Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

W. Brent Seales Jim Griffioen Kevin S. Kiernan

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "W. Brent Seales Jim Griffioen Kevin S. Kiernan"— Presentation transcript:

1 W. Brent Seales Jim Griffioen Kevin S. Kiernan
The Digital Atheneum: New Techniques for Restoring, Searching and Editing Digital Collections W. Brent Seales Jim Griffioen Kevin S. Kiernan Today I am going to present a new algorithm for generating seamless panoramic video imagery for immersive teleconferencing. University of Kentucky

2 The Digital Atheneum Project Goals
Develop new techniques for digital preservation, restoration, and presentation of damaged manuscripts University of Kentucky Principal Investigators: Jim Griffioen and Brent Seales (Computer Science) Kevin Kiernan (English) Partners The British Library IBM

3 Damaged Manuscripts Problems: Requires extensive editorial involvement
Manuscript is fragile Single images mean little without metadata Need new restoration tools and techniques

4 Research Areas Digitization techniques
3D shape many types of illumination Content-based searching and access Extensible/flexible editorial tools Distributed execution of tools and services Restoration techniques Mosaicing Digital flattening/shape visualization

5 Illumination Techniques
Visible light, Ultraviolet light, Laser scanning, Fiber-optic back-lighting

6 Three-Dimensional Scanning
Digital photography is used to provide patrons electronic facsimiles of library materials 2D images do not provide shape information Insufficient in providing a realistic “look and feel” of non-planar materials We present a technique that augments current digitization setups to acquire 3D information

7 Digitization of Materials
Special Collections: Culturally significant, unique, damaged, restricted materials Patrons are passionate about the look and feel of the original Want more than just “textual content” It is typical to provide the patron images alone (no 3D information)

8 Digitizing “Manuscripts”
We address digitization of manuscripts and similar objects Objects are ill-suited for flat-bed scanners Photographed with digital camera

9 Typical Digitization Setup
High-resolution digital camera Camera positioned above the “artifact” Image is captured fsjerjwee ael Worjt ileke sldkfj Mwiee kerlkerlk <wiel Wmekle wle e Wmeiwlwl wlwle Michae S. Brown is one cool dude and you wilsd asd -00 A

10 Multiple Lighting Conditions
Common to illuminate same object under several lighting conditions Natural fsjerjwee ael Worjt ileke sldkfj Mwiee kerlkerlk <wiel Wmekle wle e Wmeiwlwl wlwle Michae S. Brown is one cool dude and you wilsd asd -00 A

11 Multiple Lighting Conditions
Common to illuminate same object under several lighting conditions White fsjerjwee ael Worjt ileke sldkfj Mwiee kerlkerlk <wiel Wmekle wle e Wmeiwlwl wlwle Michae S. Brown is one cool dude and you wilsd asd -00 fsjerjwee ael Worjt ileke sldkfj Mwiee kerlkerlk <wiel Wmekle wle e Wmeiwlwl wlwle Michae S. Brown is one cool dude and you wilsd asd -00 A A

12 Multiple Lighting Conditions
Common to illuminate same object under several lighting conditions UV fsjerjwee ael Worjt ileke sldkfj Mwiee kerlkerlk <wiel Wmekle wle e Wmeiwlwl wlwle Michae S. Brown is one cool dude and you wilsd asd -00 fsjerjwee ael Worjt ileke sldkfj Mwiee kerlkerlk <wiel Wmekle wle e Wmeiwlwl wlwle Michae S. Brown is one cool dude and you wilsd asd -00 fsjerjwee ael Worjt ileke sldkfj Mwiee kerlkerlk <wiel Wmekle wle e Wmeiwlwl wlwle Michae S. Brown is one cool dude and you wilsd asd -00 A A A

13 Limitation of 2D imagery
When imaging non-flat objects Objects can appear crinkled or warped Difficult to disambiguate if the warping is part of the original or an artifact of the object’s shape 2D imagery is limited in what it can convey to the patron

14 Beyond 2D images With non-planar materials
2D images can prove insufficient in providing “look and feel” 3D representations provide better electronic facsimiles Goal: provide a textured 3D model to patron

15 Our Goal Provide a 3D acquisition system that can be integrated into current digitization setup Curator decides when to acquire “3D” Otherwise operates as usual No special-purpose equipment Uses equipment already available Minimum overhead

16 3D Acquisition setup for library materials
Introduce a light projector Projector mathematics behaves same as camera Projector and camera are used to triangulate 3D points on the artifact’s surface A 3D model can be acquired (and 2D image) x y z

17 Current Implementation
Prototype system Uses standard NTSC camera (low-resolution) XGA light projector (1024x768) Mirror is used to direct the light onto the materials Camera and projector are controlled from the same computer (provides synchronization) Produces 3D model with several textures

18 Results with low-resolution camera
Current Implementation Acquisition Timing 5 minutes to calibrate 1-3 minutes per object Can scan several objects after calibration Scan Density typically less than 0.5mm along projector X&Y Accuracy 0.25mm Results with low-resolution camera

19 Results Materials from U. Kentucky’s Special Collection
Non-planar materials 13th century wax seals Washington Coin Book binding (inset)

20 Editing and Searching Content
Data components to manage: Images Text (transcription, edition) Glossaries Metadata Embedded content

21 Toolkit Objectives Integrated interface
visualization editing/creation content-based search Adaptable to new problem domains Extensible Distributed Collaborative (multi-user access)

22 Distributed Service-base Architecture
The set of services can be easily modified and extended Base Services SQL-style DB service, Image and Transcript viewer/editor service, Correspondence service, Display service, Access/Security service Example Extended Services Navigation services, Template-based Image Search services, Model-based Search services, Enhancement and Restoration services, Glossary services, Annotation service, ... Current implementation based on Java/Jini allows services to be run locally or at the server

23 The Editor’s Tool - Example

24 The Editor’s Tool (1)

25 The Editor’s Tool (2)

26 The Editor’s Tool (3)

27 The Editor’s Tool (4)

28 The Editor’s Tool (5)

29 The Editor’s Tool (6)

30 The Editor’s Tool (7)

31 The Editor’s Tool (8)

32 The Editor’s Tool (9)

33 The Editor’s Tool (10)

34 The Editor’s Tool (11)

35 Enhance content-based search functionality
Future Work Digitize British Library Cottonian collection Enhance content-based search functionality Integrate 3D data Develop restoration techniques

36 University of Kentucky
The Digital Atheneum: New Techniques for Restoring, Searching and Editing Digital Collections University of Kentucky


Download ppt "W. Brent Seales Jim Griffioen Kevin S. Kiernan"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google