1. PWE3 WG IETF 55 Atlanta, GA November 21, 2002

2. Agenda (cont.) *1300-1310 Administrivia (PWE3-IETF55-danny.ppt) *1310-1325 PWE3 Architecture -- Stewart Bryant (ietf-pwe3-arch.pdf) 1325-1340 PPVPN L2 Signaling -- Eric Rosen (erosen-l2sig-pwe355.ppt) *1340-1350 PW Management Discussion -- “David Zelig" (pwe3-mibs-update.ppt) *1350-1400 PWE3 TDMoIP -- Shahram Davari (shahram-pwe3-ietf55.ppt) *1400-1410 Issues with CW & Packet Loss -- "Yaakov Stein" (cw-pl-ietf55.ppt) *1410-1420 Bi-directional LSPs for classical MPLS -- Rohit Dube (ietf-pwe355-rohit_dube) *1420-1425 TDM DT Update -- Tom K. Johnson (no slides) *1425-1430 Unstructured TDM -- Sasha Vainshtein (ucesopsn-ietf55.ppt) *1430-1440 Header Compression Drafts -- "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry) (ash-vompls-hc.ppt) *1440-1445 SG13 X-MPLS Interworking -- "Ghassem Koleyni (ghassen-pwe3-ietf55.doc) *1445-1455 Draft Updates -- Luca Martini (martini-ietf-55.ppt) *1455-1500 Wrap Up Full agenda located here: http://www.ietf.org/ietf/02nov/pwe3.txt

3. Administrivia... Agenda Bashing Minutes Blue Sheets

4. WG Document Status Requirements for PWE3 WG (redo) LC Dec ‘02 Framework for PWE3Fold into Architecture Draft Protocol Layering in PWE3 Fold into Architecture Draft PWE3 TermsFold into Architecture Draft PWE3 Architecture WG LC APR ’02 PWE3 Fragmentation and ReassemblyWG LC Dec ‘02 *Ethernet Encap Over IP/MPLS Networks WG LC Mar ’02 Transport of Layer 2 Frames Over MPLSWG LC Mar ‘02 Frame Relay over PWWG LC Mar ‘02 *Transport of ATM Cells/Frame IP/MPLS PSNsWG LC Mar ’02 PW MIBHold Pattern PW MPLS PSN MIBHold Pattern Text Conventions & OID for PW Management Hold Pattern SONET/SDH CEPHold Pattern TDM Service Spec Hold Pattern SONET/SDH CEPMIB SMIv2Hold Pattern Ethernet PW MIBHold Pattern

5. Progress Issues.... Need to address congestion control (will move CW sequence & length semantics to architecture document and discuss congestion control there;[ need to remove specifics from service documents) Need thorough security considerations sections. Need to sufficiently reference and employ requirements and architecture document terms and concepts (comments coming from me here!) Needs default mode that “just works”. TDM Requirements will be in separate draft.

6. Progress! ATM Encap will define N:1 Cell mode as default mechanism. More about this in a moment.

7. Input from ADs “I agree with Scott - one way needs to be mandatory or there aren't assured interops for the spec. Makes a pain with the vendors, but there it is.” Allison Mankin (11/18/2002) AD/ PWE3 Transport Area Advisor