1. Simulation Based Analysis of Voice over Multi Protocol Label Switching Networks

2. ABSTRACT
Problem Statement: The main aim of this thesis work is to investigate the performance of real-time voice traffic in IP networks and MPLS networks by including Traffic Engineering in MPLS. a. Studying the state-of-art of MPLS architecture and IP networks through literature study. b. Investigating the problems related when routing the real-time voice communications over IP networks through literature study

3. c. Choosing the performance parameters such as End-to-End delay, throughput, voice jitter, packets sent and packets received. d. Designing two network models for IP and MPLS considering same network topology and analyzing the results by considering the same performance parameters.

4. E. Studying the performance of real-time voice communications in MPLS network when TE is considered.

5. What is MPLS ?
It is an Internet Engineering Task Force that specified frameworks which provides for the efficient routing, forwarding and switching of traffic flows through the network.
It is considered to be the most perfect solution to address the most recently faced problems in present-day networks such as “Routing, scalability, quality of service engineering management, traffic engineering”.

6. What is MPLS? Multi Protocol – supports protocols even other than IP
Supports IPv4, IPv6, IPX, AppleTalk at the network layer
Supports Ethernet, Token Ring, FDDI, ATM, Frame Relay, PPP at the link layer
Label – short fixed length identifier to determine a route
Labels are added to the top of the IP packet
Labels are assigned when the packet enters the MPLS domain

7. Switching – Forwarding a packet Packets are forwarded based on the label value NOT on the basis of IP header information

8. Software and hardware Requirement
Software Requirements
1.OPNET 16.0 Modeller (Paid Tool)
2.VANET MobiSim
3.Visual Studio 10.0
Hardware Requirements
1. Minimum 2 GB RAM
2. INTEL I3 PROCESSOR

9. Simulation Tool Used
This Dissertation work using OPNET Modeler14.5 Network Simulator.
OPNET Modeler14.5 is a Commercial Network Simulator.
Designed for modelling communication devices, technologies, and protocols and to simulate the performance of these technologies.
Figure : Simulation Setup

10. RESULTS
AND
ANALYSIS

11. Voice Packet Send And Received

12. Voice Packet Jitter

13. Voice Packet Delay Variation

14. Voice Packet End-to-End Delay

15. IP networks End-to-End Delay

16. MPLS networks End-to-End Delay

17. References
[1] Ina M , “MPLS DiffServ-aware Traffic Engineering”, White Paper, Part No , Juniper Networks, Inc, 2004.
[2] AlWehaibi M, Kadoch A, and ElHakeem A, "Packet Loss Probability for DiffServ Over IP and MPLS Reliable Homogeneous Multicast Networks," Information Processing Letter, Volume 90, Issue 2, pp , April 2004.
[3] Ni Q, Rhomdani L, Turletti T, "A survey of QoS enhancements for IEEE wireless LAN", Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 547–566.
[4] Jamalipour A, Lorenz P, "End-to-end QoS support for IP and multimedia traffic in heterogeneous mobile networks", Computer Communications, vol.29, pp. 671–682, 2006.

18. [5] Vandermeulen F, Vermeulen B, Demeester P et al, "A generic architecture for management and control of en-to-end quality of service over multiple domains", Computer Communications, vol. 25, pp. 149–168, 2002.
[6] Filsfils C, Evans J, "Engineering a multiservice IP backbone to support tight SLA's", Computer Networks, vol. 49, pp. 131–148, 2002.
[7] Kimura T, Kamei S, "QoS evaluation of DiffServ-aware constraint based routing schemes for multi-protocol label switching networks", Computer Communications, vol. 27, pp. 147–152, 2004.
[8] Hunt R, "A review of quality of service mechanisms in IP-based networks - integrated and differentiated services, multi-layer switching, MPLS and traffic engineering", Computer Communications, vol. 25, pp. 100–108, 2002.
[9] Chuah M, Medepalli K, Park S, Wang J, "Quality of Service in Third- Generation IP-Based Radio Access Networks", Bell Labs Technical Journal, vol. 7, issue no. 2, pp. 67–89, 2002.