1. La Realidad y la Ilusión El Desarrollo de una Biblioteca Digital a la Universidad de Oregon por Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/dspace/handle/1794/2575

2. La Universidad de Oregon

3. Servicio de Biblioteca Digital y Metadatos

4. University of Oregon Libraries Digital Collections http://libweb.uoregon.edu/diglib/search.html

5. Scholars’ Bank https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/

6. La implementación de un repositorio institucional : procesos, retos y estrategias Seminario presentado en tres sesiones por Carol Hixson Jefa del Servicio de Biblioteca Digital y Metadatos http://libweb.uoregon.edu/catdept/home/ University of Oregon Libraries https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/dspace/handle/1794/1253

7. Qué? Por qué? Cómo? Glimpse of some of our collections Our reasons for building digital collections Why we chose CONTENTdm Highlights of our implementation process How the collections are being used Challenges Future plans

8. Descriptions of UO Digital Library Collections http://libweb.uoregon.edu/diglib/aboutdiglib.html

9. Tour of UO Digital Collections http://libweb.uoregon.edu/catdept/digcol/forum/slideshow.html

10. Tour of UO Digital Collections

11. Reasons for Creating Digital Collections To provide access to and awareness of under-utilized materials

12. Provide access to and awareness of under-utilized materials

13. Reasons for Creating Digital Collections To provide access to under-utilized materials To broaden access to physically fragile materials

14. Broaden Access to Physically Fragile Materials

15. Reasons for Creating Digital Collections To provide access to under-utilized materials To broaden access to physically fragile materials To preserve at-risk materials

16. Preserve at-risk materials

17. Reasons for Creating Digital Collections To provide access to under-utilized materials To broaden access to physically fragile materials To preserve at-risk materials To strengthen and build partnerships with other cultural heritage institutions

18. Strengthen and Build Partnerships

19. Reasons for Creating Digital Collections To provide access to under-utilized materials To broaden access to physically fragile materials To preserve some at risk materials To strengthen and build partnerships To explore new delivery mechanisms for content

20. Explore New Delivery Mechanisms

22. Reasons for Creating Digital Collections To provide access to under-utilized materials To broaden access to physically fragile materials To preserve some at risk materials To strengthen and build partnerships To explore new delivery mechanisms for content To help shape the digital landscape

23. Help Shape the Digital Landscape

24. Reasons for Creating Digital Collections To provide access to under-utilized materials To broaden access to physically fragile materials To preserve some at risk materials To strengthen and build partnerships To explore new delivery mechanisms for content To help shape the digital landscape To support the University’s instructional programs

25. Support the University’s Instructional Programs

27. http://newresearchsummit.blogspot.com/

28. Why We Chose CONTENTdm Accepts variety of digital formats Allows for submission item-by-item or batch loading Highly customizable Growing body of users Underlying mapping to Dublin Core Supports controlled vocabularies for any field, according to your specifications

29. Highly Customizable

30. Underlying Mapping to Dublin Core

31. OAI Registries

32. Supports Controlled Vocabularies

33. Highlights of Implementation Process http://libweb.uoregon.edu/catdept/meta/metahome.html

34. Our First Collection

35. Use of the Collections: ContentDM

36. Use of Collections: Ordering Images

37. Tracking Use: Interactive Comment Form

38. Comment Received on an Image Photo Number: PH036_4392 Comments about the image or metadata: I am browsing the collection to look for any relations to my fiance (Umatilla Tribal Member), and came across this photo. I was touched by the sweet little dog in the photo asleep on the blanket, and wondered why he was not mentioned in the description. I know it took a long time to pose for these photos, and merely getting the scene right must have made the baby and dog both exhausted.

39. Comment on This Image

40. Challenges Selection of materials

41. Selection of Materials

42. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata

43. Metadata Issues for Picturing the Cayuse

44. Poker Jim, Chief of Round Up, Pendleton, OR

45. TCI Metadata from Poker Jim Image

46. Complete Descriptive Metadata View

47. Technical Metadata Includes administrative metadata to help us manage the collections Also includes metadata designed to assist in preservation and long-term access to collections –Informed by work of RLG/OCLC, Digital Preservation Coalition, DLF, NEDLIB, etc.

48. View of Technical Metadata

49. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata Public interface – Web design

50. Public Interface: Browsable Subject Lists for the Collections

51. Public Interface: Drop-down Navigation Bars at Top

52. Public Interface: Advanced Search

53. Public Interface: Browse by Collection

54. Public Interface: Browse by Photographer

55. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata Public interface – Web design Context for collections

56. Context for Collections

57. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata Public interface – Web design Context for collections Building multiple collections simultaneously

58. Building Multiple Collections Simultaneously

59. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata Public interface – Web design Context for collections Building multiple collections simultaneously Preservation

60. Digital Content Coordinators http://libweb.uoregon.edu/diglib/digcon.html

61. Links to Digital Preservation Resources http://libweb.uoregon.edu/catdept/meta/metatools.html

62. Digital Preservation Ensuring the long-term maintenance of a bitstream (the zeros and ones): backing up files and keeping a copy at an offsite location running checks to track the deterioration of storage media, files or bitstreams

63. Digital Preservation Providing continued accessibility of the contents: viability - making sure that information is intact and readable from the storage media renderability - making sure that information is viewable by humans and able to be processed by computers understandability – making sure that information is able to be interpreted by humans

64. Digital Preservation Strategies Bitstream copying Refreshing Durable/persistent media Digital archaeology Analog backups Migration Emulation

65. Digital Preservation Components Metadata registry Format registry Checksum verification Backup procedures Persistent identifiers

66. Attributes of a Trusted Digital Repository (TDR) Administrative responsibility Organizational viability Financial sustainability Technological and procedural suitability System security Procedural accountability OAIS compliance

67. OAIS Reference Model

68. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata Public interface – Web design Context for collections Building multiple collections simultaneously Preservation Scanning, image adjustment, and OCR

69. Scanning and OCR

71. Image Adjustment

72. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata Public interface – Web design Context for collections Building multiple collections simultaneously Preservation Scanning, image adjustment, and OCR Different levels of access and copyright

73. Restricted Access: IP address

74. Restricted Access

75. Restricted Access: Password

76. Password Control

77. Without Password

78. Copyright

80. Challenges Selection of materials Metadata Public interface – Web design Context for collections Building multiple collections simultaneously Preservation Scanning, image adjustment, and OCR Different levels of access and copyright Working with partners

81. Working with Partners: Western Waters

82. Western Waters Digital Library

84. Special Challenges with Partners Metadata Searching aggregated metadata Communication Technology Funding models

85. Metadata Challenges Project participants agreed to follow the Western States Dublin Core Metadata Best Practices, version 2.0 –The standards provide considerable latitude for some elements Some participants harvested from existing collections that were created without reference to these standards

86. DC Mapping and Aggregated Searching

87. Local Customized Search Interfaces

89. Inconsistent Search Results

90. Other challenges Training staff Keeping up with technology Keeping up with changing standards Resources

91. Future plans Keep building new collections Train more staff Develop more project leaders Refine public interfaces Review and clean up metadata Improve documentation Develop better funding models Become a trusted digital repository

92. Spanish Images

93. Steve Prefontaine

94. Gertrude Bass Warner Collection

95. Charles W. Furlong Collection

96. Ulmann Collection

97. Athletics and the Academy

98. Presidential Papers

100. Historical Photographs

102. Athletics and the Academy

103. Western Waters

104. Realidad? Ilusión? Digital collections are easy Digital collections are inexpensive Digital collections will last Digital collections are comprehensive Digital collections will replace the original analog materials

105. Acknowledgements Metadata and Digital Library Services Special Collections and University Archives Library Systems Metadata Implementation Group Kate Ball, Jaye Barlous, Nathan Georgitis, Corey Harper, Lesli Larson, Lori Robare

106. Contact information Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services University of Oregon Libraries chixson@uoregon.edu (541) 346-3064

107. ¡Viva España!