Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Welcome!
2
Open Educational Resources
Stacy Smith and Sara Schafer
3
Open Educational Resources (OER)
openly licensed Free to use and edit Vetted and standards-aligned resources #GoOpen Initiative #GoOpen Districts #GoOpen States
5
K-12 English Language Arts
Standards Review for 2017 Board Adoption Suzanne Myers
6
Group Members: Writing Committee
K – 5 Nichole Kuhn Joy Brown Kambra Gallagher Carolyn Boyd 9 – 12 Jeff Baxter Julie Buzard Melissa Reed Stephen Kucharik Elida Garza Cheryl Elligan-Brown 6 – 8 Lindsay McCracken Kathy Gann Julie Aikins Jeremy Goode Kimberlee Osenga *CHAIR* However, we will structure our meetings in such a way to ensure vertical alignment and collaborative “checks and balances” between and within groups.
7
Group Members: Review Committee
K – 5 Felicia Yoakam Debra Schapaugh Angela Pond 9 – 12 Sherry Irsik Brian Skinner Danny Wade Sara Sedgwick Anna Moon Bradley 6 – 8 Senator Stephen Fitzgerald Linda Thurston Angela Goode Brent Wolf *CHAIR* However, we will structure our meetings in such a way to ensure vertical alignment and collaborative “checks and balances” between and within groups. Should we say what district each person is from, to make this more than just names. Perhaps split into two slides to add enough room?
8
Ad Hoc Committee Members
Idalia Shuman (KNEA) Rachel Henderson (Parent Representative) Tracy Stokes (Kansas MTSS) Vera Stroup-Rentier (Early Childhood/Special Education) Deb Matthews (Early Childhood/Special Education) Lauren Adams (CETE) Holly Dubiel (CETE)
9
Progress Update Who: What: When: Where: Why: Who: What: When: Where:
Writing Group What: 2-Day Meeting When: May 3-4 Where: Topeka Why: Complete Draft 1 Who: Writing Group What: Virtual Work When: May 4-June 13 Where: Online Why: Complete Draft 1 Who: Review Group What: Virtual Work When: June 13-Aug. 12 Where: Online Why: Feedback Draft 1 Who: KSDE & Committee Members What: Gathering Feedback When: June, July, October Where: Impact Institutes, Annual Conference Why: Feedback Draft 1 Who: Review Group What: 2-Day Meeting When: Dec. 5-6 Where: Topeka Why: Complete Draft 2 Who: KSDE What: Formatting Adding Links When: Dec-Jan Where: Why: Ready document for final “look” before public meetings
10
Proposed Changes Addition of “ELA Practices” to provide big picture goals Addition of “Student Success Statements” Addition of Progression for each standard in expanded form Addition of “Intent of Standard” statements to address Anchor Standard “Absorption” of Kansas 15 percent into ELA Practices and grade level standards
11
Proposed Changes, Continued
Multiple ways to view, depending on desired level of detail Interactive Links to further detail about each standard Concrete examples of possible instruction for each standard Links to jump to an “expanded form” standard within document Attention to qualitative as well as quantitative measures in Reading standard 10.
12
Proposed Changes, Continued
Updated “front matter” to explain situate the standards for educators and education stakeholders Removal of any language that dictates course sequencing (e.g. Reference to U.S. texts in HS grades) Creation of progression document for language standards Greater clarity around how to integrate the ELA strands (Writing, Reading, Speaking/Listening, Language) for deeper learning.
13
“Sneak Peek” – Quick View
14
“Sneak Peek” – Quick View (Pop-Out Example)
15
“Sneak Peek” – Standard View
16
“Sneak Peek” – Expanded View
17
Next Steps for 2017 March: Full Committee Meets
Finalize document for public review and public meetings April – May: Regional Feedback Meetings Locations TBD May – June: Review all feedback & work with committee to determine needed changes. June – July: Finalize Draft 3 Summer/Fall 2017: Board Receipt, Review, Possible Adoption
18
Questions or Comments? Suzanne Myers:
20
Standards Review for 2017 Board Adoption
K-12 Mathematics Standards Review for 2017 Board Adoption Melissa Fast Sara Schafer This is a public meeting. Important that our work follows a very intentional, rational, and deliberate process all focused on ensuring the best set of standards for our students that will help fulfill the Board’s vision for each Kansas student.
21
Group Members: Writing Committee
K – 5 Senator Marc Rhoades Maria Ortiz-Smith, USD 443 Lynette Sharlow, USD 259 Brian Shelton, USD 607 Debbie Thompson – Chair, USD 259 9 – 12 Cherrly Delacruz, USD 501 Senator Forest Knox Kim Lackey, USD 383 Sheila Meggers, USD 308 John Scoggins, USD 320 Sarah Stevens, Consultant Rich Wilson, USD 233 6 – 8 Jerry Braun, USD 489 Danira Fernandez-Flores, USD 497 Sherri Martinie, Kansas State University Elizabeth Peyser, Consultant However, we will structure our meetings in such a way to ensure vertical alignment and collaborative “checks and balances” between and within groups.
22
Group Members: Review Committee
K – 5 Bonnie Austin, USD 443 Jamie Junker, USD 259 Suzie Legg, USD 500 Connie Schrock, Emporia State University Lucas Shivers, USD 383 9 – 12 Jessica Barger, USD 512 Christopher Carter – Chair, USD 233 Larry Diepenbrock, USD 423 Kelli Ireton, USD 475 Rhonda Willis, USD 250 6 – 8 Elisa Dorian, USD 469 Maureen Engen, Archdiocese of KCK Sherry Kinderknecht, USD 315 Jenny Wilcox, USD 437 However, we will structure our meetings in such a way to ensure vertical alignment and collaborative “checks and balances” between and within groups. Should we say what district each person is from, to make this more than just names. Perhaps split into two slides to add enough room?
23
Ad Hoc Members Parents Education Organizations Business/Industry
Mickey DeHook – Parent Representative Shana Gorton – Parent Representative Business/Industry William Thompson – Business & Industry Representative Ryan Willis – Business & Industry Representative Patrick Woods – Business & Industry Representative Paul Wallen – Business & Industry Representative Education Organizations Dr. Paula Hough – MTSS Representative Shelby Jansen - Wichita Area Technical College Martin Kollman - KSDE CTE Consultant Barbara Dayal – KSDE Early Childhood Special Education Vera Stroup-Rentier – KSDE Early Childhood Special Education Lisa Lajoie-Smith – KATM Representative Deb Matthews – KSDE Special Education Assessment Alicia Stoltenberg – CETE Math Test Development Coordinator Education Organizations
24
Where we are Who: Who: Who: What: What: What: When: When: When: Where:
Writing Group What: 2-Day Meeting When: May 11th & 12th Where: Topeka Why: Work on Complete Draft 1 Who: Writing Group What: 3-Day Meeting When: July 25th – 27th Where: Topeka Why: Complete Draft 1 Who: Review Group What: Virtual Work When: September Where: Skype, , Google Why: Develop Draft 2 Things will be happening in between all of this (like State Board updates, Impact Institute and Annual Conference sharing), but these are the major meetings and “events”.
25
General Changes Same Domain, Cluster, Standard language
Cleaner format easier to read Interactive document Links to resources Pop out clarifiers Concrete examples of math practices within each grade level Links to jump to a standard within document Teacher and student glossaries
26
K – 5 Proposed Changes Embedding of Kansas 15%
Adding of resource links within document Progression Documents White papers Research Embedding of tables and videos Clarification of language and examples Moving of a few standards
27
6 – 8 Proposed Changes Embedding of Kansas 15%
Adding of resource links within document Progression Documents White papers Research Embedding of tables and videos Clarification of language and examples Moving of a few standards up to HS and down from HS
28
9 – 12 Proposed Changes Embedding of Kansas 15%
Adding of resource links within document Progression Documents White papers Research Clarification of language and examples Moving of a few standards down to MS and up from MS Emphasis on Modeling 9/10; 9/10/11; 11; All; + Notation
29
Next Steps Open document for public feedback
Online feedback form Five regional “town hall” type meetings Dodge City – February 1st Wichita – February 6th Topeka – February 8th Pittsburg – February 15th Salina – March 1st Hays – March 8th Develop 3rd draft – March 2017 Present to SBOE May 2017 Adopt Summer/Early Fall 2017
30
Mathematics Review Website
Visit the Following Website for Review Documents and Meeting Information:
31
Standards Feedback Survey
32
Questions or Comments? Melissa Fast Sara Schafer mfast@ksde.org
34
Visiting International Teacher Program
...providing Kansas students the opportunity to learn from other cultures.
35
Coordinators Suzy Myers Lizette Burks Susan Helbert Assistant Director
ELA Education Program Consultant Lizette Burks Science Education Program Consultant Susan Helbert Assistant Director Teacher Licensure
36
Purpose: Opportunity to learn languages from native speakers
Improve international education High quality teachers meet the needs of Kansas students Alleviate teacher shortages
37
Memoranda of Understanding
Ministry of Education of Spain September, 2001 Ministry of Education of China (Hanban) November, 2006
38
Advisors Sheree Willis Director, KU Confucius Institute, Jesús M. Jurado Mendoza Regional Education Officer Spanish Ministry of Education
39
More than 90 teachers since 2001 in:
Arkansas City Bucklin Cherryvale Dodge City Fairfield/Arlington Fowler Galena Garden City Greensburg Hope/White City Jayhawk Linn Jefferson Co. North Logan Macksville Manhattan Marysville Meade Northern Valley Olathe Pittsburg Stanton County Sublette Topeka Valley Falls Wichita A+ Network Clearwater Smoky Hill, Salina Greenbush & KU Confucius Institute
40
Subjects Spanish (K-12, Heritage, IDL) Chinese (FLES, K-12, IDL)
Spanish Dual language/Bilingual Elementary ESOL French Math, Science Social Studies, Art, Music
41
What KSDE will do: Interview, select, and recommend candidates
Sponsor J-1 visas Facilitate 1 year teaching license, X 3 Orientation of newly arrived Fall retreat, annually Professional development
42
Skilled teachers apply a variety of strategies for students to be successful
43
Orientation, one week in late summer
44
Retreat, a weekend in late September
45
What the district will do:
Letter of Intent Provide teacher mentor Provide community mentor Pay $2000 one-time participation fee (covers 3 years of program) Pre-service training
46
Teachers bring rich, authentic cultural elements to instruction.
47
Teacher qualifications
Proficient in English Bachelors or Masters degree Experienced Transcripts evaluated to meet Kansas requirements Exchange Visitor license for 1 year (renewable for total of 3 years)
50
Need more information? Contacts: Suzy Myers Lizette Burks
Susan Helbert, KSDE Find the VIT webpage, from either – World Languages webpages “V” for Visiting International Teachers
52
K-12 Science Looking for the 3 Dimensions
Lizette Burks
53
Survey Results Topics Identified: Need the Most Support
Assessing Quality Resources Developing 3-Dimensional Performance Tasks or Assessments Aligning Curriculum to the Kansas Curricular Standards in Science (KCSS) I also see these same topics in the curriculum leaders listserv.
54
Assessing Quality Resources
55
Assessing Quality Resources
56
Assessing Quality Resources
57
Developing 3-Dimensional Tasks or Assessments
1D D
58
Aligning Curriculum to the KCSS
59
Moving Beyond “Knowing About” Science to Making Sense of the World
Learning About Figuring Out
60
Moon Phases in Two Classrooms
Ask Yourself the Following Questions Which class is learning about and which is figuring out? Where do the questions come from? Who is involved in figuring out how to investigate the question? How do students get to an explanation? This information has helped inform where we are in the implementation process and what I can do to help us move towards the shifts that our standards hold.
61
Looking for Science Shifts
63
Questions or Comments? Lizette Burks
65
Save the Dates June 20th - 21st (?) WU Topeka
July 12th-13th PSU Pittsburg July 19th-20th BCCC Great Bend Cost: $25.00 per person
67
PollEv.com/kansasstated079 Or text PollEv.com/kansasstated079 to 22333
Poll Everywhere PollEv.com/kansasstated079 Or text PollEv.com/kansasstated079 to 22333
68
Balancing Your Assessment System
Assessment Literacy Balancing Your Assessment System These trainings are designed to help schools and districts balance their assessments systems. There are a total of 17 trainings in this series.
69
Our Work Role of assessments in todays schools
ESSA Accreditation Student Learning Importance of Assessment Literacy All Stakeholders, especially students Assessments have always been part of schooling and that is no different today. A major portion of teaching is assessing the student as they are learning the content. The reasons for the assessments may have shifted a bit over time and newer, shinier assessments have been developed but they still have very important rolls within schooling. The assessments we use serve multiple purposes for multiple stakeholders, a teacher needs to know gaps in knowledge, an administrator needs to know how well the core is working, a student needs to understand their growth over time, a state needs to know about effective policy initiatives. In order to understand the process of gathering and interpreting data to answer these questions one must be literate in the tools, assessments, they are using to gather the information. Has a bad decision ever been made based on faulty information? All too often, teachers and students are harmed through the use of inappropriate measures or misinterpretation of the information. Assessment literacy is paramount.
70
Where We are Headed Helping Build Capacity Within the State of Kansas
Assessment Literacy Trainings Assessment Literacy Standards Assessment Literacy Micro-credentialing Assessment Literacy Assessment This is one way we would like to help. We want to develop this through a backwards design, first outlining the standards, what is expected of each stakeholder to know and be able to do. Then we develop an assessment, measure, to know how we will know when they have these skills. Next we will develop trainings to help them get to that point.
71
The Standards The 1990 Standards: competence-educational-assessment-students Work being done at The National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc. (Center for Assessment): The Michigan Assessment Consortium: The Colorado Department of Education: And of course the work done at the Kansas Department of Education:
72
The Assessment Job Analysis
tasks needed to perform a job and the knowledge/skills needed to perform these tasks provides validity evidence for employment-related tests “to support a claim that the knowledge or skills being assessed are required for credential-worthy performance in an occupation and are consistent with the purpose for which the licensing or licensure program was instituted…Some form of job or job analysis provides the primary basis for defining the content domain” -The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing Brannick, M.T. & Levine, E.L. (2002). Job Analysis: Methods, Research, and Applications for Human Resource Management in the New Millennium. Thousand Oaks: Sage. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. I have done a literacy review and this is a second focus group. Next may be a survey or interviews depending on response patterns. The primary purpose of the survey is to confirm the important tasks and knowledge/skills to perform the job at an accepted level. The NCATE Standards, primarily Standard 8, is required for preservice teachers to demonstrate their understanding of assessments. This assessment would be for in-service teachers and administrators to ensure they have access to the on-going professional development needed to be successful in carrying out the assessment portion of their job. This will be formative in nature like other in-service professional development. The difference being, seat time is not what is counted but the assessment at the end. The KPTP identifies areas in which the student needs further development as an inservice teacher, this will continue the process as assessment literacy shifts and deepens depending on the career development of the teacher.
91
DLM Instructional Materials
Debbie Matthews
92
Dynamic Learning Maps 51 Modules on Instruction -
ELA Claim 1: Students will comprehend text in increasingly complex ways ELA Claim 2: Students can produce writing for a range of purposes and audiences ELA Claim 3: Students can communicate for a range of purposes and audiences ELA Claim 4: Students can engage in research/inquiry to investigate topics and present information Math Claim 1: Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of number sense Math Claim 2: Students demonstrate increasingly complex spatial reasoning and understanding of geometric principles Math Claim 3: Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of measurement, data, and analytic procedures Math Claim 4: Students solve increasingly complex mathematical problems, making productive use of algebra and functions
93
Dynamic Learning Maps DLM opened September 21
DLM is based on Instruction Begin by Selecting Essential Elements (number of elements vary by grade) Provide Instruction on Essential Element Assess Essential Element – Test with a Testlet 3-5 questions Average time to complete the Testlet is 5 minutes Teachers should assess as they instruct
94
Dynamic Learning Maps Teachers complete
First Contact Survey – characteristics of the student Person Needs Profile - Accommodations Then the student receives a Testlet that is customized to the them.
95
DLM Adobe Connect Meetings
September Getting Started with DLM What’s New with DLM? Instructional Resources Accessibility and Personal Needs Profile October 20 – Science November 10 – Writing December 15 – Wrap up for the Fall window DLM Recordings found at on the DLM webpage
96
DLM Adobe Connect Meetings
Thursday, January 19, 2017, 3:00 CST Winter Window January 4-February 28, New Instructional Resources Thursday, February 16, 2017, 3:00 CST Spring Window March, 25-April 28 Thursday, March 16, 2017, 3:00 CST Spring Window, March 25-April 28 Thursday, April , 3:00 CST Wrap up of DLM Assessments
97
NEW - PBS and Iowa Department of Education Literacy Recordings
PBS and the Iowa Department of Education developed a collection of English Language Arts videos on instructional strategies for students with cognitive disabilities - students-with-cognitive-disabilities/ The topics covered are - Language – 7 videos Reading – 15 videos Speaking/listening – 9 videos Writing – 2 videos
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.