Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EUISG Meeting 3-4 October 2014 Consultation Response on the Mid- Term Review. EUROPEAN ANTI-POVERTY NETWORK RÉSEAU EUROPÉEN DES ASSOCIATIONS DE LUTTE CONTRE.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EUISG Meeting 3-4 October 2014 Consultation Response on the Mid- Term Review. EUROPEAN ANTI-POVERTY NETWORK RÉSEAU EUROPÉEN DES ASSOCIATIONS DE LUTTE CONTRE."— Presentation transcript:

1 EUISG Meeting 3-4 October 2014 Consultation Response on the Mid- Term Review. EUROPEAN ANTI-POVERTY NETWORK RÉSEAU EUROPÉEN DES ASSOCIATIONS DE LUTTE CONTRE LA PAUVRETÉ ET L’EXCLUSION SOCIALE Sian Jones, EAPN Policy Coordinator

2 Consultation Response 1)Main inputs 2)Problematic Areas 3)Finalizing response and national action.

3 Summary of Consultation Response so far 1)For you, what does the Europe 2020 strategy mean? What are the main elements that you associate with the strategy? Strategy – Inclusive growth, delivering on the poverty and other social strategies. Changing reaction – as disillusionment has set in. Key elements – targets, guidelines, NRPs, CSRs – stakeholder engagement in review and development. 2) Overall, do you think that the Europe 2020 strategy has made a difference? Please explain Welcomed – for key objective/target, but has failed to deliver its potential – present our assessment But still important as agenda-setter, keeping poverty on the agenda and funding.

4 P.3 Questions Continued  Has the knowledge of what other EU countries are doing in Europe 2020 impacted on the approach followed in your country? - ?? Say MS not transparent about influence from other MS – and no info from members.  Has there been sufficient involvement in the Europe 2020 strategy? Are you involved? Would you like to be more? If yes, how? -Give summary of 2013/2014 NRP assessment. Highlighting low engagement and quality, some positive examples.NRP needs to be relevant, with meaningful engagement- structural dialogue, PEP, impact.

5  Do the current targets respond to the strategy’s objective of fostering growth and jobs? -Highlight lack of focus on inclusive growth -Shouldn’t abandon the targets but could be improved – highlight lacks on EU target eg %, sub-targets/EMPL  Among the current targets, do you consider some are more important than others? -All important and should be treated equally -Particular concern for poverty target as lower priority.  Do you find it useful, that EU level targets are broken down in national targets, what’s best way to set targets? Ambitious enough? - Essential to have national targets, shortfalls, problem of gaming/selection – important national information!

6  What added value of 7 action programmes for growth - EPAP, confusion with SIP/OMC – needs link to national/Europe 2020.  Adapting Europe 2020: growth strategy for a post-crisis Europe-Does the EU need a comprehensive, overarching medium term strategy?  What are the most important and relevant areas to be addressed, in order to achieve smart and sustainable growth? - Need to move forward on balanced social and economic  What new challenges should be taken into account in future? -Change in approach – economy delivers on social. Inequality 2

7  How could the strategy best linked to other EU policies? -Highlight link to Social OMC, to feed into Europe 2020 – need for separate social space.  What would improve stakeholder engagement – Give recs from position and handbook.  What type of instruments are appropriate to achieve smart, sustainable growth? -Better working of soft tools, but need for hard – ie directives/social standards.  What would be best done at EU level to deliver results and what at national level? -EU sets objective, common indicators, guidelines, mutual learning, monitor impact, National- decide how to deliver shared strategies, engage stakeholders.

8  How can the strategy encourage MS to put a stronger policy focus on growth? -By not insisting on austerity..  Are targets useful, please explain -Repetition of previous.  Would you recommend adding or removing certain targets, or targets in general. -Repetition of previous.  What are the most fruitful areas for joint EU- MS action? What would be the added value -?????  Do you have any other comment on the Europe 2020 strategy you would like to share  Highlight our PP – 5 key demands.

9 Discussion 1)Other Comments on key questions? 2)Inputting at national level very important? Who will do it? 3)Timetable for finalization.  Final inputs on EAPN position by 10 th October  Finalized to send by 13 th.  National members to complete by 31 st October  Send copies to EAPN for website.  Find on-line consultation here:http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/public- consultation/index_en.htm

10 EUROPEAN ANTI-POVERTY NETWORK RÉSEAU EUROPÉEN DE LUTTE CONTRE LA PAUVRETÉ ET L’EXCLUSION SOCIALE SQUARE DE MEEUS, 18 – 1050 BRUSSELS TEL: 0032 2 226 58 50 – FAX: 0032 2 26 58 69 www.eapn.euwww.eapn.eu - team@eapn.euteam@eapn.eu Thank you for your attention Sian Jones, EAPN Policy Coordinator sian.jones@eapn.eu www.eapn.eu SEE: EMIN: http://emin.eu.nethttp://emin.eu.net EU Alliance for a democratic, social and sustainable semester: http://semesteralliance.nethttp://semesteralliance.net


Download ppt "EUISG Meeting 3-4 October 2014 Consultation Response on the Mid- Term Review. EUROPEAN ANTI-POVERTY NETWORK RÉSEAU EUROPÉEN DES ASSOCIATIONS DE LUTTE CONTRE."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google