Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed."— Presentation transcript:

1 EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed breasT cancer Laura Biganzoli Oncologia Medica Nuovo Ospedale di Prato Istituto Toscano Tumori

2 EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed breasT cancer Age ≥ 65 Locally recurrent or metastatic HER2-neg breast cancer or HER2- positive but considered not eligible for anti-HER2 therapy No prior CT for advanced breast cancer Measurable or evaluable disease N=156 nab-paclitaxel 100mg/m2 day 1, 8, 15 q 28 nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 R till disease progression or toxicity A B Stratification factors: Age vs ≥ 75 yrs Diabetes yes, no   G3-4 CIRS-G yes, no IADL deficient yes, no Prior adj taxanes yes, no

3 Study endpoints Primary endpoint:
Event-free survival (EFS) where an event is either disease progression or death or decline in functional status Functional status will be measured using ADL and IADL at baseline, prior to each treatment cycle, at treatment discontinuation and at 4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy An ‘event’ is defined as a decrease in at least 1 point with respect to values observed at the baseline on the ADL and/or IADL scales, considered by the investigator to be treatment related, and confirmed at the subsequent cycle ADL, Activity of daily living; IADL, Instrumental ADL

4 Secondary endpoints Objective response rate (ORR)
Clinical benefit rate (CBR) Progression free survival (PFS) Overall survival (OS) Incidence of Adverse events (defined by CTCAE v4.0)

5 Statistical considerations
This study is not designed to provide adequate power for a two arm comparison. The evaluation of the best appropriate dose will be based on clinical/general conditions. In each treatment arm, the null hypothesis to be tested is that the median of the EFS time is equal to or less than 7 months. The alternative hypothesis is that the median of the EFS time is equal or greater than 12 months. The protocol will aim to accrue up to 156 patients with 78 patients randomized to Arm A, and 78 patients to Arm B. The cut-off date for primary analysis will be 12 months after the enrollment of the last study patients

6 Patient disposition Accrual completed (22 Sept 2016)
Randomized patients =160 (80/arm) Modified ITT = 79 patients/arm* Safety = 79 patients/arm * 1 patient/arm never started treatment

7 Patient characteristics° (modified ITT population)
100 mg/m2 N=76 125 mg/m2 N=77 Median age, y (range) 72 (65-84) 73 (65-88) Median ECOG performance status (range) 0 (0-2) Marital status n(%) - single/married - separate or divorced/widowed 6 (8)/ 56 (74) -/ 14 (18) 8 (10)/ 51 (66) 2 (3)/ 16 (21) Education n(%) - illitterate/elementary school/middle school - high school/university 1(1)/ 35 (46) /26 (34) 10 (13)/ 4 (5) -/ 46 (60)/ 20 (26) 10 (13)/1 (1) Caregiver presence n(%) 34 (45) 30 (39) ADL impaired n(%) 14 (18)* 20 (26) IADL impaired n(%) 21 (28)* ° patients who received ≥ 1 dose of nab-paclitaxel and have documented interruption of study treatment Data cleaning is ongoing * missing value (n=2)

8 Patient and tumor characteristics
100 mg/m2 N=76 125 mg/m2 N=77 Hormone receptor status* - ER and PgR negative n(%) - ER and/or PgR positive n(%) 8 (11) 66 (87) 8 (10) 65 (84) HER2 positive** 2 (3) - Prior neo/adjuvant chemotherapy - anthracycline +/- taxane based - taxane-based 37 (49) 22 (29) 11 (14) 45 (58) 9 (12) Anti-HER2 adjuvant therapy Site of metastatic disease - non visceral only - visceral only - visceral+non visceral 21 (28) 5 (7) 50 (66) 24 (31) 44 (57) *missing value n=2 (arm A) n=4 (arm B); ** missing value n=5 (arm A) n=10 (arm B);

9 Treatment administration and compliance
100 mg/m2 N=76 125 mg/m2 N=77 Delivered cycles n 544 412 Median number of cycles (range) 6 (1-28) 6 (1-11) Patients with dose reductions n(%) 54 (71) 61 (79)

10 Haematological adverse events (AEs)
100 mg/m2 n=76 125mg/m2 n=77 Grade 2 n(%) 3 4 5 Anemia 25 (33) 2(3) - 29(38) Leucopenia 18 (24) 7(9) 23(30) 13(17) 1(1) Neutropenia 12(16) 3(4) Incidence of ≥10% for G2 or any G3-5 in either arm

11 Non-haematological AEs
100 mg/m2 n=76 125mg/m2 n=77 Grade 2 n(%) 3 4 5 Fatigue 23(30) 7(9) 2(3) - 35(45) 4(5) Peripheral neuropathy 10(13) 3(4) 21(27) 8(10) Nausea/vomiting 8(11) 1(1) 12(16) Diarrhoea 5(6) Fever Febrile neutropenia NA Infection Dyspnoea Hepatotoxicity Renal toxicity

12 Planned final analysis
At present 17 patients without events have a follow-up time <1 year 3 patients are still on treatment Planned submission to SABCS

13 Accrual by center CENTER N . patients Opedale A.Perrino Brindisi 30*
AO Ospedali Riuniti Ancona 23 Spedali Civili Brescia 18 AO  S.Maria della Misericordia Udine 16 AO Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo 15 CRO di Aviano 14 AUSL centro-Prato 13 ASL Frosinone 8 IOV Padova 5 Ospedale Vito Fazzi Lecce 4 Fondazione S.Maugeri Pavia 5* IEO 3 AUSL 12 Viareggio Universita’di Napoli Federico II 2 AOU Integrata Verona 1 TOTAL 160 *1 pt never started per protocol therapy

14 Back up

15 The Breast 2011

16 Sopravvivenza libera da progressione
Valutazione dello sperimentatore Valutazione indipendente PFS mediana (mesi) A nab q3 11,0 mesi B nab 100 12,8 mesi C nab 150 12,9 mesi D docetaxel 7,5 mesi PFS media Totale vs. D 0,0498 B vs. C NS C vs. D 0,0065 Sopravvivenza libera da progressione Mesi Gradishar JCO 2009 16

17 Background and rationale
Elderly patients are at higher risk of chemotherapy related side effects Weekly taxanes are generally recommended treatment options in older metastatic breast cancer Fatigue and neurotoxicity are dose-limiting toxicity for docetaxel and standard paclitaxel with a possible negative impact on function Nab-paclitaxel compares favorably with paclitaxel and docetaxel both in terms of safety and efficacy Median time to resolution to G<3 neurotoxicity is shorter with nab-paclitaxel than with conventional taxanes

18 Background and rationale (I)
Limited amount of data available on activity and safety of nab-paclitaxel in older patients Aapro et al. The Breast 2011


Download ppt "EFFECT: A randomized phase II study to evaluate the EFficacy and impact on Function of two different doses of nab-paclitaxEl in elderly patients with advanCed."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google