Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFrederica Hawkins Modified over 7 years ago
1
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Conceptual Design of a 2× Trough for Use Within Salt and Oil-Based Parabolic Trough Power Plants J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2010;132(4): doi: / Figure Legend: Solar flux tracker for parabolic trough collectors
2
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Conceptual Design of a 2× Trough for Use Within Salt and Oil-Based Parabolic Trough Power Plants J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2010;132(4): doi: / Figure Legend: The TOP alignment system can potentially reduce facet alignment errors to 0.5 mrad
3
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Conceptual Design of a 2× Trough for Use Within Salt and Oil-Based Parabolic Trough Power Plants J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2010;132(4): doi: / Figure Legend: Sandia 10 kWe dish/string system dish system. The structural honeycomb facets have slope errors in the range of 8–1.4 mrad.
4
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Conceptual Design of a 2× Trough for Use Within Salt and Oil-Based Parabolic Trough Power Plants J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2010;132(4): doi: / Figure Legend: Trough-HELIOS prediction of incident flux upon a 0.07 m diameter HCE for a current 5 m aperture trough and a future 10 m trough. System errors are 5.4 mrad for the 5 m trough and 2.5 mrad for the 10 m trough. Trough-HELIOS requires surface pointing-type errors. Beam error=2∗ pointing error. The King sunshape and 1000 W/m2 insolation were assumed.
5
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Conceptual Design of a 2× Trough for Use Within Salt and Oil-Based Parabolic Trough Power Plants J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2010;132(4): doi: / Figure Legend: EC comparison of current and future trough technology
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.