Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Backhaul Challenges & Evolution Trends: THE Role of mmW

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Backhaul Challenges & Evolution Trends: THE Role of mmW"— Presentation transcript:

1 Backhaul Challenges & Evolution Trends: THE Role of mmW
A view from ETSI ISG mWT Presented by Debora Gentina Mainz, 2-4 November 2016

2 Diversified challenges and gaps for 5G
Area Traffic Capacity Latency Throughput Connections Mobility 5G 1 ms E2E Latency 10Gbps / connection 1,000K Connections / Km2 500km/h High-speed railway 10 Mbps/m2 Ultra Dense Tera Cell GAP 30~50x 100x 100x 1.5x Densification 30~50ms 100Mbps 10K 350Km/h Small Cells LTE

3 Backhaul - MW and mmW Frequency Bands Use
FDD 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 6 11 13 15 18 23 26 38 71 – 86 GHz 7/8 42 GHz 50 55 57 – 66 GHz 28 32 92 – 95 GHz mmW 4% total 2015 market Low volumes in 28, 32 & 42 GHz 38 GHz stable, replaceable by mmW (e-band) E-band volume fast increasing (>130 M$), multi-Gbps at reasonable TCO > 4.5 Million total worldwide links in operation Source: SLR 2015 Necessity of new, holistic approach to backhaul spectrum efficiently

4 Backhaul - MW and mmW Frequency Bands Use in EU
Source: Huawei internal analysis 26 GHz not deeply used and might migrate to 23 GHz or 32 GHz 38 GHz might be replaced by E-band 42 GHz almost unused and might be replaced by E-band

5 Backhaul topology evolution
Network topology change Network densification RAN sharing and operators consolidation Fiber penetration from core to edge

6 Backhaul topology evolution
Network topology change Network densification RAN sharing and operators consolidation Fiber penetration from core to edge ‘’Shorter networks’’ and shorter hops wireless backhaul pushed at the periphery Star topologies from the fiber aggregation point Source : Huawei 90% of distances is less than 10km

7 How to meet the demand of the capacity increase
Network topology change Network densification RAN sharing and operators consolidation Fiber penetration from core to edge New network topology drive backhaul to the higher part of the spectrum ‘’Shorter networks’’ and shorter hops wireless backhaul pushed at the periphery Star topologies from the fiber aggregation point Increase channel width Traditional microwave bands Band and Carrier aggregation (i.e. 18 or 23 GHz + e-band) 112/224 MHz Go to millimeter-wave E-band (10 Gbit/s per carrier NOW) D-Band (141 to GHz) In order to use larger channels it is necessary to improve spectrum efficiency at geographical level for higher channel re-usability (antenna directivity, null-forming, ATPC, ..) Faster and cheaper way to increase capacity, coping with hop length limitations Technology innovation to increase distances

8 mmW Spectrum mmW already available : V-band & E-band
6L/6U 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 11 13 15 18 23 26 38 71GHz - 86GHz 7/8 52 55 (TDD) 28 32 200 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 300 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 191.8GHz - 275GHz 92 GHz – GHz 130 GHz – GHz Traditional Radio Link 60 70 80 71 – 86 GHz 57 – 66 GHz mmW already available : V-band & E-band New mmW Spectrum coming: D-band & W-band Frequency Bands 92-94 95-100 122, W-Band D-Band

9 Above 90 GHz in details Very high capacity backhaul (multi-10Gbit/s)
6L/6U Traditional Radio Link 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 11 13 15 18 23 26 38 71GHz - 86GHz 7/8 52 55 (TDD) 28 32 200 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 300 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 191.8GHz - 275GHz 92 GHz – GHz 130 GHz – GHz Very high capacity backhaul (multi-10Gbit/s) Front-haul Fixed Wireless Access H2O O2 Frequency Bands 92-94 95-100 122, W-Band D-Band Rain attenuation of D-band is around 2 dB larger than E-band and is almost flat

10 Network Densification mmW in Urban Environment
Source: ETSI ISG mWT Macro Backhaul and Aggregation Roof-top to Roof-top Traditional planning, co-located with Macro Part of Macro Backhaul E-band (71 to to 86 GHz) Small Cell Backhaul Macro to Street-Level Form factor must be suitable for Small Cell Traffic from a few Small Cells may be aggregated Street-Level to Street-Level Links will often be almost parallel to each other LoS may be challenging in urban environment V-band (57 to 66 GHz) Source: ETSI ISG mWT

11 How to meet the demand of capacity increase New holistic approach to the use of spectrum (Band and Channel Aggregation) Necessity, and opportunity, to look at the spectrum in a new way aggregating non adjacent channels: either in the same band (channel aggregation) or in separate bands exploiting different propagation characteristics different licensing schemes Example of band aggregation combining on the same link a 55 MHz GHz and a 500 MHz 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 6 11 13 15 18 23 26 38 71 – 86 GHz 7/8 42 GHz 50 55 57 – 66 GHz 28 32 92 – 95 GHz Around 500 Mbit/s with highest availability Around 500 Mbit/s with highest availability Combine the advantages of two bands with significant differences in propagation & licensing approaches Extend coverage of E-Band applications

12 E-band Recommended Regulations
E-band recommendations in line with current situation worldwide V-band recommendations are a clear guidance for Administrations

13 What is a reasonable License fee for E-band?
ISG mWT believes it is important defining relative price point with respect to traditional bands This chart is comparing 56 MHz 38 GHz (reference price = 100) with different E-Band spectrum usage Showing that 250 MHz channel in the E-Band should be priced no more than 25% of 56 MHz in the 38 GHz The larger the E-Band channel the higher is the price, however an upper limit should be set in order not to jeopardize Total Cost of Ownership Upper limit shall also not exceed existing license fees, especially in case of channel size larger than 500 MHz or in case of light licensing

14 V-band: the FS and FS & SRD perspectives
Why License exempt: Fully uncoordinated approach is sustainable in the long term Simulations with 200 links/km2 show that 1 GHz in V-band is sufficient to ensure an acceptable risk of interference (< 2% of cases) even in worst case scenario In case of ECC scenario (EIRP < 55 dBm) and products compliant to ETSI standard (antenna gain > 30 dBi ) Why Block allocation might be envisaged in the future: FCC scenario (no minimum antenna gain requirement when EIRP < 40 dBm) and wider channel size (WiGig like equipment going outdoor – high risk of interference) NLOS connectivity application – interference scattering polluting a wide area Wide angle of view beam-steering antennas for self organizing meshed networks – higher interference due to higher side lobes Operators applications that cannot tolerate interference risk Next.... Co-existence analysis between SRD and FS in unlicensed spectrum: Conduct interference analysis with tools that take into account the geometry of high dense urban environments Define KPI (availability,..) for backhaul that take into account the peculiarities of the V-Band Co-existence with IEEE ay to improve the applicability to outdoor backhaul scenarios

15 MTTx Applications MTTx Now : Microwave for Backhaul
Network Discovery, Multi-Point-to-Point Concept MTTx Now : Microwave for Backhaul MTTx Next : mmW for Last Drop Bring broadband connectivity to as many people as possible improving penetration for villa, rural areas Complement the wired solutions

16 D-band for 4.5G and 5G H2O O2 Very high capacity leveraging on wide bandwidth with more than 30 GHz of spectrum available Backhaul and Front-haul of 4.5G and 5G Extreme low power leveraging on very high frequency, allowing very compact antennas and form factor  FWA, safe cities, ultra dense scenarios D-band can meet expectations of ultra-high capacity for 4.5G & 5G

17 Conclusions New abundant spectrum in mm-wave pushes to focus investments The allocation of spectrum for 5G must consider the needs of the operators for backhaul, current (3G & 4G) and future (5G) from rural to dense urban The allocation of spectrum for 5G cannot be separated by the allocation of sufficient and suitable spectrum to deploy the backhaul network Necessity of new, holistic approach to backhaul spectrum (BCA, wider channels) Explore opportunity of co-existence between SRD and FS in unlicensed spectrum Spectrum usage and appropriate channelization & regulations of D-band are envisaged to facilitate the deployment of high capacity backhaul systems Regulations remain the critical success factor as it was for E-band

18 Thank you! WELCOME TO THE mWT ISG
The mWT ISG is open to all ETSI members and non-members For full details of the mWT ISG including ToR – Members and Participants agreements and how to join please visit Thank you!


Download ppt "Backhaul Challenges & Evolution Trends: THE Role of mmW"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google