Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Protecting Assets Through Cell Structure

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Protecting Assets Through Cell Structure"— Presentation transcript:

1 Protecting Assets Through Cell Structure
Presenters: Crosby Sherman Former Deputy Commissioner of Ins, VT and Former Chief of Captive Insurance, NJ Mario Vitiello President, Risk Transfer Strategies LLC Dianne Salter EVP, Corporate Insurance Services President, Mountain Laurel RRG and Five Point Professional Liability Insurance Company

2 What is a Cell? A Means to segregate business Traditional Cell Captive
Will consist of Core and Cells Core will manage Cells through participation agreements Pure/single parent captive Segregation of business risks Sponsored/Group/Association captives Segregate unrelated businesses Condominium concept -Master Association (Core Captive) with cells individual owners Segregate by business line or geogrphically Pure captive expanding into 3rd party business "Core." The core holds the captive owner's contributed capital. Label each cell A, B, C, D, and E. These are unrelated companies. Each company must fund its cell with loss reserves and enough capital to cover its risk. This means that each cell must hold capital equal to an acceptable solvency ratio. For example, 5:1 premium-to-capital & surplus, is a common first-year solvency ratio. For every $5 of premium the cell needs $1 of capital & surplus.

3 Cell Evolution Started Offshore
Started as Rent-A-Captives An Alphabet Soup of Different Structures Different structures in different domiciles US Cell Captives Traditional cells provide liability/asset protection via captive statutes. Incorporated cells, are governed by corporate law. Sponsored cells, Protected cell; SegregatedCell; Incorporated Cell, Portfolio Insurance Companies, Series LLC Each new structure attempting to provide certainty in segregation protection NJ Sponsored Cell Statute

4 Popularity Increasingly Popular for Smaller Businesses Cost Effective
Risk management is becoming more sophisticated Looking for ways to solve coverage gaps or tailor insurance coverage's Cost Effective Lower formation costs. Quicker to set up. More efficient. Traditional Cell Captive NJ Statute currently allows for protected cells. Conversions

5 Lines of Business in Cells
Typical Property Casualty Lines Medical Stop Loss Recent Attention on Employee Benefits Direct conduit to reinsurers, buy reinsurance at “wholesale’ You will hear from Mario and Dianne more on how they use the captives/cells

6 Mid Market Popularity Increasingly Popular Ideal for Smaller Companies
Recent Attention on Employee Benefits Domiciles are Chasing the Movement Direct conduit to reinsurers, buy reinsurance at “wholesale’ You will hear from Mario and Dianne more on how they use the captives/cells

7 NJ Formation Core/Parent Captive
Similar to pure captive Cells are subject to NJ DOBI approval; possibly through a change in the Business Plan Cells must stand on their own as to capitalization. NJ likes the cell Risk Management Function to Reside at the Core Cell Level. Capitalization minimum of $250,000 in NJ "Core." The core holds the captive owner's contributed capital. Label each cell A, B, C, D, and E. These are unrelated companies. Each company must fund its cell with loss reserves and enough capital to cover its risk. This means that each cell must hold capital equal to an acceptable solvency ratio. For example, 5:1 premium-to-capital & surplus, is a common first-year solvency ratio. For every $5 of premium the cell needs $1 of capital & surplus.

8 Mario Vitiello, President, Risk Transfer Strategies LLC

9 Captive Insurance Group of New Jersey October 13, 2015
Medical Stop Loss Segregated Portfolio Cell Utilization.

10 Captive Overview Business Purpose
Administrator places in excess of $15 million in Premium with Stop Loss carriers for its clients. Overall loss ratio is under 60%. Mature look of business Significant risk and profit sharing available

11 Overview Formation NJ domiciled Captive Company
“Cell” captive owned by Administrator for the benefit of clients opting into the strategy and structure. Specific agreements with cell govern the program Clients participate in their own segregated cell Risks are segregated in cells High quality Carriers A.M. Best “A” Rated

12 Corporate Structure Parent Captive Client Cell 2 Client Cell 1
First $75,000 of any Specific Stop Loss Claim Client Cell 2 First $50,000 of Specific Stop Loss Claim Client Cell 3 First $100,000 of any Specific Stop Loss Claim Captive

13 Example $150,000 $250,000 Specific Stop Loss Deductible
Excess risk retained by stop loss reinsurer Specific Stop Loss Deductible Excess risk retained by Cell (ceded by the stop loss reinsurer) on any individual Claims under the specific stop loss deductible paid by the self-funded employer plan

14 Contractual Structure
Employer purchases Specific Stop Loss Insurance at targeted risk point (deductible) Reinsurer writes the coverage on their policy Client incorporates a cell in captive Requires DOI approval and proper capitalization Capitalization will be subject to a statutory minimum and increase as risk is assumed Reinsurer cedes some risk to the cell along with a share of the premium Cells are segregated from each other Captive pays its share of claims from the ceded premium Reinsurer may require cede premium to be held in a Reg. 114 Trust

15 Captive Cell owned by Client
Business Flow Client Stop Loss Carrier Captive Cell owned by Client Captive provides capital to Cell Profits & losses from Cell Flow to Client Client pays premium Carrier reimburses stop loss calims to Client Carrier cedes layer of risk premium to Captive Cell Cell reimburses Carrier for share of claims

16 Why a Cell? Allows for a stable “fit” of risk transfer
More stability Still Provides catastrophic protection Helps to stabilize Stop Loss pricing year to year Allows Client to benefit in another layer of risk if pursuing more aggressive care management strategies Allows the profit and risk charges on the ceded layer to flow back to the Client over time

17 Challenges Ensure a fair risk premium split for risk assumed by the captive Administrator will work with the client, captive actuary and the carrier to ensure a fair deal Meaningful risk transfer and critical mass in the cell The layer assumed by the Cell is the most stable piece of the risk assumed by the carrier More risk may be transferred cost effectively under this strategy Lead time to make it happen- 3 to 6 months

18 Dianne Salter, EVP, Corporate Insurance Svcs.
President, Mountain Laurel RRG President, Five Point Professional Liability Insurance Company

19 Why the Move to a Captive Program:
Unavailability of medical malpractice insurance for hospitals and physicians in Pennsylvania Commitment to risk management and claims/ litigation management Long term commitment of senior leadership to captive risk financing vehicle Need to meet PA Statutory requirements for “approved” carrier Acknowledgement of need for “appropriate” actuarially driven funding/premium

20 Strategic Advantages Creating value/evaluating performance
Adherence to risk management/claims management standards/policies and procedures Continued emphasis on quality improvement/patient safety/risk management Strategic direction/insight and coordination with claims management and risk management Key leadership providing ongoing input and oversight Long term view of the program Coverage extensions/flexibility

21 Why Alternative Risk Financing
Why Alternative Risk Financing? Top 20 PA Medical Malpractice Insurer Groups – 2013 Carrier Direct Premium Written ($mm) Market Share Type 1. Medical Protective Co 89,042 12.6% Commercial 2. PMSLIC Ins Co 61,949 8.7% 3. Mountain Laurel RRG 55,339 7.8% Hospital 4. Franklin Casualty Ins Co RRG 42,785 6.0% 5. Tri Century Ins Co 39,887 5.6% 6. Healthcare Providers Ins Exch 25,803 3.6% Physician 7. Community Hospital RRG 28,172 3.3% 8. Community Health Alliance Recip RRG 19,427 2.7% 9. Cassatt RRG Inc 18,737 2.6% 10. Broadline RRG Inc. 17,167 2.4% Carrier Direct Premium Written ($mm) Market Share Type 11. Professional Casualty Association 15,443 2.2% Commercial 12. Preferred Professional Ins Co 14,340 2.0% 13. Central PA Physicians RRG Inc 13,685 1.9% Physician 14. Proselect Ins Co 13,002 1.8% 15. Lexington Ins Co 11,846 1.7% 16. Darwin Select Ins Co 11,588 1.6% 17. Steadfast Ins Co 11,541 18. First Medical Ins Co RRG 11,105 Hospital 19. American Cas Co of Reading PA 10,240 1.4% 20. St Lukes Hlth Ntwrk Ins Co Recip RRG 9,383 1.3%

22 Keys to Successful Captives
Sense of urgency – problem to solve Good spread of risk; good business plan Understanding of loss volatility and the need for prudent funding Long-term commitment – discipline to “stay the course” through market cycles Strong business partners – manager, claims service, actuary, banking and investment, auditors and legal Commitment and involvement of senior management Open dialogue with Regulators

23 Five Pointe Professional Liability Insurance Company
CORE CELL GENERAL ASSETS MLH PC (includes Riddle) MAGEE PC TJUH PC (includes TJU & JUP) Board of Directors Sets up Protected Cells Sets Actuarial Funding Levels/Discount Rates Sets Dividend Distribution Capital Contribution

24 About Five Pointe: Established to support the risk management programs of its Member Organizations: Main Line Hospitals Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Riddle Memorial Hospital Magee Rehabilitation Hospital The assets, liabilities and operations of the domiciled segregated portfolio company were domesticated to Delaware in June 2007. Formed as a sponsored captive insurance company as a vehicle designed to segregate and protect the interests of its Member organizations: 9 hospitals and approx. 1,500 physicians/residents covered in the program. Five Pointe is a non-stock, non-profit corporation recognized as an exempt organization by the IRS. Company provides primary claims-made professional liability reinsurance coverage. Per medical incident limits range from $500,000 to $1MM.

25 Requirements of Five Pointe:
Assets/liabilities and income/expenditures of each PC must be kept separate from the general assets and assets from any other PC. Assets of PC will only be available to meet the liabilities of that PC and will be protected from creditors of any other of the PCs. If the assets of any one PC are insufficient with respect to its liability, the general assets would then be available to satisfy the PC’s liability. In no case will the liability of one PC extend to any other PC’s assets.

26 Professional Liability Program
Five Pointe Professional Liability Insurance Company (“Five Pointe”) Reinsurance vehicle for the primary professional layer of coverage provided by Mountain Laurel Risk Retention Group (“MLRRG”) Incorporated in January 2006; approved by IRS as a 501(c)(3) Domiciled in Delaware Funded based on actuarial projection of losses based on 65% confidence level and 3% discount factor; mature claims-made program As of 6/30/15 combined cell assets of approx. $258MM Direct writer for the Umbrella/Excess coverage: 100% reinsured by domestic, Bermuda and European commercial reinsurance carriers Separate excess policies for Magee, MLH and TJU As of December 13, 2014, dividend distributions of $181MM

27 Five Pointe Committee & Membership
Audit and Finance Committee Charge To make recommendations to the Board regarding the appointment and engagement of the Company’s independent audit firm; To serve as the Company’s liaison to the Company’s independent audit firm; To review the results of the annual audit report and the audited financial statements to the full Board; To review with the independent audit firm, the Company’s internal financial controls, internal auditing procedures and other questions of accounting policy and financial risk exposure; To review the annual certification of losses and loss reserves by the Company’s independent actuary and to review any premium study or recommendations made by such independent actuary; To review and make recommendations to the Board regarding budgets, investments, financings and such other matters as the Board requests; and To receive periodic reports from internal auditors.

28 Higher Quality Lowers Costs


Download ppt "Protecting Assets Through Cell Structure"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google