Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Unit 14 Social Psychology
Label a new blank page in your notebook:
2
Social psychologists Study social forces that explain why the same person acts differently in different situations
3
What are the real world implications of the f.a.e?
Q1: How does fundamental Attribution error describe how We tend to explain others’ behavior compared to ours? Fundamental Attribution Error tendency for observers, when analyzing another’s behavior, to underestimate the impact of the situation and to overestimate the impact of personality traits What are the real world implications of the f.a.e? poverty? relationships ?
4
…but, there is evidence that attitudes can develop from behavior
Q2: What is an attitude & how do attitudes and actions affect each other attitudes: feelings, based on our beliefs that influence our behavior If we believe someone is mean we may feel dislike and then act unfriendly toward them Attitudes Behavior …but, there is evidence that attitudes can develop from behavior Behavior Attitudes
5
Attitudes follow behavior…
If someone convinced you to act against your beliefs, you’d change your belief (attitude) to match your action. Foot-in-the-door phenomenon People agreeing to a small request will find it easier to later agree to a larger one Principle works for negative and positive behavior REUTERS/ Vasily Fedosenko ATTITUDES FOLLOW BEHAVIOR Cooperative actions, such as those performed by people on sports teams feed mutual liking.
6
Q2 continued…Actions Affect Attitudes…
Role: a set of expectations about a social position, defining how those in the position should act. Cognitive dissonance theory the theory that we act to reduce the discomfort (dissonance) we feel when two of our thoughts (cognitions) are inconsistent. CHEATING If you do a behavior that is “bad” you change your attitude about the behavior.
7
Power of the situation / role zimbardo prison study
Q2… 29 min A.G 5 min Power of the situation / role zimbardo prison study Purpose: Participants: Results: Ethics: If you put good people in a bad situation, will the person do bad things College age men. Randomly assigned to Guard & Prisoner Cut short after 6 days. Guards & Prisoners both felt shame & humiliation. For most, the situation did control behavior. Some guards did “evil” things and others didn’t speak up. Informed Consent 2. Keep results confidential Do no physical or mental harm Debrief participants
8
Q3: What do experiments on Conformity & obedience tell us about the power of social influence?(pg. 382) chameleon effect: Asch’s Conformity Study: define: Method deceived: # of participants: task: What is the decision participant has to make during the 3rd trial? Results when answering alone… when in the room with confederates who answered incorrectly… more likely to conform when… (7)
9
confederate confederate participant
10
Asch’s Conformity Study: define: METHOD
deceived: # of participants: task: What is the decision you have to make during the 3rd trial? RESULTS when answering alone… when in the room with confederates who answered incorrectly… more likely to conform when… adjusting our thinking or behavior to go along with a group standard a study on visual perception you & 5 others state, 1 by 1, which of 3 lines is the same as a standard 1. Easy. Should I conform? wrong less than 1% of the time wrong 37% of the time everyone else agrees group has at least THREE feel insecure have not already committed to an answer know others will observe our behavior admire the groups’ status
11
Milgram’s Obedience Study
Intro to Obedience (5 min) Define: Method “fake” study – draw randomly to determine – teacher task – learner task- teacher after 1st wrong answer: teacher after 8th wrong answer: learner after 10th wrong answer: You want to stop hurting this person but the experimenter says: “…” Final shock v: At what level would you stop? At what level would most people (say) stop? Results Obedience is highest when… (4) Re-visited 1st 3 minutes Re-visited remainder
12
Milgram’s Obedience Study
Define: changing a behavior to follow a command Method “Fake” study (deception) – “Effect of punishment on learning” Participants: 1 “teacher” & 1 “learner” teacher task – test learner on word pairs; if wrong = shock them learner task- to learn the words….actually an actor (confederate) teacher is too gradually increase shocks given to “learner” each time they are wrong If participant (“teacher”) wants to stop, the researcher says… “You have no choice. You must go on.” Final shock v: 450 volt At what level would you stop? your opinion At what level would most people say they would stop? Men vs. Women: Results Obedience is highest when…
13
Obedience highest when…
Person giving order is close by & was an authority figure The authority figure was associated with a respected institution The victim was depersonalized or far away There was no role model of defiance Point to Remember: 1. People are not evil, they are obedient. 2. One person can make a difference… minority influence: you can sway the majority if you hold firmly to your beliefs – power of committed individual is as strong as power of the group
14
Winding Times Lab Directions
In your group, assign yourself the role of Subject #1, #2, #3, or #4 Subjects #1 and #2 should go somewhere quiet and time each other, one by one, winding the yarn as fast as they can. Subjects #3 and #4 should do the same. Report your scores to Mrs. Mal.
15
Q5: How Does the Presence of others influence our actions through social facilitation & social loafing Winding Times Lab: 1. According to our class data, did social facilitation prove to be true in this experiment? Explain your answer using the data to support your response. 2. Why does social facilitation occur? 3. What are positive effects of social facilitation? 4. Would the impact of social facilitation increase or decrease with group size? Explain. 5. How does social facilitation explain home-team advantage? 6. What were the flaws in this experiment?
16
Q5: …continued… Social Facilitation:
people tend to have a stronger response (do better) on simple or well-learned tasks in the presence of others. Social Loafing: tendency to give less effort when in a group Don’t feel accountable Not worth the effort WHY?
17
Q7-8-9: What is prejudice and what are the social, emotion, & cognitive roots of prejudice?
Negative attitude towards a group beliefs (stereotypes) emotions (hostility, envy, fear) predisposed to action (discrimination) behavior
18
Open prejudice declines but subtle prejudice lingers
19
…create this chart in your notes…
Due Thursday: 15 points page …create this chart in your notes… Social Emotional Cognitive just-world phenomenon (define & example) explain how forming categories can lead to prejudice scapegoat theory categories in group v. out group 9/11 example explain how remembering vivid cases leads to prejudice vivid cases
22
Social Roots of Prejudice
Just World Phenomenon people get what they deserve; good is rewarded & evil is punished Stereotypes rationalize inequalities women slave owners In Group (us)- Out Group (them) social identities lead us to like our ingroup ingroup bias tendency to favor our own group why? Woman are naturally sensitive so justifies why hold women responsible for care taking of children
23
Emotional Roots of Prejudice
Scapegoat Theory outlet for anger by providing someone to blame poverty Prejudice levels are high among economically depressed people feeling insecure leads us to repair that by talking badly about others 9/11 Outraged people lashed out at innocent Arab-Am.
24
Cognitive Roots of Prejudice
categories = simplify our world Categories When we categorize people, we often overestimate their similarities other race effect Recall faces of one’s own race more accurately than faces of other races Vivid Cases Vivid cases are readily available in our memory & fed our stereotypes. Two groups given list containing info about 50 men. 1st group: 10 arrested for nonviolent crime. 2nd grougp: 10 arrested for murder. Later, both asked to estimate how many of 50 committed any sort of crime. The 2nd group overestimated the number.
25
Q10 & Q11: Why do we like who we do & What Are Passionate and companionate love?
Love Style Survey Eros (Items 1–4) Passionate love. . It focuses strongly on physical attraction &sensual satisfaction. Rapidly developing, emotionally intense, intimate relationships. They tend to idealize their lovers and are willing to take risks. Ludus (Items 5–8) Love is a game. Likes the “chase”. This type of person dates several partners and moves in and out of love affairs quickly & easily. He or she refuses to make long-range plans. Wary of emotional intensity from others. Storge (Items 9–12) These people find themselves in relationships that take time to develop. Desire a long-term relationship based on mutual trust. Often dates past friends
26
Pragma (Items 13–16) Need to be in a relationship where each satisfies each other’s basic or practical needs. Relationships are based on satisfactory rewards rather than romantic attraction. (“I need a boy/girl friend”) (“We’re just hanging out”) Mania (Items 17–20) Possessive, dependent love. Often fearful of being rejected by partner. Highly emotional expressiveness and a lot of disclosure, but sometimes low self-esteem. Yearns for love, but believes being in love is painful. He or she tries to force the partner into greater expressions of affection. (“Tell me how you feel”) (“Show me you love me”) Agape (Items 21–24) All-giving, selfless, non-demanding love. You would sacrifice your own interests in favor of your partner’s and give without expecting a reward. They are not happy unless the partner is also happy. Prepared to share all they have, they are vulnerable to exploitation.
27
Psych Sim 5 Dating and Mating
5. Women and men differ in jealousy in that men and women..... 6. What are the differences between men and women in terms of fantasy literature? 7. Across cultures, the top two preferences for mates were ______ and _______. 8. People tend to marry someone..... 1. Three factors that influence romantic attraction are a) b) c) 3. According to Darwin, sexual selection is.... 4. Gender Difference in Mate Selection Men prefer____ ________ ______ because.... Women prefer _______ ________ __________ _ _________ _______ because...
28
Q14: When are we most & least likely to intervene? (402)
Altruism unselfish concern for others (help) Kitty Genovese murdered while 38 of her neighbors didn’t help Bystander Intervention Three things required in order for someone to help Notice the incident Interpret it as an emergency Assume responsibility Kitty G (6:43) Bystander Effect 6 min Bystander Effect The tendency for people to be less likely to help when other people are present.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.