Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFrancine Sullivan Modified over 8 years ago
1
1 University of Houston, 2 University at Buffalo, SUNY Maggie Britton 1 Jaye L. Derrick 1 Sana Haddad 1 Kenneth E. Leonard 2 I get by with a little help from my friends: Avoidantly attached people benefit from using fictional pseudo-relationships to cope with stress
2
Stress buffering hypothesis Cohen & Wills (1985)
3
Stress buffering hypothesis Stress Health Cohen & Wills (1985)
4
Stress buffering hypothesis Social Support Stress Health Cohen & Wills (1985)
5
Avoidant attachment Collins & Feeney (2000); Ognibene & Collins (1998)
6
Uncomfortable with intimacy Avoidant attachment Collins & Feeney (2000); Ognibene & Collins (1998)
7
Uncomfortable with intimacy Do not seek social support Avoidant attachment Collins & Feeney (2000); Ognibene & Collins (1998)
8
Social surrogates Gabriel, Valenti, & Young (2015)
9
Reminders of others Parasocial relationships Social worlds Social surrogates Gabriel, Valenti, & Young (2015)
10
Reminders of others ▫ Pictures ▫ Comfort foods Parasocial relationships Social worlds Social surrogates Gabriel, Valenti, & Young (2015)
11
Reminders of others ▫ Pictures ▫ Comfort foods Parasocial relationships ▫ Fictional character ▫ Celebrity Social worlds Social surrogates Gabriel, Valenti, & Young (2015)
12
Reminders of others ▫ Pictures ▫ Comfort foods Parasocial relationships ▫ Fictional character ▫ Celebrity Social worlds ▫ Favorite books, movies, TV shows Social surrogates Gabriel, Valenti, & Young (2015)
13
Social surrogates fulfill needs
14
The current study
15
Social surrogate use will be associated with relationship functioning for people with high feelings of avoidance
16
The current study Social surrogate use will be associated with relationship functioning for people with high feelings of avoidance Social surrogate use will not be associated with relationship functioning for people with low feelings of avoidance
17
Method
18
Recruited from marriage license office Completed mailed questionnaires at time of marriage and five follow-ups Adult development study 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
19
N = 634 couples at Time 0 Husbands: ▫ 59% White, 33% African American, 8% other ▫ 66% at least some college education ▫ 89% employed at least part time Wives: ▫ 62% White, 31% African American, 7% other ▫ 62% at least some college education ▫ 75% employed at least part time Participants
20
Attachment ▫ Relationship questionnaire Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991) Created continuous dimensions of avoidance and anxiety Social surrogate use ▫ Coping with stress scale Indicate what you generally do when you are under a lot of stress. “I do things like go to the movies, read, listen to music, or watch TV, to keep myself from thinking about the problem.” 1 = I don’t do this at all; 4 = I do this a lot Measures
21
Relationship conflict ▫ Test of negative social exchange (TENSE) Ruehlman & Karoly (1991) Modified for the Adult Development Study In the past month, my partner… “Ignored my wishes or needs” “Made fun of me” “Disagreed with me” “Was angry with me” “Was too demanding of my attention" Measures
22
Results
23
Multivariate multilevel modeling ▫ Time points within couples ▫ Husbands/wives as multivariate outcomes Predictors person mean centered ▫ Positive effects (higher than own mean) ▫ Negative effects (lower than own mean) Concurrent and time-lagged analyses Overview of analyses
24
Attachment avoidance x social surrogate use predicts relationship conflict Concurrent Avoidance x social surrogate use (b = -.057, p =.030) Lagged Avoidance x social surrogate use (b = -.066, p =.017)
25
Attachment avoidance x social surrogate use predicts relationship conflict
31
Notes on analyses Included anxiety (n.s.) Included partner effects (n.s.) ▫ Not harmful for the partner
32
Discussion
33
Conclusions Avoidant people’s relationships may benefit from the use of social surrogates ▫ Receive social support ▫ No partner interaction No increased intimacy
34
Limitations and future directions Data were pulled from the Adult Development Study Indirect/single-item measure of social surrogate use Conduct study with better measures to address research question
35
This work was supported by: Grant R37 AA09922 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism awarded to Kenneth E. Leonard Acknowledgements
36
Thank you! Social Processes Lab Dr. Jaye Derrick Sana Haddad Zachary Baker Amanda Diaz Hannah Gasper Jeffrey Le Syed Rizvi Research Institute on Addictions Dr. Kenneth Leonard
37
Results table (lagged) Predictorsbp95% CI Constant 2.08 H 1.91 W 0.00 H 0.00 W [2.02, 2.14] H [1.86, 1.97] W Actor Lagged Relationship Conflict-.104.000[-.143, -.066] Actor Lagged Social Surrogate Use-.017.156[-.040,.006] Partner Lagged Social Surrogate Use-.025.032[-.049, -.002] Actor Lagged Anxiety.017.348[-.018,.051] Partner Lagged Anxiety.012.485[-.022,.047] Actor Lagged Avoidance.037.032[.003,.071] Partner Lagged Avoidance-.002.917[-.036,.032] Actor Lagged Anxiety X Lagged Social Surrogate Use-.019.469[-.070,.032] Partner Lagged Anxiety X Lagged Social Surrogate Use-.040.126[-.091,.011] Actor Lagged Avoidance X Lagged Social Surrogate Use-.057.030[-.108, -.005] Partner Lagged Avoidance X Lagged Social Surrogate Use-.039.138[-.091,.013]
38
Results table continued (concurrent) Predictorsbp95% CI Actor PMC Social Surrogate Use-.012.298[-.036,.011] Partner PMC Social Surrogate Use-.024.045[-.047, -.001] Actor PMC Anxiety.033 H.118 W.186 H.000 W [-.016,.082] H [.072,.163] W Partner PMC Anxiety.026.149[-.009,.060] Actor PMC Avoidance.019.287[-.016,.055] Partner PMC Avoidance.011.548[-.025,.046] Actor PMC Anxiety X PMC Social Surrogate Use.008.772[-.044,.059] Partner PMC Anxiety X PMC Social Surrogate Use-.022.407[-.073,.030] Actor PMC Avoidance X PMC Social Surrogate Use-.066.017[-.120, -.012] Partner PMC Avoidance X PMC Social Surrogate Use-.060.030[-.114, -.006]
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.