Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElinor Haynes Modified over 8 years ago
1
Breast Reconstruction Reconstruction Workshop, YSC National Summit March 6, 2015 Breast Reconstruction Reconstruction Workshop, YSC National Summit March 6, 2015 R. Michael Koch, M.D., F.A.C.S. Assistant Professor of Surgery Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York
2
Less is More The surgical treatment of breast cancer continues to evolve. The trend is towards less deforming methods. Goal is to eradicate the tumor without destroying normal tissues. – –Skin-sparing mastectomy – –Breast conservation – –Minimally invasive tumor ablation – –Sentinel Lymph node biopsy
3
Breast Reconstruction Newman LA, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998;5:620-626. American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2004. Available at http://www.plasticsurgery.org/.
4
Active Participation A parallel development in reconstructive surgery has also occurred. Participation in multidisciplinary Breast Centers Evolution in operative techniques: – –Direct to Implant reconstruction – –Pedicled Flaps i.e. TRAM Flap – –Flap “supercharging” – –Flap “delay” – –Free flaps – –Perforator flaps – –Intraoperative SPY Vascular Studies
5
Improving Outcomes There is a greater emphasis on studying patient outcomes. A finer appreciation of the long-term consequences of the surgical approaches. Success is now gauged by how quickly patients obtain quality-of-life objectives. Patient expectations are increasing.
6
A Team Approach—The NY Group for Plastic Surgery Model A union between the breast and reconstructive surgeon has developed. Shared goals and philosophy Ability to effectively coordinate techniques
7
A Team Approach—The NY Group for Plastic Surgery Model These developments have significantly influenced women’s interest. Many choose to undergo additional reconstructive procedures.
8
Surgical Perspective—the Driving Force for Change Traditionally, plastic- surgical thinking has been thought of as a balance between two interdependent forces: – –Reconstructive vs. Aesthetic Surgery
9
Why Do Surgical Techniques Evolve? Desire to improve results and outcome. Progress has focused on three key issues: – –Minimizing surgical risk – –Improving flap survival – –Minimizing donor-site problems
10
Surgical repertoire Constantly evolving: – –Staged Expander-to-implant – –Single-stage Alloderm and implant – –Pedicled flaps TRAM, LTD – –Free flaps TRAM Rubens ALT Gracilis Gluteal – –Perforator Flaps DIEP SIEA SGAP IGAP
11
Surgical Perspective—the Driving Force for Change The application of surgical principles to physical findings is the true art of plastic surgery. Goal is Surgical Harmony. Result should resonate. Reflect the perfect blending of surgical ingredients.
12
Prosthetic Options-Tissue Expanders Traditional Two (Three) Stage Approach: 1. Placement of Tissue Expander 2. Office-based injections to adjust volume 3. Exchange for Implant 12
13
Tissue Expander Reconstruction-Initial Step Tissue Expanders are temporary devices They create a breast shape by changing the surface area Expansion requires healthy skin for optimal results 13
14
Tissue Expanders-Second Step Step Two is the ‘Exchange Procedure” Performed once the desired breast shape and volume are obtained Outpatient procedure Typically gel implants 14
15
Delayed Reconstruction 15
16
Nipple Reconstruction Nipple reconstruction may be performed as a third step Local tissue flap is used Skin tattoo also an option 16
17
TISSUE EXPANSION
19
6 MONTHS POST-OP TISSUE EXPANDER
20
Credited with 1 st 1- stage AlloDerm® RTM RTM reconstruction in 2001. Patients: 49 women, 76 breasts Incisions: IMF, SSM (periareolar), transverse Ann Plast Surg. 57: 1–5, 2006
21
Direct-to-Implant with Alloderm Direct to Implant Approach –Adequate and healthy skin surface area –Internal support with dermal matrix –Protection of overlying skin 21
22
HUMAN TISSUE MATRIX Human cadaver dermis (from tissue bank) processed to remove all cells Collagen matrix left intact allowing vascular ingrowth No disease transmission possibility or antigeneic potential
23
Vascular Ingrowth HISTOLOGY AT 6 WEEKS
24
Introducing Alloderm 24
25
PRE-OP RIGHT BREAST CANCER
26
7 YEARS POST-OP
27
Prosthetic Approaches Advantages: –Quicker procedure –Shorter recovery –Choose the size –symmetric result for –bilateral procedures –Only one operative site Disadvantages: –Requires multiple procedures –May require revisions –Visibility and palpability –Life-long risk of infection – Life-long risk of capsular contracture – Rupture –Should not be used in the setting of XRT 27
29
Results Minor skin flap necrosis (6/30 breasts) All were excised and closed secondarily AlloDerm® RTM retained in all cases No rippling, synmastia, or capsular contractures was observed. Mean follow-up 18 months (range 15 – 24 months)
30
PROPHYLACTIC MASTECTOMY GENETICALLY (POSITIVE BRCA 1 OR 2) OR STRONG FAMILY HISTORY WITH NO TESTING OR NEGATIVE SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY (FROZEN SECTION IN RETRO AREOLAR TISSUE) INDICAT ED IN NON- CANCER PATIENT S and SELECTE D OTHERS
31
1 WEEK POST -OP
33
PRE-REDUCTION PROPH MASTECTOMY
34
6 MONTHS POST-OP
35
A Team Approach—The NY Group for Plastic Surgery Model A union between the breast and reconstructive surgeon has developed. Shared goals and philosophy Ability to effectively coordinate techniques
36
Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.