of wheat = -0.5. Suppose people bought 100 million bushels at $3 per bushel so total expenditures equal $300 million. 272272
273
Price Elasticity and Total Expenditures
A 20 percent price increase to $3.60 means quantity falls by 10 percent to 90 million with total expenditures now equal to $324 billion. Alternatively, if the demand is inelastic and prices fall, total revenue will also fall. Table 4.2 summarizes the relationship between price elasticity and total expenditures. 273273
274
TABLE 4.2: Relationship between Price Changes and Changes in Total Expenditure
274274
275
APPLICATION 4.3: Volatile Farm Prices
The demand for many basic agricultural products (wheat, corn, etc.) is relatively inelastic. Even modest changes in supply, brought about by weather patterns, can have large effects on crop prices. 275275
276
The Paradox of Agriculture
Good weather tends to produce bountiful crops, but very low crop prices. Bad weather can result in very high crop prices. Relatively small supply disruptions in the U.S. grain best during the early 1970s resulted in farm incomes rising more than 40 percent over a two year period. 276276
277
Boom and Bust in the Late 1990s
Since the New Deal in the 1930s, the volatility of farm prices has been moderated through federal price-support programs. Acreage restrictions constrained increased planting The federal government purchased crops outright 277277
278
Boom and Bust in the Late 1990s
These programs moderated severe farm price swings. With the passage of the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act in 1996, federal governmental intervention into agricultural markets was reduced. In 1997, farm prices were unusually high, but this was followed by very low prices in 1998. 278278
279
Demand Curves and Price Elasticity
The relationship between a particular demand curve and the price elasticity it exhibits can be complicated. For some curves, the elasticity remains constant everywhere, but for others it is different at every point. A more accurate way to describe it would be to say the elasticity is for current prices. 279279
280
Linear Demand Curves and Price Elasticity
The price elasticity of demand is always changing along a straight line demand curve. Demand is elastic at prices above the midpoint price. Demand is unit elastic at the midpoint price. Demand is inelastic at prices below the midpoint price. 280280
281
Numerical Example of Elasticity on a Straight Line Demand Curve
Assume a straight-line demand curve for Walkman cassette tape players is Q = P where Q is the quantity of players demanded per week and P is their price. This demand curve is illustrated in Figure 4.3 and Table 4.3 shows several price-quantity combinations. 281281
282
FIGURE 4.3: Elasticity Varies along a Linear Demand Curve
Price (dollars) 50 40 30 25 Demand 20 10 20 40 50 60 80 100 Quantity of tape players per week 282282
283
TABLE 4.3: Price, Quantity, and Total Expenditures on Walkmans for the Demand Function Q = 100 - 2P
283283
284
Numerical Example of Elasticity on a Straight Line Demand Curve
For prices of $50 or more, nothing is bought so total expenditures are $0. As prices fall between $50 and $25, the midpoint, total expenditures increase. At the midpoint, total expenditures reach a maximum. As prices fall below $25, total expenditures also fall. 284284
285
Elasticity of a Straight Line Demand Curve
More generally, for a linear demand curve of the form Q = a - bP, 285285
286
A Unitary Elastic Curve
Suppose the demand for tape players took the form The graph of this equation, shown in Figure 4.4, is a hyperbola. P·Q = $1,200 regardless of price so demand is unit elastic (-1) everywhere on the curve. 286286
287
General Formula for the Elasticity of a Hyperbola
If the demand curve takes the following form, the price elasticity of demand is equal to b everywhere on the curve. 287287
288
FIGURE 4.4: A Unitary Elastic Demand Curve
Price (dollars) 60 50 40 30 20 20 24 30 40 60 Quantity of tape players per week 288288
289
Income Elasticity of Demand
The income elasticity of demand equals the percentage change in the quantity demanded of a good in response to a 1 percent change in income. The formula is given by (where I represents income): 289289
290
Income Elasticity of Demand
For normal goods, eQ,I is positive because increases in income lead to increases in purchases of the good. For inferior goods eQ,I is negative. If eQ,I > 1, the purchase of the good increases more rapidly than income so the good might be called a luxury good. 290290
291
APPLICATION 4.4: An Experiment in Health Insurance
Most developed countries have some form of national health insurance. In the U.S. Medicare covers the elderly and Medicaid is available for many of the poor. Recently a number of comprehensive government health plans have been proposed. 291291
292
The Moral Hazard Problem
A “moral hazard” problem occurs because insurance misleadingly lowers the out-of- pocket expenses to patients, greatly increasing their demand for medical services. An important question, in considering implementing national health insurance is how large an increase is likely to develop? 292292
293
The Rand Experiment The Rand Corporation conducted a government-funded large-scale experiment in four cities. People were assigned to different insurance plans that varied in the generosity of coverage they offered. Table 1 shows the results from the experiment. 293293
294
The Rand Experiment A rough estimate of the elasticity of demand can be obtained by averaging the percentage changes across the various plans in Table 1 294294
295
Table 1: Results of the Rand Health Insurance Experiment
295295
296
Low Elasticities for Hospital and Doctors’ Visits
Using the estimate of found in Table 4.4, and based on other studies suggests only a small increase in hospital and doctor visits would result from the lower prices provided by insurance. Alternatively, researchers have found greater elasticities (around -0.5) for dental care and outpatient mental health care. 296296
297
Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand
The cross-price elasticity of demand measures the percentage change in the quantity demanded of a good in response to a 1 percent change in the price of another good. Letting P’ be the price of another good, 297297
298
Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand
If the goods are substitutes, an increase in the price of one will cause buyers to purchase more of the substitute, so the elasticity will be positive. If the goods are complements, an increase in the price of one will cause buyers to buy less of that good and also less of the good they use with it, so the elasticity will be negative 298298
299
Empirical Studies of Demand: Estimating Demand Curves
Estimating a demand curve for a product is one of the more difficult but important problems in econometrics. Empirical studies are useful because they a provide a more precise estimate of the amount of change in quantity demanded that results due to a price change. 299299
300
Problems Estimating Demand Curves
The first problem is how to derive an estimate holding all other factors (the ceteris paribus assumption) constant. This problem is often solved, as discussed in the Appendix to Chapter 1, by the use of multiple regression analysis. 300300
301
Problems Estimating Demand Curves
The second problem deals with what is observed in the data. The data points represent quantity and price outcomes that are simultaneously determined by both the demand and the supply curves. The econometric problem is to “identify” from these equilibrium points the demand curve that generated them. 301301
302
Some Elasticity Estimates
Table 4.4 gathers a number of estimated income and price elasticities of demand. Some things to note All of the estimated price elasticities are less than zero as predicted by a negatively sloped demand curve. Most of the price elasticity estimates are inelastic. 302302
303
TABLE 4.4: Representative Price and Income Elasticities of Demand
303303
304
Some Elasticity Estimates
The income elasticities of automobiles and transatlantic travel exceed 1 (luxuries). The high income elasticities are balanced by goods such as food and medical care which are less than 1 (necessities). There is no evidence of Giffen’s paradox in the table. 304304
305
Some Cross-price Elasticity Estimates
Table 4.5 shows a few cross-price elasticity estimates All of the goods appear to be substitutes and have positive cross-price elasticities. 305305
306
TABLE 4.5: Representative Cross-Price Elasticities of Demand
306306
307
Application 4.5: Alcohol Taxes as Drunk Driving Policy
Each year more than 40,000 Americans die in automobile accidents. It is generally believed that alcohol consumption is a major contributing factor in at least half of those accidents. Most empirical studies of alcohol consumption show that it is sensitive to price. 307307
308
Application 4.5: Alcohol Taxes as Drunk Driving Policy
The figures in Table 4.4 suggest that these elasticities range from approximately –0.3 for beer to perhaps as large as –0.9 for wine. Most teenage alcohol consumption is beer. The lower price elasticity of demand for beer poses a problem for those who would use alcohol taxes as a deterrent to drunk driving. 308308
309
Chapter 5 Production © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
310
Production Functions The purpose of a firm is to turn inputs into outputs. An abstract model of production is the production function, a mathematical relationship between inputs and outputs. 310310
311
Production Functions Letting q represent the output of a particular good during a period, K represent capital use, L represent labor input, and M represent raw materials, the following equation represents a production function. 311311
312
Two-Input Production Function
An important question is how firms choose their levels of output and inputs. While the choices of inputs will obviously vary with the type of firm, a simplifying assumption is often made that the firm uses two inputs, labor and capital. 312312
313
Application 5.1: Everyone is a Firm
Looking at people as “firms can yield some interesting insights Economists have tried to estimate the amount of production that people do for themselves. Time-use studies suggest that the time people spend in home production is only slightly less than the time spent working. 313313
314
Application 5.1: Everyone is a Firm
Some of the more straightforward things produced at home are what might be called “housing services”. The production function concept is widely used in thinking about health issues. A somewhat more far-fetched application of the home-production concept is to view families as “producers of children.” 314314
315
Marginal Product Marginal physical productivity, or more simply, the marginal product of an input is the additional output that can be produced by adding one more unit of a particular input while holding all other inputs constant. The marginal product of labor (MPL) is the extra output obtained by employing one more unit of labor while holding the level of capital equipment constant. 315315
316
Marginal Product The marginal product of capital (MPK) is the extra output obtained by using one more machine while holding the number of workers constant. 316316
317
Diminishing Marginal Product
It is expected that the marginal product of an input will depend upon the level of the input used. Since, holding capital constant, production of more output is likely to eventually decline with adding more labor, it is expected that marginal product will eventually diminish as shown in Figure 5.1. 317317
318
FIGURE 5.1: Relationship between Output and Labor Input Holding Other Inputs Constant
Total per week Output L* Labor input per week (a) Total output MP L 318318 L* Labor input per week (b) Marginal product
319
Diminishing Marginal Product
The top panel of Figure 5.1 shows the relationship between output per week and labor input during the week as capital is held fixed. Initially, output increases rapidly as new workers are added, but eventually it diminishes as the fixed capital becomes overutilized. 319319
320
Marginal Product Curve
The marginal product curve is simply the slope of the total product curve. The declining slope, as shown in panel b, shows diminishing marginal productivity. 320320
321
Average Product Average product is simply “output per worker” calculated by dividing total output by the number of workers used to produce the output. This corresponds to what many people mean when they discuss productivity, but economists emphasize the change in output reflected in the marginal product. 321321
322
Appraising the Marginal Product Concept
Marginal product requires the ceteris paribus assumption that other things, such as the level of other inputs and the firm’s technical knowledge, are held constant. An alternative way, that is more realistic, is to study the entire production function for a good. 322322
323
Japan appears to have a productivity advantage.
APPLICATION 5.2: Why Do the Japanese Have a Cost Advantage in Making Cars? In 1979 Japan overtook the United States as the world’s largest producer of automobiles. Japan appears to have a productivity advantage. For example, workers at Honda or Toyota take about 30 hours to produce a car while workers in General Motors or Chrysler take about 45 hours. 323323
324
APPLICATION 5.2: Why Do the Japanese Have a Cost Advantage in Making Cars?
Reasons for this are not known although it does not appear to be explained by simple substitution of capital for labor. U.S. producers tend to use more assembly lines which allows greater variability in vehicle size than in Japan. This makes it easier to use automating production, such as robots, in Japan. 324324
325
APPLICATION 5.2: Why Do the Japanese Have a Cost Advantage in Making Cars?
Also, although both U.S. and Japanese producers tend to buy many components of cars from independent suppliers, these suppliers are better integrated with the assembly firms in Japan. In addition, there appears to be more of an adversarial relationship between labor and management in the U.S. than in Japan. 325325
326
Isoquant Maps An isoquant is a curve that shows the various combinations of inputs that will produce the same (a particular) amount of output. An isoquant map is a contour map of a firm’s production function. All of the isoquants from a production function are part of this isoquant map. 326326
327
Isoquant Map In Figure 5.2, the firm is assumed to use the production function, q = f(K,L) to produce a single good. The curve labeled q = 10 is an isoquant that shows various combinations of labor and capital, such as points A and B, that produce exactly 10 units of output per period. 327327
328
FIGURE 5.2: Isoquant Map 328328 Capital per week KA A KB B q = 10
Labor per week LA LB 328328
329
Isoquant Map The isoquants labeled q = 20 and q = 30 represent two more of the infinite curves that represent different levels of output. Isoquants record successively higher levels of output the farther away from the origin they are in a northeasterly direction. 329329
330
FIGURE 5.2: Isoquant Map 330330 Capital per week KA A q = 30 q = 20 KB
Labor per week LA LB 330330
331
Isoquant Map Unlike indifference curves, the labeling of the isoquants represents something measurable, the quantity of output per period. In addition to the location of the isoquants, economists are also interested in their shape. 331331
332
Rate of Technical Substitution
The negative of the slope of an isoquant is called the marginal rate of technical substitution (RTS), the amount by which one input can be reduced when one more unit of another input is added while holding output constant. It is the rate that capital can be reduced, holding output constant, while using one more unit of labor. 332332
333
Rate of Technical Substitution
333333
334
Rate of Technical Substitution
The particular value of this trade-off depends upon the level of output and the quantities of capital and labor being used. At A in Figure 5.2, relatively large amounts of capital can be given up if one more unit of labor is added (large RTS), but at B only a little capital can be sacrificed when adding one more unit of labor (small RTS). 334334
335
The RTS and Marginal Products
It is likely that the RTS is positive (the isoquant has a negative slope) because the firm can decrease its use of capital if one more unit of labor is employed. If increasing labor meant the having to hire more capital the marginal product of labor or capital would be negative and the firm would be unwilling to hire more of either. 335335
336
Diminishing RTS Along any isoquant the (negative) slope become flatter and the RTS diminishes. When a relatively large amount of capital is used (as at A in Figure 5.2) a large amount can be replaced by a unit of labor, but when only a small amount of capital is used (as at point B), one more unit of labor replaces very little capital. 336336
337
APPLICATION 5.3: Engineering and Economics
Engineering studies can be used to provide information about a production function. Engineers have developed three different methods (A, B, and C) to produce output. These methods are shown in Figure 1, when method A uses a greater capital labor ratio than B, and the capital labor ratio at B exceeds that at C. 337337
338
FIGURE 1: Construction of an Isoquant from Engineering Data
K per period A B a C c b q0 L per period 338338
339
APPLICATION 5.3: Engineering and Economics
The points a, b, and c represent three different methods to produce q0 units of output, so these points are one the same isoquant. This method was used by economists to examine the production of domestic hot water by rooftop solar collectors. 339339
340
APPLICATION 5.3: Engineering and Economics
This method has been used to examine the extent to which energy and capital can be substituted in industrial equipment design. Economists have also found that energy and capital are sometimes complements in production, which may have caused the poor productivity of the 1970s due to high energy costs. 340340
341
Returns to Scale Returns to scale is the rate at which output increases in response to proportional increases in all inputs. In the eighteenth century Adam Smith became aware of this concept when he studied the production of pins. 341341
342
Returns to Scale Adam Smith identified two forces that come into play when all inputs are increased. A doubling of inputs permits a greater “division of labor” allowing persons to specialize in the production of specific pin parts. This specialization may increase efficiency enough to more than double output. However these benefits might be reversed if firms become too large to manage. 342342
343
Constant Returns to Scale
A production function is said to exhibit constant returns to scale if a doubling of all inputs results in a precise doubling of output. This situation is shown in Panel (a) of Figure 5.3. 343343
344
FIGURE 5.3: Isoquant Maps showing Constant, Decreasing, and Increasing Returns to Scale
Capital per week 4 q = 40 3 q = 30 2 q = 20 1 q = 10 Labor 1 2 3 4 per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale 344344
345
Decreasing Returns to Scale
If doubling all inputs yields less than a doubling of output, the production function is said to exhibit decreasing returns to scale. This is shown in Panel (b) of Figure 5.3. 345345
346
FIGURE 5.3: Isoquant Maps showing Constant, Decreasing, and Increasing Returns to Scale
Capital Capital per week per week 4 4 q = 40 3 q = 30 3 q = 30 2 2 q = 20 q = 20 1 1 q = 10 q = 10 Labor Labor 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 per week per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale (b) Decreasing Returns to Scale 346346
347
Increasing Returns to Scale
If doubling all inputs results in more than a doubling of output, the production function exhibits increasing returns to scale. This is demonstrated in Panel (c) of Figure 5.3. In the real world, more complicated possibilities may exist such as a production function that changes from increasing to constant to decreasing returns to scale. 347347
348
FIGURE 5.3: Isoquant Maps showing Constant, Decreasing, and Increasing Returns to Scale
Capital Capital per week per week 4 4 q = 40 3 q = 30 3 q = 30 2 2 q = 20 q = 20 1 1 q = 10 q = 10 Labor Labor 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 per week per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale (b) Decreasing Returns to Scale Capital A per week 4 3 q = 40 2 q = 30 q = 20 1 q = 10 348348 1 2 3 4 Labor per week (c) Increasing Returns to Scale
349
APPLICATION 5.4: Returns to Scale in Beer Brewing
Because beer is produced in volume (barrels per year) but capital has costs that are proportional to surface area, larger breweries were able to achieve increasing returns to scale. Economies to scale were also achieved through automated control systems in filling beer cans. 349349
350
APPLICATION 5.4: Returns to Scale in Beer Brewing
National markets may also foster economies of scale in distribution, advertising (especially television), and marketing. These factors became especially important after World War II and the number of U.S. brewing firms fell by over 90 percent between and the mid-1980s. 350350
351
APPLICATION 5.4: Returns to Scale in Beer Brewing
The output of the industry became consolidated in a few large firms which operated very large breweries in multiple locations to reduce shipping costs. Beginning the the mid-1980s, however, smaller firms offering premium brands, provided and opening for local microbreweries. 351351
352
APPLICATION 5.4: Returns to Scale in Beer Brewing
The 1990s have seen a virtual explosion of new brands with odd names or local appeal. A similar event occurred in great Britain during the 1980s with the “real ale” movements, but it was followed by small firms being absorbed by national brands. A similar absorption may be starting to take place in the United States. 352352
353
Input Substitution Another important characteristic of a production function is how easily inputs can be substituted for each other. This characteristic depends upon the slope of a given isoquant, rather than the whole isoquant map. 353353
354
Fixed-Proportions Production Function
It may be the case that absolutely no substitution between inputs is possible. This case is shown in Figure 5.4. If K1 units of capital are used, exactly L1 units of labor are required to produce q1 units of output. If K1 units of capital are used and less than L1 units of labor are used, q1 can not be produced. 354354
355
Fixed-Proportions Production Function
If K1 units of capital are used and more than L1 units of labor are used, no more than q1 units of output are produced. With K = K1, the marginal physical product of labor is zero beyond L1 units of labor. The q1 isoquant is horizontal beyond L1. Similarly, with L1 units of labor, the marginal physical product of capital is zero beyond K1 resulting in the vertical portion of the isoquant. 355355
356
FIGURE 5.4: Isoquant Map with Fixed Proportions
Capital per week A K2 q2 K1 q1 q0 K0 Labor per week L0 L1 L2 356356
357
Fixed-proportions Production Function
This type of production function is called a fixed-proportion production function because the inputs must be used in a fixed ratio to one another. Many machines require a fixed complement of workers so this type of production function may be relevant in the real world. 357357
358
The Relevance of Input Substitutability
Over the past century the U.S. economy has shifted away from agricultural production and towards manufacturing and service industries. Economists are interested in the degree to which certain factors of production (notable labor) can be moved from agriculture into the growing industries. 358358
359
Changes in Technology Technical progress is a shift in the production function that allows a given output level to be produced using fewer inputs. Isoquant q0 in Figure 5.5, summarized the initial state of technical knowledge. K0 and L0 units of capital and labor respectively can produce this level of output. 359359
360
Changes in Technology After a technology improvement, the same level of output can be produced with the same level of capital and reduced labor, L1. The improvement in technology is represented in Figure 5.5 by the shift of the q0 isoquant to q’0. Technical progress represents a real savings in inputs. 360360
361
FIGURE 5.5: Technical Change
Capital per week K1 K0 A q0 q’0 361361 L1 L0 Labor per week
362
Technical Progress versus Input Substitution
In studying productivity data, especially data on output per worker, it is important to make the distinction between technical improvements and capital substitution. In Figure 5.5, the first is shown by the movement from L0, K0 to L1, K0, while the latter is L0, K0 to L1, K1. 362362
363
Technical Progress versus Input Substitution
In both cases, output per worker would rise (q0/L0 to q0/L1) With technical progress there is a real improvement in the way things are produced. With substitution, no real improvement in the production of the good takes place. 363363
364
APPLICATION 5.5: Multifactor Productivity
Table 1 shows the rates of change in productivity for three countries measured as output per hour. While the data show declines during the to 1991 period, they still averaged over 2 percent per year. However, this measure may simply reflect simple capital-labor substitution. 364364
365
APPLICATION 5.5: Multifactor Productivity
A measure that attempts to control for such substitution is called mutifactor productivity. As table 2 shows, the period looks much worse using the multifactor productivity measure. 365365
366
APPLICATION 5.5: Multifactor Productivity
Reasons for the decline in post productivity include rising energy prices, high rates of inflation, increasing environmental regulations, deteriorating education systems, or a general decline in the work ethic. Clearly after 1991, productivity has improved greatly. 366366
367
TABLE 1: Annual Average Change in Output per Hour in Manufacturing
367367
368
TABLE 2: Annual Average Change in Multifactor Productivity Manufacturing
368368
369
A Numerical Example Assume a production function for the fast-food chain Hamburger Heaven (HH): where K represents the number of grills used and L represents the number of workers employed during an hour of production. 369369
370
A Numerical Example This function exhibits constant returns to scale as demonstrated in Table 5.1. As both workers and grills are increased together, hourly hamburger output rises proportionally. 370370
371
TABLE 5.1: Hamburger Production Exhibits Constant Returns to Scale
371371
372
Average and Marginal Productivities
Holding capital constant (K = 4), to show labor productivity, we have Table 5.2 shows this relationship and demonstrates that output per worker declines as more labor is employed. 372372
373
TABLE 5.2: Total Output, Average Productivity, and Marginal Productivity with Four Grills
373373
374
Average and Marginal Productivities
Also, Table 5.2 shows that the productivity of each additional worker hired declines. Holding one input constant yields the expected declining average and marginal productivities. 374374
375
The Isoquant Map Suppose HH wants to produce 40 hamburgers per hour. Then its production function becomes 375375
376
The Isoquant Map Table 5.3 show several K, L combinations that satisfy this equation. All possible combinations in the “q = 40” isoquant are shown in Figure 5.6. All other isoquants would have the same shape showing that HH has many substitution possibilities. 376376
377
TABLE 5.3: Construction of the q = 40 Isoquant
377377
378
FIGURE 5.6: Technical Progress in Hamburger Production
Grills (K) 10 4 q = 40 1 4 10 Workers (L) 378378
379
Technical Progress Technical advancement can be reflected in the equation Comparing this to the old technology by recalculating the q = 40 isoquant 379379
380
Technical Progress In Figure 5.6 the new technology is the isoquant labeled “q = 40 after invention.” With 4 grills, average productivity is now 40 hamburgers per hour per worker whereas it was 10 hamburgers per hour before the invention. This level of output per worker would have required 16 grills with the old technology. 380380
381
FIGURE 5.6: Technical Progress in Hamburger Production
Grills (K) 10 4 q = 40 after invention q = 40 1 4 10 Workers (L) 381381
382
Chapter 6 Costs © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
383
Basic Concepts of Costs
Opportunity cost is the cost of a good or service as measured by the alternative uses that are foregone by producing the good or service. If 15 bicycles could be produced with the materials used to produce an automobile, the opportunity cost of the automobile is 15 bicycles. The price of a good or service often may reflect its opportunity cost. 383383
384
Basic Concepts of Costs
Accounting cost is the concept that goods or services cost what was paid for them. Economic cost is the amount required to keep a resource in its present use; the amount that it would be worth in its next best alternative use. 384384
385
Labor Costs Like accountants, economists regard the payments to labor as an explicit cost. Labor services (worker-hours) are purchased at an hourly wage rate (w): The cost of hiring one worker for one hour. The wage rate is assumed to be the amount workers would receive in their next best alternative employment. 385385
386
Capital Costs While accountants usually calculate capital costs by applying some depreciation rule to the historical price of the machine, economists view this amount as a sunk cost. A sunk cost is an expenditure that once made cannot be recovered. These costs do not focus on foregone opportunities. 386386
387
Capital Costs Economists consider the cost of a machine to be the amount someone else would be willing to pay for its use. The cost of capital services (machine-hours) is the rental rate (v) which is the cost of hiring one machine for one hour. This is an implicit cost if the machine is owned by the firm. 387387
388
APPLICATION 6.1: Stranded Costs and Electricity Deregulation
Until the mid 1990s, the electric power industry in the United States was heavily regulated. The expected decline in the wholesale price of electricity resulting from deregulation has sparked a debate over “stranded costs”. 388388
389
The Nature of Stranded Costs
When the average costs of generating electricity exceed the price of electricity in the open market, the generating facilities become “uneconomic.” The historical costs of these facilities have been “stranded” by deregulation. 389389
390
The Nature of Stranded Costs
To economists, these are sunk costs. Generating facilities that have become “uneconomic” have zero market value, a situation that occurs frequently in many other business (for example, machines that produce 78 RPM recordings). Economist Joseph Schumpeter coined such situations, “creative destruction.” 390390
391
The Legal Framework--Socking It to the Consumer
Utilities companies argue that they were promised a “fair” return on their investment, so they should be compensated for the impact of deregulation. Southern California Edison Company was awarded stranded cost compensation that exceeded the company’s value on the New York Stock Exchange. 391391
392
The Legal Framework--Socking It to the Consumer
A result of mandated stranded-cost compensation is the slowing of the pace of deregulation. Since consumers see little of the price decline, they have little incentive to push for deregulation. Would-be entrants are also not encouraged by consumers because of the stranded-cost compensation. 392392
393
Entrepreneurial Costs
Owners of the firm are entitled to the difference between revenue and costs which is generally called (accounting) profit. However, if they incur opportunity costs for their time or other resources supplied to the firm, these should be considered a cost of the firm. 393393
394
The Legal Framework--Socking It to the Consumer
A computer programmer that started a software firm would supply time, the value of which is an opportunity cost. The wages the programmer would have earned if he or she worked elsewhere could be used as a measure of this cost. Economic profit is revenue minus all costs including these entrepreneurial costs. 394394
395
Two Simplifying Assumptions
The firm uses only two inputs: labor (L, measured in labor hours) and capital (K, measured in machine hours). Entrepreneurial services are assumed to be included in the capital costs. Firms buy inputs in perfectly competitive markets so the firm faces horizontal supply curves at prevailing factor prices. 395395
396
Economic Profits and Cost Minimization
Total costs = TC = wL + vK. Assuming the firm produces only one output, total revenue equals the price of the product (P) times its total output [q = f(K,L) where f(K,L) is the firm’s production function]. 396396
397
Economic Profits and Cost Minimization
Economic profits () is the difference between a firm’s total revenues and its total economic costs. 397397
398
Cost-Minimizing Input Choice
Assume, for purposes of this chapter, that the firm has decided to produce a particular output level (say, q1). The firm’s total revenues are P·q1. How the firm might choose to produce this level of output at minimal costs is the subject of this chapter. 398398
399
Cost-Minimizing Input Choice
Cost minimization requires that the marginal rate of technical substitution (RTS) of L for K equals the ratio of the inputs’ costs, w/v: 399399
400
Graphic Presentation The isoquant q1 shows all combinations of K and L that are required to produce q1. The slope of total costs, TC = wL + vK, is - w/v. Lines of equal cost will have the same slope so they will be parallel. Three equal total costs lines, labeled TC1, TC2, and TC3 are shown in Figure 6.1. 400400
401
FIGURE 6.1: Minimizing the Costs of Producing q1
Capital per week TC1 TC2 TC3 K* q1 Labor per week L* 401401
402
Graphic Presentation The minimum total cost of producing q1 is TC1 (since it is closest to the origin). The cost-minimizing input combination is L*, K* which occurs where the total cost curve is tangent to the isoquant. At the point of tangency, the rate at which the firm can technically substitute L for K (the RTS) equals the market rate (w/v). 402402
403
An Alternative Interpretation
From Chapter 5 Cost minimization requires or, rearranging 403403
404
The Firm’s Expansion Path
A similar analysis could be performed for any output level (q). If input costs (w and v) remain constant, various cost-minimizing choices can be traces out as shown in Figure 6.2. For example, output level q1 is produced using K1, L1, and other cost-minimizing points are shown by the tangency between the total cost lines and the isoquants. 404404
405
The Firm’s Expansion Path
The firm’s expansion path is the set of cost- minimizing input combinations a firm will choose to produce various levels of output (when the prices of inputs are held constant). Although in Figure 6.2, the expansion path is a straight line, that is not necessarily the case. 405405
406
FIGURE 6.2: Firm’s Expansion Path
Capital per week TC1 TC3 TC2 Expansion path q3 K1 q2 q1 Labor per week L1 406406
407
Cost Curves A firm’s expansion path shows how minimum- cost input use increases when the level of output expands. With this it is possible to develop the relationship between output levels and total input costs. These cost curves are fundamental to the theory of supply. 407407
408
Cost Curves Figure 6.3 shows four possible shapes for cost curves.
In Panel a, output and required input use is proportional which means doubling of output requires doubling of inputs. This is the case when the production function exhibits constant returns to scale. 408408
409
FIGURE 6.3: Possible Shapes of the Total Cost Curve
Quantity per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale 409409
410
Cost Curves Panels b and c reflect the cases of decreasing and increasing returns to scale, respectively. With decreasing returns to scale the cost curve is convex, while the it is concave with increasing returns to scale. Decreasing returns to scale indicate considerable cost advantages from large scale operations. 410410
411
FIGURE 6.3: Possible Shapes of the Total Cost Curve
Quantity per week Quantity per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale (b) Decreasing Returns to Scale Total cost TC Quantity per week 411411 (c) Increasing Returns to Scale
412
Cost Curves Panel d reflects the case where there are increasing returns to scale followed by decreasing returns to scale. This might arise because internal co-ordination and control by managers is initially underutilized, but becomes more difficult at high levels of output. This suggests an optimal scale of output. 412412
413
FIGURE 6.3: Possible Shapes of the Total Cost Curve
Quantity per week Quantity per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale (b) Decreasing Returns to Scale TC Total cost Total cost TC Quantity per week Quantity per week 413413 (c) Increasing Returns to Scale (d) Optimal Scale
414
Average Costs Average cost is total cost divided by output; a common measure of cost per unit. If the total cost of producing 25 units is $100, the average cost would be 414414
415
Marginal Cost The additional cost of producing one more unit of output is marginal cost. If the cost of producing 24 units is $98 and the cost of producing 25 units is $100, the marginal cost of the 25th unit is $2. 415415
416
Marginal Cost Curves Marginal costs are reflected by the slope of the total cost curve. The constant returns to scale total cost curve shown in Panel a of Figure 6.3 has a constant slope, so the marginal cost is constant as shown by the horizontal marginal cost curve in Panel a of Figure 6.4. 416416
417
FIGURE 6.4: Average and Marginal Cost Curves
AC, MC AC, MC Quantity per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale 417417
418
Marginal Cost Curves With decreasing returns to scale, the total cost curve is convex (Panel b of Figure 6.3). This means that marginal costs are increasing which is shown by the positively sloped marginal cost curve in Panel b of Figure 6.4. 418418
419
FIGURE 6.4: Average and Marginal Cost Curves
AC, MC AC, MC MC AC AC, MC Quantity per week Quantity per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale (b) Decreasing Returns to Scale 419419
420
Marginal Cost Curves Increasing returns to scale results in a concave total cost curve (Panel c of Figure 6.3). This causes the marginal costs to decrease as output increases as shown in the negatively sloped marginal cost curve in Panel c of Figure 6.4. 420420
421
FIGURE 6.4: Average and Marginal Cost Curves
AC, MC AC, MC MC AC AC, MC Quantity per week Quantity per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale (b) Decreasing Returns to Scale AC, MC AC MC Quantity per week 421421 (c) Increasing Returns to Scale
422
Marginal Cost Curves When the total cost curve is first concave followed by convex as shown in Panel d of Figure 6.3, marginal costs initially decrease but eventually increase. Thus, the marginal cost curve is first negatively sloped followed by a positively sloped curve as shown in Panel d of Figure 6.4. 422422
423
FIGURE 6.4: Average and Marginal Cost Curves
AC, MC AC, MC MC AC AC, MC Quantity per week Quantity per week (a) Constant Returns to Scale (b) Decreasing Returns to Scale AC, MC AC AC, MC MC AC MC q* Quantity per week Quantity per week 423423 (c) Increasing Returns to Scale (d) Optimal Scale
424
Average Cost Curves If a firm produces only one unit of output, marginal cost would be the same as average cost Thus, the graph of the average cost curve begins at the point where the marginal cost curve intersects the vertical axis. 424424
425
Average Cost Curves For the constant returns to scale case, marginal cost never varies from its initial level, so average cost must stay the same as well. Thus, the average cost curve are the same horizontal line as shown in Panel a of Figure 6.4. 425425
426
Average Cost Curves With convex total costs and increasing marginal costs, average costs also rise as shown in Panel b of Figure 6.4. Because the first few units are produced at low marginal costs, average costs will always b less than marginal cost, so the average cost curve lies below the marginal cost curve. 426426
427
Average Cost Curves With concave total cost and decreasing marginal costs, average costs will also decrease as shown in Panel c in Figure 6.4. Because the first few units are produced at relatively high marginal costs, average is less than marginal cost, so the average cost curve lies below the marginal cost curve. 427427
428
Average Cost Curves The U-shaped marginal cost curve shown in Panel d of Figure 6.4 reflects decreasing marginal costs at low levels of output and increasing marginal costs at high levels of output. As long as marginal cost is below average cost, the marginal will pull down the average. 428428
429
Average Cost Curves When marginal costs are above average cost, the marginal pulls up the average. Thus, the average cost curve must intersect the marginal cost curve at the minimum average cost; q* in Panel d of Figure 6.4. Since q* represents the lowest average cost, it represents an “optimal scale” of production for the firm. 429429
430
APPLICATION 6.2: Findings on Firms’ Costs
Entries in Table 1 represent long-run average cost estimates for different size firms as a percentage of the minimal average-cost firm in the industry. These estimates, except for trucking, suggest lower average cost for medium and large firms. Figure 1 shows the average cost firm suggested by the data. 430430
431
FIGURE 1: Long-Run Average Cost Curve Found in Many Empirical Studies
AC Quantity per period q* 431431
432
TABLE 1: Long-Run Average-Cost Estimates
432432
433
APPLICATION 6.3: Airlines’ Costs
Costs for airlines have been of interest to economists because of recent changes such as deregulation, bankruptcy, and mergers. Two general findings: Costs seem to differ substantially among U.S. firms. Costs for U.S. airlines appear to be significantly lower than for airlines in other countries. 433433
434
Reasons for Differences among U.S. Firms
Airlines that fly longer average distances or operate a greater number of flights over a given network tend to have lower costs. Firms can spread the fixed costs associated with terminals, maintenance facilities, and reservation systems over a larger output volume. 434434
435
Reasons for Differences among U.S. Firms
Firms that operate older fleets or that operate fleets with many different types of planes tend to have higher maintenance and fuel costs. Wage costs, especially for pilots, also differ significantly among the airlines. 435435
436
International Airline Regulation and Costs
Many foreign carriers’ have not adopted the “hub and spoke” system which appears to be more efficient. Foreign firms are subject to more regulation. This situation appears to be changing. For example, Australia ended rigid controls and costs fell by 15 to 20 percent. 436436
437
Distinction between the Short Run and the Long Run
The short run is the period of time in which a firm must consider some inputs to be absolutely fixed in making its decisions. The long run is the period of time in which a firm may consider all of its inputs to be variable in making its decisions. 437437
438
Holding Capital Input Constant
For the following, the capital input is assumed to be held constant at a level of K1, so that, with only two inputs, labor is the only input the firm can vary. As examined in Chapter 5, this implies diminishing marginal productivity to labor. 438438
439
Types of Short-Run Costs
Fixed costs; costs associated with inputs that are fixed in the short run. Variable costs; costs associated with inputs that can be varied in the short run. 439439
440
Input Inflexibility and Cost Minimization
Since capital is fixed, short-run costs are not the minimal costs of producing variable output levels. Assume the firm has fixed capital of K1 as shown in Figure 6.5. To produce q0 of output, the firm must use L1 units of labor, with similar situations for q1, L1, and q2, L2. 440440
441
FIGURE 6.5: “Nonoptimal” Input Choices Must Be Made in the Short Run
Capital per week STC0 STC2 STC1 K1 q2 q1 q0 441441 L0 L1 L2 Labor per week
442
Input Inflexibility and Cost Minimization
The cost of output produced is minimized where the RTS equals the ratio of prices, which only occurs at q1, L1. Q0 could be produce at less cost if less capital than K1 and more labor than L0 were used. Q2 could be produced at less cost if more capital than K1 and less labor than L2 were used. 442442
443
Per-Unit Short-Run Cost Curves
443443
444
Per-Unit Short-Run Cost Curves
Having capital fixed in the short run yields a total cost curve that has both concave and convex sections, the resulting short-run average and marginal cost relationships will also be U-shaped. When SMC < SAC, average cost is falling, but when SMC > SAC average cost increase. 444444
445
Relationship between Short-Run and Long-Run per-Unit Cost Curves
Figure 6.6 shows all cost relationships for a firm that has U-shaped long-run average and marginal cost curves. At output level q* long-run average costs are minimized and MC = AC. Associated with q* is a certain level of capital, K*. 445445
446
FIGURE 6.6: Short-Run and Long-Run Average and Marginal Cost Curves at Optimal Output Level
AC, MC MC AC SMC SAC q* Quantity per week 446446
447
Relationship between Short-Run and Long-Run per-Unit Cost Curves
In the short-run, when the firm using K* units of capital produces q*, short-run and long-run total costs are equal. In addition, as shown in Figure AC = MC = SAC(K*) = SMC(K*). For output above q* short-run costs are higher than long-run costs. The higher per-unit costs reflect the facts that K is fixed. 447447
448
APPLICATION 6.4: Can We Do Anything About Traffic Snarls?
For any traffic facility (road, bridge, tunnel, and so forth), output is measured in number of vehicles per hour. Capital costs are largely fixed, as depreciation occurs regardless of the level of traffic. Variable costs consist primarily of motorists’ time. 448448
449
APPLICATION 6.4: Can We Do Anything About Traffic Snarls?
Studies, based on people’s willingness to spend time commuting, indicate travel time “costs” about $8 per hour. The marginal cost of producing “one more trip” is the overall increase in travel time experienced by all motorists when one more vehicle uses a traffic facility. 449449
450
APPLICATION 6.4: Can We Do Anything About Traffic Snarls?
The high costs associated with adding an extra automobile to an already crowded facility are not directly experienced by the motorist driving the car, because these costs are imposed on other motorists. This divergence between the private costs and the total social costs leads to motorists opting for overutilizeing traffic facilities. 450450
451
Congestion Tolls The standard economists answer to this problem is to adopt taxes that bring social and private marginal costs into agreement. This implies the adoption of highway, bridge, or tunnel tolls, that accurately reflect social costs. Since these costs vary by time of day, tolls should also vary over the day. 451451
452
Toll-Collecting Technology
This approach was previously not feasible since collection booths for tolls would add more to the congestion that in aiding to the solving of the problem. However, the development of low-cost electronic toll collection techniques, now make it possible using cards with pre-coded computer chips. 452452
453
Shifts in Cost Curves Any change in economic conditions that affects the expansion path will also affect the shape and position of the firm’s cost curves. Three sources of such change are: change in input prices technological innovations, and economies of scope. 453453
454
Changes in Input Prices
A change in the price of an input will tilt the firm’s total cost lines and alter its expansion path. For example, a rise in wage rates will cause firms to use more capital (to the extent allowed by the technology) and the entire expansion path will rotate toward the capital axis. 454454
455
Changes in Input Prices
Generally, all cost curves will shift upward with the extent of the shift depending upon how important labor is in production and how successful the firm is in substituting other inputs for labor. With important labor and poor substitution possibilities, a significant increase in costs will result. 455455
456
Technological Innovation
Because technological advances alter a firm’s production function, isoquant maps as well as the firm’s expansion path will shift when technology changes. Unbiased improvements would shift isoquants toward the origin enabeling firms to produce the same level of output with less of all inputs. 456456
457
Technological Innovation
Technological change that is biased toward the use of one input will alter isoquant maps, shift expansion paths, and affect the shape and location of cost curves. For example, if workers became more skilled, this would save only on labor input. 457457
458
Economies of Scope Economies of scope is the reduction in the costs of one product of a multiproduct firm when the output of another product is increased. For example, when hospitals do many surgeries of one type, it may have cost advantages in doing other types because of the similarities in equipment and operating personnel used. 458458
459
APPLICATION 6.5: Economies of Scope in Banks and Hospitals
Banks and hospitals are both complex types of firms that produce many different products. Recently, a large number of mergers has occurred in both of these industries. One of the primary reasons for expected the lower costs associated with these mergers is that the mergers make it possible for firms to have a broader array of products. 459459
460
APPLICATION 6.5: Economies of Scope in Banks and Hospitals
If economies of scope are important, the additional production after mergers, may cause the costs of these firms’ traditional business lines to be lower. Banks represent an industry where for-profit firms dominate whereas hospitals are more commonly regarded as nonprofit firms. 460460
461
APPLICATION 6.5: Economies of Scope in Banks and Hospitals
Banks are financial intermediaries. Economies of scope can reduce banks’ costs if the costs associated with any one particular financial product fall when the bank offers other products. The possibility of economies of scope has played an important role in the evolution of banking regulations (e.g. Glass-Steagall Acts in the U.S. and the more flexible merger guidelines adopted by the European Community.) 461461
462
APPLICATION 6.5: Economies of Scope in Banks and Hospitals
Although most hospitals are not intended to earn economic profits, they still face revenue constraints that push them toward cost-minimization. Economies of scope arise in a variety of hospital activities Facilities for surgical operations tend to have lower costs the wider the variety of operations that are done The provision of of outpatient services, running intensive care units, and establishing hospital owned pharmacies also lead to economies of scope. 462462
463
A Numerical Example Assume Hamburger Heaven (HH) can hire workers at $5 per hour and it rents all of its grills for $5 per hour. Total costs for HH during one hour are TC = 5K + 5L where K and L are the number of grills and the number of workers hired during that hour, respectively. 463463
464
A Numerical Example Suppose HH wishes to produce 40 hamburgers per hour. Table 6.1 repeats the various ways HH can produce 40 hamburgers per hour. This shows that total costs are minimized when K = L = 4. Figure 6.10 shows the cost-minimizing tangency. 464464
465
TABLE 6.1: Total Costs of Producing 40 Hamburgers per Hour
465465
466
Figure 6.7: Cost-Minimizing Input Choice for 40 Hamburgers per Hour
Grills per hour 8 E 4 2 40 hamburgers per hour Total cost = $40 2 4 8 466466 Workers per hour
467
Long-Run cost Curves HH’s production function is constant returns to scale so As long as w = v = $5, all of the cost minimizing tangencies will resemble the one shown in Figure 6.10 and long-run cost minimization will require K = L. 467467
468
Long-Run cost Curves This situation, resulting from constant returns to scale, is shown in Figure 6.8. HH’s long-run total cost function is a straight line through the origin as shown in Panel a. Its long-run average and marginal costs are constant at $1 per burger as shown in Panel b. 468468
469
FIGURE 6.8: Total, Average, and Marginal Cost Curves
costs Average and marginal costs Total costs $80 60 40 Average and marginal costs 20 $1.00 20 40 60 80 20 40 60 80 Hamburgers per hour Hamburgers per hour (a) Total Costs (b) Average and Marginal Costs 469469
470
Short-Run Costs Table 6.2 repeats the labor input required to produce various output levels holding grills fixed at 4. Diminishing marginal productivity of labor causes costs to rise rapidly as output expands. Figure 6.9 shows the short-run average and marginal costs curves. 470470
471
TABLE 6.2: Short-Run Costs of Hamburger Production
471471
472
FIGURE 6.12: Short-Run and Long-Run Average and Marginal Cost Curves for Hamburger Heaven
marginal costs $2.50 SMC (4 grills) 2.00 SAC (4 grills) 1.50 1.00 AC, MC .50 20 40 60 80 100 Hamburgers per hour 472472
473
Profit Maximization and Supply
Chapter 7 Profit Maximization and Supply © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
474
The Nature of Firms While firms are complex institutions, the typical approach taken by economists is to assume that the firm’s decisions are made by a single dictatorial manager who rationally pursues some goal. The goal most often used is that the firm maximizes economic profit. 474474
475
APPLICATION 7.1: Corporate Profits, Taxes, and Leveraged Buyout Craze
The U.S. corporate profit tax was levied in was levied in 1909, four years before the personal income tax. Some economists believe that this tax seriously distorts the allocation of resources because It fails to use the economic profit definition. It taxes corporate income twice. 475475
476
Definition of Profits Much of what is defined as corporate profits under the tax laws is a normal return to shareholders for the equity they have invested in the corporation. Shareholders expect return on their investment whether interest from bonds or returns on equity. 476476
477
Definition of Profits Some portion of corporate profits reflects the owners forgone earnings by making equity investments. If this cost were added to corporate costs, profits would be substantially reduced. 477477
478
Effects of the Double Tax
The corporate profits tax is a tax on the equity returns of corporate shareholders. Two effects of this tax. Corporations find it more attractive to finance new capital investments through loans and bond offerings whose interest is tax deductible. 478478
479
Effects of the Double Tax
Since corporate income is taxed twice--when it is earned by the corporation and when it is paid to shareholders as dividends--the total rate of tax applied to corporate equity capital is much higher than applied to other capital. Investors will be less willing to invest in corporate business than in other assets that are not taxed at as high a tax rate. 479479
480
The Leveraged Buyout Craze
Some suggest that these peculiarities are partly responsible for the wave of leveraged buyouts (LBOs) that swept financial markets in the 1980s. The basic principle is to use borrowed funds to acquire most of the outstanding stock of a corporation which substitutes a less highly taxed source of capital (debt) for the highly taxed form (equity). 480480
481
The Leveraged Buyout Craze
The benefits of LBOs are larger when corporations can be purchased cheaply. The huge increases in stock prices in starting in 1991 made such deals less profitable. Most late 1990 buyouts came through the use of vastly appreciated share prices as high prices made equity finance cheaper. 481481
482
Marginalism Firms as profit maximizers will make decisions in a marginal way. The manager looks, for example, at the marginal profit from producing one more unit of output or the additional profit from hiring one more unit of labor. When the incremental profit of an activity becomes zero, profits are maximized. 482482
483
The Output Decision Economic profits () are defined as = R(q) - TC(q) where R(q) is the amount of revenues received and TC(q) are the economic costs incurred, , both depending upon the level of output (q) produced. The firm will choose the level of output that generates the largest level of profit. 483483
484
The Output Decision In Figure 7.1, (TC) is the total cost curve that is drawn consistent with the discussion in Chapter 6. The total revenues curve is labeled (R). As drawn in the figure, profits reach their maximum at the output level q*. 484484
485
FIGURE 7.1: Marginal Revenue Must Equal Marginal Cost for Profit Maximization
Costs (TC) Revenues (R) Costs, Revenue (a) Output per week Profits (b) Output per week q1 q* q2 Profits 485485
486
The Marginal Revenue/Marginal Cost Rule
At output levels below q* increasing output causes profits to increase, so profit maximizing firms would not stop short of q*. Increasing output beyond q* reduces profits, so profit maximizing firms would not produce more than q*. 486486
487
The Marginal Revenue/Marginal Cost Rule
At q* marginal cost equals marginal revenue, the extra revenue a firm receives when it sells one more unit of output. In order to maximize profits, a firm should produce that output level for which the marginal revenue from selling one more unit of output is exactly equal to the marginal cost of producing that unit of output. 487487
488
The Marginal Revenue/Marginal Cost Rule
At the profit maximizing level of output Marginal Revenue = Marginal Cost or MR = MC. Firms, starting at zero output, can expand output so long as marginal revenue exceeds marginal cost, but don’t go beyond the point where these two are equal. 488488
489
Marginalism in Input Choices
Both labor and capital should be hired up to the point where the additional revenue brought in by selling the output produced by the extra labor or capital equals the increase in costs brought on by hiring the additional inputs. 489489
490
Marginal Revenue A price taker is a firm or individual whose decisions regarding buying or selling have no effect on the prevailing market price of a good or service. For a price taking firm MR = P. 490490
491
Marginal Revenue for a Downward-Sloping Demand Curve
A firm that is not a price taker faces a downward sloping demand curve for its product. These firms must reduce their selling price in order to sell more goods or services. In this case marginal revenue is less than market price MR < P. 491491
492
A Numerical Example Assume the quantity demanded of tape cassettes from a particular store per week (q) is related to the price (P) by q = 10 - P. Total revenue is (P·q) and marginal revenue (MR) is the change in total revenue due to a change in quantity demanded. 492492
493
A Numerical Example This example demonstrates that MR < P as shown in Table 7.1. Total revenue reaches a maximum at q = 5, P = 5. For q > 5, total revenues decline causing marginal revenue to be negative. 493493
494
TABLE 7.1: Total and Marginal Revenue for Cassette Tapes (q = 10 - P)
494494
495
A Numerical Example This hypothetical demand curve is shown in Figure 7.2. When q = 3, P = $7 and total revenue equals $21 which is shown by the area of the rectangle P*Aq*0. If the firm wants to sell four tapes it must reduce the price to $6. 495495
496
FIGURE 7.2: Illustration of Marginal Revenue for the Demand Curve for Cassette Tapes (q = 10 - P)
Price (dollars) 10 P* = $7 A Demand 1 2 3 4 10 Cassette tapes per week 496496 q*
497
A Numerical Example Total revenue is not $24 as illustrated by the area of the rectangle P**Bq**0. The sale of one more tape increases revenue by the price at which it sells ($6). But, to sell the fourth tape, it must reduce its selling price on the first three tapes from $7 to $6 which reduces revenue by $3, which is shown in the lightly shaded rectangle. 497497
498
FIGURE 7.2: Illustration of Marginal Revenue for the Demand Curve for Cassette Tapes (q = 10 - P)
Price (dollars) 10 P* = $7 A P* = $6 B Demand 1 2 3 4 10 Cassette tapes per week 498498 q* q**
499
A Numerical Example The net result of this price decrease is total revenue increases by only $3 ($6 - $3). Thus, the marginal revenue of the fourth tape is $3. The sale of the sixth tape, instead of five, results in an increase in revenue of the price ($4), but a decrease for the five other tapes (- $5) with a net effect (MR) = -$1. 499499
500
Marginal Revenue and Price Elasticity
As previously defined in Chapter 4, the price elasticity of demand for the market is This same concept can be defined for a single firm as 500500
501
Marginal Revenue and Price Elasticity
If demand facing the firm is inelastic (0 eq,P > -1), a rise in the price will cause total revenues to rise. If demand is elastic (eq,P < -1), a rise in price will result in smaller total revenues. This relationship between the price elasticity and marginal revenue is summarized in Table 7.2. 501501
502
TABLE 7.2: Relationship between Marginal Revenue and Elasticity
502502
503
Marginal Revenue and Price Elasticity
It can be shown that all of the relationships in Table 7.2 can be derived from the basic equation For example, if eq,P < -1 (elastic), this equation shows that MR is positive. 503503
504
Marginal Revenue and Price Elasticity
If demand is infinitely elastic (eq,P = -), MR will equal price, as was shown when the firm is a price taker. Suppose a non price taker firm knows elasticity = -2 and its current price is $10. Selling one more product will result in a marginal revenue of $5 [$10(1+1/-2)], which would be produced only if MC < $5. 504504
505
Marginal Revenue Curve
It is sometimes useful to think of the demand curve as the average revenue curve since it shows the revenue per unit (price). The marginal revenue curve is a curve showing the relation between the quantity a firm sells and the revenue yielded by the last unit sold. It is derived from the demand curve. 505505
506
Marginal Revenue Curve
With a downward-sloping demand curve, the marginal revenue curve will lie below the demand curve since, at any level of output, marginal revenue is less than price. A demand and marginal revenue curve are shown in Figure 7.3. For output levels greater than q1, marginal revenue is negative. 506506
507
FIGURE 7.3: Marginal Revenue Curve Associated with a Demand Curve
Price P1 Demand (Average Revenue) q1 Quantity per week Marginal Revenue 507507
508
Shifts in Demand and Marginal Revenue Curves
As previously discussed, changes in such factors as income, other prices, or preferences cause demand curves to shift. Since marginal revenue curves are derived from demand curves, whenever the demand curve shifts, the marginal revenue curve also shifts. 508508
509
APPLICATION 7.2: How Did Airlines Respond to Deregulation?
Due to the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 Regulation of airline fares was reduced or eliminated entirely. Rules governing the assignment of airline routes were relaxed The response of airlines was generally consistent with the profit-maximization hypothesis. 509509
510
Marginal Revenue Businesspeople have relatively inelastic demands, so the prices for the type of seats they normally buy did not change much. Tourists and similar persons have relatively elastic demands, and large price reductions were targeted for these groups. Overall, these discount fares generated far more revenue than across-the-board cuts. 510510
511
Marginal Cost While fleets of aircraft could not be changed in the short-run, airlines altered their route structure. Service to many small communities, previously required by the Civil Aeronautics Board, were curtailed. Hub-and-spoke procedures were adopted to allow firms to use different types of aircraft on different routes. 511511
512
Marginal Cost Because the marginal cost associated with filling empty seats on a plane is essentially zero, profits from the last few passengers on a flight are very high. Airlines have tried very hard to reduce the losses they suffer from “no shows” by selling more space than is available--overbooking. 512512
513
Short-Run Profit Maximization
Since the firm has no effect on the price it receives for its product, the goal of maximizing profits dictates that it should produce the quantity for which marginal cost equals price. At a given price, such as P* in Figure 7.4, the firm’s demand curve is a horizontal line through P*. 513513
514
FIGURE 7.4: Short-Run Supply Curve for a Price-Taking Firm
SMC SAC P* = MR E q* Quantity per week 514514
515
Short-Run Profit Maximization
At P* = MR, the firm maximizes profits by producing q*, since this is where price equals short-run marginal costs. At P* profits are positive since P > SAC, but at a price such as P***, short-run profits would be negative. If price just equaled average cost (and marginal cost), short-run profits equal zero. 515515
516
FIGURE 7.4: Short-Run Supply Curve for a Price-Taking Firm
SMC P** SAC P* = MR E A F P*** P1 q1 q*** q* q** Quantity per week 516516
517
Short-Run Profit Maximization
If, at P* the firm produced less than q*, profits could be increased by producing more since MR > SMC below q*. Alternatively, if the firm produced more than q* profits could be increased by producing less since MR < SMC beyond q*. Thus, profits can only be maximized by producing q* when price is P*. 517517
518
Short-Run Profit Maximization
Total profits are given by the area P*EFA which can be calculated by multiplying profits per unit (P* - A) times the firm’s chosen output level q*. For this situation to truly be a maximum profit, the marginal cost curve must also be be increasing (it would be a profit minimum if the marginal cost curve was decreasing). 518518
519
The Firm’s Short-Run Supply Curve
The firm’s short-run supply curve is the relationship between price and quantity supplied by a firm in the short-run. For a price-taking firm, this is the positively sloped portion of the short-run marginal cost curve. For all possible prices, the marginal cost curve shows how much output the firm should supply. 519519
520
The Shutdown Decision For very low prices, the firm could also produce zero output. Since fixed costs are incurred whether or not the firm produces any goods, the decision to produce is based on short-run variable costs. 520520
521
The Shutdown Decision 521521 The firm will opt for q > 0 providing
The price must exceed average variable cost. 521521
522
The Shutdown Decision The shutdown price is the price below which the firm will choose to produce no output in the short-run. It is equal to minimum average variable costs. In Figure 7.4, the shutdown price is P1. For all P P1 the firm will follow the P = MC rule, so the supply curve will be the short-run marginal cost curve. 522522
523
The Shutdown Decision Notice, the firm will still produce if P < SAC, so long as it can cover its fixed costs. However, if price is less than the shutdown price (P < P1 in Figure 7.4), the firm will have smaller losses if it shuts down. This decision is illustrated by the colored segment 0P1 in Figure 7.4. 523523
524
FIGURE 7.4: Short-Run Supply Curve for a Price-Taking Firm
SMC P1 Quantity per week 524524
525
Table 1 shows U.S. oil well drilling activity over the past 27 years.
APPLICATION 7.3: Why Is Drilling for Crude Oil Such a Boom or Bust Business? Since prices for crude oil are set in international markets, oil drilling firms are price takers responding to price incentives. Rising marginal costs reflect increased costs encountered as firms have to drill to greater depths or in less accessible areas. Table 1 shows U.S. oil well drilling activity over the past 27 years. 525525
526
TABLE 1: Wold Oil Prices and Oil-Well Drilling Activity in the United States
526526
527
APPLICATION 7.3: Why Is Drilling for Crude Oil Such a Boom or Bust Business?
The table also shows average prices of crude oil in various years, adjusted for changing prices or drilling equipment. Between 1970 and 1980 real oil prices tripled resulting in a tripling of drilling. Many of these additional wells were drilled in the high cost areas like the Gulf of Mexico or the Arctic Slope of Alaska. 527527
528
APPLICATION 7.3: Why Is Drilling for Crude Oil Such a Boom or Bust Business?
By 1990 real crude oil prices had declined by 40 in response to recessions and increased supplies of crude oil from the such places as the North Sea and Mexico. As the table shows, drilling declined in response to lower prices. This continued throughout the 1990s with the number of wells falling below 20,000 by 1997. 528528
529
APPLICATION 7.3: Why Is Drilling for Crude Oil Such a Boom or Bust Business?
The decline in oil prices caused several shutdowns of marginal operations; especially those that used pressurized steam or produced fewer than 10 barrels per day. Despite continued new drilling, by 1997 the number of operating wells had dropped by nearly 10 percent compared to the mid-1980s. 529529
530
This lead to problems with suppliers of oil exploration industry.
APPLICATION 7.3: Why Is Drilling for Crude Oil Such a Boom or Bust Business? This lead to problems with suppliers of oil exploration industry. Producers of high-strength oil pipe suffered huge financial losses as they were unable to sell enough to keep their factories fully utilized. Suppliers of other materials for the oil exploration industry had similar problems and many cities in Texas and Louisiana experienced sharp economic downturns. 530530
531
Profit Maximization and Managers’ Incentives
The principal-agent relationship is an economic actor (the principal) delegating decision-making authority to another party (the agent). As early as Adam Smith, it was understood that managers of a company may have different goals than are the goals of the owners of the company. 531531
532
A Model of the Principal-Agent Relationship
Figure 7.5 shows the indifference curve map of a manager’s preferences between the firm’s profits (the primary interest of the owners) and various benefits that accrue mainly to the manager. Assuming the manager is also the owner, if the manager chooses no special benefits, profits will be max. 532532
533
A Model of the Principal-Agent Relationship
Each dollar of benefits received by the manger reduces profits by one dollar. The slope of the budget constraint is -1, and profits will be zero when benefits equal max. The owner-manager maximizes utility at *, B* which, which is somewhat less than max. 533533
534
FIGURE 7.5: Incentives for a Manager Acting as an Agent for a Firm’s Owners
Profits per week max * B U1 Owner’ constraint max B* Benefits per week 534534
535
Conflicts in the Agent Relationship
Now suppose that the manager owns only one-third of the capital with the other two- thirds owned by outside investors. In this case, one dollar in benefits only costs the manager $0.33 in profits which is reflected in the Agent’s constraint in Figure 7.6. Now the manager will maximize profits by choosing **, B**, a lower level of profits and a higher level of benefits. 535535
536
FIGURE 7.5: Incentives for a Manager Acting as an Agent for a Firm’s Owners
Profits per week max Agent’s constraint * B ** U2 U1 Owner’ constraint *** max B* B** Benefits per week 536536
537
Conflicts in the Agent Relationship
However, **, B** is not attainable by the firm, so profits will actually be ***. The other owners have been harmed by relying on an agency relationship. It appears that the smaller the ownership by the manager, the greater the reduction in profits. Other agent conflicts studied by economists include investment managers and automobile mechanics. 537537
538
APPLICATION 7.4: Principals and Agents in Franchising and Medicine
Many large business, such as McDonald’s Corporation, operate their local retail outlets through franchise contracts. For example, local McDonalds restaurants are usually owned by local groups of investors. The problem for the parent company is to ensure that their franchise agents operate in a proper manner. 538538
539
APPLICATION 7.4: Principals and Agents in Franchising and Medicine
Various provisions of franchise contracts help to assure proper behavior. With McDonald’s franchises, for example, must meet food-quality and service standards and must purchase supplies from firms that meet standards set by the parent company. The franchisee, in return, gets some management assistance and national advertising and gets to keep a large share of the profits. 539539
540
APPLICATION 7.4: Principals and Agents in Franchising and Medicine
Physicians act as agents for patients who often lack knowledge of their illness or what treatments are warranted. There are several reasons why physicians might not chose exactly what a fully informed patient might choose. Unlike the physician, the patient must pay the medical bills. 540540
541
APPLICATION 7.4: Principals and Agents in Franchising and Medicine
Since the physician is usually the care provider, he or she may financially benefit from the services provided. Studies find evidence of this physician induced demand, especially for patients with insurance. Doctors are “double agents” with insured patients since they represent both the patients and the insurance company. 541541
542
APPLICATION 7.5: Principals and Agents in Franchising and Medicine
Current controversies, such as the growth of managed care organizations arise from this dual relationship. The rapid escalation of health costs have resulted in managed care organizations. Alternatively, restrictions place by managed care organizations have resulted in a major backlash among patients. 542542
543
Incentive Contracts Owners, however, could refuse to invest in firms where managers behave this way. Managers would then have two options. They could go it alone and finance the company solely with their funds. This would return to the original case and result in *, B*. A manger could work out some agreement with potential investors. 543543
544
Incentive Contracts It would likely be too costly for other owners to have managers completely pay for their benefits. But owners could construct contracts that give managers incentives to economize on benefits and pursue more profit maximizing goals. Incentives include stock options and profit sharing bonuses. 544544
545
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
Stock options grant the holder the ability to buy shares at a fixed price. If the market price of the shares increases, the holder will benefit by buying at the option price and selling at the higher price. Firms grand options to their executives as incentives to manage the firm in a way that leads to increases in stock value. 545545
546
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
While stock options were uncommon in the 1980s, by the 1990s top executives of the largest companies received more than half their total compensation in the form of stock options. Reasons for this increase in the use of options include Rising stock prices made this option attractive. 546546
547
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
Since options are often assigned a zero cost to the firm, they made a low-cost way to pay their executives. A special provision of the tax laws enacted in limited deductions of executive pay to no more than $1 million per year, unless pay was tied to company performance--which increased the incentive to use stock options. 547547
548
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
One estimate found that stock options provide more than 50 times the pay-to-performance ratio provided by conventional pay packages. Dollar for dollar, options also provide more pay- to-performance incentives than a simple grant of shares to the executives. 548548
549
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
The exact incentive effects of stock options are complex depending on how the options are granted and the ways in which the stock price for the firm performs. Say a company grants an executive a fixed dollar value of options for each of the next five years. If stock prices increase, the executive will be better off but the value of the options will not change. 549549
550
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
Alternatively, if the firm grants the executive a fixed number of shares for five years, then increases in the share price will affect his or her future compensation. In general, options are less valuable when the firm pays large dividends to its shareholders, so executives with options have an incentive to not pay dividends. 550550
551
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
Options are more valuable when the company’s stock price is more volatile, so executives with options have incentives to take greater risks. Given the complexity, there is little strong evidence about the actual effects of incentives on management behavior. 551551
552
APPLICATION 7.5: The Good and Bad Effects of Stock Options
Comparison between Europe (where options are rare) and the United States suggest that U.S. executives are more careful about how their decisions affect shareholders. The rise of “superstar” managers during the 1990s may mean that executives are now given a freer hand in running businesses. 552552
553
Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
554
Timing of a Supply Response
A supply response is the change in quantity of output in response to a change in demand conditions. The pattern of equilibrium prices will be different depending upon the time period In the very short run, quantity is fixed so there is no supply response 554554
555
Timing of a Supply Response
In the short run existing firms may change the quantity they are supplying, but no firms enter or exit the market. In the long run firms can further change the quantity supplied and new firms may enter the market. 555555
556
Pricing in the Very Short Run
The market period (very short run) is a short period of time during which quantity supplied is fixed. In this period, price acts to ration demand as it adjusts to clear the market. This situation is illustrated in Figure 8.1 where supply is fixed at Q*. 556556
557
FIGURE 8.1: Pricing in the Very Short Run
Price S P1 D Quantity per week Q* 557557 557
558
Pricing in the Very Short Run
When demand is represented by the curve D, P1 is the equilibrium price. The equilibrium price is the price at which the quantity demanded by buyers of a good is equal to the quantity supplied by sellers of the good. 558558
559
Shifts in Demand: Price as a Rationing Device
If demand were to increase, as illustrated by the new demand curve D’ in Figure 8.1, P1 is no longer the equilibrium price since the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied. The new equilibrium price is now P2 where price has rationed the good to those who value it the most. 559559
560
FIGURE 8.1: Pricing in the Very Short Run
Price S P2 P1 D’ D Quantity per week Q* 560560 560
561
APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions
Auctions on the internet have rapidly become one of the most popular ways of selling all manner of goods. There is a sense that internet auctions resemble the theoretical situation illustrated in Figure 8.1…the goods are in fixed supply and will be sold for whatever bidders are willing to pay. However, this view of things may be too simple because it ignores dynamic elements which may be present in suppliers’ decisions. 561561
562
APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions
A quick examination of internet auction sites suggests that operators employ a variety of features in their auctions. “Reserve” prices, bidding history, and “buy it now” prices are all features offered at various sites. Attempts to answer the many questions that surround the returns to operators usually focus on the uncertainties inherent in the auction process and how bidders respond to them. 562562
563
APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions
Because buyers and sellers are total strangers in internet auctions, a number of special provisions have been developed to mitigate the risks of fraud that the parties might encounter in such situations. The primary risk facing bidders is in knowing that the goods being offered meet expected quality standards. Previous bidders provide rankings to many of the auction sites. 563563
564
APPLICATION 8.1: Internet Auctions
For sellers, the primary risk is that they will not be paid. Various intermediaries (such as Pay Pal) have been developed to address this problem. 564564
565
Applicability of the Very Short-Run Model
This model may only apply where the goods are very perishable. It is usually assumed that a rise in price will prompt producers to bring additional quantity to the market. This can result from greater production, or, if the goods are durable, from existing stock held by producers. 565565
566
Short-Run Supply In the short-run the number of firms is fixed as no firms are able to enter or leave the market. However, existing firms can adjust their quantity in response to price changes. Because of the large number of firms, each firm is treated as a price taker. 566566
567
Construction of a Short-Run Supply Curve
The quantity that is supplied is the sum of the quantities supplied by each firm. The short-run market supply curve is the relationship between market price and quantity supplied of a good in the short run. In Figure 8.2 it is assumed that there are only two firms, A and B. 567567
568
FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market Supply Curve
Price Price Price SA P qA1 Output Output Quantity per week (a) Firm A (b) Firm B (c) The Market 568568
569
FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market Supply Curve
Price Price Price SB SA P qA1 qB1 Output Output Quantity per week (a) Firm A (b) Firm B (c) The Market 569569
570
FIGURE 8.2: Short-Run Market Supply Curve
Price Price Price SB S SA P qA1 qB1 Output Output Q1 Quantity per week 570570 (a) Firm A (b) Firm B (c) The Market
571
Construction of a Short-Run Supply Curve
Both firm A’s and firm B’s short-run supply curves (their marginal cost curves) are shown in Figure 8.2(a) and Figure 8.2(b) respectively. The market supply curve is the horizontal sum of the two firms are every price. In Figure 8.2(c), Q1 equals the sum of q1A and q1B. 571571
572
Short-Run Price Determination
Figure 8.3 (b) shows the market equilibrium where the market demand curve D and the short-run supply curve S intersect at a price of P1 and quantity Q1. This equilibrium would persist since what firms supply at P1 is exactly what people want to buy at that price. 572572
573
FIGURE 8.3: Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms Determine market price in the Short Run
SMC Price Price S Price SAC P1 D d q1 q2 Q1 Q2 Quantity per week q1 q2 q1 ‘ Output Quantity (a) Typical Firm (b) The Market (c) Typical Person 573573
574
FIGURE 8.3: Interaction of Many Individuals and Firms Determine market price in the Short Run
SMC Price Price S Price SAC P2 D’ P1 d’ D d q1 q2 Q1 Q2 Quantity per week q1 q2 q1 ‘ Output Quantity (a) Typical Firm (b) The Market (c) Typical Person 574574
575
Functions of the Equilibrium Price
The price serves as a signal to producers about how much should be produced. To maximize profit, firms will produce the output level for which marginal costs equal P1. This yields an aggregate production of Q1. 575575
576
Functions of the Equilibrium Price
Given the price, utility maximizing individuals will decide how much of their limited incomes to spend At price P1 the total quantity demanded is Q1. No other price brings about the balance of quantity demanded and quantity supplied. These situations are depicted in Figure 8.3 (a) and (b) for the typical firm and individual, respectively. 576576
577
Effect of an Increase in Market Demand
If the typical person’s demand for the good increases from d to d’, the entire market demand curve will shift to D’ as shown in figure 8.3. The new equilibrium is P2, Q2 where a new balance between demand and supply is established. 577577
578
Effect of an Increase in Market Demand
The increase in demand resulted in a higher equilibrium price, P2 and a greater equilibrium quantity, Q2. P2 has rationed the typical person’s demand so that only q2 is demanded rather than the q’1 that would have been demanded at P1. P2 also signals the typical firm to increase production from q1 to q2. 578578
579
Shifts in Demand Curves
Demand will increase, shift outward, because Income increases The price of a substitute rises The price of a complement falls Preferences for the good increase 579579
580
Shifts in Demand Curves
Demand will decrease, shift inward, because Income falls The price of a substitute falls The price of a complement rises Preferences for the good diminish 580580
581
Shifts in Supply Curves
Supply will increase, shift outward, because Input prices fall Technology improves Supply will decrease, shift inward, because Input prices rise 581581
582
Table 8.1: Reasons for a Shift in a Demand or Supply Curve
582582
583
Short-Run Supply Elasticity
The short-run elasticity of supply is the percentage change in quantity supplied in the short run in response to a 1 percent change in price. 583583
584
Short-Run Supply Elasticity
If a 1percent increase in price causes firms to increase quantity supplied by more than 1 percent, supply is elastic. If a 1 percent increase in price causes firms to increase quantity supplied by less than 1 percent, supply is inelastic. 584584
585
Shits in Supply Curves and the Importance of the Shape of the Demand Curve
The effect of a shift in supply upon equilibrium levels of P and Q depends upon the shape of the demand curve. If demand is elastic, as in Figure 8.4 (a), a decrease in supply has a small effect on price but a relatively large effect on quantity. If demand is inelastic, as in Figure 8.4 (b), the decrease in supply has a greater effect on price than on quantity. 585585
586
FIGURE 8.4: Effect of a Shift in the Short-Run Supply Curve on the Shape of the Demand Curve
Price Price S S D P P D Quantity per week Q Q Quantity per week (a) Elastic Demand (b) Inelastic Demand 586586
587
FIGURE 8.4: Effect of a Shift in the Short-Run Supply Curve on the Shape of the Demand Curve
Price Price S’ S S P’ P’ D P P D Q’ Quantity per week Q’ Q Q Quantity per week (a) Elastic Demand (b) Inelastic Demand 587587
588
Shifts in Demand Curves and the Importance of the Shape of the Supply Curve
The effect of a shift in demand upon equilibrium levels of P and Q depends upon the shape of the supply curve. If supply is inelastic, as in Figure 8.5 (a), the effect on price is much greater than on quantity. If the supply curve is elastic, as in Figure 8.5 (b), the effect on price is relatively smaller than the effect on quantity. 588588
589
Figure 8.5: Effect of A shift in the Demand Curve Depends on the Shape of the Short-Run Supply Curve
Price Price S P’ P P D D Quantity per week Q Quantity per week Q (a) Inelastic Supply (b) Elastic Supply 589589
590
Figure 8.5: Effect of A shift in the Demand Curve Depends on the Shape of the Short-Run Supply Curve
Price Price S P’ P’ P P D’ D’ D D Quantity per week Q Q’ Quantity per week Q Q’ (a) Inelastic Supply (b) Elastic Supply 590590
591
APPLICATION 8.2: Ethanol Subsidies in the United States and Brazil
Ethanol has potentially desirable properties as a fuel for automobiles or additive to gasoline that may reduce air pollution. Several governments have adopted subsides to producers of ethanol. One way to show the effect of a subsidy is to treat it as a shift in the short-run supply curve as shown in Figure 1. 591591
592
APPLICATION 8.2: Figure 1: Ethanol Subsidies Shift the Supply Curve Price
($/gallon) S1 P1 D Q1 Quantity 592592 (million gallons)
593
APPLICATION 8.2: Figure 1: Ethanol Subsidies Shift the Supply Curve Price
($/gallon) S1 S2 P1 P2 Subsidy D Q1 Q2 Quantity 593593 (million gallons)
594
APPLICATION 8.2: Ethanol Subsidies in the United States and Brazil
The subsidy shifts out the supply curve (by about 54 cents-a-gallon in the U.S.) which results in a quantity demanded increase from Q1 to Q2. The total cost of the subsidy depends upon the per-gallon amount and on the amount of the increase in quantity demanded. 594594
595
APPLICATION 8.2: Ethanol Subsidies in the United States and Brazil
In the U.S. it is made from corn, and the subsidy is primarily found in Iowa where many major corn producers are located. In Brazil it is made from sugar cane and was heavily subsidized until Economic liberalization in the 1990s. Due to political pressure from producers, the subsidy is again being proposed. 595595
596
A Numerical Illustration
Suppose the quantity of cassette tapes demanded per week (Q) depends on the price of the tapes (P) per equation 8.2, Suppose short-run supply is given by equation 8.3. 596596
597
A Numerical Illustration
Figure 8.6 shows the graph for these equations. Since the supply curve intersects the vertical axis at P = 2, this is the shutdown price. The equilibrium price is $6 with people demanding 4 tapes which equals the amount supplied by the firms. 597597
598
FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply Curves for Cassette Tapes
Price S 10 6 2 D 4 10 Tapes per week 598598
599
A Numerical Illustration
If the demand increased as reflected in equation 8.4, the former equilibrium price and quantity would no longer hold. As shown in Figure 8.6, the new equilibrium price is $7 where the quantity demanded and supplied of tapes is 5. 599599
600
FIGURE 8.6: Demand and Supply Curves for Cassette Tapes
Price $12 S 10 7 6 5 2 D’ D 3 4 5 6 10 12 Tapes per week 600600
601
A Numerical Illustration
Table 8.2 shows the two cases. After the increase in demand, there is an excess demand for tapes at the old equilibrium price of $6. The increase in price from $6 to $7 restores equilibrium in the market. 601601
602
TABLE 8.2: Supply and Demand Equilibrium in the Market for Cassette Tapes
602602 New equilibrium Initial equilibrium
603
The Long Run Long run supply responses are much more flexible than in the short run. Long-run cost curves reflect greater input flexibility. Firms can enter and exit the market in response to profit opportunities. 603603
604
Equilibrium Conditions
In a perfectly competitive equilibrium, no firm has an incentive to change its behavior. Firms must be choosing the profit maximizing level of output. Firms must be content to stay in or out of the market. 604604
605
Profit Maximization It is assumed that the goal of each firm is to maximize profits. Since each firm is a price taker, this implies that each firm product where price equals long-run marginal cost. This equilibrium condition, P = MC determines the firm’s output choice and its choice of inputs that minimize their long-run costs. 605605
606
Entry and Exit The perfectly competitive model assumes that firms entail no special costs when they exit and enter the market. Firms will be enticed to enter the market when economic profits are positive. Firms will leave the market when economic profits are negative. 606606
607
Entry and Exit Entry will cause the short-run market supply curve to shift outward causing the market price to fall. This will continue until positive economic profits are no longer available. Exit causes the short-run market supply curve to shift inward causing the market price to increase, eliminating the economic losses. 607607
608
Long-Run Equilibrium For purposes of this chapter, it is assumed that all firms producing a particular good have identical cost curves. Thus, in the long-run equilibrium all firms earn zero economic profits. Firms will produce at minimum average total costs where P = MC and P = AC. 608608
609
Long-Run Equilibrium P = MC results from the assumption that firm’s are profit maximizers. P = AC results because market forces cause long run economic profits to equal zero. In the long run, firm owners will only earn normal returns on their investments. 609609
610
Long-Run Supply: The Constant Cost Case
The constant cost case is a market in which entry or exit has no effect on the cost curves of firms. Figure 8.7 demonstrates long-run equilibrium for the constant cost case. Figure 8.7 (b) shows that market where the market demand and supply curves are D and S, respectively, and equilibrium price is P1. 610610
611
FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case
Price Price SMC MC S AC P1 D q1 Output Q1 Quantity per week (a) Typical Firm (b) Total Market 611611
612
FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case
Price Price SMC MC S AC P2 P1 D D q1 q2 Output Q1 Quantity per week Q2 (a) Typical Firm (b) Total Market 612612
613
FIGURE 8.7: Long-Run Equilibrium for a Perfectly Competitive Constant Market: Cost Case
Price Price SMC MC S AC S’ P2 P1 LS D D q1 q2 Output Q1 Q3 Quantity per week Q2 (a) Typical Firm (b) Total Market 613613
614
Long-Run Supply: The Constant Cost Case
The typical firm will produce output level q1 which results in Q1 in the market. The typical firm is maximizing profits since price is equal to long-run marginal cost. The typical firm is earning zero economic profits since price equals long-run average total costs. There is no incentive for exit or entry. 614614
615
A Shift in Demand If demand increases to D’, the short-run price will increase to P2. A typical firm will maximize profits by producing q2 which will result in short-run economic profits (P2 > AC). Positive economic profits cause new firms to enter the market until economic profits again equal zero. 615615
616
A Shift in Demand Since costs do no increase with entry, the typical firm’s costs curves do not change. The supply curve shifts to S’ where the equilibrium price returns to P1 and the typical firm produces q1 again. The new long-run equilibrium output will be Q3 with more firms in the market. 616616
617
Long-Run Supply Curve Regardless of the shift in demand, market forces will cause the equilibrium price to return to P1 in the long-run. The long-run supply curve is horizontal at the low point of the firms long-run average total cost curves. This long-run supply curve is labeled LS in Figure 8.7 (b). 617617
618
APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals
Movies have been available for home rental since the 1920s. The basic rental business has consistently exhibited the characteristics of a constant cost industry. By the end of the 1980s, more than 70% of U.S. households owned VHS tape players. At first the rental industry was quite profitable, but there were no significant barriers to entry. 618618
619
APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals
Because inputs used by the industry (low-wage workers and simple rental space) were readily available at market prices, the industry had a perfectly elastic long-run supply curve – it could easily meet exploding demand with no increase in price. The number of tape rental outlets grew fourfold and the standard price for rental of a movies fell to about $1.50 per night. 619619
620
APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals
Introduction of DVD technology in the mid- 1990s followed a similar path. Once a critical threshold of households owned DVD players, the rental market for movies on DVD emerged quickly. Again, the absence of barriers to entry together with the ready availability of inputs resulted in a close approximation to the constant cost model. 620620
621
APPLICATION 8.3: Movie Rentals
This elastic supply response has also dictated a strict market test for innovations in the movie rental business – such innovations must be cost-competitive with existing methods of distribution or they will not be adopted. The fate of “Divx” technology provides an instructive example. Because consumers had to purchase special equipment, Divx gained few adherents and was largely abandoned by the start of 1999. 621621
622
Shape of the Long-Run Supply Curve: The Increasing Cost Case
The increasing cost case is a market in which the entry of firms increases firms’ costs. New firms may increase demand for scarce inputs driving up their prices. New firms may impose external costs in the form of air or water pollution. New firms may place strains on public facilities increasing costs for all firms in the market. 622622
623
FIGURE 8.8: Increasing Costs Result in a Positively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price Price SMC S MC SMC D AC MC P2 AC P3 P3 P1 P1 2 q1 q2 Output q3 Output Q1 Quantity per week Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market 623623
624
FIGURE 8.8: Increasing Costs Result in a Positively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price Price D’ SMC S MC SMC D AC P2 MC P2 AC P1 P1 2 q1 q2 Output q3 Output Q2 Q3 Q1 Quantity per week (a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market 624624
625
FIGURE 8.8: Increasing Costs Result in a Positively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price Price D’ SMC S S’ MC SMC D AC LS P2 MC P2 AC P3 P3 P1 P1 2 q1 q2 Output q3 Output Q2 Q3 Q1 Quantity per week (a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market 625625
626
The Increasing Cost Case
This case is shown in Figure 8.8, where the initial equilibrium price is P1 with the typical firm producing q1 with total output Q1. Economic profits are zero. The increase in demand to D’, with short-run supply curve S, causes equilibrium price to increase to P2 with the typical firm producing q2 resulting in positive profits. 626626
627
The Increasing Cost Case
The positive profits entice firms to enter which drives up costs. The typical firm’s new cost curves are shown in Figure 8.8 (b). The new long-run equilibrium price is P3 with market output Q3. The long-run supply curve, LS, is positively sloped because of the increasing costs. 627627
628
Long-Run Supply Elasticity
The long-run elasticity of supply is the percentage change in quantity supplied in the long run in response to a 1 percent change in price. 628628
629
TABLE 8.3: Estimated Long-Run Supply Elasticities
629629
630
The Decreasing Cost Case
The decreasing cost case is a market in which the entry of firms decreases firms’ costs. Entry may produce a larger pool of trained labor which reduces the costs of hiring. Entry may provide a “critical mass” of industrialization that permits the development of more efficient transportation, communications, and financial networks. 630630
631
The Decreasing Cost Case
The initial equilibrium is shown as P1, Q1 in Figure 8.9 (c). The increase in demand from D to D’ results in the short-run equilibrium, P2, Q2 where the typical firm is earning positive economic profits. Entry drives down costs for the typical firm, as shown in Figure 8.9 (b). 631631
632
FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price Price S SMC D P2 MC AC SMC MC P1 AC P1 2 q1 Output Output Q1 Quantity per week (a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market 632632
633
FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price Price S D’ SMC D P2 MC P2 AC SMC MC P1 AC P1 2 q1 q2 Output Output Q2 Q1 Quantity per week (a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market 633633
634
FIGURE 8.9: Decreasing Costs Result in a Negatively Sloped Long-Run Supply Curve
Price Price Price D’ S SMC D P2 MC P2 S’ AC SMC MC P1 AC P1 2 P3 P3 LS q1 q2 Output q3 Output Q2 Q3 Q1 Quantity per week (a) Typical Firm before Entry (b) Typical Firm after Entry (c) The Market 634634
635
The Decreasing Cost Case
Entry continues until short-run economic profits are eliminated. The new long-run equilibrium is P3, Q3 as shown in Figure 8.9 (c). The long-run supply curve is downward sloping due to the decreasing costs as labeled LS in Figure 8.9 (c). 635635
636
APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?
Network externalities occur when additional users cause network costs to decline. Subject to Metcalfe’s Law which states that the number of interconnections possible in a given communications network expands with the square of the number of subscribers in the network. 636636
637
APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?
These cause negatively sloped long-run supply curves. This can cause lower consumer prices when demand expands. Industries subject to network externalities include telecommunications, computer software, and the Internet. 637637
638
APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?
Telecommunications Most of the gains in developed countries have been realized, but remain for less developed. Computer Software As adoption grows, lower learning costs for users. These benefits may explain why software companies are not too concerned with pirating. 638638
639
APPLICATION 8.4: How Do Network Externalities Affect Supply Curves?
The Internet Since anything that can be encoded in digital format can be shared over the network, benefits for specialized groups can also be realized. This, along with the improved storage capacity of computers, makes it possible to provide specific types of services that where cost prohibitive before the Internet. 639639
640
Infant Industries Initially the cost of production of a new product may be very high. As the pool of skilled workers grows, costs may decline. It is often argued that these “infant” industries must be protected from lower-cost foreign competition until they reach the lower cost portion of their supply curves. 640640
641
Applying the Competitive Model
Chapter 9 Applying the Competitive Model © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
642
Consumer Surplus Consumer surplus is the extra value individuals receive from consuming a good over what they pay for it. Alternatively, it is what people would be willing to pay for the right to consume a good at its current price. 642642
643
Consumer Surplus In Figure 9.1, the equilibrium price and quantity are P* and Q*. The demand curve, D, shows what people are willing to pay for the good. The total value of the good to buyers is given by the area below the demand curve from Q = 0 to Q = Q* (AEQ*0). 643643
644
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price A S P* E D B 644644 Q* Quantity per period
645
Consumer Surplus Consumers expenditures for Q* are given by the area P*EQ*0. Consumers receive a “surplus” (total value less what they pay) equal to the area AEP*, which is shaded gray in Figure 9.1. 645645
646
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price A S P* E D B 646646 Q* Quantity per period
647
Producer Surplus Producer surplus is the extra value producers get for a good in excess of the opportunity costs they incur for producing it. It can also be defined as what all producers would pay for the right to sell a good at its current market price. 647647
648
Producer Surplus At the equilibrium shown in Figure 9.1, producers receive total revenue equal to the area P*EQ*0. If producers sold one unit at a time at the lowest possible price, producers would have been willing to produce Q* for the payment of BEQ*0. 648648
649
Producer Surplus Thus, producer surplus the the area P*EB shaded in green in Figure 9.1. 649649
650
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price A S P* E D B 650650 Q* Quantity per period
651
Short-Run Producer Surplus
The positive slope of the short-run supply curve, S, in Figure 9.1 results from the diminishing returns to variable inputs that are encountered as output is increased. For production up to Q*, price exceeds marginal cost, so total short-run profits equal the area P*EB less fixed costs 651651
652
Short-Run Producer Surplus
Producer surplus, the area P*EB, reflects the sum of total short-run profits and short-run fixed costs. Short-run producer surplus is the part of total profits that is in excess of the profits firms would have if they chose to produce nothing at all. As such, it is similar to consumer surplus. 652652
653
Long-Run Producer Surplus
Since long-run economic profits are zero and there are no fixed costs in the long-run, producer surplus is much different in the long run. The positive slope of the long-run supply curve reflects increasing input costs as output is expanded. 653653
654
Long-Run Producer Surplus
Consider the area P*EB in Figure 9.1 as long- run producer surplus. It measures all of the increased payments relative to the situation in which the industry produces no output. The inputs would have received lower prices if this industry had not produced output. 654654
655
Ricardian Rent Ricardian rent is the long-run profits earned by owners of low-cost firms. It may be capitalized into the prices of these firms’ inputs. Assume there are many parcels of land on which tomatoes might be grown. These farms range from very fertile land (low cost) to poor, dry land (high cost). 655655
656
Ricardian Rent At low prices, only the most fertile land is used.
As output increases, higher-cost plots of land are brought into production because higher prices make this land profitable. The long-run supply curve is positively sloped because of the increasing costs associated with using less fertile land. 656656
657
Ricardian Rent The market equilibrium price and quantity, P*, Q*, are shown in Figure 9.2 (d). Low-cost farms, Figure 9.2 (a) and medium- cost farms, Figure 9.2 (b), earn long-run economic profits. Marginal farms, Figure 9.2 (c) earn zero economic profits 657657
658
FIGURE 9.2 (d): The Market Price S P* E D B Q per Q* period 658658
659
FIGURE 9.2 (a): Low-Cost Farm
Price MC AC P* q* q per period 659659
660
FIGURE 9.2 (b): Medium-Cost Farm
Price AC P* q per period q* 660660
661
FIGURE 9.2 (c): Marginal Farm
Price MC AC P* q* q per period 661661
662
FIGURE 9.2: Ricardian Rent
Price Price MC AC MC AC P* P* q* q per q* q per period period (a) Low-Cost Farm (b) Medium-Cost Farm Price Price MC AC S P* P* E D B q* q per Q* Q per period period 662662 (c) Marginal Farm (d) The Market 662
663
Ricardian Rent Profits earned by the intramarginal farms can persist in the long run because they reflect the returns to a scarce resource, low-cost land. Entry can not erode these profits because of the scarcity of the low-cost land. The sum of these long run profits (P*EB) is the producer surplus ( Ricardian rent). 663663
664
Economic Efficiency The competitive equilibrium is efficient in that it produces the largest surplus equal to the sum of producer and consumer surplus. In Figure 9.1, an output level of Q1 results in a loss of surplus equal to the area FEG. Consumers would be willing to pay P1 for a good that producers are willing to produce for P2, so mutually beneficial transactions exit. 664664
665
FIGURE 9.1: Competitive Equilibrium and Consumer/Producer Surplus
Price A S F P1 P* E P2 G D B 665665 Q1 Q* Quantity per period
666
APPLICATION 9.1: Does Buying Things on the Internet Improve Welfare?
Transaction costs associated with conducting business on the internet have been reduced due to Technical innovations significant network externalities. Prior to this, transaction costs exceed the difference between consumers’ willingness to pay and producers costs. 666666
667
APPLICATION 9.1: Does Buying Things on the Internet Improve Welfare?
Prior to the decline in internet costs, transaction costs exceeded P2 - P1 in Figure 1, so no transactions occurred. Assuming transaction costs fell to zero, trading would start and a competitive equilibrium would occur at P*, Q*. 667667
668
FIGURE 1: Reduced Transaction Costs Promote Internet Commerce
Price P 2 S P* P 1 D 668668 Quantity Q*
669
APPLICATION 9.1: Does Buying Things on the Internet Improve Welfare?
Some early evidence Electronic retailing directly to consumers totaled about $20 billion in 2001. Business to business sales represented another $50 to $75 billion. Most sales are in travel-related goods, on-line financial services, and some narrow categories of consumer goods such as books. 669669
670
APPLICATION 9.1: Does Buying Things on the Internet Improve Welfare?
Retailers as Infomediaries The role for retailing “middlemen” on the internet is to provide information to the consumer. Internet automobile sellers provide comparative information about the features of cars and point to dealers with the best price. Internet airline services search for the lowest price or most convenient departure. 670670
671
A Numerical Example The market equilibrium is P* = $6 and Q* = 4. The equilibrium is shown as point E in Figure 9.3. At point E consumers are spending $24 ($6·4). 671671
672
A Numerical Example At point E in Figure 9.3, consumer surplus is $8 (= ½·$4·4). Producers also gain a producer surplus of $8 at point E. Total consumer and producer surplus is $16. If price stays at $6 but output falls to 3, total surplus falls to $15. 672672
673
FIGURE 9.3: Efficiency in Tape Sales
Price 10 S 6 E D 2 673673 1 2 3 4 5 Tapes per period
674
A Numerical Example For any output level, total surplus is the area between the demand and supply curves out to that level of output. Once output is specified, the price affects the distribution of the surplus between producers and consumers, but does not affect the total amount of the surplus. 674674
675
A Numerical Example If output > 4 tapes per period with P = $6, total surplus is less than $16. At Q = 5, consumer surplus falls to $7.50. $8 for four tapes less $.50 because the fifth tapes sells for more than people want to pay for the fifth tape. Producer surplus also equals $7.50 reflecting the loss of $.50 on the production of the fifth tape. Total surplus is $15 for Q = 5 tapes per week. 675675
676
Price Controls and Shortages
In Figure 9.4 the market initially is in equilibrium at P1, Q1 (point E). Then demand increases from D to D’. This would cause price to rise to P2 encouraging entry in the short-run. Eventually entry would bring the price down to P3 and the market would be in long-run equilibrium. 676676
677
FIGURE 9.4: Price Controls and Shortages
SS LS P 1 E D 677677 Q Quantity 1 per period
678
FIGURE 9.4: Price Controls and Shortages
SS LS P 2 P 3 E’ P 1 E D’ D 678678 Q Q Q Quantity 1 2 3 per period
679
Price Controls and Shortages
Suppose the government imposed a price control at the below equilibrium price of P1 when demand increased. Firms would only supply Q1 and no entry would take place. Since customers would demand Q4 at this price, there would be a shortage of Q4 - Q1. 679679
680
Price Controls and Shortages
The welfare consequences of price control can be analyzed using consumer and producer surplus. Consumers would gain surplus of P3CEP1 (colored in gray) due to the lower price. This is a direct transfer of surplus from producers to consumers with no gain in total surplus. 680680
681
FIGURE 9.4: Price Controls and Shortages
SS A LS P 2 C P 3 E’ P 1 E D’ D 681681 Q Q Q Quantity 1 3 4 per period
682
Price Controls and Shortages
If output had expanded, consumers would gain the area AE’C. Since output is reduced by the price control, this is a loss of surplus to consumers. Similarly, producers don’t gain the area CE’E that would have resulted from increased output. The area AE’E is the total welfare loss. 682682
683
Application 9.2: Rent Control: Why This Bad Idea Never Dies
History of Rent Control Controls were adopted in man U.S. and European cities in response to rapidly rising rents during World War II which continued after the war in several European countries and New York City. Inflation of the 1970s resulted in several U.S. cities introducing more “flexible” rent controls More than 10 percent of U.S. rentals are controlled. 683683
684
Application 9.2: Rent Control: Why This Bad Idea Never Dies
Rent Control and Housing Quality Studies have confirmed the prediction that rent controls will benefit current tenants and harm landlords and new tenants. However, the most important effect is that landlords effectively reduce the supply of housing by reducing the quality of their units. 684684
685
Application 9.2: Rent Control: Why This Bad Idea Never Dies
Effects of the “New” Rent Control Laws By allowing landlords to pass on increases in taxes or utility costs, post World War II laws were more flexible. Many also allow rents to be increased to market levels when current tenants leave. Some economists suggest that such laws help to deal with the landlords market power, but few economists support this position. 685685
686
Tax Incidence The study of the final burden of a tax after considering all market reactions to it is tax incidence theory. The incidence of a “specific tax” of a fixed amount per unit of output that is imposed on all firms in a constant cost industry is illustrated in Figure 9.5 686686
687
FIGURE 9.5: Effect of the Imposition of a Specific Tax on a Perfectly Competitive Constant Cost Industry Price Price S’ S SMC MC P 4 AC P 3 P 1 LS P 2 Tax D D’ q2 q1 Output Q Q Q Quantity 3 2 1 per week (a) Typical Firm (b) The Market 687687
688
Tax Incidence Since for any price, P, consumers pay the firm gets to keep P - t (where t is the per unit tax), the effect of the tax on firms can be shown as a decrease in demand. The vertical distance between the demand curves is t. It creates a wedge between the consumers’ price, P, and the price firms receive. 688688
689
Short-Run Tax Incidence
The short-run effect is to decrease output from Q1 to Q2, where firms receive P2 and consumers pay P3 (P3 - P2 = t). So long as P2 is above minimum variable costs, the firm continues to produce and the tax incidence is shared by consumers, whose price increased to P3, and by firm’s who now receive only P2 rather than P1. 689689
690
Long-Run Tax Incidence
Firms will not operate at a loss in the long run, so exit will take place shifting the short-run supply curve back to S’. In the new long-run equilibrium, output will return to Q3 where the firm’s will receive P1 again and consumers will pay P4. The long-run tax incidence is all on the consumer although the firms pays the tax. 690690
691
Long-Run Incidence with Increasing Costs
When the long-run supply curve has a positive slope, both consumers and firms pay a portion of the tax. The imposition of the tax shifts the long-run demand curve inward to D’ (as shown in Figure 9.6) which causes the price to fall from P1 to P2 as some firms exit and input prices fall. 691691
692
FIGURE 9.6: Tax Incidence in an Increasing Cost Industry
Price LS A P 3 P E 1 B 1 P 2 E 2 Tax D D’ 692692 Q Q Quantity 2 1 per period
693
Long-Run Incidence with Increasing Costs
Consumers pay a portion of the tax since the gross price of P3 exceeds the pre-tax price. Total tax collection is the gray area P3ARE2P2. The inputs to the firm pay the remainder of the tax as they are not paid based on a lower net price of P2. 693693
694
Incidence and Elasticity
The economic actor who has the most elastic curve will be able to avoid more of the tax leaving the actor with the more inelastic curve to pay most of the tax. If demand is relatively inelastic and supply is elastic, demanders will pay most of the tax. If supply is relatively inelastic and demand is elastic, suppliers will pay most of the tax. 694694
695
APPLICATION 9.3: The Tobacco Settlement Is Just a Tax
In November 1998 most U.S. states reached agreements with the tobacco companies that amounted to about $200 billion. The Tobacco Settlement as a Tax Increase. This can be treated as an increase in cigarette taxes. The settlement added about $0.30 per pack, a 15 percent increase on the initial $3.00 price. 695695
696
The Tobacco Settlement as a Tax Increase
With an elasticity of demand of (Table 4.4), the quantity of cigarettes sold would be expected to fall by about 5.25 percent (0.350.15) from 24 billion packs per year to billion packs. Total “tax collections” would be about $6.8 billion per year. 696696
697
The Tobacco Settlement as a Tax Increase
If tobacco companies continue to earn about $0.25 per pack, the 1.25 billion reduction in sales will cost them about $300 million per year. Thus, consumers pay most of the “tax” resulting from this settlement. Since tobacco consumers tend to have relatively low incomes, the tax is regressive. 697697
698
Other Effects of the Settlements
Empirical evidence suggests that young smokers may have a larger price elasticity. The goal of a decline in smoking by young people may be obtained. Also, studies suggest that individuals who do not smoke as teenagers are much less likely to smoke later. In addition, advertising aimed at young people was sharply restricted. 698698
699
Other Effects of the Settlements
Special interest also benefited. Many states adopted programs to aid tobacco farmers who were affected by the decline in tobacco sales. The smallest tobacco company (Liggett) provided evidence for the states, and the higher cigarette prices will increase its profits. The lawyers who represented the states each received between $1 - $2 million per year. 699699
700
Taxation and Efficiency
Taxes reduce output of the taxed commodities and a reallocation of production to other areas. Reallocation means that some mutually beneficial transactions will be foregone so economic welfare will decline. 700700
701
Taxation and Efficiency
In Figure 9.6, the total loss of consumer surplus is the area P3AE1P1. The area P3ABP1 is transferred into tax revenue and the area AE1B is simply lost. The loss in producer surplus is P1E1E2P2 of which P1BE2P2 is tax revenue and BE1E2 lost. 701701
702
Taxation and Efficiency
The effect of the transfer into tax revenue on welfare is ambiguous since consumers and producers may benefit from government expenditures. However, the deadweight loss is the losses of consumer and producer surplus that are not transferred to other parties. This is also called the “excess burden” of a tax. 702702
703
A Numerical Illustration
Using the supply-demand equilibrium in the market for cassette tapes, suppose the government implements a $2 per tape tax that retailers add to the sales price of each tape sold. 703703
704
A Numerical Illustration
Demanders, on the other hand, must pay P + t for each tape so the demand function becomes: 704704
705
A Numerical Illustration
Equilibrium requires supply equal demand. or P* = 5, Q* =3. Consumers pay $7 for each tape and total tax collections are $6 per week. Total consumer and producer surplus is decreased by $6 of tax revenue and the excess burden is $1. 705705
706
Transactions Costs Transaction costs, such as a real estate broker fee, also cause a wedge between buyers’ and sellers’ prices. To the extent that transaction costs are on a per-unit basis, the same analysis as with a tax applies, so both parties bear some of the cost and output will be reduced. 706706
707
Transactions Costs If the wedge is a lump-sum amount per transaction, such as the cost of driving to the supermarket to buy groceries, the individual will seek to reduce the number of transactions. While prices will not change significantly, persons will hold larger inventories to reduce their transaction costs. 707707
708
Gains from International Trade
Figure 9.7 shows the domestic demand and supply curves for a particular good, say shoes. Without international trade, the equilibrium price and quantity would be PD, QD. If the world shoe price is PW, the opening of trade will cause prices to fall causing quantity to increase to Q1. 708708
709
Gains from International Trade
The quantity supplied by domestic producers will fall to Q2 with shoe imports of Q1 - Q2. Consumer surplus increases by the area PDE0E1PW. Part, PDE0APW, comes as a transfer from domestic producers, and the rest is an unambiguous gain in welfare (E0E1A). 709709
710
FIGURE 9.7: Opening of International Trade Increases Total Welfare
Price LS P E D E P 1 W A D 710710 Q Q Q Quantity 2 D 1 per period
711
Tariff Protection Producers will resist their losses, and since the loss is spread over fewer producers than the gain for consumers, they have a stronger incentive to organize for trade protection. A major trade protection is a tariff which is a tax on an imported good. Effects of a tariff are shown in Figure 9.8. 711711
712
FIGURE 9.8: Effects of a Tariff
Price LS E P B 2 R E P 1 W C F A D 712712 Q Q Q Q Quantity 2 4 3 1 per period
713
Tariff Protection Compared to the free trade equilibrium E1, the imposition of a per-unit tariff in the amount of t raises the effective price to PW + t = PR. Quantity demanded falls to Q3 while domestic production expands to Q4. Tariff revenue is the area BE2FC, equal to t(Q3 - Q4). 713713
714
Tariff Protection Total consumer surplus is reduced by the area PRE2E1PW. Part becomes tariff revenue and part is transferred into domestic producer’s surplus (area PRBAPW). The two colored triangles BCA and E2E1F represent losses that are not transferred; these are the deadweight losses from the tariff. 714714
715
Other Types of Trade Protection
Because of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), there has been a decline in tariffs. However, other restrictive measures including quotas, “voluntary” export restrains, and a series of nonquantitative restrictions have been used for protectionism. 715715
716
Other Types of Trade Protection
A quota that limits imports to Q3 - Q4 (in Figure 9.8) would have a similar effect to a tariff. Market price would rise to PR. Consumer surplus would be transferred to domestic producers (area PRBAPW). A deadweight loss equal to the areas of the colored triangles would also occur. 716716
717
Other Types of Trade Protection
However, with a quota, no tax revenue is generated. The area BE2FC can go to foreign producers or to windfall gains to owners of import licenses. Nonquantitative restrictions such as health or other inspections also impose costs like a a tariff on imports, and can be analyzed in a similar manner using Figure 9.8. 717717
718
APPLICATION 9.4: The Endless Saga of Steel Protectionism
On March 6, 2002, President Bush announced that the U.S. would adopt a “temporary” tariff on steel imports. This tariff amounted to 30% on many major steel products. Other products were taxed at somewhat lower rates (8 to 15 percent). 718718
719
APPLICATION 9.4: The Endless Saga of Steel Protectionism
It would be hard to find an industry that has had the degree of special protection from trade pressures that has characterized the U.S. steel industry. Over the past 30 years, the industry has succeeded in obtaining the following protectionist measures: Import quotas Minimum price agreements with exporters “Voluntary” export restraints by nations that import into the U.S. 719719
720
APPLICATION 9.4: The Endless Saga of Steel Protectionism
Economists concluded that the costs of the 2002 tariffs to the overall economy could be quite large. Estimated tariff revenues are about $900 million annually; gains in domestic producer surplus might amount to another $700 million. Balanced against this would be estimated losses of about $2.5 billion in consumer surplus. There might then be an annual deadweight loss of perhaps $900 million from the tariffs. 720720
721
Chapter 10 Monopoly © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
722
Monopoly A market is described as a monopoly if there is only one producer. This single firm faces the entire market demand curve. The monopoly must make the decision of how much to produce. The monopoly’s output decision will completely determine the good’s price. 722722
723
Causes of Monopoly Barriers to entry which are factors that prevent new firms from entering a market are the source of all monopoly power. There are two general types of barriers to entry Technical barriers Legal barriers 723723
724
Technical Barriers to Entry
A primary technical barrier is when the firm is a natural monopoly because it exhibits diminishing average cost over a broad range of output levels. Hence, a large-scale firm is more efficient than a small scale firm. A large firm could drive out competitors by price cutting. 724724
725
Technical Barriers to Entry
Other technical barriers to entry. Special knowledge of a low-cost method of production. Ownership of a unique resource. Possession of unique managerial talents. 725725
726
Legal Barriers to Entry
Pure monopolies can be created by law. The basic technology for a product can be assigned to only one firm through a patent. The rational is that it makes innovation profitable and encourages technical advancement. The government can award an exclusive franchise or license to serve a market. This may make it possible to ensure quality standards 726726
727
APPLICATION 10.1: Should You Need a License to Shampoo a Dog?
State governments license many occupations and impose penalties for those who run a business without a license. Specific examples include: Dry Cleaning in California Perspective dry-cleaners must take a licensing exam which may require attending a school. Profits are higher than in other states. Existing firms are staunch defenders of the law. 727727
728
APPLICATION 10.1: Should You Need a License to Shampoo a Dog?
Liquor Stores Currently 16 states operate liquor-store monopolies. In 34 other states, liquor stores are licensed and subject to restrictions on pricing and advertising. States with licenses have higher prices. Existing owners are most stringent supporters. Taxicabs Many cities limit number of taxicabs. In Toronto, prices are about 225 percent higher. New York city taxi medallions cost about $250,000. 728728
729
Profit Maximization To maximize profits, a monopoly will chose the output at which marginal revenue equals marginal costs. The demand curve is downward-sloping so marginal revenue is less than price. To sell more, the firm must lower its price on all units to be sold in order to generate the extra demand. 729729
730
A Graphic Treatment A monopoly will produce an output level in which price exceeds marginal cost. Q* is the profit maximizing output level in Figure 10.1. If a firm produced less than Q*, the loss in revenue (MR) will exceed the reduction in costs (MC) so profits would decline. 730730
731
FIGURE 10.1: Profit Maximization and Price Determination in a Monopoly Market
MC Price AC E P* A C D MR Quantity Q* per week 731731
732
A Graphical Treatment The increase in costs (MC)would exceed the gain in revenue (MR) if output exceeds Q*. Hence, profits are maximized when MR = MC. Given output level Q*, the firm chooses P* on the demand curve because that is what consumers are willing to pay for Q*. The market equilibrium is P*, Q*. 732732
733
Monopoly Supply Curve With a fixed market demand curve, the supply “curve” for a monopoly is the one point where MR = MC (point E in Figure 10.1.) If the demand curve shifts, the marginal revenue curve will also shift and a new profit maximizing output will be chosen. Unlike perfect competition, these output, price points do not represent a supply curve. 733733
734
Monopoly Profits Monopoly profits are shown as the area of the rectangle P*EAC in Figure 10.1. Profits equal (P - AC)Q*, If price exceeds average cost at Q* > 0, profits will be positive. Since entry is prohibited, these profits can exits in the long run. 734734
735
Monopoly Rents Monopoly rents are the profits a monopolist earns in the long run. These profits are a return to the factor that forms the basis of the monopoly. Patent, favorable location, license, etc.. Others might be willing to pay up to the amount of this rent to operate the monopoly to obtain its profits. 735735
736
What’s Wrong with Monopoly?
Profitability Monopoly power is the ability to raise price above marginal cost. Profits are the difference between price and average cost. In Figure 10.2, one firm earns positive economic profits (a) while the other (b) earns zero economic profits. 736736
737
FIGURE 10.2: Monopoly Profits Depend on the Relationship between the Demand and Average Cost Curves
Price Price MC AC MC AC P* P*=AC AC D D MR MR Q* Quantity Q* Quantity per week per week (a) Monopoly with Large Profits (b) Zero-Profit Monopoly 737737
738
What’s Wrong with Monopoly?
If monopoly rents accrue to inputs, the monopoly may appear to not earn a profit. People may also be concerned that economic profits go to the wealthy. However, as with the Navajo blanket monopoly, the profits of the low-income Navajo are coming from the more wealthy tourists. 738738
739
APPLICATION 10.2: Who Makes Money at Casinos?
U.S. casinos take in about $50 billion each year in gross revenues. In some markets, casinos operate quite competitively…there are so many casinos in Las Vegas that it is unlikely that any one of them has much power to set prices monopolistically. However, many other locales have adopted such restrictions on the numbers and sizes of casinos that owners of these casinos are able to capture substantial monopoly profits. 739739
740
Riverboat Gambling A number of states on the Mississippi River permit casino gambling only in riverboats. One clear impact of the way that riverboat gambling is regulated is to provide monopoly rents to a number of different parties. States are the primary beneficiaries – they usually tax net profits from riverboats at more than 30 percent. The owners of riverboats also make monopoly profits. 740740
741
Indian Gaming The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 clarified the relationship between state and the Indian tribes living within their borders. The Act made it possible for these tribes to offer casino gambling under certain circumstances. Since the passage of the Act, more than 120 tribes have adopted some form of legalized gambling. The distributional consequences of Indian gaming are generally beneficial. 741741
742
What’s Wrong with Monopoly
Distortion of Resource Allocation Monopolists restrict their production to maximize profits. Since price exceeds marginal cost, consumers are willing to pay more for extra output than it costs to produce it. From societies point of view, output is too low as some mutually beneficial transactions are missed. 742742
743
Distortion of Resource Allocation
In Figure 10.3 the monopolist is assumed to produce under conditions of constant marginal cost. Further, it is assumed that if the good where produced by a perfectly competitive industry, the long-run cost curve would be the same as the monopolist’s. 743743
744
Distortion of Resource Allocation
In this situation, a perfectly competitive industry would produce Q* where demand equals long- run supply. A monopolist produces at Q** where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. The restriction in output (Q* - Q**) is a measure of the harm done by a monopoly. 744744
745
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price D MR P** B MC ( =AC) A 745745 Q** Quantity per week
746
Monopolistic Distortions and Transfers of Welfare
The competitive output level (Q* in Figure 10.3) is produced at price P*. The total value to consumers is the area DEQ*0 Consumers’ pay P*EQ*0. Consumer surplus is DEP*. 746746
747
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and Distributional Effects of Monopoly
MR Price P** B E P* MC ( =AC) A 747747 Q** Q* Quantity per week
748
Allocational Effects A monopolist would product Q** at price P**.
Total value to the consumer is reduced by the area BEQ*Q**. However, the area AEQ*Q** is money freed for consumers to spend elsewhere. The loss of consumer surplus is BEA which is often called the deadweight loss from monopoly. 748748
749
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price MR P** B E P* MC ( =AC) A Value of transferred inputs 749749 Q** Q* Quantity per week
750
Distributional Effects
In Figure 10.3 monopoly profits equal the area P**BAP*. This would be consumer surplus under perfect competition. It does not necessarily represent a loss of social welfare. This is the redistributional effects of monopoly that may or may not be desirable. 750750
751
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price D MR P** B Transfer from consumers to firm E P* MC ( =AC) A Value of transferred inputs 751751 Q** Q* Quantity per week
752
FIGURE 10.3: Allocational and Distributional Effects of Monopoly
Price D MR P** B Transfer from consumers to firm Deadweight loss E P* MC ( =AC) A Value of transferred inputs 752752 Q** Q* Quantity per week
753
Monopolists’ Costs Monopolists costs may be higher due to: 753753
Resources spent to achieve monopoly profits such as ways to erect barriers to entry. Monopolists may expend resources for lobbying or legal fees to seek special favors from the government such as restrictions on entry through licensing or favorable treatment from regulatory agencies. 753753
754
Monopolists’ Costs The possibility that costs may be higher for monopolists complicates the comparison of monopoly with perfect competition. Studies that have attempted to measure welfare losses from monopoly find estimates are sensitive to assumptions. Estimates range from as little as 0.5 percent of GDP to as much as 5 percent of GDP. 754754
755
APPLICATION 10.3: Pricing Problems in Dallas
“People in the same trade seldom meet together even for merriment and diversion but the conversation ends … in some contrivance to raise prices” (Adam Smith) The CEO of American Airlines was taped in a conversation where he suggested that if Braniff Airway would raise prices, American Airlines would follow. 755755
756
APPLICATION 10.3: Pricing Problems in Dallas
Later, American Airlines was accused of predatory pricing. It was accused of lowering prices to drive small carriers out of the market and then raise prices after the small firms leave. Unless prices are below average variable cost (a “shutdown standard”), this pricing behavior is not necessarily illegal. 756756
757
A Numerical Illustration of Deadweight Loss
Table 10.1 repeats the information about the cassette tape market used as an illustration in previous chapters. If tapes have a $3 marginal cost, this would be the price under perfect competition. As shown in the Table, this would result in consumer surplus equal to $21. 757757
758
TABLE 10.1: Effects of Monopolization on the Market for Cassette Tapes
758758 Competitive Equilibrium: (P = MC) Monopoly equilibrium: (MR = MC)
759
A Numerical Illustration of Deadweight Loss
If the industry were a monopoly the firm would produce where marginal revenue equals marginal cost, an output of 4 units. As shown in the Table, this would result in $12 of monopoly profits and $6 of consumer surplus which totals $18. The deadweight loss is the difference between the $21 and the $18 or $3. 759759
760
Price Discrimination Price discrimination occurs if identical units of output are sold at different prices. If the monopolist could sell its product at different prices to different customers, new opportunities exits as shown in Figure 10.4. Some consumer surplus still exists (area DBP**). The possibility of mutually beneficial trades exist as represented by the area BEA. 760760
761
FIGURE 10.4: Targets for Price Discrimination
MR B P** E MC ( =AC) P* A 761761 Q** Q* Quantity per week
762
Perfect Price Discrimination
Perfect price discrimination is selling each unit of output for the highest price obtainable. The firm would sell the first unit at slightly below 0D (Figure 10.4), the next for slightly less, and so on until the firm reaches Q*, where a lower price would result in less profit. All consumer surplus (area P*DE) would be monopoly profit. 762762
763
Perfect Price Discrimination
Since the monopolist would produce and sell Q* units of output, which is the competitive equilibrium. This pricing scheme requires a way to determine what each consumer would be willing to pay, and The monopolist must be able to stop consumers from selling to each other. 763763
764
APPLICATION 10.4: Financial Aid at Private Colleges
Prior to the 1990s the U.S. government proposed a formula to determine a student’s need, and schools would offer such aid. Because the formula differed among colleges, the net price (family contribution) differed. The Overlap Group (23 prestigious colleges) negotiated the differences so that each college offered the same net price. 764764
765
APPLICATION 10.3: Financial Aid at Private Colleges
The U.S. Justice Department challenged this pricing scheme as price fixing. Although the schools signed a consent decree, they were exempted from the antitrust laws by the Higher Education Act of 1992. 765765
766
APPLICATION 10.3: Financial Aid at Private Colleges
Several innovative pricing schemes were put forth by schools in the 1990s. Several schools adopted sophisticated statistical models used to offer the lowest price necessary to get a particular student to accept an offer of admission. Schools using this approach come very close to perfect price discrimination. 766766
767
Quantity Discounts Quantity discounts allow some sales at the monopolist’s price (P** in Figure 10.4), and sales beyond Q** at a lower price which increases profits. Examples include a second pizza for a lower price and supermarket coupons. The monopolist must keep customers who buy at lower prices to sell to customers at a price less than P**. 767767
768
Two-Part Tariffs In this pricing scheme, customers must pay an entry fee for the right to purchase a good. A classic example is the pricing of movie popcorn. The entry fee, which should be set to obtain as much of the consumer surplus as possible, is the price of movie itself. Popcorn is then priced to maximize admission so long as the price exceeds cost. 768768
769
APPLICATION 10.4: Pricing at the Magic Kingdom
During the 1960s Disneyland patrons had to purchase a “passport” containing a ticket for admission to the rides (see Table 1 for the structure of a typical passport). Because of higher labor costs, Disney switched to an entry fee with zero marginal prices for all rides. 769769
770
TABLE 1: Structure of a Typical Disneyland Passport
770770
771
APPLICATION 10.4: Pricing at the Magic Kingdom
Disney could also use other price discrimination practices such as reduced prices for multiday tickets. With ever-growing attractions and newer ticket technology (especially optical scanners) has allowed Disney to again price discriminate in a manner similar to their practices in the 1960s. 771771
772
Market Separation If the market can be separated into two or more categories may be able to chare different prices. Figure 10.5 shows the separation into two markets. The profit-maximizing decision is to sell Q1* in the first market and Q2* in the second market where, in both cases, MR = MC. 772772
773
FIGURE 10.5: Separated Markets Raise the Possibility of Price Discrimination
2 D 2 MC D 1 MR MR 1 2 Quantity in market 1 Q* Q* Quantity in market 2 1 2 773773
774
Market Separation The two market prices will be P1and P2 respectively.
As shown in Figure 10.5, the price-discriminating monopolist will charge a higher price in the market with the more inelastic demand. Examples include book publishers charging higher prices in the U.S. or charging different prices for a movie in the day than at night. 774774
775
Pricing for Multiproduct Monopolies
If a firm has pricing power in markets for several related products, other strategies can be used. Firms can require users of one product to also buy a related product such as coffee filters bought with coffee machines. Firms can also create pricing bundles such as option packages on cars or computers. 775775
776
APPLICATION 10.6: Bundling of Satellite TV Offerings
Theory of Program Bundling Four consumer’s willingness to pay for either sports or movie programming is shown in Figure 1. Two, A and D, are willing to pay $20 per month for sports (A) or movies (D). B want sports but some movies and C wants movies with some sports. 776776
777
FIGURE 1: Willingness to Pay for Cable TV Options
Movies 20 D C 15 B A 8 15 20 Sports 777777
778
APPLICATION 10.6: Bundling of Satellite TV Offerings
Charging $15 per each package would yield $60 from these customers. A bundling scheme that charges $20 per package, if purchased individually, or $23 if both are bought, would yield $86. Thus, revenue can be increased by the proper choice of pricing bundles of services. 778778
779
APPLICATION 10.6: Bundling of Satellite TV Offerings
Bundling by Direct TV, Inc. Bundling prices are shown in Table 1, where the incremental costs help to demonstrate the bundling price scheme. Notice adding sports costs $10 extra, but the full movie package adds $43 ($15 for Showtime and $28 for HBO/STARZ). Both packages together ($51) offers a minor savings over buying the separate packages. 779779
780
TABLE 1: Sample Direct TV Program Options
780780
781
Marginal Cost Pricing Regulation and the Natural Monopoly Dilemma
By marginal cost pricing the deadweight loss from monopolies is minimized. However, this would require a natural monopoly to operate at a loss. A unregulated monopoly would produce QA at price PA in Figure 10.6, yielding a profit of PAABC. 781781
782
FIGURE 10.6: Price Regulation for a Natural Monopoly
B C AC MC MR D 782782 Q Q Quantity A R per week
783
Marginal Cost Pricing Regulation and the Natural Monopoly Dilemma
Marginal cost pricing of PR which results in QR demanded would generate an a loss equal to the area GFEPR because PR < AC. Either marginal cost pricing must be abandoned or the government must subsidize the monopoly. 783783
784
FIGURE 10.6: Price Regulation for a Natural Monopoly
B C F H G AC E P MC R J MR D 784784 Q Q Quantity A R per week
785
Two-Tier Pricing Systems
Under this system the monopoly is permitted to charge some users a high price and charge “marginal” users a low price. The regulatory commission might allow the monopoly to charge PA and sell QA to one class of buyers. Other users would pay PR and would demand QR - QA. 785785
786
Two-Tier Pricing Systems
At total output of QR average costs are 0G. Under this system, monopoly profits (area PAAHG) balance the losses (area HFEJ). Here the “marginal user” pays marginal cost and is subsidized by the “intramarginal” user. 786786
787
APPLICATION 10.7: Can Anyone Understand Telephone Pricing?
In January 1, 1984 AT& T formally divested itself of its seven local Bell Operating Companies as the result of a 1974 Department of Justice antitrust suit. The goal of the restructuring was to improve the performance and competitiveness of the U.S. telephone industry. 787787
788
APPLICATION 10.7: Can Anyone Understand Telephone Pricing?
Subsidization of Local Phone Service Prior to the breakup, regulators forced AT&T to subsidize local residential phone services. They covered these losses by charging above- average costs on long distance calls. Residential services cost an average of $28 per month but the typical charge was $11. 788788
789
APPLICATION 10.7: Can Anyone Understand Telephone Pricing?
After the breakup regulators had to choose between implementing huge increases in residential telephone rates or continuing subsidies. The politically expedient choice was to force AT&T and other to continue to subsidize local residential rates. 789789
790
APPLICATION 10.7: Can Anyone Understand Telephone Pricing?
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 The government used this act to increase entry into the local phone market to try to reduce the monopoly power of local providers. This was attempted by specifying specific conditions under which these local companies could offer long distance service. To obtain this right, local companies had to sell services to potential entrants into their market. 790790
791
Rate of Return Regulation
Regulators may permit a monopoly to charge a price above average cost that will earn a “fair” rate of return on investment. If the allowed rate exceeds that an owner might earn under competitive circumstances, the firm has an incentive to use relatively more capital input than needed to minimize costs. 791791
792
Imperfect Competition
Chapter 11 Imperfect Competition © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
793
Imperfect Competition
Pricing in these markets falls between perfect competition and monopoly. Three topics considered: Pricing of homogeneous goods in markets with few firms. Product differentiation in these markets. How entry and exit affect long-run outcomes in imperfectly competitive markets. 793793
794
Pricing of Homogeneous Goods
In this market a relatively few firms produce a single homogeneous good. Assume demanders are price takers. Assume there are no transactions or informational costs. These assumptions result in a single equilibrium price for the good. Initially, assume a fixed, small number of identical firms. 794794
795
Quasi-Competitive Model
A model of oligopoly pricing in which each firm acts as a price taker even though there may be few firms is a quasi-competitive model. As a price taker, a firm will produce where price equals long-run marginal costs. This equilibrium will resemble the perfectly competitive solution, even with few firms. 795795
796
Quasi-Competitive Model
In Figure 11.1, the quasi-competitive equilibrium is PC (= MC), QC. This equilibrium represents the highest quantity and lowest price that can prevail in the long run given the demand curve D. A lower price would not be sustainable in the long run because it would not cover average costs. 796796
797
FIGURE 11.1: Pricing under Imperfect Competition
Price C P MC C D MR 797797 Q Quantity C per week
798
Cartel Model A model of pricing in which firms coordinate their decisions to act as a multiplant monopoly is the cartel model. Assuming marginal costs are constant and equal across firms, the cartel output is point M (the monopoly output) in Figure 11.1. The plan would require a certain output by each firm and how to share the monopoly profits. 798798
799
FIGURE 11.1: Pricing under Imperfect Competition
Price P M M P A A C P MC C D MR Q Q Q Quantity 799799 M A C per week
800
Cartel Model Maintaining this cartel solution poses three problems:
Cartel formations may be illegal, as it is in the U.S. by Section I of the Sherman Act of 1890. It requires a considerable amount of costly information be available to the cartel. The market demand function. Each firm’s marginal cost function. 800800
801
Cartel Model 801801 The cartel solution may be fundamentally unstable.
Each member produces an output level for which price exceeds marginal cost. Each member could increase its own profits by producing more output than allocated by the cartel. If the cartel directors are not able to enforce their policies, the cartel my collapse. 801801
802
APPLICATION 11.1: The De Beers Cartel
In the 1870s the discovery of the rich diamond fields in South Africa lead to major gem and industrial markets. After a competitive start, the ownership of the richest mines became incorporated into the De Beers Consolidated Mines which continues to dominate the world diamond trade. 802802
803
APPLICATION 11.1: The De Beers Cartel
Operation of the De Beers Cartel Since the 1880s diamonds found outside of South Africa are usually sold to De Beers who markets the diamonds to the final consumers through its central selling organization (CSO) in London. By controlling supply, the CSO maintains high prices which have been estimated to be as much as one thousand times marginal cost. 803803
804
APPLICATION 11.1: The De Beers Cartel
Dealing with Threats to the Cartel This large markup promotes threat of entry with any new diamond discovery. De Beers has used its market power to control would-be-chiselers. They drove down prices when the former Soviet Union and Zaire tried market entry in the 1980s. New finds in Australia were sold to the CSO rather than try to fight the cartel. 804804
805
APPLICATION 11.1: The De Beers Cartel
The Glamour of D Beers De Beers controls most print and television advertising, including “Diamonds Are Forever”. They convinced Japanese couples to adopt the western habit of buying engagement rings. De Beers has attempted to generate a brand name with customers to get consumers to judge De Beers diamonds superior to other suppliers. 805805
806
The Cournot Model The Cournot model of duopoly is one in which each firm assumes the other firm;s output will not change if it changes its own output level. Assume A single owner of a costless spring. A downward sloping demand curve for water has the equation Q = P. 806806
807
The Cournot Model As shown in Figure 11.2, the monpolist would maximize profit by producing Q = 60 with a price = $60 and profits (revenue) = $3600. Note, this output equals one-half of the quantity that would be demanded at a price of zero. Assume a second spring is discovered. 807807
808
FIGURE 11.2: Spring Monopolist’s Output Choice
Price 120 60 MR D 808808 Output per week 60 120
809
Duopoly Model Cournot assumed that firm A, say, chooses its output level (qA) assuming the output of firm B (qB) is fixed and will not adjust to A’s actions. The total market output is given by 809809
810
Duopoly Model If the demand curve is linear, the marginal revenue curve will bisect the horizontal axis between the price axis and the demand curve. Thus, the profit maximizing point is given by 810810
811
Duopoly Model If firm B chooses to produce 60 units, firm A would choose 30 [=( ) 2]. Equation 11.4 is called a reaction function which, in the Cournot model, is a function or graph that shows how much one firm will produce given what the other firm produces. 811811
812
FIGURE 11.3: Cournot Reaction Functions in a Duopoly Market
120 Output of firm B(qB) Firm A’s reactions Output of firm A(qA) 812812 60 120
813
Duopoly Model Firm A’s reaction function is shown in Figure 11.3. Firm B’s reaction function is given below and also shown in Figure 11.3 813813
814
FIGURE 11.3: Cournot Reaction Functions in a Duopoly Market
120 Output of firm B(qB) Firm A’s reactions 60 Equilibrium Firm B’s reactions Output of firm A(qA) 814814 60 120
815
Cournot Equilibrium The actions of the two firms are consistent with each other only at the point where the two lines intersect. The point of intersection is the Cournot equilibrium, a solution to the Cournot model in which each firm makes the correct assumption about what the other firm will produce. 815815
816
FIGURE 11.3: Cournot Reaction Functions in a Duopoly Market
120 Output of firm B(qB) Firm A’s reactions 60 Equilibrium 40 Firm B’s reactions Output of firm A(qA) 816816 40 60 120
817
Cournot Equilibrium In this Cournot equilibrium each firm produces 40 units of output. Total industry profit is $3,200, $1600 for each firm). Because the firms do not fully coordinate their actions, their profits are less than the cartel profit ($3,600) but much greater than the competitive solution where P = MC = 0. 817817
818
Price Leadership Model
A model in which one dominant firm takes reactions of all other firms into account in its output and pricing decisions is the price leadership model. A formal model assumes the industry is composed of a single price-setting leader and a competitive fringe which is a group of firms that act as price takers. 818818
819
Price Leadership Model
This model is shown in Figure 11.4. The demand curve D represents the total demand curve for the industry’s product. The supply curve SC represents the supply decisions of all the firms in the competitive fringe. 819819
820
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price Leadership Model
SC D 820820 Quantity per week
821
Price Leadership Model
The demand curve (D’) for the dominant firm is derived as follows: For a price of P1 or above the competitive fringe will supply the entire market. For a price of P2 or below, the dominant firm will supply the entire market. Between P2 and P1 the curve D’ is constructed by subtracting what the fringe will supply from the total market demand. 821821
822
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price Leadership Model
SC P 1 D’ P 2 D Quantity per week 822822
823
Price Leadership Model
Given D’, the leader’s marginal revenue curve is MR’ which equals the leader’s marginal cost (MC) at the profit maximizing level QL. Market price is PL and equilibrium output is QT (= QC + QL). The model does not explain how the leader is chosen. 823823
824
FIGURE 11.4: Formal Model of Price Leadership Model
SC P 1 D’ P L P 2 MC MR’ D Quantity per week 824824 Q Q Q C L T
825
APPLICATION 11.2: Cournot in California
Borenstein and Bushnell paper: Perhaps the most elaborate attempt at modeling the impact of electricity deregulation in California. Authors focus on competition between the three major electricity-generating firms. They argue that the smaller suppliers can be treated as competitive suppliers but that the major in-state producers behave in the way assumed in the Cournot model. 825825
826
APPLICATION 11.2: Cournot in California
Borenstein and Bushnell show that under certain circumstances there is substantial market power in California wholesale electricity markets. One way to measure that power is by the Lerner Index, the ratio (P – MC/P). The authors showed with the Lerner Index that during peak periods, equilibrium in these markets is far from the competitive ideal. They also show that market power can be significantly restrained by larger price elasticities of demand for electricity. 826826
827
Product Differentiation: Market Definition and Firms Choices
A product group is a set of differentiated products that are highly substitutable for one another. Assume few firms in each product group. Firms will incur additional costs to differentiate their product up to the point where the additional revenue from this activity equals the marginal cost. 827827
828
Product Differentiation: Market Equilibrium
The demand curve for each firm depends on the prices and product differentiation activities of its competitors. The firm’s demand curve may shift frequently, and its position at any point in time may only be partially understood. Each firm must make assumptions about its competitors’ actions, and whatever one firm decides may affect its competitor’s actions. 828828
829
APPLICATION 11.3: Price Leadership in Financial Markets
The Prime Rate at New York Commercial Banks Major New York commercial banks quote a “prime rate” which purports to be the interest rate that they charge on loans to their most creditworthy customers. Recent research indicates actual pricing is more complex, but the prime provides a visible and influential indicator or rate change. 829829
830
APPLICATION 11.3: Price Leadership in Financial Markets
While rates changes are sluggish, when “large” changes (0.25 or more) are required one of the major banks will act like a leader and announce a new prime rate on a trial basis. After a few days, either most banks will follow or the initiator will return to its old rate. 830830
831
APPLICATION 11.3: Price Leadership in Financial Markets
A number of researchers have found that rates tend to rise soon after an increase in bank costs, but decline only slowly when costs fall. Similarly, a rise in the prime tends to hurt the stock prices of banks that increase because the increase signals that profits hare being squeezed by costs. Alternatively, stock prices rise when the prime rate falls. 831831
832
APPLICATION 11.3: Price Leadership in Financial Markets
Price Leadership in the Foreign Exchange Market The large market for world currencies is dominated by major financial institutions and is heavily influenced by the “intervention” of various nations’ central banks. Because central bank intervention is not announced in advance, well informed traders may have an information market advantage. 832832
833
APPLICATION 11.3: Price Leadership in Financial Markets
In a study of the German Mark (DM), an author found that one bank tended to pay the role of leader in setting the DM/$ exchange rate. This leadership role arose because of the bank’s ability to foresee intervention by the German central bank in exchange markets. Quoted exchange rate between 25 and 60 minutes before the intervention were copied by other banks, while within 25 minutes (with information more diffused) no clear cut pattern emerged. 833833
834
APPLICATION 11.4: Competition in Breakfast Space
Industrial Concentration Three major firms control approximately 80 percent of the market. Returns on invested capital are more than double those of the average industry. It is unclear why the market is not more competitive since there do not seem to be any major economies of scale and no obvious barriers to entry. 834834
835
APPLICATION 11.4: Competition in Breakfast Space
The FTC Complaint and Product Differentiation In 1972 the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) claimed the largest producers actions tended to establish monopoly-like conditions. Proliferation of new, highly advertised, brands left no room for potential new entrants. Brand identification also prevented new entrants from duplicating existing cereal. 835835
836
APPLICATION 11.4: Competition in Breakfast Space
Demise of the Legal Case Firms claimed that they were engaging in active competition by creating new cereal brands. Also, many new “natural” cereals did enter the market in the 1970s. The case was quietly dropped in 1982. Recent studies still indicate a lack of competition and continued higher profits. 836836
837
APPLICATION 11.4: Competition in Breakfast Space
One of illustrating the contention that major firms so proliferated their brands so as to keep potential competitors out was developed by S. Salop. Figure 1 depicts consumers evenly located along the circle which may represent an actual geographic space or product space. The presence of two firms (A and B) with two products each deters entry by C. 837837
838
. . . . Application Figure 1: Salop’s Model of Spatial Competition.
B1 C . . B2 A2 838838
839
Product Differentiation: Entry by New Firms
The degree to which firms can enter the market plays an important role. Even with few firms, to the extent that entry is possible, long-run profits are constrained. If entry is completely costless, long-run economic profits will be zero (as in the competitive case). 839839
840
Monopolistic Competition
If firms are price takers, P = MR = MC for profit maximization. Since P = AC, if entry is to result in zero profits, production will take place where MC = AC (at minimum average cost). If, say through product differentiation, firms have some control over price, each firm faces a downward sloping demand curve. 840840
841
Monopolistic Competition
Entry still may reduce profits to zero, but production at minimum cost is not assured. Monopolistic competition is a market in which each firm faces a negatively sloped demand curve and there are no barriers to entry. This type of market is illustrated in Figure 11.5. 841841
842
FIGURE 11.5: Entry Reduces Profitability in Oligopoly
Price, costs d mr AC MC P* Quantity per week q* 842842
843
Monopolistic Competition
Initially the demand curve is d, marginal revenue is mr, and q* is the profit-maximizing output level. If entry is costless, the entry shifts the firm’s demand curve inward to d’ where profits are zero. At output level q’, average costs are not minimum, and qm - q’ is excess capacity. 843843
844
FIGURE 11.5: Entry Reduces Profitability in Oligopoly
Price, costs d mr AC MC d’ P* P’ mr’ Quantity per week q’ q* qm 844844
845
Sustainability of Monopolistic Competition
Monopolistic competition focuses only on the behavior of actual entrants but ignores the effects of potential entrants. A broader perspective of the “ invisible hand” is the distinction between competition in the market and competition for the market. 845845
846
Determination of Industry Structure
Let q* represent that output level for which average costs are minimized. Let Q* represent the total market for the commodity when price equals market (and average) cost. The number of firms, n, in the industry (which may be relatively small) is given by 846846
847
Determination of Industry Structure
As shown in Figure 11.6, for example, only four firms fulfill the market demand Q*. The contestability assumption will ensure competitive behavior even though firms may recognize strategic relationships among themselves. The potential for entrants constrains the types of behavior that are possible. 847847
848
FIGURE 11.6: Contestability and Industry Structure
Price AC AC AC AC 2 3 4 1 P* D Quantity per week q* 2* 3* Q* = 4* q q q 848848
849
APPLICATION 11.4: Airline Deregulation Revisited
Airlines Contestability Since planes are mobile, they can be moved into a market that promises excess profits. Such potential entry should hold prices at competitive levels even with few firms. However, terminal facilities are market specific and brand loyalty appears to exist. Also, some major airports have limited potential for growth. 849849
850
APPLICATION 11.4: Airline Deregulation Revisited
Effects of Deregulation Studies suggest that fares declined after deregulation with one study suggesting yearly gains to customers of about $8.6 billion. However, this study found that additional welfare gains of about $2.5 billion were not realized because of the limitations of landing slots and computer reservations systems may aid in price collusion among major airlines. 850850
851
APPLICATION 11.4: Airline Deregulation Revisited
Trend in Airline Competition Many new airlines entered after the deregulation, but they were often consolidated into larger carriers. Several existing airlines went out of business. The hub-and-spoke designs of flight networks were introduced which has lead to dominance of one or two airlines in a hub city which may have resulted in higher fares. 851851
852
Barriers to Entry The existence of barriers to entry change the type of analysis. In addition to those previously discussed, barriers include brand loyalty and strategic pricing. Firms may drive out potential entrants with low prices followed later by price increases or they may buy up smaller firms. 852852
853
Strategy and Game Theory
Chapter 12 Strategy and Game Theory © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
854
Basic Concepts Any situation in which individuals must make strategic choices and in which the final outcome will depend on what each person chooses to do can be viewed as a game. Game theory models seek to portray complex strategic situations in a highly simplified setting. 854854
855
Basic Concepts All games have three basic elements:
Players Strategies Payoffs Players can make binding agreements in cooperative games, but can not in noncooperative games, which are studied in this chapter. 855855
856
Players A player is a decision maker and can be anything from individuals to entire nations. Players have the ability to choose among a set of possible actions. Games are often characterized by the fixed number of players. Generally, the specific identity of a play is not important to the game. 856856
857
Strategies A strategy is a course of action available to a player.
Strategies may be simple or complex. In noncooperative games each player is uncertain about what the other will do since players can not reach agreements among themselves. 857857
858
Payoffs Payoffs are the final returns to the players at the conclusion of the game. Payoffs are usually measure in utility although sometimes measure monetarily. In general, players are able to rank the payoffs from most preferred to least preferred. Players seek the highest payoff available. 858858
859
Equilibrium Concepts In the theory of markets an equilibrium occurred when all parties to the market had no incentive to change his or her behavior. When strategies are chosen, an equilibrium would also provide no incentives for the players to alter their behavior further. The most frequently used equilibrium concept is a Nash equilibrium. 859859
860
Nash Equilibrium A Nash equilibrium is a pair of strategies (a*,b*) in a two-player game such that a* is an optimal strategy for A against b* and b* is an optimal strategy for B against A*. Players can not benefit from knowing the equilibrium strategy of their opponents. Not every game has a Nash equilibrium, and some games may have several. 860860
861
An Illustrative Advertising Game
Two firms (A and B) must decide how much to spend on advertising Each firm may adopt either a higher (H) budget or a low (L) budget. The game is shown in extensive (tree) form in Figure 12.1 861861
862
An Illustrative Advertising Game
A makes the first move by choosing either H or L at the first decision “node.” Next, B chooses either H or L, but the large oval surrounding B’s two decision nodes indicates that B does not know what choice A made. 862862
863
FIGURE 12.1: The Advertising Game in Extensive Form
7,5 L B H 5,4 L A L 6,4 B H H 6,3 863863
864
An Illustrative Advertising Game
The numbers at the end of each branch, measured in thousand or millions of dollars, are the payoffs. For example, if A chooses H and B chooses L, profits will be 6 for firm A and 4 for firm B. The game in normal (tabular) form is shown in Table 12.1 where A’s strategies are the rows and B’s strategies are the columns. 864864
865
Table 12.1: The Advertising Game in Normal Form
865865
866
Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibria
A dominant strategy is optimal regardless of the strategy adopted by an opponent. As shown in Table 12.1 or Figure 12.1, the dominant strategy for B is L since this yields a larger payoff regardless of A’s choice. If A chooses H, B’s choice of L yields 5, one better than if the choice of H was made. If A chooses L, B’s choice of L yields 4 which is also one better than the choice of H. 866866
867
Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibria
A will recognize that B has a dominant strategy and choose the strategy which will yield the highest payoff, given B’s choice of L. A will also choose L since the payoff of 7 is one better than the payoff from choosing H. The strategy choice will be (A: L, B: L) with payoffs of 7 to A and 5 to B. 867867
868
Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibria
Since A knows B will play L, A’s best play is also L. If B knows A will play L, B’s best play is also L. Thus, the (A: L, B: L) strategy is a Nash equilibrium: it meets the symmetry required of the Nash criterion. No other strategy is a Nash equilibrium. 868868
869
Two Simple Games Table 12.2 (a) illustrates the children’s finger game, “Rock, Scissors, Paper.” The zero payoffs along the diagonal show that if players adopt the same strategy, no payments are made. In other cases, the payoffs indicate a $1 payment from the loser to winner under the usual hierarchy (Rock breaks Scissors, Scissors cut Paper, Paper covers Rock). 869869
870
TABLE 12.2 (a): Rock, Scissors, Paper--No Nash Equilibria
870870
871
Two Simple Games This game has no equilibrium.
Any strategy pair is unstable since it offers at least one of the players an incentive to adopt another strategy. For example, (A: Scissors, B: Scissors) provides and incentive for either A or B to choose Rock. Also, (A: Paper, B: Rock) encourages B to choose Scissors. 871871
872
Two Simple Games Table 12.2 (b) shows a game where a husband (A) and wife (B) have different preferences for a vacation (A prefers mountains, B prefers the seaside) However, both players prefer a vacation together (where both players receive positive utility) than one spent apart (where neither players receives positive utility). 872872
873
TABLE 12.2 (b): Battle of the Sexes--Two Nash Equilibria
873873
874
Two Simple Games At the strategy (A: Mountain, B: Mountain), neither player can gain by knowing the other’s strategy. The same is true with the strategy (A: Seaside, B: Seaside). Thus, this game has two Nash equilibria. 874874
875
APPLICATION 12.1: Nash Equilibrium on the Beach
Applications of the Nash equilibrium concept have been used to analyze where firms choose to operate. The concept can be used to analyze where firm’s locate geographically. The concept can also be used to analyze where firm’s locate in the spectrum of specific types of products. 875875
876
APPLICATION 12.1: Nash Equilibrium on the Beach
Hotelling’s Beach Hotelling looked at the pricing of ice cream sellers along a linear beach. If people are evenly spread over the length of the beach, he showed that each seller had an advantage selling to nearby consumers who incur lower (walking) costs. The Nash equilibrium concept can be used to show the optimal location for each seller. 876876
877
APPLICATION 12.1: Nash Equilibrium on the Beach
Milk Marketing in Japan In southern Japan, four local marketing boards regulate the sale of milk. It appears that each must take into account what the other boards are doing, since milk can be shipped between regions. A Nash equilibrium similar to the Cournot model found prices about 30 percent above competitive levels. 877877
878
APPLICATION 12.1: Nash Equilibrium on the Beach
Television Scheduling Firms can also choose where to locate along the spectrum that represents consumers’ preferences for characteristics of a product. Firms must take into account what other firms are doing, so game theory applies. In television, viewers’ preferences are defined along two dimensions--program content and broadcast timing. 878878
879
APPLICATION 12.1: Nash Equilibrium on the Beach
In general, the Nash equilibrium tended to focus on central locations There is much duplication of both program types and schedule timing This has left “room” for specialized cable channels to attract viewers with special preferences for content or viewing times. Sometimes the equilibria tend to be stable (soap operas and sitcoms) and sometimes unstable (local news programming). 879879
880
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
The Prisoner’s Dilemma is a game in which the optimal outcome for the players is unstable. The name comes from the following situation. Two people are arrested for a crime. The district attorney has little evidence but is anxious to extract a confession. 880880
881
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
The DA separates the suspects and tells each, “If you confess and your companion doesn’t, I can promise you a six-month sentence, whereas your companion will get ten years. If you both confess, you will each get a three year sentence.” Each suspect knows that if neither confess, they will be tried for a lesser crime and will receive two-year sentences. 881881
882
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
The normal form of the game is shown in Table The confess strategy dominates for both players so it is a Nash equilibria. However, an agreement not to confess would reduce their prison terms by one year each. This agreement would appear to be the rational solution. 882882
883
TABLE 12.3: The Prisoner’s Dilemma
883883
884
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
The “rational” solution is not stable, however, since each player has an incentive to cheat. Hence the dilemma: Outcomes that appear to be optimal are not stable and cheating will usually prevail. 884884
885
Prisoner’s Dilemma Applications
Table 12.4 contains an illustration in the advertising context. The Nash equilibria (A: H, B: H) is unstable since greater profits could be earned if they mutually agreed to low advertising. Similar situations include airlines giving “bonus mileage” or farmers unwilling to restrict output. The inability of cartels to enforce agreements can result in competitive like outcomes. 885885
886
Table 12.4: An Advertising Game with a Desirable Outcome That is Unstable
886886
887
Cooperation and Repetition
In the version of the advertising game shown in Table 12.5, the adoption of strategy H by firm A has disastrous consequences for B (-50 if L is chosen, -25 if H is chosen). Without communication, the Nash equilibrium is (A: H, B: H) which results in profits of +15 for A and +10 for B. 887887
888
TABLE 12.5: A Threat Game in Advertising
888888
889
Cooperation and Repetition
However, A might threaten to use strategy H unless B plays L to increase profits by 5. If a game is replayed many times, cooperative behavior my be fostered. Some market are thought to be characterized by “tacit collusion” although firms never meet. Repetition of the threat game might provide A with the opportunity to punish B for failing to choose L. 889889
890
Many-Period Games Figure 12.2 repeats the advertising game except that B knows which advertising spending level A has chosen. The oral around B’s nodes has been eliminated. B’s strategic choices now must be phrased in a way that takes the added information into account. 890890
891
FIGURE 12.2: The Advertising Game in Sequential Form
7,5 L B H 5,4 L A L 6,4 H B 891891 H 6,3
892
Many-Period Games The four strategies for B are shown in Table 12.6.
For example, the strategy (H, L) indicates that B chooses L if A first chooses H. The explicit considerations of contingent strategy choices enables the exploration of equilibrium notions in dynamic games. 892892
893
TABLE 12.6: Contingent Strategies in the Advertising Game
893893
894
Credible Threat The three Nash equilibria in the game shown in Table 12.6 are: (1) A: L, B: (L, L); (2) A: L, B: (L, H); and (3) A: H, B: (H,L). Pairs (2) and (3) are implausible, however, because they incorporate a noncredible threat that firm B would never carry out. 894894
895
Credible Threat Consider, for example, A: L, B: (L, H) where B promises to play H if A plays H. This threat is not credible (empty threats) since, if A has chosen H, B would receive profits of 3 if it chooses H but profits of 4 if it chooses L. By eliminating strategies that involve noncredible threats, A can conclude that, as before, B would always play L. 895895
896
Credible Threat The equilibrium A: L, B: (L, L) is the only one that does not involve noncredible threats. A perfect equilibrium is a Nash equilibrium in which the strategy choices of each player avoid noncredible threats. That is, no strategy in such an equilibrium requires a player to carry out an action that would not be in its interest at the time. 896896
897
Models of Pricing Behavior: The Bertrand Equilibrium
Assume two firms (A and B) each producing a homogeneous good at constant marginal cost, c. The demand is such that all sales go to the firm with the lowest price, and sales are evenly split if PA = PB. All prices where profits are nonnegative, (P c) are in each firm’s pricing strategy. 897897
898
The Bertrand Equilibrium
The only Nash equilibrium is PA = PB = c. Even with only two firms, the Nash equilibrium is the competitive equilibrium where price equals marginal cost. To see why, suppose A chooses PA > c. B can choose PB < PA and capture the market. But, A would have an incentive to set PA < PB. This would only stop when PA = PB = c. 898898
899
Two-Stage Price Games and Cournot Equilibrium
If firms do not have equal costs or they do not produce goods that are perfect substitutes, the competitive equilibrium is not obtained. Assume that each firm first choose a certain capacity output level for which marginal costs are constant up to that level and infinite thereafter. 899899
900
Two-Stage Price Games and Cournot Equilibrium
A two-stage game where the firms choose capacity first and then price is formally identical to the Cournot analysis. The quantities chosen in the Cournot equilibrium represent a Nash equilibrium, and the only price that can prevail is that for which total quantity demanded equals the combined capacities of the two firms. 900900
901
Two-Stage Price Games and Cournot Equilibrium
Suppose Cournot capacities are given by A situation in which is not a Nash equilibrium since total quantity demanded exceeds capacity. Firm A could increase profits by slightly raising price and still selling its total output. 901901
902
Two-Stage Price Games and Cournot Equilibrium
is not a Nash equilibrium because at least one firm is selling less than its capacity. The only Nash equilibrium is which is indistinguishable from the Cournot result. This price will be less than the monopoly price, but will exceed marginal cost. 902902
903
Comparing the Bertrand and Cournot Results
The Bertrand model predicts competitive outcomes in a duopoly situation. The Cournot model predict monopolylike inefficiencies in which price exceed marginal cost. The two-stage model suggests that decisions made prior to the final (price setting) stage can have important market impact. 903903
904
APPLICATION 12.2: How is the Price Game Played?
Many factors influence how the pricing “game” is played in imperfectly competitive industries. Two such factors that have been examined are Product Availability Information Sharing 904904
905
APPLICATION 12.2: How is the Price Game Played?
Product availability is an important component of competition in many retail industries. The impact of movie availability in the video-rental industry was examined in 2001 by James Dana. His data showed that Blockbuster’s prices were 40% higher than at other stores. He argued that Blockbuster’s higher price in part stems from its reputation for having movies available and that those prices act as a signal. 905905
906
APPLICATION 12.2: How is the Price Game Played?
Firms in the same industry often share information with each other at many levels. A 2000 study of cross-shareholding in the Dutch financial sector showed clear evidence that competition was reduced when firms had financial interests in each other’s profits. A famous 1914 antitrust case found that a price list published by lumber retailers facilitated higher prices by discouraging wholesalers from selling at retail. 906906
907
Tacit Collusion: Finite Time Horizon
Would the single-period Nash equilibrium in the Bertrand model, PA = PB = c, change if the game were repeated during many periods? With a finite period, any strategy in which firm A, say, chooses, PA > c in the last period offers B the possibility of earning profits by setting PA > PB > c. 907907
908
Tacit Collusion: Finite Time Horizon
The threat of charging PA > c in the last period is not credible. A similar argument is applicable for any period before the last period. The only perfect equilibrium requires firms charge the competitive price in all periods. Tacit collusion is impossible over a finite period. 908908
909
Tacit Collusion: Infinite Time Horizon
Without a “final” period, there may exist collusive strategies. One possibility is a “trigger” strategy where each firm sets its price at the monopoly price so long as the other firm adopts a similar price. If one firm sets a lower price in any period, the other firm sets its price equal to marginal cost in the subsequent period. 909909
910
Tacit Collusion: Infinite Time Horizon
Suppose the firms collude for a time and firm A considers cheating in this period. Firm B will set PB = PM (the cartel price) A can set its price slightly lower and capture the entire market. Firm A will earn (almost) the entire monopoly profit (M) in this period. 910910
911
Tacit Collusion: Infinite Time Horizon
Since the present value of the lost profits is given by (where r is the per period interest rate) This condition holds for values of r < ½. Trigger strategies constitute a perfect equilibrium for sufficiently low interest rates. 911911
912
Generalizations and Limitations
Assumptions of the tacit collusion model: Firm B can easily detect whether firm A has cheated Firm B responds to cheating by adopting a harsh response that punishes firm A, and condemns itself to zero profit forever. More general models relax one or both of these assumptions with varying results. 912912
913
APPLICATION 12.3: The Great Electrical Equipment Conspiracy
Manufacturing of electric turbine generators and high voltage switching units provided a very lucrative business to such major producers and General Electric, Westinghouse, and Federal Pacific Corporations after World War II. However, the prospect of possible monopoly profits proved enticing. 913913
914
APPLICATION 12.3: The Great Electrical Equipment Conspiracy
To collude they had to create a method to coordinate their sealed bids. This was accomplished through dividing the country into bidding regions and using the lunar calendar to decide who would “win” a bid. The conspiracy became more difficult as its leaders had to give greater shares to other firms toward the end of the 1950s. 914914
915
APPLICATION 12.3: The Great Electrical Equipment Conspiracy
The conspiracy was exposed when a newspaper reporter discovered that some of the bids on Tennessee Valley Authority projects were similar. Federal indictments of 52 executives lead to jail time for some and resulted in a chilling effect on the future establishment of other cartels of this type. 915915
916
Entry, Exit, and Strategy
Sunk Costs Expenditures that once made cannot be recovered include expenditures on unique types of equipment or job-specific training. These costs are incurred only once as part of the entry process. Such entry investments mean the firm has a commitment to the market. 916916
917
First-Mover Advantages
The commitment of the first firm into a market may limit the kinds of actions rivals find profitable. Using the Cournot model of water springs, suppose firm A can move first. It will take into consideration what firm B will do to maximize profits given what firm A has already done. 917917
918
First-Mover Advantages
Firm A knows fir B’s reaction function which it can use to find its profit maximizing level of output. Using the previously discussed functions. 918918
919
First-Mover Advantages
Marginal revenue equals zero (revenue andprofits are maximized) when qA = 60. With firm A’s choice, firm B chooses to produce Market output equals 90 so spring water sells for $30 increasing A’s revenue by $200 to $1800. Firm B’s revenue falls by $700 to $900. This is often called a “Stakelberg equilibrium.” 919919
920
Entry Deterrence In the previous model, firm A could only deter firm B from entering the market if it produces the full market output of 120 units yielding zero revenue (since P = $0). With economies of scale, however, it may be possible for a first-mover to limit the scale of operation of a potential entrant and deter all entry into the market. 920920
921
A Numerical Example One simple way to incorporate economies of scale is to have fixed costs. Using the previous model, assume each firm has to pay fixed cost of $784. If firm A produced 60, firm B would earn profits of $116 (= $900 - $784) per period. If firm A produced 64, firm B would choose to produce 28 [ = (120-64) 2]. 921921
922
A Numerical Example Total output would equal 92 with P = $28. Firm B’s profits equal zero [profits = TR - TC = ($28·28) - $784 = 0] so it would not enter. Firm A would choose a price of $56 (= ) and earn profits of $2,800 [= ($56·64) - $784]. Economies of scale along with the chance to be the first mover yield a profitable entry deterrence. 922922
923
Consider two types of first-mover advantages
APPLICATION 12.4: First-Mover Advantages for Alcoa, DuPont, Procter and Gamble, and Wal-Mart Consider two types of first-mover advantages Advantages that stem from economies of scale in production. Advantages that arise in connection with the introduction of pioneering brands. 923923
924
Economies of Scale for Alcoa and DuPont.
APPLICATION 12.4: First-Mover Advantages for Alcoa, DuPont, Procter and Gamble, and Wal-Mart Economies of Scale for Alcoa and DuPont. The first firm in the market may “overbuild” its initial plant to realize economies of scale when the demand for the product expands. Antitrust action against the Aluminum Company of America (Alcoa) claimed that it built larger plants than justified by current demand. 924924
925
APPLICATION 12.4: First-Mover Advantages for Alcoa, DuPont, Procter and Gamble, and Wal-Mart
In the 1970s, DuPont expanded its capacity to produce titanium dioxide which is a primary coloring agent in white paint. Studies suggest that this strategy was successful in forestalling new investment by others into the titanium dioxide market. 925925
926
Pioneering Brands for Proctor and Gamble
APPLICATION 12.4: First-Mover Advantages for Alcoa, DuPont, Procter and Gamble, and Wal-Mart Pioneering Brands for Proctor and Gamble Introducing the first brand of a new product appears to provide considerable advantage over later-arriving rivals. Proctor and Gamble was successful in this with Tide laundry detergent in the 1940s and Crest toothpaste in the 1950s. New products are a risk for consumers, and if the first one works, consumers may stick with it. 926926
927
The Wal-Mart Advantage
APPLICATION 12.4: First-Mover Advantages for Alcoa, DuPont, Procter and Gamble, and Wal-Mart The Wal-Mart Advantage Its success stems from its first mover advantage in economies of scale and its initial “small town” strategy. Started in the 1960s, it started serving smaller, mostly Southern markets. This profitable near monopoly situation allowed it to grow and gain economies of scale in distribution and in buying power. 927927
928
Limit Pricing A limit price is a situation where a monopoly might purposely choose a low (“limit”) price policy with a goal of deterring entry into its market. If an incumbent monopoly chooses a price PL < PM (the profit-maximizing price) it is hurting its current profits. PL will deter entry only if it falls short of the average cost of a potential entrant. 928928
929
Limit Pricing If the monopoly and potential entrant have the same costs (and there are no capacity constraints), the only limit price is PL = AC, which results in zero economic profits. Hence, the basic monopoly model does not provide a mechanism for limit pricing to work. Thus, a limit price model must depart from traditional assumptions. 929929
930
Incomplete Information
If an incumbent monopoly knows more about the market than a potential entrant, it may be able to use this knowledge to deter entry. Consider Figure 12.3. Firm A, the incumbent monopolist, may have “high” or “low” production costs based on past decisions which are unknown to firm B. 930930
931
FIGURE 12.3: An Entry Game 931931 1,3 Entry B 4,0 No entry High cost A
3, -1 B Low cost 931931 No entry 6,0
932
Incomplete Information
Firm B, the potential entrant, must consider both possibilities since this affects its profitability. If A’s costs are high, B’s entry is profitable (B = 3). If A’s costs are low, B’s entry is unprofitable (B = -1). Firm A is clearly better off if B does not enter. A low-price policy might signal that firm A is low cost which could forestall B’s entry. 932932
933
Predatory Pricing The structure of many predatory pricing models also stress asymmetric information. An incumbent firm wishes its rival would exit the market so it takes actions to affect the rival’s view of future profitability. As with limit pricing, the success depends on the ability of the monopoly to take advantage of its better information. 933933
934
Predatory Pricing Possible strategies include:
Signal low costs with a low-price policy. Adopt extensive production differentiation to indicate the existence of economies of scale. Once a rival is convinced the incumbent firm possess an advantage, it may exit the market, and the incumbent gains monopoly profits. 934934
935
APPLICATION 12.4: The Standard Oil Legend
The Standard Oil case of 1911 was one of the landmarks of U.S. antitrust law. In that case, Standard Oil Company was found to have “attempted to monopolize” the production, refining, and distribution of petroleum in the U.S., violating the Sherman Act. The government claimed that the company would cut prices dramatically to drive rivals out of a particular market and then raise prices back to monopoly levels. 935935
936
APPLICATION 12.4: The Standard Oil Legend
Unfortunately, the notion that Standard Oil practiced predatory pricing policies in order to discourage entry and encourage exit by its rivals makes little sense in terms of economic theory. Actually, the predator would have to operate with relatively large losses for some time in the hope that the smaller losses this may cause rivals will eventually prompt them to give it up. This strategy is clearly inferior to the strategy of simply buying smaller rivals in the marketplace. 936936
937
APPLICATION 12.4: The Standard Oil Legend
In a famous 1958 article, J.S. McGee concluded that Standard Oil neither trieds to use predatory policies nor did its actual price policies have the effect of driving rivals from the oil business. McGee examined over 100 refineries bought by Standard Oil and found no evidence that predatory behavior by Standard Oil caused these firms to sell out. Indeed, in many cases Standard Oil paid quite good prices for these refineries. 937937
938
N-Player Game Theory The most important additional element added when the game goes beyond two players is the possibility for the formation of subsets of players. Coalitions are combinations of two or more players in a game who adopt coordinated strategies. A two-person game example is a cartel. 938938
939
N-Player Game Theory The formation of successful coalitions in n- player games if influenced by organizational costs. Information costs associated with determining coalition strategies. Enforcement costs associated with ensuring that a coalition’s chosen strategy is actually followed by its members. 939939
940
Chapter 13 Labor Markets © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
941
Marginal Productivity Theory of Input Demand
Input prices are also determined by the forces of supply and demand. The firms are on the demand side while the supply comes from individuals. The theory of input demand relies on Ricardo’s theory of marginal productivity. 941941
942
Profit-Maximizing Behavior and the Hiring of Inputs
A profit-maximizing firm will hire additional units of any input up to the point at which the additional revenue from hiring one more unit is exactly equal to the cost of hiring that unit. Let MEK and MEL denote the marginal expense of hiring capital and labor, respectively. 942942
943
Profit-Maximizing Behavior and the Hiring of Inputs
Let MRK and MRL be the extra revenue that hiring more units of capital and labor allows the firm to bring in. Profit maximizing behavior requires: 943943
944
Price-Taking Behavior
If the firm is a price taker in the capital and labor market then it can always hire an extra unit of capital at the prevailing rate (v) and an extra unit of labor at the wage rate (w). 944944
945
Marginal Revenue Product
Marginal product is how much output the additional input can produce. Marginal revenue (MR) is the extra revenue obtained from selling an additional unit of output. Thus, the profit maximizing rules are: 945945
946
Marginal Revenue Product
The marginal revenue product of labor and capital are the extra revenue obtained from selling the output produced by hiring an extra worker or machine. These show how much extra revenue is brought in by hiring one more unit of an input. 946946
947
A Special Case--Marginal Value Product
If the firm is also a price taking in the goods market, marginal revenue equals the price (P) at which the output sells. The profit maximizing conditions become 947947
948
Marginal Value Product
The marginal value product (MVP) of capital and labor, respectively, are special cases of marginal revenue product in which the firm is a price taker for its output. 948948
949
APPLICATION 13.1: Hiring by Nonprofit Firms
Most hospitals in the U.S. operate on a not-for- profit basis. In some cases hospitals are owned by public corporations and presumably strive for maximum profits. Economists have found important differences in the labor demand for these two types of institutions. 949949
950
APPLICATION 13.1: Hiring by Nonprofit Firms
Some of the differences may relate to a “quality bias” for non-profit hospitals. Such hospitals seem to hire more high-wage labor (physicians) and less lower-wage labor (nurses) than do for-profit hospitals. One explanation for this result may be that nonprofit hospitals are run by physicians who gain utility from high-quality (high-cost) surroundings which the managers of for-profit hospitals have a more “bottom line” mentality. 950950
951
APPLICATION 13.1: Hiring by Nonprofit Firms
Virtually all colleges and universities are operated as nonprofit institutions. It is not surprising that faculty hiring does not follow the principles of profit maximization. On most campuses, more than 50% of the faculty has the rank of full professor but, on average, full professors are paid nearly twice as much as assistant professors and instructors. 951951
952
Responses to Changes in Input Prices: Single Variable input Case
Assume the firm has fixed capital and can only vary its labor input in the short run. Labor will exhibit diminishing marginal physical productivity so labor’s MVP will decline as more labor is hired. In Figure 13.1, the profit maximizing firm will hire L1 labor hours when the wage rate is w1. 952952
953
FIGURE 13.1: Change in Labor Input When Wage Falls: Single Variable Case
MVP Wage w1 w2 MVPL 953953 L1 L2 Labor hours
954
Responses to Changes in Input Prices: Single Variable input Case
If the wage rate falls to w2 the firm hires increased labor out to L2. If the firm continued to hire L1 it would not be maximizing profit since labor would be capable of producing more in additional revenue than hiring additional labor would cost. With one variable input, diminishing marginal productivity results in a downward sloping demand curve. 954954
955
A Numerical Example Table 13.1 shows the productivity for Hamburger Heaven when it uses four grills The marginal product declines as more workers are assigned to the grills Marginal Revenue Product is simply price, $1.00 times the marginal product. At a wage of $5.00, the firm should hire four workers. 955955
956
TABLE 13.1: Hamburger Heaven’s Profit-Maximizing Hiring Decision
956956
957
The Substitution Effect
The substitution effect, in the theory of production, is the substitution of one input for another while holding output constant in response to a change in the input’s price. In Figure 13.2(a), a fall in w will cause the firm to change from input combination A to B to equate RTS to the new w/v. Diminishing RTS leads to more labor hired. 957957
958
FIGURE 13.2: Substitution and Output Effects of A Decrease in Price of Labor
Capital per week Price MC K1 A P K2 q1 L1 L2 Labor hours per week q1 Output per week (a) Input Choice (b) Output Decision 958958
959
FIGURE 13.2: Substitution and Output Effects of A Decrease in Price of Labor
Capital per week MC K1 A P K2 B q1 L1 L2 Labor hours per week q1 Output per week (a) Input Choice (b) Output Decision 959959
960
The Output Effect The output effect is the effect of an input price change on the amount of the input that the firm hires that results from a change in the firm;s output level. In Figure 13.2(b), the lower w causes the marginal cost curve to shift to MC’. The profit maximizing output raises to q2 resulting in more labor hired. 960960
961
FIGURE 13.2: Substitution and Output Effects of A Decrease in Price of Labor
Capital per week MC MC’ K1 A P K2 B q1 L1 L2 Labor hours per week q1 q2 Output per week (a) Input Choice (b) Output Decision 961961
962
FIGURE 13.2: Substitution and Output Effects of A Decrease in Price of Labor
Capital per week MC MC’ K1 A C P K2 q2 B q1 L1 L2 Labor hours per week q1 q2 Output per week (a) Input Choice (b) Output Decision 962962
963
Summary of Firm’s Demand for Labor
A fall in the wage rate will cause the firm to hire more labor for two reasons: The firm will substitute the now cheaper labor for other inputs that are now relatively more expensive, the substitution effect. The decline in wages will lower marginal costs so the profit maximizing firm will produce more output which requires hiring more labor, the output effect. 963963
964
Responsiveness of Input Demand to Price Changes
Ease of Substitution The size of the substitution effect will depend upon how easy it is to substitute other factors of production for labor. The size of the substitution effect will also depend upon the length of time as it becomes easier to find substitutes in a longer period of time. 964964
965
Costs and the Output Effect
The size of the output effect will depend upon How large the increase in marginal costs brought about by the wage rate increase is, and How much quantity demanded will be reduced by a rising price. The first depend upon how important labor is in production while the latter depends upon the price elasticity of demand for the final product. 965965
966
APPLICATION 13.2: Controversy over the Minimum Wage
The Fair Labor Standards Act of established a national minimum wage of $.25 per hour. Each increase raises debate about whether such increases are counterproductive In Figure 1(a) the equilibrium wage is w1 with l1 units of labor hired. 966966
967
FIGURE 1: Effects of a Minimum Wage in a Perfectly Competitive Labor Market
Capital per week S w2 Wage = w1 w1 q1 D q2 L2 Labor per week l1 Labor per week (a) The Market (b) Typical Firm 967967
968
APPLICATION 13.2: Controversy over the Minimum Wage
A minimum wage of w2 will cause firms to hire less, l2, units of labor while more labor L3 will be supplied The imposition of a minimum wage will result in an excess supply of labor over the demand for labor of L3 - L2. 968968
969
FIGURE 1: Effects of a Minimum Wage in a Perfectly Competitive Labor Market
Capital per week Wage= w2 S w2 Wage = w1 w1 q1 D q2 L1 L2 Labor per week L3 l2 l1 Labor per week (a) The Market (b) Typical Firm 969969
970
Minimum Wages and Teenage Unemployment
Teenagers are most likely to be affected by minimum wage laws because their skills are usually at the lower end of the spectrum. While many factors are at play, a major study in the 1970s found that a 1-percent increase resulted in a 0.3 percent reduction in teenage employment. Minority group members have rates that exceed 30 percent. 970970
971
Recent Disputes over the Evidence
A 1994 study by Card and Krueger challenged the belief that minimum wages reduced employment opportunities. Their study of fast-food restaurants in New Jersey and Pennsylvania found no negative effects on employment. However, an analysis of different data from these states found negative employment effects 971971
972
Input Supply Resources come from three major sources:
Labor is provided by individuals. Capital equipment is produced which other firms can buy outright or rent. Natural resources are extracted from land and can be used outright or sold to other firms. As shown in earlier chapters, capital and natural resources have upward sloping supply curves. 972972
973
Labor Supply and Wages Wages represent the opportunity cost of not working at a paying job for individuals. For purposes of this analysis, wages should be interpreted to include all forms of compensation. Individuals will balance the monetary rewards from working against the psychic benefits of other, nonpaid activities. 973973
974
Labor Supply and Wages Labor supply curves will differ based upon individual preferences. Noneconomic factors such as pleasant working conditions will affect the location of the supply curve. It is likely that an increase in the wage will result in more labor supplied to the market. Graphically, the market labor supply curve is likely to be positively sloped. 974974
975
Equilibrium Input Price Determination
In Figure 13.3, the market demand for labor is labeled D, and the market supply of labor is labeled S. The equilibrium wage and quantity is where quantity demanded equals quantity supplied, [w*, L*]. Other things equal, this equilibrium will tend to persist from period to period. 975975
976
FIGURE 13.3: Equilibrium in an Input Market
Wage S w* D 976976 Labor hours per week L*
977
Shifts in Demand and Supply
Any factor that shifts the firms’ underlying production function will shift its input demand curve. Since the demand for an input is derived from the demand for the output, changes in the prices of the output will shift input demand curves 977977
978
Shifts in Demand and Supply
In Figure 13.3, the demand curve shifts to D’ which reduces equilibrium wages from w* to w’ and equilibrium employment from L* to L’. The various factors that shift input demand and supply curves are summarized in Table 13.2. 978978
979
FIGURE 13.3: Equilibrium in an Input Market
Wage S w* w’ D D’ 979979 Labor hours per week L’ L*
980
TABLE 13.2: Factors That Shift Input Demand and Supply Curves
980980
981
APPLICATION 13.3: Why is Wage Inequality Increasing?
Wage inequality has a long history, but seems to have increased recently. Measuring Wage Inequality To control for differences in hours, researchers look at “full-time, year-round” workers. Usually, they concentrate on one gender and try to include total wages including fringe benefits. A common approach is to compare workers in the 90th to workers in the 10th percentile. 981981
982
APPLICATION 13.3: Why is Wage Inequality Increasing?
U.S. studies for the period find The 90/10 ratio in 1965 stood at about 4.3 for male, full-time, year round workers. By 1995, this 90/10 ratio had increased to 5.4. European countries have also experienced an increase in inequality although only the United Kingdom has had increases similar to the U.S. 982982
983
APPLICATION 13.3: Why is Wage Inequality Increasing?
Factors that increase the supply of low-wage workers or increase the demand for high-wage workers would help to explain these trends. Two Important Trends A sharp increase in the relative demand for technically skilled workers which partially explains the rising wages of college graduates. 983983
984
APPLICATION 13.3: Why is Wage Inequality Increasing?
The second factor, which explains less of the trend, is that there has also been a decline in the demand for low-wage workers. Two reasons for the decline A decline in the importance of manufacturing industries in the overall economy, and Sustained increases in imports of goods that are produced primarily with unskilled labor 984984
985
APPLICATION 13.3: Why is Wage Inequality Increasing?
Trends in labor supply have exacerbated the demand effects. Large (legal and illegal) immigrations in the 1990s may have increased the supply of low-wage workers. The increase in labor supply of women has probably had its greatest impact on low-wage men. 985985
986
Monopsony If the firm is not a price taker in the input market, it may have to offer a higher wage to attract more employees. A monopsony is the condition in which one firm is the only hirer in a particular input market. If the firm is a monopsony, it faces the entire market supply curve for the input. 986986
987
Marginal Expense The marginal expense of an input is the cost of hiring one more unit of an input. The firm has to offer a higher wage to the hired worker and to the workers already employed. The marginal expense of labor (MEL) will exceed the price of the input if the firm faces an upward- sloping supply curve for the input. 987987
988
A Numerical Illustration
Suppose the Yellowstone Park Company is the only hirer of bear wardens. The number of people willing to take this job (L) is given by This relationship is shown in Table 13.3 988988
989
TABLE 13.3: Labor Costs of Hiring Bear Wardens in Yellowstone Park
989989
990
A Numerical Illustration
Total labor costs (w·L) is shown in the third column and the marginal expense of hiring each warden is shown in the fourth column. Since the new warden and the existing wardens receive the wage increase, the marginal expense exceeds the wage rate. 990990
991
A Numerical Illustration
Figure 13.4 shows the supply curve (S) for wardens. If Yellowstone wishes to hire three wardens it must pay $6 per hour with total outlays of $18 (point A on the graph). The wage must be increased to $8 to get a fourth warden (point B) which results in total outlays of $32. 991991
992
FIGURE 13.4: Marginal Expense of Hiring Bear Wardens
Hourly wage S B $8 A 6 3 4 Bear wardens per hour 992992
993
A Numerical Illustration
The marginal expense of the fourth warden, $14 is reflected in the graph. The hourly wage ($8) is shown in gray. The extra outlay to the three previous workers ($8 per hour versus $6 per hour previously) is shown in color. Total outlays exceed the amount for three wardens by the sum of these two areas. 993993 993
994
FIGURE 13.4: Marginal Expense of Hiring Bear Wardens
Hourly wage S B $8 A 6 3 4 Bear wardens per hour 994994
995
Monopsonist’s Input Choice
The profit-maximizing monopsonist will hire up to the point where the additional revenue equals the additional cost of hiring one more unit of input. For labor this requires: Only if the firm is a price taker will MEL = w. 995995
996
A Graphical Demonstration
The demand curve in Figure 13.5 is D. Since marginal expense (MEL) exceeds the wage, the marginal expense curve is above the supply curve (S). L1 is the profit maximizing choice while the marginal value product is MVP1 and the wage is w1. 996996
997
FIGURE 13.5: Pricing in a Monopsonistic Labor Market
ME Wage S D 997997 Labor hours per week
998
FIGURE 13.5: Pricing in a Monopsonistic Labor Market
ME Wage S MVP1 D 998998 Labor hours per week L1
999
FIGURE 13.5: Pricing in a Monopsonistic Labor Market
ME Wage S MVP1 w1 D 999999 Labor hours per week L1
1000
A Graphical Demonstration
L1 is less than L*, the amount hired with perfect competition. As with a monopoly, the “demand curve” for a monopolist actually consists of the single point given by L1, w1.
1001
FIGURE 13.5: Pricing in a Monopsonistic Labor Market
ME Wage S MVP1 w* w1 D Labor hours per week L1 L*
1002
Monopsonists and Resource Allocation
Since the monopsonist restrict its input use, it pays an input less than its marginal value product (w1 < MVP1). Total output could be increased by drawing more labor into the market. The more inelastic the labor supply, the more the monopsonists can benefit from this profit opportunity.
1003
Causes of Monopsony If competition for inputs is lacking, monopsony may exit. The input may have high opportunity costs of moving to another input market. The input may be so specialized that there is only one firm that hires that input. Firms may join together to form a cartel in the input market.
1004
APPLICATION 13.4: Monopsony in the Market for Sports Stars
Because players marginal revenue products are more easily measured and correlated with spectator attendance, sports provides a good market for study. The “reserve clause” in professional baseball found layers to teams that first signed them giving teams monopsony power.
1005
Monopsony in Major League Baseball
In a famous 1974 study, G.W. Scully examined the correlation between a team’s winning percentage and its attendance. Next, he analyzed what aspects of an individual’s performance most closely related to a team’s overall performance. He used this information to estimate the MRPs of the players.
1006
Monopsony in Major League Baseball
He found the MRPs greatly exceeded players salaries. A players strike in 1972 and other legal actions led to the adoption of the free-agent provisions that partially replaced the reserve-clause. This has severely limited the monopsony power of major league teams.
1007
Basketball and Michael Jordan
While it did not have a reserve clause, the National Basketball Association (NBA) has exercised some monopsony power. Early stars probably were most affected, but Michael Jorden’s multimillion dollar salary was millions of dollars less than what he was worth to the NBA in terms of higher television ratings when he played.
1008
Bilateral Monopoly A bilateral monopoly is a market in which both suppliers and demanders have monopoly power. Pricing is indeterminate in such markets. In Figure 13.6, “supply” and “demand” intersect at P*, Q*, but this is not equilibrium since neither player is a price taker.
1009
FIGURE 13.6: Bilateral Monopoly
Input price ME S D MR Quantity per period
1010
Bilateral Monopoly The monopoly supplier will operate on its marginal revenue curve (MR) and prefer price- quantity combination P1, Q1.
1011
FIGURE 13.6: Bilateral Monopoly
Input price ME S P1 D MR Quantity per period Q1
1012
Bilateral Monopoly The monopoly supplier will operate on its marginal revenue curve (MR) and prefer price- quantity combination P1, Q1. The monopsonistic will operate on its marginal expense curve (ME) and prefer combination P2, Q2.
1013
FIGURE 13.6: Bilateral Monopoly
Input price ME S P* P2 D MR Quantity per period Q2
1014
Bilateral Monopoly The monopoly supplier will operate on its marginal revenue curve (MR) and prefer price- quantity combination P1, Q1. The monopsonistic will operate on its marginal expense curve (ME) and prefer combination P2, Q2. The final outcome, after bargaining, will lie between these two combinations.
1015
FIGURE 13.6: Bilateral Monopoly
Input price ME S P1 P* P2 D MR Quantity per period Q2 Q1 Q*
1016
Chapter 14 Capital Markets © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
1017
Time Periods and the Flow of Economic Transactions
Ways transactions can occur across periods. Durable goods that last more than one period. An individual can borrow or lend. Individual Savings--The Supply of Loans. Savings frees up resources that can be used to produce investment goods. Savings provide funds for firms to finance investment goods.
1018
Two-Period Model of Saving
Suppose there are only two time periods. C0 is consumption this year. C1 is consumption in the following year. Only consumption yields utility which can be purchased with current income, Y. Income saved earns interest (at a real interest rate of r) before it is used to buy C1. The consumers goal is to maximize utility.
1019
A Graphical Analysis The indifference curves in Figure 14.1 show the utility obtainable from various combinations of C0 and C1. When C0 = Y, no income is saved for the second period. When C0 = 0, C1 = (1 + r)Y. The person can consume all income in the second period plus what is earned in interest.
1020
FIGURE 14.1: The Savings Decision
(1+r) Y U3 U2 U1 Y C
1021
A Graphical Analysis Between these two endpoints, the budget constraint is the black straight line. Utility is maximized at C*0, C*1 where the MRS equals (1 + r). Utility is maximized where the rate the individual is willing to trade C0 for C1 equals the rate he or she is able to trade these in the market through savings.
1022
FIGURE 14.1: The Savings Decision
(1+r) Y C* 1 U 3 U 2 U 1 C* Y C
1023
Substitution and Income Effects of a Change in r
A change in r changes the “price” of future versus current consumption. The substitution effects of an increase in r are shown in Figure 14.2. The move along U2 to S. The higher opportunity cost of C0 rises and the person substitutes C1 for C0. The person saves more do to the increase in r.
1024
FIGURE 14.2: Effect of an Increase in r on Savings Is Ambiguous
(1+r’) Y (1+r) Y S C* 1 U 2 C* Y C
1025
Substitution and Income Effects of a Change in r
The income effect is S to C0**, C1**. If consumption in both periods is a normal good, both should increase. The net effect of increased r on C0 (and on savings) is ambiguous. Savings increase if the substitution effect dominates (as shown in Figure 14.2), but decrease if the income effect dominates. Savings probably increase with higher r.
1026
FIGURE 14.2: Effect of an Increase in r on Savings Is Ambiguous
(1+r’) Y (1+r) Y C** 1 S C* U 3 1 U 2 C** C* Y C
1027
Firms’ Demand for Capital and Loans
The profit maximizing firm will rent additional capital equipment up to the point at which the marginal revenue product of the equipment is equal to the rental rate on the equipment. Assume all firms rent all of the capital they use from other firms.
1028
Rental Rates and Interest Rates
The per-period rate that firms have to pay to rent the equipment will be determined by the average costs that the rental firms incur. Two important costs of the equipment are: Depreciation costs reflect the wear and tear. Borrowing costs are the explicit or implicit opportunity (interest) costs for the funds tied up in the equipment.
1029
Rental Rates and Interest Rates
If depreciation (d) and borrowing (r = interest) costs are proportional to the market price of the equipment being rented (P) we have the following expression for the per-period rental rate, v.
1030
Rental Rates and Interest Rates
This equation shows why there is an inverse relationship between the demand for equipment and the interest rate. When the interest rate is high, rental rates will be high and firms will try to substitute toward cheaper inputs while low interest rates induce firms to rent more equipment. This will change the demand for loans, with low rates encouraging greater borrowing.
1031
Ownership of Capital Equipment
Firms that own equipment are really in two businesses. They produce goods. They lease capital equipment to themselves. The implicit rates they pay for leasing capital equipment are the same as for a firm that rents such equipment.
1032
APPLICATION 14.1: Do We Need Tax Breaks for Savers?
Total U.S. personal savings amounted to less than one percent of disposable income in This is a steep decline from earlier savings levels in the U.S. This is much lower than typical 10 percent rates found in other countries.
1033
APPLICATION 14.1: Do We Need Tax Breaks for Savers?
Concerns are whether individuals will have adequate savings for their own retirement or to provide sufficient capital accumulation for future generations. Recent attempts to stimulate savings. All allow tax deductions for contributions, and do not tax assets in the plan until paid at retirement.
1034
APPLICATION 14.1: Do We Need Tax Breaks for Savers?
Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Set up by individuals acting on their own. Only low-income individuals receive tax deductions, but everyone can avoid taxation of returns from assets in the plan. 401(k) Plans Set up by employers who sometimes match employees contributions.
1035
APPLICATION 14.1: Do We Need Tax Breaks for Savers?
Both contributions and assets returns are tax- exempt until retirement. Keogh Plans Similar to the other plans except that they are intended for self-employed individuals. These generally have higher contribution limits.
1036
APPLICATION 14.1: Do We Need Tax Breaks for Savers?
The effect of these plans on savings is ambiguous. The after-tax interest rate for savers is higher, but the substitution and income effects work in opposite directions. Also, since only the contributions to specific plans are apply, they provide incentives for individuals to shift to these plans without changing their total amount of savings.
1037
APPLICATION 14.1: Do We Need Tax Breaks for Savers?
Most studies use date on individual savings behavior. Studies suggest that people have very different attitudes toward savings. Some are serious savers who will accumulate assets in many forms. Others never save. Plan participants are the serious saver types.
1038
APPLICATION 14.1: Do We Need Tax Breaks for Savers?
But it is not possible to determine if these plans themselves have increased savings. A more correct interpretation is that plan participation acts only to identify savers who are predisposed to save more. The true impact of these savings plans remains unknown.
1039
Determination of the Real Interest Rate
Figure 14.3 shows the supply of loans assumed to be an upward sloping function of the interest rate, r. The demand for loans is negatively related to the interest rate. Higher rates increase the equipment rental rate. Q*, r* is the equilibrium, with the rate that links economic time periods together.
1040
FIGURE 14.3: The Real Interest Rate Is Determined in the Market for Loans
Q* Quantity of loans per period
1041
Changes in the Real Interest Rate
Factors that increases firms’ demand for capital equipment will increase the demand for loans. These include: Technical progress that makes equipment more productive. Declines in the equipment market prices. Optimistic views of the demand for products. The increased demand causes an increase in the real interest rate.
1042
Changes in the Real Interest Rate
Factors that affect savings by individuals will shift the supply curve of loans. These include Government-provided pension plans that reduce individuals’ current savings which increases the real interest rate. Reductions in taxes on savings increase the supply of loans and decrease the real interest rate.
1043
APPLICATION 14.3: Inflation-Indexed Bonds
Most government bonds do not explicitly take account of economy-wide inflation. Recently, however, several nations have issued “inflation-indexed” bonds that adjust payments for changes in inflation. In theory, these bonds pay a real interest rate. Israel, Australia, Turkey, and Brazil are significant issuers of such bonds.
1044
APPLICATION 14.3: Real and Nominal Interest Rates
Assume the nominal interest rate of i for a one-period loan of $1 with a e percent expected increase in the price level by next year. The real value of your repayment will be:
1045
APPLICATION 14.3: Real and Nominal Interest Rates
As previously shown, this real payment is also given by (1 + r), where r is the real interest rate. So,
1046
APPLICATION 14.3: Real and Nominal Interest Rates
Nominal and real interest rates differ by the expected rate of inflation, e. This equation also provides a way to estimate expected inflation. For example, on August 11, 1999 a 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yield was 6.13 percent with a percent rate on an indexed bond The expected inflation rate was over 2 percent.
1047
APPLICATION 14.3: The Design of Inflation-Indexed Bonds
The previous calculation assumed that inflation-indexed bonds paid the real interest rate. In the U.S., changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is used to adjust such bonds. But, the IRS has decided that both the higher interest payments caused by inflation and the annual increase in redemption value are taxable.
1048
APPLICATION 14.3: The Design of Inflation-Indexed Bonds
Thus, the actual, after-tax real interest rate promised by inflation-indexed bonds may be much lower than reported. In addition, these bonds are subject to differing risk factors. For nominal bonds, the risk is in higher inflation rates. For these bonds, the risk is in possible changes in government policy toward them.
1049
Present Discounted Value
Transactions that take place at different times cannot be compared directly because of the interest that is received or paid. A promise to pay a dollar today is not the same as a promise to pay a dollar in one year. A dollar today is more valuable because it can be invested at interest for the year.
1050
Single-Period Discounting
In a two period model, a dollar invested today will grow by a factor of (1 + r) next year. The present value of a dollar that will not be received until next year is 1/(1 + r) dollars. The present value of $1 a year from now, with r = is $0.95 [$0.95 = $1/(1.05)].
1051
Present Value The present value is discounting the value of future transactions back to the present day to take account of the effect of potential interest payments. Table 14.1 demonstrates the discount factor for various interest rates. The first row demonstrates that the higher the interest rate, the smaller the discount factor.
1052
Table 14.1: Present Discounted Value of $1 for Various Time Periods and Interest Rates
1053
Multiperiod Discounting
The present value of $1 that is not to be paid until n years in the future is given by: Table 14.1 shows various interest rates and different values of n. For example, with r = 0.10 and n = 10, the present value of $1 is $0.39.
1054
Present Value and Economic Motives
The goal of the firm making decisions over time is changed to “maximize the present value of all future profits.” This yields nearly the same results as we have shown for one period profit maximization. This is sometimes stated as the firm makes decisions to “maximize the present value of the firm.”
1055
Present Value and Economic Motives
For individuals, present value enters the utility maximization decision through the budget constraint. In some cases, individuals may “discount” the future in that they would prefer to consume in the present relative to the future.
1056
APPLICATION 14.4: Discounting Cash Flows and Derivative Securities
Mortgages typically are long-lived and there is an active secondary market that permits the initial lender to sell the mortgage. Often many mortgages are sold in a bundle to gain economies of scale in buying and selling. Collateralized mortgage operations (CMOs) carry this one step further by selling only a portion of the cash flow such as the interest payments from a given pool of mortgages.
1057
APPLICATION 14.4: Discounting Cash Flows and Derivative Securities
Each expected cash flow from the CMO must be appropriately discounted to the present. Variability in payment complicates this calculation: For example, an unexpected increase in repayments increases the value of a “repayment CMO” because the funds are available sooner.
1058
APPLICATION 14.4: Discounting Cash Flows and Derivative Securities
A security, such as a CMO, is called a “derivative” because its value is derived from some underlying, more basic security such as a mortgage. Other examples include futures contracts on commodities, metals, and foreign currencies and options on common stocks or indexes of common stocks.
1059
APPLICATION 14.4: Discounting Cash Flows and Derivative Securities
Some firms aggregate their derivative portfolios into a single stream of discounted cash flows. They use historical data to study how changes in the general economic environment might be expected to affect those cash flows.
1060
APPLICATION 14.4: Discounting Cash Flows and Derivative Securities
The Long-Term Capital Management hedge fund, run by two recent Nobel prize winners in economics, was such a fund. In the summer of 1998, cash flows did not follow previous historical relationships and this fund ran into serious problems. The fund was bailed out by the U.S. Federal Reserve.
1061
Pricing of Exhaustible Resources
Scarcity costs are the opportunity costs of future production foregone because current production depletes exhaustible resources. These are in addition to the usual production costs. In Figure 14.4, the usual production marginal costs are reflected in the supply curve, S.
1062
FIGURE 14.4: Scarcity Costs Associated with Exhaustible Resources
Price S P* D Quantity per week Q*
1063
Pricing of Exhaustible Resources
Scarcity costs shift the marginal cost curve up to S’. Because of scarcity costs, current output falls from Q* to Q’, and the market price increases from P* to P’. The charges effectively encourage “conservation” of the exhaustible resource.
1064
FIGURE 14.4: Scarcity Costs Associated with Exhaustible Resources
Price P’ S P* D Quantity per week Q’ Q*
1065
The Size of Scarcity Costs
The actual value depends upon the future resource price. For example, suppose the firm believes that copper will sell for $1 per pound in 10 years. Selling one pound today will mean $1 foregone in the future since copper supply is fixed. If r = 5 percent, the present value equals $0.61. If production marginal costs = $0.35 per pound, scarcity costs = $0.26 per pound ($0.61-$0.35).
1066
Time Pattern of Resource Prices
In the absence of change in real production costs or firms’ expectations about future prices, the relative price of resources should be expected to rise over time at the real rate of interest. In the previous example, with r = 5 percent, copper prices would increase by 5 percent per year to equal $1 in 10 years.
1067
Time Pattern of Resource Prices
If resource prices rose more slowly that the real rate of interest, firms would invest elsewhere decreasing supply and increasing the resource price. If resource prices rose faster than the real rate of interest, firms would increase supply and decrease its price. Equilibrium could only occur if the price increase equaled the real rate of interest.
1068
APPLICATION 14.5: Are Any Resources Scarce?
Resource Price Trends As shown in Table 1, there has been a general trend of a decrease in resource prices. However, declining relative costs of extraction and development may be masking rising scarcity costs. Nevertheless, rising real resource prices driven by scarcity is not yet a foregone conclusion.
1069
Table 1: Real Prices for Natural Resources (1990 = 100)
1070
APPLICATION 14.5: Implications of Scarcity
The effect of rising natural resource prices on GDP would depend upon such factors as: The ability of firms to substitute other inputs. Types of resource-saving technical innovations. Willingness of consumers to reduce consumption. A fairly careful estimate suggests a reduction of real economic growth of 0.3 percent by the year 2050.
1071
Uncertainty and Information
Chapter 15 Uncertainty and Information © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
1072
Probability The probability of an event happening is, roughly speaking, the relative frequency with which an event occurs. For example, the probability of a head coming up on a flip of a fair coin is ½. That is, when a coin is flipped a large number of times, we can expect a head to come up in approximately one-half of the flips.
1073
Expected Value The expected value of a game with a number of uncertain outcomes is the size of the prize the player will win on average. If, for example, on a single flip of a coin, Jones pays Smith $1 (X1 = +$1) if a tail comes up and Smith will pay Jones $1 (X2 = -$1) if a head comes up, the expected value of the game is
1074
Expected Value If the game was changes so that, from Smith’s point of view, X1 = $10, and X2 = -$1, the expected value for Smith would be Because Smith would stand to win $4.50 on average, she might be willing to pay Jones up to this amount to play. Fair games are games that cost their expected value.
1075
APPLICATION 15.1: Blackjack Systems
Each player in Blackjack is dealt two cards (with the dealer playing last). The dealer asks each player if he or she wishes another card. The player getting a hand that totals closest to 21, without going over 21, is the winner. If the receipt of a card puts a player over 21, that player automatically loses.
1076
APPLICATION 15.1: Blackjack Systems
Played this way, the game offers a number of advantages to the dealer. The dealer plays last, so other players can go over 21 (and lose) before the dealer plays. Usually, the dealer also wins ties. The dealer has a winning margin of 6 percent on average, with the player winning 47 percent of the hands and the dealer 53 percent.
1077
APPLICATION 15.1: Betting Systems
To entice more people to play, casinos have eased the rules. At many Las Vegas casinos, dealers must play under fixed rules and ties result in bets being returned to the players. With these rules, the dealers advantage falls to as little as 0.1 percent. If players use systems, such as card counting, they may win over 50 percent of the time.
1078
APPLICATION 15.1: Casino’s Response
To deal with card counting, Las Vegas casinos have made several rule changes. They use multiple decks to make counting more difficult. They refuse admission to known system players. This illustrates that small changes in expected values can have important implications.
1079
Risk Aversion When people are faced with a risky but fair situation, they will usually choose not to participate. Risk aversion is the tendency for people to refuse to accept fair games. A Swiss mathematician, Daniel Bernoulli, theorized that it is not strictly the monetary payoff of a game that matters to people, but the expected utility from the game’s prizes.
1080
Diminishing Marginal Utility
Specifically, Bernoulli assumed that the utility associated with the payoffs in a risky situation increases less rapidly than the dollar value of these payoffs. The extra (or marginal) utility that winning an extra dollar in prize money provides is assumed to decline as more dollars are won.
1081
Diminishing Marginal Utility
Diminishing marginal utility is reflected in Figure 15.1, which shows the utility associated with possible prizes (or incomes) from $0 to $15,000. The concave shape of the curve reflects assumed diminishing marginal utility. The gain in utility due to an increase in income from $1000 to $2000 exceeds the gain from $14,000 to $15,000.
1082
A graphical Analysis of Risk Aversion
In Figure 15.1, the person has three options. He or she may: retain the current level of income ($10,000) without taking any risk; take a fair bet with a chance of winning or losing $2,000; take a fair bet with a chance of winning or losing $5,000.
1083
FIGURE 15.1: Risk Aversion 10831083 Utility U 5 8 10 12 15 Income
5 8 10 12 15 Income (thousands of dollars)
1084
A graphical Analysis of Risk Aversion
The current $10,000 provides utility of U3. The utility of the $2,000 bet is the average of the utility of $12,000 (if he or she wins) and the utility of $8,000 (if he or she loses). This average utility is U2 < U3. The utility (U1 < U2) of the $5000 bet is the average of the utility of winning ($15,000) and losing ($5,000).
1085
FIGURE 15.1: Risk Aversion 10851085 Utility U U3 U2 U1 5 8 10 12 15
5 8 10 12 15 Income (thousands of dollars)
1086
Willingness to Pay to Avoid Risk
With risk aversion and equal expected values ($10,000 for the three options in Figure 15.1), people will prefer risk-free incomes to risky incomes which offer less utility. In Figure 16.1, a risk-free income of $9,500 provides the same utility as the $2,000 gamble. The person would pay up to $500 to avoid the risk of the $2000 gamble.
1087
FIGURE 15.1: Risk Aversion 10871087 Utility U U3 U2 U1 5 8 9.5 10 12
5 8 9.5 10 12 15 Income (thousands of dollars)
1088
APPLICATION 15.2: Do HMO Patients Need a Bill of Rights?
Much of the controversy over HMOs can be clarified by considering how the issue of moral hazard operates in health insurance markets. Figure 1 illustrates the moral hazard dilemma as it applies to medical care. In the absence of insurance, people would by Q* units of medical care at a price of P*.
1089
. . FIGURE 1: Moral Hazard in the Medical Care Market 10891089 P A C
S . B P*/3 Demand Q Q* Q’
1090
APPLICATION 15.2: Do HMO Patients Need a Bill of Rights?
Because most medical care purchases are insured, consumers do not pay P* for their care. Instead they may pay only, say, one-third of the market price for the care that they receive and they therefore increase the quantity demanded to Q’. Because the value of this extra care to consumers is less than the marginal cost of the care (assumed to be P*), there will be a deadweight loss from the insurance given by the area ABC.
1091
APPLICATION 15.2: Do HMO Patients Need a Bill of Rights?
Because HMOs operate under predetermined budget constraints, they have an incentive to be sure that the care they provide meets some sort of cost- benefit standard. They may therefore be reluctant to provide care up to the amount that insured consumers want to buy (Q’).
1092
APPLICATION 15.2: Do HMO Patients Need a Bill of Rights?
These firms will tend to push the quantity of care toward Q* -- a level of care for which marginal benefit is equal to marginal cost. Much of the consumer dissatisfaction with HMOs may reflect the fact that established spending patterns were already exaggerated by the prevalence of insurance in medical care markets.
1093
Methods of Reducing Risk: Insurance
Figure 15.2 shows the motive for buying insurance. Assume that during the next year this person, with a $10,000 current income, faces a 50 percent change of having $4,000 in unexpected medical bills. Without insurance, this person’s utility would be U1, the utility of the average of $6000 and $10,000.
1094
FIGURE 15.2: Insurance Reduces Risk
Utility U U1 Income (thousands of dollars) 6 7.5 10
1095
Fair Insurance Fair insurance is insurance for which the premium is equal to the expected value of the loss. In Figure 15.2, fair insurance would cost $2,000 which is the expected value of what insurance companies would have to pay each year in health claims. This would guarantee income of $8,000 which would yield utility of U2
1096
FIGURE 15.2: Insurance Reduces Risk
Utility U U2 U1 Income (thousands of dollars) 6 7.5 8 10
1097
Unfair Insurance Since insurance companies have costs beyond paying benefits, they can not sell insurance at actuarially fair premiums. In Figure 15.2 the person would be willing to pay up to $2,500 for health insurance since $7,500 of risk-free income yields as much utility (U1) as without any insurance. A premium of $3,500, however, would reduce utility to U0.
1098
FIGURE 15.2: Insurance Reduces Risk
Utility U U2 U1 U0 Income (thousands of dollars) 6 6.5 7.5 8 10
1099
Uninsurable Risks Some risks are so unique or difficult to evaluate that insurers are unable to set premium rates so that risks become uninsurable. If events are so infrequent or unpredictable, such as wars, etc. insurers have no basis for establishing premiums.
1100
Uninsurable Risks When buyers and sellers have different information, market outcomes may exhibit adverse selection--the quality of goods or services traded will be biased toward market participants with better information. Those who expect large losses will buy insurance so the insurer will be paying out more in losses than expected.
1101
Uninsurable Risks Moral hazard is the effect that having insurance has on the behavior of the insured. Having insurance may cause people to be more likely to incur losses. For example, if people have insurance on the cash they carry they are more likely to lose it through carelessness.
1102
Methods of Reducing Risk: Diversification
Diversification is the economic principle underlying the adage, “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.” Diversification is the spreading of risk among several options rather than choosing only one. Suitably spreading risk around may increase utility above that obtain by a single action.
1103
Diversification Figure 15.3 shows the utility of income for an individual with a current income of $10,000 who must invest $4,000 in risky assets. Assume only two such assets, shares of stock in company A or company B. The stock costs $1, but will increase to $2 if the company does well during the next year.
1104
Diversification If the company does poorly, the stock will be worthless. Each company has a chance of doing well. If the two companies’ prospects are unrelated to one another, holding both stocks will reduce the person’s risks.
1105
Diversification Investing in 4,000 shares of company A yields a 50 percent chance of having $14,000 and a 50 percent chance of having $6,000. This yields a utility level of U1. If the person invests in 2,000 shares of each company, there are four possible outcomes which are shown in Table 15.1.
1106
FIGURE 15.3: Diversification Reduces Risk
Utility U U1 Income (thousands of dollars) 6 10 14
1107
TABLE 15.1: Possible Outcomes from Investing in Two Companies
1108
Diversification Each of these four outcomes is equally likely, with half the cases where the person ends up with his or her original $10,000. The diversification strategy, while it still has an expected value of $10,000, has less risk. In Figure 15.3, point C represent when B does poorly and D represent when B does well. Point E, (the average of C and D) results from diversification and yields utility U2 > U1.
1109
FIGURE 15.3: Diversification Reduces Risk
Utility D U U2 U1 E C Income (thousands of dollars) 6 10 14
1110
APPLICATION 15.3: Mutual Funds
Mutual funds pool money from many investors to buy shares in several different companies. For this service, investors pay annual management fees of 1 to 1.5 percent of the value of the money they have invested.
1111
APPLICATION 15.3: Diversification and Riskiness of Funds
A single investor trying to buy shares in, say, 100 companies would find that most of his or her funds would be used for brokerage fees. Because mutual funds deal in large volumes, brokerage commissions are lower. This allows the investor to reduce risk through diversification at lower cost.
1112
APPLICATION 15.3: Diversification and Riskiness of Funds
Fund managers offer products with varying amounts of risk. Money market and short-term bond funds offer little risk, balanced funds (stock and bonds) offer more risk, and growth funds generally offer the most risk. One study found a 10 percent increase in riskiness increases average yield by 1 percentage point.
1113
APPLICATION 15.3: Portfolio Management
Mutual fund managers can reduce risk further by their choice of stocks. If their investments tend to move in opposite directions, the value of diversification increases. Examples include holding mining stock, which tends to move opposite of the market, or holding stock from many different countries.
1114
Pricing of Risk in Financial Assets
Because people are willing to pay something to avoid risks, it seems that one should be able to study the process directly. We could treat “risk” like any other commodity and study the factors that influence its demand and supply. With financial assets, the risks people face are purely monetary and relatively easy to measure.
1115
Investors’ Market Options
Figure 15.4 shows a simplified illustration of the market options open to a would-be investor in financial assets. The points on the figure represent the options available. For example, point A represents a risk-free asset such as money in a checking account. Asset B represents a relatively risky stock. All other points in Figure 15.4 represent the risks and returns associated with assets that an investor might buy.
1116
Figure 15.4: Market Options for Investors
Market Line Annual return C B A Risk
1117
Investors’ Market Options
Investors like high annual returns but dislike risk, so they will choose to hold combinations of these available assets that lie on their “northwest” periphery. By mixing various risky assets with the risk-free asset (A), they can choose any point along the line AC. This line is labeled the market line because it shows the possible combinations of annual returns and risk that an investor can achieve by taking advantage of what market the offers.
1118
APPLICATION 15.4: The Equity Premium Puzzle—Historical Rates of Return
The risk associated with various assets is sometimes measured by the “standard deviation” of their annual returns. This measure shows the range in which roughly two-thirds of the returns fall. As shown in Table 1, in two-thirds of the years common stocks returned more than -8 percent and less than percent.
1119
APPLICATION 15.4: The Equity Premium Puzzle--The Excess Return on Common Stocks
The quantitative nature of the extra returns to common stock holding are inconsistent with many other studies of risk. Other studies suggest that individuals would accept the extra risk associated with stocks for an extra return of between 1 and 2 percent per year-- significantly less than the 7 percent actually provided.
1120
APPLICATION 15.4: The Equity Premium Puzzle--The Excess Return on Common Stocks
One possible explanation is that the figures in Table 1 underestimate the risk of stocks. If returns on stock are highly correlated with the business cycle, this would cause a double risk in economic downturns A fall in income A fall in returns from investment However, the actual correlation does not appear high enough for this extra risk to be very large.
1121
Other explanations put forth include:
APPLICATION 15.4: The Equity Premium Puzzle--The Excess Return on Common Stocks Other explanations put forth include: The higher return on stocks is needed to compensate for the higher transaction costs associated with stocks. Only people whose incomes are excessively affected by the business cycle buy stocks. Neither of these explanation has appeared to survive close scrutiny.
1122
Choices by Individual Investors
The market line in Figure 15.4 provides a constraint on the options that financial markets provide to individual investors. These investors then choose among the available options on the basis of their own attitudes toward risk. This process is illustrated in Figure 15.5.
1123
Choices by Individual Investors
The figure shows a typical indifference curve for three different types of investors. The three investors illustrated in Figure have different attitudes toward risk. Investor I has a very low tolerance for risk. He will opt for mix of investments that include a lot of the risk-free option (point L).
1124
Choices by Individual Investors
Investor II has a moderate toleration for risk. She will opt for a combination of assets that are reasonably representative of the overall market (M). Finally, investor III is a real speculator. She will accept a risky combination of assets (N) – more risky than the overall market.
1125
Figure 15.5: Choices by Individual Investors
UIII UII Market Line Annual return N UI M L A Risk
1126
The Economics of Information
A Utility-Maximizing Model The basic model is shown in Figure 15.6 where an individual is assumed to face two possible outcomes (sometimes called states of the world), but he or she does not know what outcome will occur. The person’s consumption in the two states is denoted C1 and C2, and possible values are recorded in the axes.
1127
FIGURE 15.6: Utility Maximization under Uncertainty
Certainty line C2 E C2 E B U2 D A A C2 U1 CE1 CA1 C1
1128
A Utility-Maximizing Model
At point A, the individual has considerably more consumption in state 1 than in state 2. This person might be willing to give up some consumption in state 1 to consume more in state 2. This might we accomplished by paying an insurance premium in state 1 in order to increase consumption in state 2 (when things go wrong).
1129
A Utility-Maximizing Model
For example, if the terms at which insurance can be bought are reflected in the slope of the line AE, this person could increase utility from U1 to U2 by purchasing complete insurance and moving to point E. Buying complete insurance has allowed this person to obtain CE1 (which equals CE2) with certainty.
1130
FIGURE 15.6: Utility Maximization under Uncertainty
Certainty line C2 E C2 E B U2 D A A C2 U1 E A C1 C1 C1
1131
Balancing the Gains and Costs of Information
Another way to improve his or her situation would be to gather additional information. Consumption will decrease in the good outcome but increase in the bad outcome. The issue is whether acquiring information will raise utility above U1. Point B, for example, represents a utility-improving investment, but point D is a poor investment in information.
1132
Information Differences among Economic Actors
The level of information that an individual acquires will depend on how much the information costs. There are reasons to believe that information costs may differ significantly among individuals. Sellers or large-scale repeat buyers of a good may have greater access to information than first-time buyers.
1133
Information Differences among Economic Actors
People also have differing preferences about buying information. Some people care greatly about getting the best buy while the preferences of others might be to buy the first model available. Having information levels differ among people raises a number of difficult problems on how markets operate.
1134
APPLICATION 15.5: Safe Driver Insurance Policies
Since actuarially fair insurance can increase the utility of risk-adverse individuals, persons who face very different probabilities of loss should pay different insurance premiums. But insurers must be able to correctly estimate the individuals probability of loss so that insurance can be properly priced.
1135
APPLICATION 15.5: A Theoretical Model
When insurers possess less information than do insurance buyers, adverse selection may undermine the entire insurance market. In Figure 1, person 1 has a relatively low risk of incurring state 2, so fair insurance is represented by budget constraint AE and point E is possible. For person 2, losses are more likely so fair insurance is represented by the line AF.
1136
Figure 1: Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets
Certainty Line E F A C1
1137
APPLICATION 15.5: A Theoretical Model
However, if the insurance company can not tell how risking a particular customer is, this twin solution is not feasible. Person 2 will buy the policy intended for 1 and the additional losses will cause the insurer to lose money on policy AE. The insurer will have to increase the price, reducing person 1’s utility which may result in that person choosing to be uninsured.
1138
APPLICATION 15.5: Safe Driver Policies
Traditionally insurers have used accident data to assign higher premium costs to high risk groups such as young male drivers. Recently measures, such as a 1989 ballot initiative in California, have tried to limit this use of rating factors. High risk groups would benefit at the cost of historically safer drivers.
1139
Information and Economic Efficiency
The proof of the efficiency of competitive prices assumes that these equilibrium prices are known to all economic actors. If this assumption is relaxed, Adam Smith’s invisible hand may not be very effective. Incorrect decisions based on faulty information about price or quantity can result in inefficient allocation of resources.
1140
Asymmetric Information and the “Lemons” Problem
Asymmetric information occurs when buyers and sellers have different amounts of information about a market transaction. George Akerlof first investigated this with the market for used cars, so it was called the “lemons” problem. Assume there are only two types of cars (good cars and lemons) and only the owners know which category into which their car falls.
1141
Asymmetric Information and the “Lemons” Problem
If buyers can not differentiate, all cars will sell for the same price somewhere between the true worth of the two types of cars. Owners of good cars will not sell, since their cars are worth more than the price, so only lemons will be offered for sale. The erosion of quality may be retarded by such things as warranties.
1142
Adverse Selection The used car market is an example of adverse selection such as insurance markets where buyers know more about themselves (such as their health) than do sellers. Thus, only high risk individuals may choose insurance, and low risk individuals will find insurance too costly. This can also be a problem for very productive workers in the labor market.
1143
Acquisition and Provision of Information
The inefficiency inherent in the adverse selection outcomes provides a powerful incentive for economic actors to acquire information. In the used car market, buyers might spend time and money to investigate cars. Sellers may try to “signal” the quality of the cars they wish to sell.
1144
APPLICATION 15.6: Looking for Lemons--Pickup Trucks
A 1982 study of of 1970s pickup trucks market the found about 60 percent were used. After controlling for may factors, there was no evidence of differences in repairs between new and used pickups. This could be explain by Buyers might have expertise in repair, or Sellers might provide repair records.
1145
APPLICATION 15.6: Looking for Lemons--Fee Agents in Baseball
Professional baseball players can sell themselves to other teams as “free agents” after playing a certain number of years with the team that initially signed them. The present team may know more about the player than the purchasing team. A study found that free agents signed by new teams spent more time on the disabled list.
1146
APPLICATION 15.6: Looking for Lemons--Thoroughbreds
Racehorse “yearlings” are sold at auction such as the Keeneland auction held in September near Lexington, Kentucky. Dividing the sellers into those who both breed and race horses (who might want to keep the best horses for racing) and those who only breed horses. A study found that, controlling for other factors, horses from racing sellers sold for less.
1147
Externalities and Public Goods
Chapter 16 Externalities and Public Goods © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
1148
Defining Externalities
An externality is the effect of one party’s economic activities on another party that is not taken into account by the price system. Externalities can occur between any two economic actors. Externalities can be beneficial or harmful.
1149
Externalities between Firms
Consider two firms--one producing eyeglasses, and another producing charcoal. The production of charcoal is said to have an external effect on the production of eyeglasses if the output of eyeglasses depends not only on the amount of inputs chosen by the eyeglass firm but also on the level of production of charcoal.
1150
Externalities between Firms
Suppose the eyeglass firm is near and downwind from the charcoal company. The amount of eyeglasses may depend upon the amount of charcoal in the air which affects the precision grinding wheels. The level of eyeglass production is partially determined by the amount of charcoal produced, with more charcoal reducing the amount of eyeglasses.
1151
Externalities between Firms
One of the most famous beneficial externalities between firms involves one firm producing honey and the other producing apples. Bees feed on apple blossoms, which increases the production of honey, and Bees pollinate apple crops, which increases the production of apples.
1152
Externalities Firms can generate air, water, and other types of pollution when producing products. Alternatively, auto pollution, graffiti, and noise are some externalities imposed by people on firms. When people do things that harm others, like playing their radios loudly, or help, like shoveling their sidewalk, they can impose externalities on other people.
1153
Reciprocal Nature of Externalities
In dealing with externalities it is important to recognize that both parties are needed for an externality to exist. If the eyeglass producer was not located near the charcoal factory, there would be no externality. If another person was not around, no one would be bothered when someone plays their radio loudly.
1154
APPLICATION 16.1: Secondhand Smoke
Secondhand smoke (officially, environmental tobacco smoke, or ETS), refers to the effects of smokers’ consumption of cigarettes and other tobacco products on third-party bystanders. The harm of ETS is controversial, but the Environmental Protection Agency estimates approximately 2,200 deaths annually.
1155
APPLICATION 16.1: Reciprocal Nature of the ETS Externality
Smokers potentially harm bystanders, but limiting the “rights” of smokers impose inconveniences as well. One study suggests that workplace restrictions on smoking results in a loss of approximately $20 billion per year in consumer surplus. Such estimates, like those of the harms of ETS, are controversial.
1156
APPLICATION 16.1: Private Action and Public Actions
Many private decisions have limited smoking in the workplace and in public areas. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has proposed banning all workplace smoking. Many question whether governmental action is necessary given the private actions already taken.
1157
Externalities and Allocational Efficiency
The presence of externalities can cause a market to operate inefficiently. In the previous example an externality affected the production of eyeglasses. The firm producing charcoal did not take into account the negative effect its production had on the production of eyeglasses.
1158
Social Costs Social costs are the costs of production that include both input costs and costs of the externalities that production may cause. In the previous example, by not recognizing the externality in its production, the charcoal firm produced too much. Society would be better-off by reallocating resources away from charcoal production and toward the production of other goods.
1159
A Graphical Demonstration
Assume the charcoal producer is a price taker so that its demand curve is horizontal, as shown in Figure 16.1. The firm maximizes profits, given the prevailing market price, by producing q* where price(P*) equals marginal cost(MC). Due to the externality, however, the social marginal cost (MCS) exceeds MC.
1160
FIGURE 16.1: An Externality in Charcoal Production Causes an Inefficient Allocation of Resources
Price, costs of charcoal MCS MC E P* q* Charcoal per week
1161
A Graphical Demonstration
The cost of the externality is shown by the vertical distance between MSC and MC. At q* the social marginal cost exceeds what people are willing to pay for the charcoal, P*. Resources are misallocated and production should be reduced to q’ where MSC equals P*. The reduced total social costs (area ABq*q’) exceed the reduced total spending (area AEq*q’).
1162
FIGURE 16.1: An Externality in Charcoal Production Causes an Inefficient Allocation of Resources
MCS Price, costs of charcoal B MC A E P* C q’ q* Charcoal per week
1163
Property Rights Property rights are the legal specification of who owns a good and the trades the owner is allowed to make with it. Common property is property that may be used by anyone without cost. Private property is property that is owned by specific people who may prevent others from using it.
1164
Costless Bargaining and Competitive Markets
Considering the charcoal-eyeglass externality, suppose property rights were defined so as to give sole rights to use the air to one of the firms. The firms were then free to bargain over how the air might be used. If bargaining is costless the two parties might arrive at q’ on their own.
1165
Ownership by the Polluting Firm
If the charcoal firm owns the land, it must add these ownership costs to its total costs. The costs of polluting the air are what someone else is willing to pay for this resource (clean air) in its best alternative use. The eyeglass company would be willing to pay the an amount equal to the external cost the charcoal company is imposing.
1166
Ownership by the Polluting Firm
The charcoal company’s marginal cost will be MSC, and it will produce q’. The charcoal company will sell the remaining air use rights to the eyeglass maker for a fee of some amount between AEC (the lost profits of producing q’ rather than q*) and ABEC (the maximum amount the eyeglass maker would be willing to pay to avoid having the charcoal producer increase production to q*.
1167
Ownership by the Injured Firm
If the eyeglass maker owns the air, the charcoal firm will offer a payment to use the air associated with output level q’. The eyeglass owner will not sell rights to pollute beyond this because the price that the charcoal maker would be willing to pay (P* - MC) falls short of the cost of this additional pollution (MCS - MC). The socially optimal charcoal output, q’, is produced in this case as well.
1168
The Coase Theorem The Coase theorem (first proposed by Ronal Coase) states that, if bargaining is costless, the social cost of an externality will be taken into account by the parties, and the allocation of resources will be the same no matter how property rights are assigned. In the previous example, q’ was produced regardless of who owned the air.
1169
Distributional Effects
The assignment of property rights does affect the distribution of the benefits. If the charcoal maker receives the property rights, the fees from the eyeglass producer will make it at least as well off as if it produced q*. If the eyeglass producer receives the property rights, the fees from the charcoal producer will at least cover the pollution damage. Factors, such as equity may be important.
1170
The Role of Transactions Costs
The Coase theorem relies heavily on the assumption of zero transactions costs. If bargaining costs are high, the voluntary exchange may break down so the efficient outcome may not be realized. This may be particularly true concerning environmental externalities.
1171
APPLICATION 16.2: Property Rights in Nature—Bees and Apples
In many locales contractual bargaining between beekeepers and orchard owners provide for renting bees for the pollination of many crops. Rents appear to accurately reflect the value of honey that is yielded with higher rents for clover growers because apple blossoms yield less honey.
1172
APPLICATION 16.2: Property Rights in Nature—Shellfish
Overfishing creates an externality since no single fisher takes into account the fact that his or her catch with reduce others catches. Coastal situations allow property rights so owners can consider harvesting practices. One study suggests that oyster yields were higher in Virginia because it made it easier to enforce property rights.
1173
APPLICATION 16.2: Property Rights in Nature—Elephants
In the past, ivory hunters have lead to a decline of over 50 percent of the population in East African countries. Recently, villages received property rights to elephants and sold limited numbers of elephants for hunting. Elephants populations in these areas are on the rise.
1174
Externalities with High Transactions Costs
When transactions costs are high, externalities may cause real losses in economic welfare. The fundamental problem is that, with high transactions costs, economic actors face no pressure to recognize the third-party effects they have. All solutions to externality problems in these cases must therefore find some way to get the actors to “internalize” the third-party effects they cause.
1175
Legal Redress The operation of the law may sometimes provide a way for taking externalities into account. If the charcoal producer in Figure 16.1 can be sued for the harm it does to eyeglass makers, payment of damages will increase the costs associated with charcoal production. Hence, the charcoal MC curve will shift upward to MCS and an efficient allocation of resources will be achieved.
1176
Taxation A Pigovian tax (first proposed by A. C. Pigou) is a tax or subsidy on an externality that brings about an equality of private and social marginal costs. Figure 16.2 is similar to Figure 16.1, except that an excise tax of amount t is shown that reduces the net price to P* - t. This causes the firm to produce the socially optimal level of output, q’.
1177
FIGURE 16.2: Taxation Solution to the Externality Problem
Price, costs of charcoal MCS B MC A E P* P* - t C q’ q* Charcoal per week
1178
Regulation of Externalities
An alternative to taxation is regulation. The horizontal axis in Figure 16.3 shows percentage reductions in pollution that would exist without regulation. The curve MB shows the marginal benefit by reducing pollution by one unit. The shape comes from the assumption of diminishing returns.
1179
FIGURE 16.3: Optimal Pollution Abatement
Marginal benefit, cost MC f* MB R* 100 Reduction in emission
1180
Regulation of Externalities
The curve MC reflects the marginal costs in reducing environmental emissions including foregone profits and the costs of antipollution equipment. The positive slope reflects the assumption of increasing marginal costs. R* is the optimal level of pollution where the marginal benefits equal marginal costs.
1181
Fees, Permits, and Direct Controls
Three general ways to reduce emissions to R* through environmental policy. A Pigovian-type effluent fee for each percent of pollution not reduced. Governmental regulators could issue permits to produce emission levels. Direct controls of the amount of pollution allowed.
1182
Fees An “effluent fee”,f*in Figure 16.3, is charged for each percent that pollution is not reduced. For reductions less than R*, the fee exceeds marginal cost, so firms will choose abatement. Reductions greater than R* would not be profitable. The firm is free to choose its method to reduce pollution.
1183
FIGURE 16.3: Optimal Pollution Abatement
Marginal benefit, cost MC f* MB RL R* RH 100 Reduction in emission
1184
Permits Government issued permits would allow firms to “produce” (100 - R*) percent of their unregulated emission levels. As shown in Figure 16.3, freely traded permits would sell for a price of f*. A competitive market will ensure that the optimal level of emissions reductions will be attained at minimal social cost.
1185
Direct Controls Governments can tell firms the level of emissions they would be allowed, and, in many cases, are accompanied by specification of the precise mechanism by which R* is to be achieved. This is a common approach in the U.S. Specification of the mechanism of reduction may reduce the cost-minimization incentive.
1186
APPLICATION 16.3: Regulating Power Plant Emissions
Many electric power plants burn coal for fuel. This generates some byproducts including sulfuric acid which is associated with the creation of “acid rain” which harms lakes and forests. Acid rain is found in the eastern U.S. and Canada as well as Europe, Russia, and China.
1187
APPLICATION 16.3: Regulation of Production Technology
The U.S. has used a “command-and-control” (CAC) approach. Air quality standards are defined by law and plants are required to install specific equipment; with most requiring “scrubbers” that clean exhaust fumes in their stacks. Studies suggest that these costs exceed minimum costs by a factor of two.
1188
APPLICATION 16.3: Emission Charges
A more efficient alternative would be to impose a Pigouvian tax on emissions. Firms could choose any technology that gives emission reductions at a marginal cost that is less than or equal to the tax. Studies suggest this is considerable more cost effective, but will decrease the demand for eastern U.S. coal (with employment losses), which is not politically popular.
1189
APPLICATION 16.3: Emissions Trading
The Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 allow power plants who reduce their pollution levels below specified standards to sell credits to other firms. This allows other firms to subsidize the reductions of emissions by those firms who can achieve low pollution with the least cost. This has achieved savings of approximately 50 percent over regular CAC approaches.
1190
An Example: Global Warming
Existing models of the earth’s atmosphere are not adequate to explain how carbon emissions may raise global temperatures. Evaluating the costs to restrict carbon emissions involve much uncertainty. Estimates from general equilibrium models range from welfare gains to costs as great as 10 percent of GDP.
1191
Attributes of Public Goods
Nonexclusive goods are goods that provide benefits that no one can be excluded from enjoying. National defense is an example since, once an army or navy is set up, everyone in the country receives protection whether they pay or not. Alternatively, a hamburger is exclusive since, someone can be excluded from consuming if they do not pay for it.
1192
Attributes of Public Goods
Nonrival goods are goods that additional consumers may use at zero marginal cost. For example, one more person crossing an already existing bridge during an off-peak period requires no additional resources and does not reduce consumption of anything else.
1193
Public Goods Public goods provide nonexclusive benefits to everyone in a group and that can be provided to one more user at zero marginal cost. Table 16.1 presents a cross-classification of goods by their possibilities for exclusion and rivalry.
1194
TABLE 16.1: Types of Public and Private Goods
1195
Public Goods and Market Failure
In buying a public good, any one person will not be able to appropriate all the benefits the good offers. Since others can not be excluded they can use the good at zero marginal cost, society’s benefits from the public good exceed the benefits to the single buyer.
1196
Public Goods and Market Failure
However, the buyer will not take societies benefits into consideration. As a result, private markets will tend to underallocate resources to public goods. Figure 16.4 shows a situation two people have a demand for a public good. The total demand for the public good is the vertical sum of each persons demand curve.
1197
FIGURE 16.4: Derivation of the Demand for a Public Good
Willingness to pay Total demand Demand by person 2 Demand by person 1 Quantity of public good per week [ , ] Denotes equal distances
1198
Public Goods and Market Failure
Each point on the total demand curve shows what persons 1 and 2, together, are willing to pay for a particular level of the public good. Because each individual’s demand curve is below the total demand curve, no single buyer is willing to pay what the good is worth to society.
1199
Voluntary Solutions for Public Goods
Since public goods cannot be traded efficiently in competitive markets, one approach deals with whether an efficient allocation might come out voluntarily. Would people agree to be taxed in exchange for the benefits the public good provides? One solution was proposed by Erik Lindahl in
1200
The Lindahl Equilibrium
In Figure 16.5, the curve labeled SS shows one person’s (Smith) demand for a particular public good. The vertical axis measures the share of the public good’s cost that Smith must pay. The negative slope of SS indicates that, at a higher tax “price” for the public good, Smith’s quantity demanded is smaller.
1201
FIGURE 16.5: Lindahl Equilibrium in the Demand for a Public Good
Share of cost paid by Smith 100 S S Quantity of public good
1202
The Lindahl Equilibrium
The second individual’s (Jones) public good demand curve is derived similarly, but the proportion paid by Jones is shown on the right axis. The right axis is reverse scale so that moving up the axis results in a lower tax paid by Jones. Given this convention, Jones’s demand curve (JJ) has a positive slope.
1203
FIGURE 16.5: Lindahl Equilibrium in the Demand for a Public Good
Share of cost paid by Smith Share of cost paid by Jones 100 J S J S 100 Quantity of public good
1204
The Lindahl Equilibrium
The two demand curves intersect at C with an output level OE of the public good. At this output level Smith is willing to pay 60 percent of the good’s cost whereas Jones willingly pays 40 percent. At outputs below OE, the two people combines are willing to pay more than 100 percent of the cost of the public good.
1205
FIGURE 16.5: Lindahl Equilibrium in the Demand for a Public Good
Share of cost paid by Jones Share of cost paid by Smith 100 J S C 60 40 J S 100 E Quantity of public good
1206
The Lindahl Equilibrium
For output levels greater than OE, people are not willing to pay the total cost of the good. Output level OE is a Lindahl equilibrium which is a balance between people’s demand for public goods and the tax shares that each must pay for them. The tax shares are “pseudo prices,” and the outcome can be shown to be efficient.
1207
Revealing the Demand for Public Goods: The Free Rider Problem
The voting patterns of people generally do not provide enough information to permit Lindahl’s tax share to be computed. Alternatively, governments might ask people how much they are willing to pay for a particular package of public goods. It is likely that this poll would prove to be extremely inaccurate because of free riders.
1208
The Free Rider Problem People may feel that they should understate their true preferences to reduce their tax liability with the hope that others will be willing to bear the burden of paying the taxes for the public good. A free rider is a consumer of a nonexclusive good who does not pay for it in the hope that other consumers will.
1209
APPLICATION 16.4: Why is There So Much Fund-Raising Public Broadcasting?
The public radio and television broadcasting corporations in the U.S. were intended to be supported primarily by listeners and viewers through voluntary contributions. Since users can not be excluded from using what is “on the air” and costs do not increase if another user tunes in, broad-casting appears to be a pure public good.
1210
APPLICATION 16.4: Why is There So Much Fund-Raising Public Broadcasting?
However, thriving commercial markets suggest that broadcasting may not be underproduced. Viewed as a mechanism for delivering advertising messages, broadcasting is both exclusive (advertisers must pay) and rival (only one advertiser can use a time slot).
1211
APPLICATION 16.4: Why is There So Much Fund-Raising Public Broadcasting?
An alternative justification is that certain types of broadcasting will be unattractive to advertisers (for example, cultural) and will be underprovided in private markets. However, the free rider problem tends to undermine voluntary support. Fewer than 10 percent of the viewers of public television make voluntary contributions.
1212
APPLICATION 16.4: Why is There So Much Fund-Raising Public Broadcasting?
Public broadcasting has had to turn to advertising. Cable television stations, such as The Learning Channel, today provide programming that is indistinguishable from public broadcasting. Voluntary support of public is declining and its long-run viability is in doubt.
1213
Local Public Goods Since individuals are relatively free to move from one locality to another, the public goods problem may be more tractable on the local level. “Voting with one’s fee” provides a mechanism for revealing demand for public goods. People who want high-quality schools or strong police protection can choose to live in high tax areas.
1214
Direct Voting and Resource Allocation
In some situations, people vote directly on policy questions. While majority rule is a common criteria, many cases require even greater amounts (even 100 percent in Quaker meetings) to win in a voting situation. However, for what follows, majority rule is assumed.
1215
TABLE 16.3: Preferences That Produce the Paradox of Voting
1216
The Paradox of Voting Majority-rule voting systems may not arrive at an equilibrium but instead may cycle among alternative options. This paradox is illustrated in Table 16.3. Suppose there are three voters (Smith, Jones, and Fudd) choosing among three policy options regarding spending on a particular public good (A = low, B = medium, and C = high).
1217
The Paradox of Voting Preferences of the three voters are indicated by the order listed in the table. For example, Smith prefers A to B and B to C. In a vote between A and B option A would win. Similarly, a vote between A and C would result in option C winning. But, a vote between C and B would find B (which lost to A above, and A lost to C) winning.
1218
Single-Peaked Preferences and the Median Voter Theorem
Equilibrium voting outcomes can always occur in cases where the issue being voted upon is one-dimensional and where voters’ preferences are “single-peaked.” In Figure 16.6, the preferences that give rise to the paradox of voting are shown by assigning hypothetical utility levels to A, B, and C.
1219
Single-Peaked Preferences and the Median Voter Theorem
The preferences of Smith and Jones are single-peaked--as levels of public goods’ expenditures rise, there is only one local utility maximizing choice (A for Smith, B for Jones. Fudd has two local peaks (A and C). If Fudd’s preferences were represented by the dashed line, option B would defeat both A and C.
1220
FIGURE 16.6: Single-Peaked Preferences and the Median Voter Theorem
Utility Fudd Fudd (alternate) Jones Smith Quantity of public good A B C
1221
Single-Peaked Preferences and the Median Voter Theorem
B wins because it is the choice of the median voter whose preferences for a public good represent the middle point of all voters’ preferences for the good. The median voter result applies to any number of voters. If choices are one-dimensional and preferences are single-peaked, majority rule will select the median voter’s choice.
1222
APPLICATION 16.5: Referenda on Public Spending
California’s Proposition 13, passed in 1977, required that property in California be taxed at a maximum rate of 1 percent of the 1975 fair market value. It also imposed sharp limits on tax increases in future years. Local property tax revenues declined by nearly 60 percent between fiscal 1978 and 1979.
1223
APPLICATION 16.5: Referenda on Public Spending
One explanation for the passage of this law was a demand for changing the sources of local tax revenues. Citizens were largely content with existing levels of local services but wanted state tax sources (income and sales, primarily) to take over a larger share of the burden.
1224
APPLICATION 16.5: Referenda on Public Spending--California’s Proposition 13
Alternatively, voters may have wished for a decline in local government size. Both hypotheses have empirical support. California voters did raise other state taxes, but spending is significantly lower than before the initiative.
1225
APPLICATION 16.5: Referenda on Public Spending--Massachusetts and Michigan
In Massachusetts, the 1980 passage of Proposition 2½, similar to Proposition 13, was fueled by a preference for “greater efficiency” in government. The Michigan “Headler Amendment,” which proposed to limit state taxes, also appeared to stem from preferences for more efficiency.
1226
APPLICATION 16.5: Referenda on Public Spending --Home Rule in Illinois
“Home Rule,” which eliminates state-level restrictions on spending, was adopted by communities in Illinois. More heterogeneous groups appeared to want to limit local spending. More homogeneous groups wanted to forsake the spending restrictions. The homogeneous groups have similar interests with respect to government size and functions.
1227
Representative Government and Bureaucracies
In a representative government, individuals vote for directly for candidates, not policies. This raises the issue of whether or not representatives will actually vote the way their constituents want and present the possibility for rent-seeking behavior where firms or individuals influence government policy to increase their own welfare.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.