Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Please note, these are the actual video-recorded proceedings from the live CME event and may include the use of trade names and other raw, unedited content.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Please note, these are the actual video-recorded proceedings from the live CME event and may include the use of trade names and other raw, unedited content."— Presentation transcript:

1 Please note, these are the actual video-recorded proceedings from the live CME event and may include the use of trade names and other raw, unedited content.

2 Oncology Grand Rounds Ovarian Cancer Nurse and Physician Investigators Discuss New Agents, Novel Therapies and Actual Cases from Practice Friday, April 29, :15 PM – 1:45 PM Faculty Paula J Anastasia, RN, MN, AOCN Lisa B Arvine, RN, MSN, ANP-BC, WHNP-BC Robert L Coleman, MD Kathleen Moore, MD Moderator Neil Love, MD

3 Oncology Grand Rounds Series

4

5

6

7

8 Oncology Grand Rounds: Themes
New agents and treatment strategies: Benefits and risks Counseling patients about side effects Practical implementation End-of-life care Psychosocial issues in patient care Supporting the supporters Job satisfaction and burnout in oncology professionals The oncology professional just entering practice The bond that heals

9 Courtesy of Christiana Care Health System

10 Module 1: Biology of Ovarian Cancer; BRCA Testing and “BRCAness”

11 Discussion Topics Histopathologic subtypes of OC and implications for clinical decision-making Indications for BRCA testing in women with OC; role of extended panel testing; options for available assays and the role of genetic counseling, including virtual counseling Implications of a positive BRCA mutation test result for treatment decision-making

12 Discussion Topics Incidence of BRCA1/2 alterations and other clinically relevant genetic abnormalities in ovarian and other gynecologic cancers Identification of BRCA-like and other genomic signatures that may predict benefit from PARP inhibition

13 55-Year-Old Woman with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (Ms Anastasia)
2011: Diagnosed with ovarian cancer Enrolled on GOG-0262: Carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab x 6  maintenance bevacizumab x 1 year Complete response 2013: Diagnosed with breast cancer Adjuvant tamoxifen Genetic testing: RAD51D germline mutation Recurrent ovarian cancer Multiple chemotherapies and surgery Currently no evidence of disease Married and employed as a television writer

14

15 NCCN Guidelines: RAD51D Mutation

16 Ovarian cancer is separated into histological categories
Low grade High grade Specific molecular features define these categories and shape clinical trial design: Mucinous tumors KRAS mutations High-grade serous cancers Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is common and thus displays a high rate of platinum sensitivity Low-grade serous cancers KRAS mutations; usefulness of MEK inhibitors Clear cell cancers Chemotherapy insensitivity, PIK3CA mutations and sensitivity to VEGFR-2 inhibitors Serous Mucinous Endometrioid Clear cell Courtesy of Ursula Matulonis, MD

17 PARP and Base Excision Repair
DNA damage PARP PARP recruitment NAD+ poly(ADP-ribose) PARP PARP activation and assembly of repair factors PARP pol β XRCC1 LigIII PNK 1 PARG PAR degradation via PARG End processing, gap filling and ligation PNK 1 pol β LigIII XRCC1 Adapted from Vergote, ND; Khanna et al, 2001; Sanchez-Perez, 2006; Kennedy et al, 2006.

18 Mechanism of Cell Death from Synthetic Lethality Induced by PARP Inhibition
Adapted from Iglehart JD, Silver DP. N Engl J Med 2009;361(2):

19 Mechanism of Cell Death from Synthetic Lethality Induced by PARP Inhibition
Courtesy of Jenny C Chang, MD

20 Examples of Available Multigene Panels
Test Name # Genes BRCAPlus 5 BreastNext 17 OvaNext 23 BROCA risk panel 51 myRisk 25 Breast Cancer High Risk Panel 6 BC/OC panel 21 BRCAvantage Plus 7

21 Who Will Benefit from PARP Inhibitor Treatment?
Germline Somatic Sporadic tumors with intact BRCA function Hypermethylated Alt Paths Adapted from Coleman, 2009. Courtesy of Robert Coleman, MD.

22 Cooling Cap Experience
Outside company (We used PenguinTM Cold Caps; New FDA approval 12/2015 for Dignicap®) Patient has complete accountability Time consuming and costly: $580 to rent cold cap Additional $500 if you hire a person to do the exchanges and bring dry ice: (her husband did this) Change every 20 min x 1 hour before chemo, Change every 30 min during chemo, Change every 30 min x 4 hours after chemo She did not lose her hair. No one at work knew she was on chemo — that was her goal Courtesy of Paula J Anastasia, RN, MN, AOCN

23 “Penguin” Cooling Cap Cold cap used during her 2nd line chemo to prevent hair loss from paclitaxel Photos courtesy of Paula J Anastasia, RN, MN, AOCN, used with permission 2015

24 Module 2: Key Issues in Up-Front Management

25 Discussion Topics Multidisciplinary consultation in the primary management of OC Patient selection for neoadjuvant systemic treatment Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy: Available clinical data, tolerability and current indications Supportive management considerations for patients receiving IP chemotherapy Therapeutic options for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant metastatic disease

26 Discussion Topics Current role, if any, of bevacizumab as a component of primary and/or maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed OC Available efficacy and safety data guiding the use of bevacizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy in the setting of platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant recurrent OC Other anti-angiogenic agents under investigation

27 57-Year-Old Woman with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (Ms Arvine)
10/2014: Diagnosed with ovarian cancer Cytoreductive surgery Carboplatin/paclitaxel 10/2015: Recurrent disease Paclitaxel/bevacizumab  maintenance bevacizumab Most recent scans: No evidence of disease Married with 2 children, previously a physician assistant Suffers from considerable anxiety over the unknowns of her health and her children’s future

28

29 Key Issues in the Up-Front Management of Stage III Ovarian Cancer
Rationale and supporting evidence for debulking surgery Management of bulky disease Neoadjuvant therapy Systemic therapy for patients who undergo optimal debulking Systemic therapy for patients without optimal debulking Dose-dense chemotherapy Intraperitoneal chemotherapy

30 Ovarian Cancer Standard of Care
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Cytoreductive Surgery 75%-80% Stage III-IV Platinum/Taxane x 6-8 Cycles 75%-80% Achieve Remission Alternative Dosing Regimens Surveillance 80% Experience Recurrence Long-Term Survival 15% Recurrence Second-Line Treatment Targeted Tx Clinical Trials NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer Version ; NCCN 2012; NCI 2012

31 Intravenous versus Intraperitoneal Administration of Cisplatin*
Pharmacokinetics IV CDDP 100 mg/m2 IP CDDP 90 mg/m2 Peritoneal fluid AUC Peritoneal fluid AUC Plasma Plasma * Adapted from Howell SB et al. Ann Intern Med 1982;97(6):

32 IP extravasation, complications
Pain during infusion is not normal Erythema post infusion not normal Bloating, discomfort due to abdominal “expansion” can last 2-5 days: normal Fatigue, malaise, loss of appetite, nausea all common post IP and interfere with daily life IP cisplatin is given after IV paclitaxel day 1; IP paclitaxel is given on day 8 — pt was not able to receive due to delay from extravasation Courtesy of Paula J Anastasia, RN, MN, AOCN

33 Extravasation of IP Cisplatin
3 Different Patients Upper Photo: Normal IP infusion Lower Photos: IP extravasation, painful infusion, erythema develops day later Obesity may make needle insertion a challenge Photos courtesy of Paula J Anastasia, RN, MN, AOCN 2007, 2015

34 General Approach to Treatment of First or Second Recurrence
Platinum refractory/resistant Platinum sensitive Platinum-free interval <6 months Platinum-free interval >6 months Platinum retreatment +/- Bevacizumab (Triplet) Nonplatinum treatment +/- Bevacizumab (Doublet) . NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer Version

35 AURELIA (GINECO) Primary endpoint: PFS Secondary endpoints:
Physician’s choice: SOC or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg q3w Chemotherapy to progression Platinum-resistant OC, PP, FTC, (PFI <6 months) Prior bevacizumab allowed n = 361 Arm A Arm B Chemotherapy to progression SOC Primary endpoint: PFS Secondary endpoints: ORR, PFIbio, OS, QoL, safety Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q2w* to progression Stratification variables: Chemotherapy regimen Previous anti-angiogenic therapy PFI <3 vs 3–6 months . Chemotherapy options (physician’s choice): Weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 Topotecan (4 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 OR 1.25 mg/m2 d1-5 q3w) Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 d1 q4w *15 mg/kg q3w if combined with topotecan q3w ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT Pujade-Laurain E et al. Proc ASCO 2012;Abstract LBA5002; J Clin Oncol 2014;32(13):

36 GOG-0213: Response and Survival with Carbo-Pac + Bev in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
PFS: Hazard ratio = 0.61, p < OS: Hazard ratio = 0.83, p = 0.56 N = 509 (RECIST) Percent (%) P < Coleman RL et al. Proc SGO 2015;Abstract 3.

37 Module 3: PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Metastatic Disease

38 Discussion Topics Incorporation of olaparib into the treatment algorithm for patients with recurrent OC BRCA mutation status and efficacy of PARP inhibitors Available data with olaparib as maintenance therapy for patients with recurrent OC Similarities and differences between olaparib and other PARP inhibitors under development Potential synergy between PARP inhibitors and anti- angiogenic agents

39 65-Year-Old Woman with a BRCA Germline Mutation and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (Ms Arvine)
2002: Diagnosed with papillary serous ovarian cancer Cytoreductive surgery Carboplatin/paclitaxel 2013: Disease recurrence Secondary cytoreductive surgery Carboplatin/gemcitabine Enrolled in SOLO 2 trial evaluating olaparib maintenance therapy A retired nurse, married with 2 children

40

41 PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer
Structure and mechanism(s) of action of PARP inhibitors Currently available and investigational PARP inhibitors Clinical research findings to date Efficacy Side effects and toxicities Anemia GI toxicity Practical clinical application of olaparib therapy Ongoing clinical trials

42 New Agent Profile: Olaparib
FDA approval: December 19, 2014  Mechanism of action: Small-molecule PARP inhibitor Indication: As monotherapy for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated (as detected by an FDA-approved test) advanced ovarian cancer after ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy Dose/schedule: 400 mg (eight 50-mg capsules) twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity Olaparib package insert

43 PARP Inhibitors Have Single-Agent Activity in Recurrent Germline BRCA (gBRCA) OC
Phase II study of single-agent olaparib in patients with recurrent gBRCA-mutated OC (N = 57) 400 mg PO BID 100 mg PO BID Audeh MW et al. Lancet 2010;376(9737):

44 Olaparib Phase II Study
Multicenter Phase II study (N = 298 evaluable patients) Patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and recurrent cancer Eligibility Ovarian cancer resistant to prior platinum therapy Breast cancer with 3 chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease Pancreatic cancer with prior gemcitabine Prostate cancer with progression on hormonal and one systemic therapy Olaparib administered: 400 mg twice per day Primary efficacy endpoint: Tumor response rate Kaufman B et al. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:

45 Olaparib Phase II Study
Phase II study of olaparib monotherapy (400 mg BID) in patients with recurrent gBRCA-mutated breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancer (N = 298). 193 patients with ovarian cancer Response Patients with OC (n = 193) Tumor response rate 31.1% CR 3% PR 28% SD ≥ 8 weeks 33% Kaufman B et al. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:

46 Maintenance Olaparib: Study 19
Patients Platinum-sensitive high-grade serous OC ≥2 previous platinum regimens Maintained PR or CR after last platinum regimen Olaparib 400 mg BID, orally (n = 136) R Placebo (n = 129) Randomized 1:1 Primary endpoint PFS by RECIST Secondary endpoints TTP by CA-125 (GCIG criteria) or RECIST, OS, safety 82 sites in 16 countries Ledermann et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 5003; N Engl J Med 2012;366(15):

47 Study 19: Progression-free survival
1.0 Olaparib 8.4 Placebo 4.8 Median PFS (months) 0.9 0.8 Hazard ratio 0.35 P< 0.7 0.6 Proportion of patients progression free 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Randomized treatment 0.1 Placebo Olaparib 400 mg bid 3 6 9 12 15 18 Time from randomization (months) At risk (n) Olaparib 136 104 51 23 6 Placebo 129 72 23 7 1 Ledermann et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 5003; N Engl J Med 2012;366(15):

48 Study 19: PFS for patients with BRCA mutation (BRCAm)
BRCAm (n = 136) Olaparib Placebo Median PFS 11.2 mo 4.3 mo HR = 0.18 p < 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Proportion of patients progression-free 0.5 0.4 0.3 Olaparib BRCAm 0.2 Placebo BRCAm 0.1 3 6 9 12 15 Time from randomization (months) Number at risk Olaparib BRCAm 74 59 33 14 4 Placebo BRCAm 62 35 13 2 82% reduction in risk of disease progression or death with olaparib Presented by Jonathan Ledermann et al at ASCO 2013; Lancet Oncol 2014;15(8):

49 Ongoing and Planned Trials of Olaparib Maintenance for OC
Study N Phase Setting Treatment NCT (SOLO 1) 397 III After 1st-line platinum-based Tx BRCA mutated Olaparib NCT 167 Platinum sensitive, relapsed sBRCAm or HRR-associated gene mutations Placebo NCT 297 April 2015

50 Proportion progression-free
Primary Outcome: Cediranib/Olaparib Significantly Increased PFS Compared to Olaparib Alone + Censored Proportion progression-free Cediranib/ olaparib Olaparib Ced/Olap PFS events 28 19 Median PFS 9.0 mo 17.7 mo p = 0.005 HR 0.42 Olaparib Months Treatment Assignment 1: Olaparib 2: Olaparib/Cediranib Liu J et al. Proc ASCO 2014;Abstract LBA5500.

51 Phase I/II Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) with Olaparib or Cediranib
Durvalumab + Olaparib Advanced or recurrent solid tumors (ovarian, triple-negative breast, lung, prostate, colorectal) No prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy (N = 323) R Durvalumab + Cediranib Primary endpoints: Phase I: Recommended Phase II dose, safety in all patients Phase II: Overall response rate for patients with recurrent OC NCT

52 PARP Inhibitors in Clinical Trials for Ovarian Cancer (OC)
Ongoing trials Veliparib (ABT-888) Phase I: Combination studies in newly diagnosed and advanced OC Phase III: Study of combination veliparib as induction therapy followed by maintenance veliparib in newly diagnosed Stage III/IV OC Rucaparib (CO-338 or AGO14699 or PF ) Phase I/II: As monotherapy in BRCAm-positive OC Phase II: As monotherapy in relapsed OC (ARIEL2) Phase III: As switch maintenance after platinum in relapsed high-grade serous OC (ARIEL3) Niraparib (MK4827) Phase I/II: Niraparib and/or bevacizumab in HRD platinum-sensitive OC (AVANOVA) Phase I/II: Niraparib and pembrolizumab in recurrent OC (KEYNOTE-162) Phase II: Niraparib after ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy Phase III: Niraparib maintenance in advanced OC Talazoparib (BMN 673) Phase I or II: As monotherapy or as combination therapy for advanced OC Clinicaltrials.gov (Accessed April 2016).

53 Module 4: Prevention and Management of Side Effects and Toxicities of PARP Inhibitors

54 Discussion Topics Prevention and management of the gastrointestinal toxicities associated with olaparib (eg, nausea, diarrhea) Incidence of anemia in patients receiving olaparib Incidence of myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia in patients receiving olaparib Activity of PARP inhibitors in CNS disease secondary to metastatic OC

55 56-Year-Old Woman with a BRCA Germline Mutation and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (Ms Anastasia)
2011: Diagnosed with OC Optimal debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy One year later: Recurrent disease Chemotherapy Surgery Chemotherapy with bevacizumab 1/2015: Received fourth-line olaparib 400 mg BID Decreased to 200 mg BID due to anemia A homemaker

56 Olaparib: Select Adverse Events
Pooled patient set (n = 300) Patients receiving ≥3 lines of prior chemotherapy (n = 223) All grades Grade ≥3 Nausea 65% 2% 64% 3% Fatigue 61% 7% 58% Vomiting 39% 43% 4% Diarrhea 30% 1% 31% Anemia 28% 14% 15% Abdominal pain 26% 5% 7 % Decreased appetite 22% Dyspepsia 19% 20% Dysgeusia 18% 16% Matulonis U et al. Ann Oncol 2016;[Epub ahead of print].

57 Strategies for Managing Nausea/Vomiting
Prophylactic antiemetics Dose interruption Dose reduction Behavioral modification Avoid sweet or spicy foods Rest but do not lie flat for at least 2 hours after finishing a meal 5 five to 6 smaller meals, rather than 3 large meals, throughout the day

58 Strategies for Managing Anemia
Rule out other causes Iron deficiency MDS/AML Agents that increase blood levels of olaparib CYP3A inhibitors (fluconazole, aprepitant, etc) Grapefruit, Seville oranges Dose interruption Dose reduction Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents Blood transfusion

59 Olaparib and MDS/AML Overall, MDS/AML were reported in 22 of 2,618 (<1%) patients who received olaparib The majority of MDS/AML cases (17 of 22) were fatal The duration of therapy with olaparib in patients who developed secondary MDS/cancer therapy- related AML varied from <6 months to >2 years All patients had received previous chemotherapy with platinum agents and/or other DNA-damaging agents Olaparib package insert, April 2016

60 When the world says: “Give Up” Hope whispers... ‘Try it one more time’


Download ppt "Please note, these are the actual video-recorded proceedings from the live CME event and may include the use of trade names and other raw, unedited content."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google