1. University of Management & Technology, Lahore
Welcome to the Honorable Members of 10th QEC Meeting of Private Sector Universities
University of Management & Technology, Lahore

2. Agenda of the Meeting
Progress Review & Strategy for Completing targets of assessment year
Best practices in assessment process.

3. SARs Submitted to HEC Sr.No. Department / School Program Description 1
School of Business & Economics
BBA 2
MBA 3
School of Professional Advancement
Masters in Banking and Finance 4
Institute of Audit & Accountancy
Masters in Commerce (M. Com) 5
Bachelors in Commerce 6
BS – Accounting 7
Department of Electrical Engineering
BS – Electrical Engineering 8
Department of Social Sciences & Humanities
BS – Social Sciences with Majors in Psychology

4. SARs Submitted to HEC Sr.No. Department Program Description 9
School of Social Sciences & Humanities
MS - Education 10
MS – Applied Linguistics 11
School of Textile & Design
Bachelors in Fashion Design 12
School of Business & Economics
MS - Management 13
Institute of Islamic Banking
MS – Islamic Banking & Finance 14
Institute of Applied Sciences
BS Aviation Management 15
BS Aircraft Maintenance & Technology 16
Bachelors of Textile & Technology Management 17
MS Textiles

5. Sr.No.
Department / School
Program Description 18
School of Social Sciences & Humanities
MA - English 19
School of Science & Technology
BS - CS 20
BS - SE

6. Conducting Evaluation Surveys
Following Surveys have been completed:
Teacher’s Evaluation
Course Evaluation
Faculty Course Review Report
Faculty Survey
Faculty Resume
Alumni Survey
Employer Survey
Survey of Graduating Students

7. Remedial Measures taken on the basis of feedbacks
Tripping of Multimedia projectors during power shut downs for which a Generator has been installed in order to avoid tripping during power shut downs.
Establishment of Media Labs in the new building. Previously we were conducting labs in consultation with different media chanels

8. Remedial Measures taken on the basis of feedbacks
Provision of proper lockers for equipment for architecture students.
Calibration of instrument before practicals.

9. Impact /Outcomes of Evaluation
Role of QEC in improving the quality of education is now better
understood.
Awareness and sensitivity regarding Quality and the Quality Assurance measures is increasing amongst the stakeholders.
Sense of accountability and responsibility (amongst university
management, faculty members, and students) has begun to improve.
Faculty development programs have been initiated for capacity building.

10. Best practices in Assessment Process.
Adoption of Scorecard system based upon number of Publications by the department right from the inception of MS programs to date
Conducting Regular Quality Council Meeting to determine the effectiveness of Assessment processes
Accreditation by different accreditation councils like NBEAC,NCEAC,NEACTE and SAQS etc.

11. Category A: Proposal Approved by BASAR
Conducted Doctoral Program Assessments of all the programs offered by various Schools / Institutes.
Category A: Proposal Approved by BASAR
Category B: Comprehensive Qualified and Proposal under Development
Category C: Course Work Completed and Comprehensive Awaited
Category D: Course Work Regular and Satisfactory Performance
Category E: Course Work Irregular or Unsatisfactory performance
Category F: Dropped out during Course work
Category G: Dropped out after Passing Comprehensive but before BASAR
Category H: Total Admitted
Category I: Passed Out

12. Program Assessments at MS / M.Phil Level
Developed the systems for Program Assessments based on Alumni feedback. Conducted program assessments of MS Management, MS Applied Linguistics and MS Education.
35 Program Manuals of all MS / M. Phil and Ph. D programs have been prepared in consultation with relevant CODs.

13. Program Brief
Program Mission Statement
Program Objectives
Rationale of the Program
Learning Outcomes
Program Structure
Road Map of the Program
Career Prospects
Course outlines of individual Course
Eligibility/ Admission Criteria
Assessment & Evaluation of Courses
Degree Awarding Criteria
List of Faculty Members
List of Research Publications
Scheme of Study
Course Outlines of Individual Course(s)

14. Performance of Quality Enhancement Cell in the eyes of QAA, HEC

15. Academic Performance of UMT
Key Performance Indicators of UMT
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Fall 2014
Spring 2015
Course material
83.09
83.00
83.39
84.6
85.52
84.27
85.36
Class Teaching
79.94
83.06
83.21
84.17
85.90
85.09
85.66
Class Assessment
79.77
81.67
81.64
81.52
82.06
83.31
83.99
Student Learning
78.21
80.31
80.4
80.67
81.5
82.66
82.93
Resources
68.02
72.35
76.83
77.03
77.63
79.74
78.55
78.50
Grand Percentage
77.81
80.08
81.07
81.16
81.99
83.59
82.78
83.29

16. School wise satisfaction Level
Key Performance Indicators of Schools / Institutes (Average Percentages)
School / Institute
Course material
Class Teaching
Class Assessment
Student Learning
Resources
Grand Percentage
SCA
91.26
91.00
89.30
87.87
86.49
89.18
ICCS
85.87
86.33
84.91
84.25
83.06
84.88
ICP
91.43
92.21
92.03
89.85
88.51
90.81
IIB
85.31
85.28
83.13
82.99
81.17
83.58
SST
84.46
84.44
55.04
81.85
80.25
77.21
IAS
85.86
85.22
85.74
83.39
75.49
83.14
SPA
82.08
81.13
79.75
77.75
78.78
79.90
SBE
85.15
85.90
78.23
82.15
79.69
82.22
SSSH
88.44
88.71
87.41
86.19
83.90
86.93
STD
85.20
85.79
84.15
84.37
79.08
83.72
SEN
85.66
85.72
84.10
82.42
79.17
83.41
SAP
87.48
87.17
86.16
86.22
83.91
SAS
80.52
77.89
81.57
77.18
72.25
77.88
SGS
85.14
84.48
82.46
73.01
82.06

17. Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SBE
Fall 2014
Spring 2015
Fall 2015
Finance
83.10
81.00
77.99
Marketing
81.73
85.08
83.02
Skills Development
83.12
78.37
84.91
Quantitative Methods
80.74
82.68
82.42
Management
86.42
80.19
81.79
Economics
81.93
84.12
83.11
Operations and Supply Chain
84.02
81.70
80.80
Information System
82.43
80.90
82.37

18. Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SST
Fall 2014
Spring 2015
Fall 2015
Informatics & Systems
80.27
83.05
77.24
Computer Sciences
80.25
82.22
76.52

19. Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SEN
Fall 2014
Spring 2015
Fall 2015
Electrical Engineering
82.71
83.06
84.91
Industrial Engineering
78.86
77.07
76.77
Mechanical Engineering
88.98
84.53
87.95
Energy Engineering
80.82
79.30
83.09
Civil Engineering
86.41
80.52
82.43

20. Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SSSH
Fall 2014
Spring 2015
Fall 2015
Special Needs Education
90.96
89.86
91.15
Psychology
83.21
83.51
83.47
English Language & Literature
89.89
90.02
87.04
ITC
86.16
85.58
88.53
Education
89.14
89.00
85.65
Sociology
86.57
Media and Communication
80.43
78.31
85.53
Political Science
88.08

21. Observations / Recommendations
Total 30 Resource Persons have been identified having Academic Performance 10% below than University’s Average.
Problems in accessing Moodle

22. Recommendations to Enhance Research Activities at UMT
Every Faculty Member must publish at least one Research paper in HEC recognized Journal as a Principal author during a year.
Number of travel grants from HEC be increased
Every Ph.D. Candidate must publish two research publications in HEC recognized Journal, failing to which the degree will not be awarded.

23. Every MS Scholar must publish at least one Research paper in HEC recognized Journal before submitting his / her thesis for defense without which no degree will be offered.
Every School / Institute offering MS / Ph.D. must start publishing its own Journal in order to promote a healthy Research Culture.

24. In order to enhance Industry – academia relationship, number of university industrial linkages through (ORICs) be enhanced and such projects be designed in collaboration with each and every School / Institute level.
Efforts be made to increase the number of Research Grant from HEC & from other sources like: USAID, JICA, Corporate sector & NGOs etc.

25. Future Plans Automation of Student’s and other Stakeholder’s feedbacks
The best Faculty members of each department and school / institute will be awarded with Best Teacher’s award
Continuous training to the Faculty members having academic performance below than 70 %

26. Questions & Answers