Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJemima Kennedy Modified over 8 years ago
1
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 Schematic of adhesive contact between an elastic flat surface and an elastic wavy surface with period L subjected to a remotely applied normal traction p¯ (negative when tensile) Figure Legend:
2
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 The normalized contact zone a/L versus the normalized normal load P/p0L per period in JKR-type model for different values of α Figure Legend:
3
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 Schematic of the contact half-width a and the cohesive zone a≤|x|≤c, where the adhesive surface interactions are present. Adhesive traction in Maugis–Dugdale model is assumed to be constant σ0 acting over a cohesive zone lengthδc. Figure Legend:
4
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 The half-widths of contact and interaction zones versus the normal load with α=0.3 for (a) μ=0.1, (b) μ=0.6, (c)μ=1.5, and (d) μ=3. The corresponding Westergaard and JKR-type are also included for comparison. Figure Legend:
5
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 The half-widths of contact and interaction zones versus the normal load with α=0.6 for (a) μ=0.1, (b) μ=0.6, (c) μ=1.5, and (d) μ=3. The corresponding Westergaard and JKR-type are also included for comparison. Figure Legend:
6
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 The half-widths of contact and interaction zones versus the normal load with α=1 for (a) μ=0.6 and (b) μ=1.5. The corresponding Westergaard and JKR-type are also included for comparison. Figure Legend:
7
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 Critical compressive force within a period to achieve full contact as a function of the transition parameter for different values of α Figure Legend:
8
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Revisiting the Maugis–Dugdale Adhesion Model of Elastic Periodic Wavy Surfaces J. Appl. Mech. 2016;83(10):101007-101007-8. doi:10.1115/1.4034119 Pull-off force within a period as a function of the transition parameter for different values of α Figure Legend:
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.