Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AYP consequences are based on the July AYP Report.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AYP consequences are based on the July AYP Report."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 AYP consequences are based on the July AYP Report.

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 SPS – Met AYP SES – NI1 (R/ELA – SWD) SMS – NI1 (Math & R/ELA – SWD) SHS – NI6 (ELA - Black & SWD – Graduation Rate) ASPA – Did Not Meet (Math – Econ. Disadvantage) TCE – Met AYP ECI – Did Not Meet ( CRCT Math – Black)(Grad. Rate – All students) (GHSGT Math – All Students & Econ. Disadv.) (GHSGT ELA – Econ. Disadv.)

11 CRCT Math CRCT R/ELA GHSGT Math GHSGT ELAAttend.Grad Rate State78.089.678.190.66.377.8 Emanuel Co.69.385.274.783.98.072.5

12

13 CRCT MathCRCT R/ELAGHSGT MathGHSGT ELAAttendanceGrad Rate Burke County73.785.4 78.96.368.0 Columbia County86.794.087.594.94.682.3 Emanuel County69.385.274.783.98.072.5 Glascock County66.783.980.093.310.276.2 Jefferson County72.682.763.384.22.668.1 Jenkins County70.888.278.484.58.168.3 Lincoln County81.694.779.882.74.085.6 McDuffie County74.988.676.690.67.477.6 Richmond County62.984.262.384.16.868.4 Taliaferro County65.680.664.788.25.280.0 Warren County65.484.546.581.410.264.6 Wilkes County73.588.388.195.55.888.6

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21 200720082009 All Students71.169.769.3 Black68.161.359.5 Hispanic73.568.366.3 White85.476.777.7 SWD49.641.236.9 Econ Disadv.73.365.464.5

22

23 200720082009 All Students84.58585.2 Black78.379.679.3 Hispanic71.778.279.6 White90.990.490.9 SWD6561.158.3 Econ Disadv.81.381.782.5

24

25 200720082009 All Students64.965.974.7 Black49.248.763 White78.880.187 SWD631.244.4 Econ Disadv.53.157.686.6

26

27 200720082009 All Students82.480.883.9 Black69.467.878 White94.790.790.2 SWD4451.153.3 Econ Disadv.757477.9

28

29 200720082009 All Students9.810.48 Black5.74.64.1 Hispanic7.15.37.5 White13.81611.4 SWD1113.511.2 Econ Disadv.10.411.28.8

30

31 200720082009 All Students67.263.172.5 Black57.752.863.2 White77.171.980 SWD34.320.528.1 Econ Disadv.57.753.763.4

32

33

34 Step 1 – MyGaDoe Login Step 2 – AYP Reports

35 Step 3 – Select School – View Report Step 4 – Academic Performance – AYP Indicator

36 Step 5 Select Download Step 6 Download File

37 Step 8 – Open File Step 7 – Save file and open Caution – Sensitive Information

38 Step 9 – Yes to accept format Click on the “Second Indicator” for additional information.

39 Retained information FAY status Days absent Test data 9 th Grade Enter Date... plus more Grade Level Gender Race Date of Birth SWD ELL ESOL

40 Annual Measureable Objectives

41 CRCT: Reading/English Language Arts Annual Step Georgia AMOs (Benchmarks) (AYP Targets) 200360.00% 200460.00% 200566.70% 200666.70% 200766.70% 200873.30% 200973.30% 201073.30% 201180.00% 201286.70% 201393.30% 2014100.00%

42 CRCT: Mathematics Annual Step Georgia AMOs (Benchmarks) (AYP Targets) 200350.00% 200450.00% 200558.30% 200658.30% 200758.30% 200859.50% 200959.50% 201067.60% 201175.70% 201283.80% 201391.90% 2014100.00%

43 Enhanced GHSGT: Mathematics Starting Point Annual Step Georgia AMOs (Benchmarks) (AYP Targets) 2003n/a 200462.30% 200562.30% 200666.60% 200766.60% 200874.90% 200974.90% 201074.90% 201181.20% 201287.40% 201393.70% 2014100.00%

44 Enhanced GHSGT (E-GHSGT): Language Arts Starting Point Annual Step Georgia AMOs (Benchmarks) (AYP Targets) 2003n/a 200481.60% 200581.60% 200684.70% 200784.70% 200887.70% 200987.70% 201087.70% 201190.80% 201293.90% 201396.90% 2014100.00%

45 Graduation Rate School YearAMO 2006-0765% 2007-0870% 2008-0975% 2009-1080% 2010- 1190% 2011-1290% 2012 -1395% 2013-14100%

46 Get ready – what do you know already? Identify areas for comparison. Examine trends and relationships. Identify and define problem areas. Develop intervention strategies. Evaluate – plan progress monitoring (benchmark testing) to determine the effectiveness of intervention strategies.

47 Has one area been consistently weak over the past three years? Has one area been consistently strong every year? Do there appear to be relationships between data? Do there appear to be relationships between student performance and instructional practices... teacher experience... class size? Are there patterns with grades levels?

48 Identify test scores inconsistent with the course grade. Identify large score discrepancies in a particular area from year to year? Are there any surprises in the data? Identify score discrepancies between teaching teams or teachers?

49 What intervention strategies are being used or planned already? What would yield the most immediate results or changes? What factors are in our control?

50 Tomorrow’s Session Share and discuss your AYP report Discuss trends identified for your school What are the implications? Share strategies and solutions for improvement this upcoming year. Each school will report out their information.

51 Analyze the Data SPS 2009 CRCT Scores from 3 rd Grade (SMS) 2008 CRCT Scores from 2 nd Grade (SPS) 2009 CRCT Scores 1 st & 2 nd Grade (SPS) SES 2008 CRCT Scores 2 nd Grade (SPS) 2009 CRCT Scores 2 nd Grade (SPS) – preparation for 2010 2009 CRCT Scores 3 rd – 5 th Grade (SES) TCE 2009 CRCT Scores 1 st – 5 th Grade (TCE) 2008 CRCT Scores 1 st – 5 th Grade (TCE)

52 Analyze the Data ASPA 2009 CRCT Scores 1 st – 8 th (ASPA) 2008 CRCT Scores 1 st – 8 th (ASPA) SMS 2008 CRCT Scores 5 th Grade (SES) 2009 CRCT Scores 5 th Grade (SES) – preparation for 2010 2009 CRCT Scores 6 th – 8 th Grade (SMS)

53 Analyze the Data ECI 2009 CRCT Scores 5 th Grade (TCE) – preparation for 2010 2009 CRCT Scores 6 th – 8 th Grade (ECI) 2008 CRCT Scores 6 th – 8 th Grade (ECI) 2006 CRCT Scores 8 th Grade (ECI) – compare failures with 2009 GHSGT 2009 GHSGT Scores EOCTs – predictor for GHSGT success EOCT scores – compared to state/RESA EOCT scores – analyze by subject areas EOCT scores – analyze by teacher

54 Analyze the Data SHS 2009 CRCT Scores 8 th Grade (SMS) – preparation for 2010 2009 CRCT Scores 8 th Grade (ASPA) – preparation for 2010 2006 CRCT Scores 8 th Grade (SMS) – compare failures with 2009 GHSGT 2009 GHSGT Scores EOCTs – predictor for GHSGT success EOCT scores – compared to state/RESA EOCT scores – analyze by subject areas EOCT scores – analyze by teacher

55 Data Resources Assistant Principals will have access to folder on their desktop with test results and other data. GaDOE If you need additional data, please let us know and we will work to get you the information you need.


Download ppt "AYP consequences are based on the July AYP Report."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google