Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

UOP ETH 321 Week 3 Knowledge Check NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at week-3-knowledge-check For.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "UOP ETH 321 Week 3 Knowledge Check NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at week-3-knowledge-check For."— Presentation transcript:

1 UOP ETH 321 Week 3 Knowledge Check NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at http://www.assignmentcloud.com/eth-321-new/eth-321- week-3-knowledge-check For more classes visit www.assignmentcloud.com 1 In which case is an offer irrevocable? When the offeree has not made any preparations before accepting the offer When the offeree has partly acted upon the offer When the offer is not in the form of an option contract When the offeree’s response contradicts the offer even minimally

2 2 What does the mailbox rule, in the context of common law contracts, state? An offeror cannot revoke his or her offer under any circumstance. An offeror must receive a written document of acceptance by the offeree in order for an offer to be considered accepted. An offeree is said to have accepted an offer as soon as he or she dispatches the acceptance An offeree can use any method of acceptance, even if it has not been specified by the offeror. 3 Which of the following meets the consideration requirement of contracts? When a promiser pledges to perform a legal duty When a promisee gives up a legal right When a promiser gifts a property of high value to someone When a promisee provides a gift for a favor done in the past 4 When does fraudulent misrepresentation occur in the context of contracts? When one party to a contract unintentionally fails to notice an error in the express terms of the contract When one party to a contract knowingly provides only puffing and not facts in the contract When one party to a contract knowingly distorts a material fact in the contract When one party to a contract unintentionally conceals one of the facts in the terms of the contract 5 Mr. Sanchez is a 70 year old man with Parkinson’s disease. Jennifer, a full time nurse, has been taking care of him for over four years. Mr. Sanchez depends on Jennifer and considers her to be a trustworthy caregiver. However, Jennifer informs Mr. Sanchez that she can no longer be his caregiver unless he promises to leave his estate to her in his will. Since Mr. Sanchez does not have anyone else to care for him, he accepts this agreement. Under which condition would a court of law allow Mr. Sanchez to void this agreement? Fraudulent misrepresentation Slander


Download ppt "UOP ETH 321 Week 3 Knowledge Check NEW Check this A+ tutorial guideline at week-3-knowledge-check For."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google