1. Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1):011001-011001-9. doi:10.1115/1.4006792 Layouts of indirect-cycle plants (a) and DSG plant (b). These figures are screenshots from Thermoflex ® 20. Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1):011001-011001-9. doi:10.1115/1.4006792 Angles definition of a linear Fresnel reflector with horizontal N-S orientation tracking axis [26] Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1):011001-011001-9. doi:10.1115/1.4006792 Longitudinal and transversal IAM trend as a function of incidence angle Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1):011001-011001-9. doi:10.1115/1.4006792 Annual maps of OR for PT (top) and LFR (bottom) technology Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1):011001-011001-9. doi:10.1115/1.4006792 Monthly net electricity production for the technologies investigated Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparison of Two Linear Collectors in Solar Thermal Plants: Parabolic Trough Versus Fresnel J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2012;135(1):011001-011001-9. doi:10.1115/1.4006792 February 5 (top) and July 2 (bottom), DNI and net power output for the three plant layouts studied Figure Legend: