Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClifton Campbell Modified over 8 years ago
1
UNLUCKY IN LOCKS
2
Schuyler Towne ● Lock.gd ● Research Scholar @ Ronin Institute ● @Shoebox ● “schuyler towne” on “the internet”
12
Medeco Vs. Emhart
13
Medeco
15
Emhart
18
Medeco vs. Emhart ● Differentiated security elements ● Attacker can attack one element at a time ● Lift, then Rotate or Rotate, then lift. ● Integrated security elements ● Attacker must attack both elements at once ● Lift AND rotate.
19
Medeco sues, gets royalties, eventually Emhart rolls up lock manufacturing..
20
Kwikset Vs. Schlage
21
Kwikset Smartkey Breakdowns courtesy Zeke
22
Schlage Securekey ● Similar, but not the same ● Rekeyable ● Pivoting rather than sliding carriage
23
Kwikset Sues ● Accuses Schlage of infringing on 2 parts of their patent ● Accuses Schlage of false advertising ● Specifically Schlage claim that their lock is “10x more secure than any competitor”
25
Off market by Dec, 2011. Kwikset Wins.
26
Norman Epstein
39
Sadly the Pragmatic Lock Co. rolled up & Norman himself died a few years ago.
40
Few self-respecting professional "inventors" have felt their mission to be fulfilled until they have "invented" a lock of some kind. Apparently there is a fascination in the subject which they cannot resist, however complete their ignorance of the past achievements and present development of the art, and so each incontinently proceeds to "invent" things which, while new to his untutored mind, are usually already well-known, occasionally in successful use, but more frequently long since consigned to the limbo of useless and discarded schemes. Henry Robinson Towne sez:
42
“One might find himself baffled to operate, even with the use of this, its proper key.”
44
BUT WHY?
45
4,136X
46
x.lock.gd ● x.lock.gd
48
Thank you! Lock.gd x.lock.gd @Shoebox
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.