Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lack of Evidence of a Clopidogrel – Statin Interaction in the CHARISMA Trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:291-5 Jacqueline Saw, MD*, Danielle Brennan, MS†,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lack of Evidence of a Clopidogrel – Statin Interaction in the CHARISMA Trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:291-5 Jacqueline Saw, MD*, Danielle Brennan, MS†,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Lack of Evidence of a Clopidogrel – Statin Interaction in the CHARISMA Trial
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:291-5 Jacqueline Saw, MD*, Danielle Brennan, MS†, Steven Steinhubl, MD‡, Deepak L. Bhatt, MD†, Koon-Hou Mak, MD§, Keith Fox, MB^, and Eric J. Topol, MD# for the CHARISMA Investigators *Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; †Cleveland, Ohio; ‡Lexington, Kentucky; §Singapore; ^Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; and #La Jolla, California

2 Study Objective To evaluate the potential impact of long-term concomitant administration of clopidogrel and statins in the CHARISMA study on long-term clinical event-rates

3 CHARISMA Trial Design Median 28 months
Bhatt DL, et al. N Eng J Med 2006;354:1-12.

4 Methods (1) We performed a secondary analysis evaluating the differential treatment effect (interaction) of clopidogrel versus placebo according to the type of statin administered: CYP3A4-MET versus Non-CYP3A4-MET Atorvastatin versus pravastatin Analyses of the entire CHARISMA cohort, symptomatic cohort, & asymptomatic cohort

5 Methods (2) Statin administration was non-randomized
Recorded at baseline and each follow-up visit Our analysis was based upon baseline statin administered — 2 major groups: CYP3A4-MET: Statins predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 (atorvastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin) Non-CYP3A4-MET: Statins not predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 (pravastatin, fluvastatin)

6 Statistical Analyses Intention-to-treat population, 2-sided tests, 5% α Chi-square to compare baseline variables Cox proportional-hazards model to estimate the HR and 95% CI for the primary efficacy endpoint Logistic regression model to compute OR and 95% CI for the primary safety endpoint Interactions tested with Cox proportional-hazards model, incorporating terms for randomized treatment and treatment-by-statin, to assess if treatment effect differed for CYP3A4-MET vs. non-CYP3A4-MET, and atorvastatin vs. pravastatin SAS software (8.2, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

7 Baseline Characteristics
CYP3A4-MET (N=8,245) Non-CYP3A4-MET (N=1,748) P value Age 63.9 ± 9.4 64.4 ± 9.4 0.048 Body mass index 29.0 ± 5.2 28.5 ± 5.1 <0.001 Female 2278 (27.6%) 478 (27.3%) 0.810 Diabetes mellitus 3418 (41.5%) 702 (40.2%) 0.318 Active smoker 871 (10.6%) 171 (9.8%) 0.332 Hypertension 6098 (74.0%) 1254 (71.7%) 0.056 Hyperlipidemia 7488 (90.8%) 1544 (88.3%) 0.001 History of MI 3615 (43.8%) 754 (43.1%) 0.584 History of stroke 1545 (18.7%) 376 (21.5%) 0.008 History of CHF 553 (6.7%) 99 (5.7%) 0.109 Prior CABG 2173 (26.4%) 373 (21.3%) Prior CEA 521 (6.3%) 86 (4.9%) 0.026 PAD 1844 (22.4%) 330 (18.9%)

8 Primary Efficacy Endpoint
HR 0.93 p=0.23 HR 1.02 p=0.87 HR 0.87 p=0.08 HR 0.89 p=0.18 HR 0.78 p=0.19 HR 0.80 p=0.06 HR 0.72 p=0.13

9 Interaction: CYP3A4-MET
The interaction of the type of statin (CYP3A4-MET vs. non-CYP3A4-MET) and randomized treatment was not significant. p=0.69

10 Interaction: Atorvastatin/Pravastatin
The interaction of atorvastatin versus pravastatin and randomized treatment was not significant. p=0.54

11 Statins Versus No Statins
p<0.001 p<0.001

12 Symptomatic Patients In the symptomatic subgroup, the interaction of the type of statin used (CYP3A4-MET vs. Non-CYP3A4-MET) and the randomized treatment (clopidogrel vs. placebo) remained insignificant: p=0.18 Likewise, the interaction of atorvastatin versus pravastatin and randomized treatment was not significant: p=0.25

13 GUSTO Major Bleeding OR 1.24 p=0.11 OR 1.29 p=0.20 OR 1.19 p=0.33

14 Limitations Retrospective post hoc analysis
Statin administration not randomized Statin dose not recorded Analysis based upon baseline statin use Platelet aggregation or activation not assessed

15 Conclusions Despite theoretical concerns and ex vivo testing suggesting a potential negative interaction with concomitant clopidogrel and CYP3A4-MET statin administration, there was no evidence of an interaction clinically in a large placebo- controlled trial with long-term follow-up Our study is concordant with other clinical analyses, suggesting that clinicians need not choose statins on the basis of CYP3A4- metabolism, even when long-term clopidogrel co-administration is required


Download ppt "Lack of Evidence of a Clopidogrel – Statin Interaction in the CHARISMA Trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:291-5 Jacqueline Saw, MD*, Danielle Brennan, MS†,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google