1. Stephen L. Firsing III, PhD, MPA, MA John Delport, PhD Fredanna A.D. M’Cormack McGough, PhD, RD John Yannessa, PhD Mariel Celina Po, BS Kaitlyn Brown, Student of Public Health Evaluation of two audience response systems in the college classroom

2. Let’s try out the TurningPoint Audience Response System!

3. What is your favorite Super Hero? A. Superman B. Batman C. Iron Man D. Captain America E. Wonder Woman

4. If you had to be some kind of animal, what kind of animal would you be? A. Eagle B. Shark C. Cheetah D. Dolphin E. Turtle

5. Now lets try out Poll Everywhere!

6. Why use audience response systems in the classroom? 1. Immediate Feedback 2. Formative Assessment 3. Students Compare Responses

7. What was the Purpose of this Research Project? The purpose of this research project was to evaluate the adequacy of two popular clicker systems in the Coastal Carolina University classroom: TurningPoint and Poll Everywhere.

8. What are the major differences between the clicker systems? TurningPoint ($, RF clicker) VS. Poll Everywhere (40 free, online, text)

9. What was the Research Methodology? R = 13 Public Health Courses (3P) 4 Special Education Courses (1P) X a = TurningPoint X b = Poll Everywhere 0=Observation Points R X a O 1 X b O 2 O 3 Mid- Semester End- Semester Start- Fall 2014 Spring 2015

10. What were the Outcomes for Observation #1 (TurningPoint)? Quantitative = Audience Response Technology Questionnaire or ART-Q (25 items) Quantitative = Audience Response Technology Questionnaire or ART-Q (25 items) Appraisal/Learning Negative Grade Impact Attendance Enjoyment Preparation/Motivation Ease of Use Instructor Performance Qualitative = Overall Likes & Dislikes (2 items) Qualitative = Overall Likes & Dislikes (2 items)

11. What were the Outcomes for Observation #2 (Poll Everywhere)? Quantitative = Audience Response Technology Questionnaire or ART-Q (25 items) Quantitative = Audience Response Technology Questionnaire or ART-Q (25 items) Appraisal/Learning Negative Grade Impact Attendance Enjoyment Preparation/Motivation Ease of Use Instructor Performance Qualitative = Overall Likes & Dislikes (2 items) Qualitative = Overall Likes & Dislikes (2 items)

12. What were the Outcomes for Observation #3 (Comparison)? Quantitative = 5 ARS comparison items Quantitative = 5 ARS comparison items Was easier for you to use? (TP, PE, Neither) Engaged you more in the course material? Was easier for your instructor to use? Was more reliable or had fewer technical problems? Did you prefer using overall? Qualitative = General comments about the ARS systems and about the use of ARS (of any kind) in the classroom (2 items) Qualitative = General comments about the ARS systems and about the use of ARS (of any kind) in the classroom (2 items)

13. Study Participants = Undergraduate Students TurningPoint (O 1 ) N = 306 TurningPoint (O 1 ) N = 306 Poll Everywhere (O 2 ) N = 317 Poll Everywhere (O 2 ) N = 317 Comparison Survey (O 3 ) N = 323 Comparison Survey (O 3 ) N = 323

14. Appraisal/Learning Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) Question on ART-Q Questionnaire TurningPoint Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 Poll Everywhere Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 1.Because of the ARS system, I had a better idea of what to expect on exams, quizzes, or assignments. 4.070 (p =.057) 3.934 2.I believe that I knew more about what would be emphasized on exams, quizzes, or assignments because of the ARS system. 4.073 (p =.244) 3.993 3.Using the ARS system gave me a preview of what I needed to know for exams, quizzes, or assignments. 4.137 (p =.130) 4.037 Note: P values calculated by paired samples t-test; significantly different values = p <.05

15. Negative Grade Impact Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) Question on ART-Q Questionnaire TurningPoint Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 Poll Everywhere Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 4.The ARS system interfered with my getting a good grade. 1.967 (p =.259) 2.077 5.Because we used the ARS system, I expect to get a lower grade than I would have otherwise. 1.641 (p =.026) 1.809 6.Using the ARS system negatively impacted my grade. 1.585 (p =.083) 1.709

16. Attendance Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) Question on ART-Q Questionnaire TurningPoint Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 Poll Everywhere Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 7.Because the ARS system was used, I attended class more regularly than I would have otherwise. 2.924 (p =.561) 2.877 8.Using the ARS system increased my likelihood of attending class on time. 2.947 (p =.969) 2.950 9.The ARS system motivated me to attend class on time. 2.997 (p =.750) 2.970

17. Enjoyment Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) Question on ART-Q Questionnaire TurningPoint Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 Poll Everywhere Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 10.Using the ARS system was fun. 4.183 (p =.000) 3.940 11.It was exciting to answer questions using the ARS system. 4.150 (p =.000) 3.841 12.I enjoyed using the ARS system. 4.275 (p =.000) 3.933 13.I did not like using the ARS system. 1.622 (p =.001) 1.811 14.I had a good experience with the ARS system. 4.220 (p =.001) 3.977

18. Preparation/Motivation Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) Question on ART-Q Questionnaire TurningPoint Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 Poll Everywhere Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 15.Using the ARS system made me more likely to review my notes prior to class. 3.372 (p =.177) 3.260 16.Using the ARS system encouraged me to do readings prior to class. 3.250 (p =.967) 3.253 17.Because we used the ARS system, I prepared for class more than I would have otherwise. 3.268 (p =.252) 3.174 18.The ARS system boosted my enthusiasm for studying the material we learned in the course. 3.483 (p =.259) 3.392

19. Ease of Use Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) Question on ART-Q Questionnaire TurningPoint Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 Poll Everywhere Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 19.Using the ARS system was easy. 4.317 (p =.000) 4.042 20.I had no problems using the ARS system. 4.168 (p =.000) 3.874 21.Using the ARS system was pretty hard. 1.484 (p =.000) 1.707

20. Instructor Performance Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) Question on ART-Q Questionnaire TurningPoint Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 Poll Everywhere Mean Score SA=5, SD=1 22.The ARS questions used by the instructor were easy. 3.808 (p =.543) 3.766 23.The ARS questions used by the instructor were clear and understandable. 4.220 (p =.015) 4.077 24.The ARS questions used by the instructor were asked at the appropriate times during class. 4.271 (p =.018) 4.142 25.Overall, I feel the ARS system improved the instructor’s ability to teach. 3.961 (p =.120) 3.846

21. Overall Mean Scores Results (0 1 vs. 0 2 ) TurningPoint (O 1 ) ART-Q Mean Score = 3.3788 TurningPoint (O 1 ) ART-Q Mean Score = 3.3788 Poll Everywhere (O 2 ) ART-Q Mean Score = 3.2925 Poll Everywhere (O 2 ) ART-Q Mean Score = 3.2925 Mean Scores Significantly Different (p =.021) Mean Scores Significantly Different (p =.021)

22. Comparison Results (0 3 ) Of the two audience response systems used in this class, which system… Turning Point Poll Everywhere Neither 28.Was easier for you to use?57.4%39.8%2.8% 29.Engaged you more in the course material? 53.0%39.8%7.2% 30.Was easier for your instructor to use? 45.7%46.3%8.0% 31.Was more reliable or had fewer technical problems? 43.8%44.1%12.2% 32.Did you prefer using overall?54.3%41.6%4.0%

23. Qualitative Results: Dislikes about Poll Everywhere Did not like texting long codes (28) “Too many numbers to text, shorten numbers” “The codes to enter were too long. Maybe if it were like one letter it would have been better” “It confused some students about which numbers to text” “I have a flip phone – too challenging” “Too much to keep texting numbers over and over instead of one click” “Not as fast as using the clickers”

24. Qualitative Results: Dislikes about Poll Everywhere Did not like the technical issues/problems (24) “Does not work on my phone; message block” “My texts never go through” “Sometimes my answers wouldn’t submit” “Technical difficulties” “Tech problems!!!” “Sometimes the texts don’t go through” “Sometimes technology is slow, doesn’t work”

25. Qualitative Results: Dislikes about Poll Everywhere Did not like using cell phone/texting in-class (19) “Having to use my phone for it” “If your cell phone is dead/has no service then you can’t use it” “Incorporating cell phones into the classroom seems inherently distracting” “Hard to stay focused with my phone in front of me” “Having to use my cell phone. It was so tedious” “Might not always have cell phone or data service to use it”

26. Qualitative Results: Dislikes about Poll Everywhere Did not like that responses were real time (7) “Everyone went with the majority answer” “No challenge because it shows the answers selected by others as they answer” “You could see everyone’s response as they were going – could influence vote” “You could see the most popular answers before you vote”

27. Qualitative Results: Dislikes about TurningPoint Did not like the technical issues/problems (41) “It did not work any time we used it” “It wasn’t 100% reliable” “It has glitches a lot of the time” “Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn’t” “A lot of technical problems, wish we were able to use it more”

28. Qualitative Results: Likes about Poll Everywhere Students liked that Poll Everywhere was: Engaging/interactive (37) Simple to use (36) A good way to review material (35) Anonymous (17) Using cell phones (11)

29. Qualitative Results: Likes about TurningPoint Students liked that TurningPoint was: Engaging/interactive (67) Good to review course material (57) Simple to use (42) Anonymous (26)

30. Conclusion Findings indicate, both quantitatively and qualitatively, that students at Coastal Carolina University favor using the TurningPoint system over the Poll Everywhere system in the classroom.