1. Evaluating the Effects of Substance Use and Education on the Likelihood of Arrest Among Hispanics
Lorna Alvarez-Rivera, Ph.D., & R. Neal McIntyre, Jr., DPA
Valdosta State University

2. Introduction
The current body of research that exists pertaining to Latinos and crime lacks consensus on the magnitude and even the nature of the issue. This paper attempts to contribute to the literature on ethnicity and crime by discussing crime among Latinos. Specifically, it examines the effect of substance use and education on criminality among Latinos. Examining the link between Latinos and crime is of great importance at a time when the Hispanic population in the U.S. has reached an all-time high of 16.7% is expected to continue to grow (U.S. Census, 2011).

3. Background
Members of many ethnic minorities in the U.S. report higher rates of substance use, particularly alcohol abuse, than do Whites (Caetano & Clark, 1998)
It has been hypothesized that ethnic minorities may turn to alcohol and substance use as a means to reduce stress associated with being acculturated into American society.
Of the ethnic minorities in the U.S., Hispanics are currently the fastest growing group and are expected to constitute 25% of the U.S. population by 2050

4. Background
Given their levels of poverty, minority status, and residential concentration in areas with wide drug and alcohol distribution, Latina/os are considered at risk for substance abuse (Gil & Vega, 2001)
Trends suggest that substance abuse among Latina/os is increasing (Caetano, Baruah, & Chartier, 2011; Warner et al., 2006)
In addition, Latina/os tend to be stereotyped as being uneducated

5. Background
The perception of being uneducated and living in impoverished, high crime areas impact life chances for Latina/os
Reduced opportunities to succeed through conventional means could increase the potential for criminality and subsequent arrest for Latina/os.

6. Purpose
The purpose of this study is to add to the body of current research focusing on Hispanics by evaluating the effects of substance use (including alcohol) and education on the likelihood of arrest among Hispanics in the U.S.

7. Methodology
The current study is a secondary analysis of data derived from the National Household Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 2004.
Binary logistic regression models are used to determine the effect of ethnicity, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, mental health, and education on the likelihood of arrest, controlling for a series of variables

8. Hypotheses
History of substance and alcohol abuse will predict the likelihood of being arrested
Lower levels of educational achievement will predict the likelihood of being arrested
Presence of mental illness will predict the likelihood of being arrested
Ethnicity will significantly predict the likelihood of being arrested

9. Descriptive Statistics of Dependent Variables
Mean
Std. Dev.
Drug
54520
.01
.087
Propcrime
54519
.107
Viocrime
54522
Crimhist
55443
.16
.366

10. Descriptive Statistics of Independent Variables
Mean
Std. Dev
Married
55602
.26
.439
Workforce
55581
.54
.499
Female
.52
.500
Education
.32
.467
Hispanic
.14
.348
Government Program
1.82
.382
Alcohol Abuse
21272
1.2
.402
Drug Abuse
21380
1.21
.405
Mental Health
26702
1.11
.313

11. Property Crime Arrests
Results
Ever Arrested/Booked
(Crimhist)
Violent Crime Arrests
(Viocrime)
Property Crime Arrests
(Propcrime)
Any Drug Arrest
(Drug)
Model 1
b (se)
Exp (B)
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Married
-.110
(.049)
.896*
-1.801
(.374)
.165***
-2.417
(.461)
.089***
-1.909
(.401)
.148***
Workforce
1.088
(.055)
2.968***
.246
(.182)
1.279
.358
(.163)
1.431*
.511
(.217)
1.667*
Female
-1.161
(.047)
.313***
-.953
(.190)
.386***
-.639
(.165)
.528***
-1.188
(.230)
305***
Education
-.089
(.048)
.915
-.945
(.264)
.389***
-1.528
(.291)
.217***
-.304
(.247)
.738
Hispanic
.022
(.073)
1.022
-.072
(.285)
.930
-.315
.730
-.361
(.371)
.697
Government Program
-.460
(.072)
.631***
-.814
(.225)
.443***
-.187
(.253)
.829
-.811
(.263)
.444**
Alcohol Abuse
.045
(.200)
1.046
.961
(.641)
2.615
-.273
(.794)
.761
(.884)
Drug Abuse
-.067
(.203)
.935
-.873
(.692)
.418
.008
(.811)
1.008
.252
(.895)
1.286
Mental Health
.126
(.095)
1.134
-.128
(.373)
.880
.279
(.367)
1.322
-.200
(.399)
.819

12. Results
Married respondents were approximately 10% less likely to have been arrested, 83% less likely to have been arrested for a violent crime, 91% less likely to have been arrested for a property crime, and 85% less likely to have been arrested for a drug offense in comparison to those who reported not being married.
Those who reported working were approximately 3 times more likely to have been arrested for a crime, 1.4 times more likely to have been arrested for a property crime, and 1.7 times more likely to have been arrested for a drug offense in comparison to those who were not working.

13. Results
Females were approximately 69% less likely to have ever been arrested, 41% less likely to have ever been arrested for a violent crime, 47% less likely to have ever been arrested for a property crime, and 69% less likely to have ever been arrested for a drug offense.
Respondents with more than a high school education were approximately 61% less likely to have ever been arrested for a violent crime and 78% less likely to have ever been arrested for a property crime.
Respondents who had participated in one or more government programs were approximately 37% less likely to have ever been arrested, 56% less likely to have been arrested for a violent crime, and 56% less likely to have been arrested for a drug offense in comparison to those who have never participated in any governmental programs.

14. Conclusions
Drug and alcohol abusers were not more likely to report being arrested in comparison to those who do not or have not abused alcohol or drugs
Individuals with lower educational levels were more likely to be arrested for violent and property crimes.
Those who reported to have suffered mental illness were not more likely to have been arrested
Hispanic respondents were not more likely to have been arrested in comparison to non-Hispanics.