1. Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Coordination Group Meeting April 4, 2006

2. 2 Lines of Business Opportunities OMB and the LoB Task Forces are focused on business-driven, common solutions developed through architectural processes. The following LoBs will be undertaken in FY 2006: Budget Formulation and Execution IT Infrastructure Optimization Geospatial Common Solutions: A business process and/or technology based shared service made available to government agencies. Business Driven (vs. Technology Driven): Solutions address distinct business improvements that directly impact LoB performance goals. Developed Through Architectural Processes: Solutions are developed through a set of common and repeatable processes and tools. Common Solutions: A business process and/or technology based shared service made available to government agencies. Business Driven (vs. Technology Driven): Solutions address distinct business improvements that directly impact LoB performance goals. Developed Through Architectural Processes: Solutions are developed through a set of common and repeatable processes and tools.

3. 3 Managing Partners and OMB Leads IT Infrastructure: –Managing Partner: Deidre Lee, GSA –OMB Office Lead: Dick Burk –OMB Portfolio Manager: Jeff Koch Geospatial LOB: –Managing Partner: Ivan DeLoatch, DOI –OMB Lead & Portfolio Manager: Stacie Boyd Budget Formulation and Execution: –Managing Partner: TBD –OMB Lead: Andy Schoenbach –OMB Portfolio Manager: Jeff Koch

4. 4 LoB Management Weekly face to face status meetings will be held with all of the managing partners and OMB on Thursdays from 1-2:00 pm at the White House Conference Center, Jackson Room Checkpoint conference calls will be held with Managing Partners, OMB LOB leads, and GSA LOB PM every Monday and Thursday at 8:30 am. As needed LoB Task Forces will consult and communicate with interagency councils (e.g., Chief Financial Officers Council, Budget Officers Advisory Council, Chief Information Officers Council, Federal Geographic Data Committee, etc). Initial, interim and final briefings As needed for consultation The success and sustainment of the current and upcoming LoB initiatives will rely in large part on the establishment of an effective operational structure.

5. 5 High-Level Timeline Mar 2006 Apr 2006May 2006Jun 2006Jul 2006Aug 2006Sep 2006 Kick Off Meeting 3/16/06 Proposed Common Solutions & Draft Architecture 6/9/06 Draft Solutions & Architecture 5/26/06 RFI Distributed 4/6/06 Develop Common Solutions & Target Architecture Define/ Plan LoB Monitor and Communicate LoB Progress/Status RFI Responses Received & Evaluated 5/5/06-5/15/06 LoB Vision & Plan Completed 3/28/06 Develop Business Case Draft Joint Business Case due 6/9/06; Agency Comments due 6-19 Final Joint Business Case Early Aug. ‘06 Develop RFI

6. 6 Expected LoB Outcomes The LoB Task Forces will identify common solutions, develop a target architecture, and develop a joint (interagency) business case by August 2006. MilestonesKey Deliverables 3/28/06LoB Vision, Goals, and Objectives and project Plan (FY06 draft spend plan, project plan) 4/6/06RFI to Industry, Agencies, etc. 4/18-19/06Practitioner’s Day Meetings 5/8/06Collection of Agency Data (4/10 – 5/8) 5/5/06Due date for RFI Responses 5/15/06RFI Analysis and Summarization 5/26/06Draft Common Solutions and Target Architecture 6/9/06Proposed Common Solutions and Target Architecture 6/9/06Draft Joint Business Case for LoB Common Solutions 6/12/06Draft Joint Business Case to Agencies for Comment 6/19/06Due Date for Agency Comments on Draft Joint Business Case Early Aug 06Final Joint Business Case for LoB Common Solutions

7. 7 Task Force/Subcommittee Structure GSA / OMB Executive Sponsor DOI – USGS Managing Partner RFI Subcommittee Leslie Armstrong (DOI) JBC Subcommittee Dennis Crow (USDA) CS/TA Subcommittee Bill Burdett (DOJ) VGOs Subcommittee Ivan DeLoatch (DOI) Task Force 61 Government-wide Members Wide Participation16 Members MP staff / contr. support Wendy Blake-Coleman - EPA Bill Burdett – DOJ Don Campbell – FCC Randy Fusaro – DOC, Census Tony Lavoi – DOC, NOAA Matt Leopard – EPA Steve Marley - NASA 19 Members MP staff / contr. support Carolyn Austin – Treas. Chris Barnard – DHS Wendy Blake-Coleman – EPA Carol Brandt - DOT Don Campbell – FCC Tony Lavoi – DOC, NOAA Diana Takata - OMB Michael Thieme – DOC, Census Ron Wilson - DOJ 22 Members MP staff / contr. support Lindsay Banks - DOT Wendy Blake-Coleman - EPA Don Campbell – FCC Colleen Coggins - DOI Barry Davis – DOT, FAA Rick Kryger – DOL Tony Lavoi – DOC, NOAA John Leidich – DOC, Census Steve Marley - NASA Diana Takata – OMB Robert Wallace - DOE Ron Wilson - DOJ

8. 8 Vision, Goals, & Objectives Description A statement that reflects what complete success looks like. Goals are the desired results or achievements that the effort is directed at, making the vision a reality. Objectives are the tactical targets that lead to meeting the goals. Each line of business must identify common solutions and develop a supporting target enterprise architecture that addresses the goals and objectives of the vision. Approach Managing partners develop a straw man Conduct Task Force working session to validate and refine Submit draft to OMB and review with OMB Revise and finalize Delivery Date Draft due to OMB COB 3/28/06

9. 9 Final Draft Vision Vision (A statement that reflects what complete success of the Geo LoB looks like) The Nation’s interests are served, and the core missions of Federal agencies and their partners are met, through the effective and efficient development, provision, and interoperability of geospatial data and services.

10. 10 Final Draft Goals Goals (The desired results of the vision) Productive intergovernmental collaboration for geospatial- related activities and investments across all sectors and levels of government Optimized and standardized common geospatial functions, services, and processes that are responsive to customers (users) Cost efficient acquisition, processing, and access to geospatial data and information

11. 11 Final Draft Objectives Objectives (The tactical targets that lead to achieving the goals) To improve governance processes and results in alignment with common geospatial solutions To identify, evaluate and implement common geospatial services, processes and best practices To enhance coordination across geospatial community stakeholders Goal 1 - Productive intergovernmental collaboration for geospatial-related activities and investments across all sectors and levels of government

12. 12 Final Draft Objectives Objectives (The tactical targets that lead to achieving the goals) To implement guidance provided through the FEA Geospatial Profile To adopt, deploy and promote effective use of geospatial interoperability standards To establish an LoB-wide business architecture for common functions associated with geospatial information Goal 2 - Optimized and standardized common geospatial functions, services, and processes that are responsive to customers

13. 13 Final Draft Objectives Objectives (The tactical targets that lead to achieving the goals) To coordinate geospatial requirements and capabilities To identify opportunities and consolidate geospatial acquisition activities To enhance LoB-wide portfolio management To develop and implement geospatial requirements language for Federal grants and contracts Goal 3 - Cost efficient acquisition, processing, and access to geospatial data and information

14. 14 Request for Information (RFI) Description Business performance requirements for the LoB will be submitted to industry vendors, non-profits, governments, and agencies for feedback. The RFI will include overarching, strategic questions fundamental to all the LoB initiatives as well as LoB-specific questions. Approach Provide RFI purpose, guidelines, and process Tasks Forces will develop the RFIs and review/analyze the responses Dependent on vision, goals, and objectives Delivery Date 4/6/06 – submit to industry vendors, government and non-profits 5/5/06 – collect submitted responses 5/15/06 - analyze and summarize RFI responses in a report

15. 15 RFI Update: Emergency Response, Research, and Administrative/Resource Management scenarios and associated questions developed TF edits must be rec’d by noon, 4/5 to not impede production schedule Provide market pool submittals by noon, 4/5 Draft Due 4/3 Final Due 4/6

16. 16 Common Solution & Target Architecture Description A business process and/or technology based shared service made available to government agencies that achieves the vision, objectives, and performance metrics of the LoB. Approach Employ responses from agency analysis and RFI Develop target architecture that identifies the elements necessary to achieve LoB vision and objectives Dependent on definition of vision, goals, and objectives and RFI process Delivery Date 5/26/06 – submit draft Common Solution and Target Architecture 6/9/06 – submit proposed Common Solution and Target Architecture

17. 17 Joint Business Case Business Case Description A joint FY08 Exhibit 300 Approach Written by the managing partners in collaboration with the participating agencies Must comply with A-11 guidance Dependent on identification of common solution and development of target architecture Delivery Date 6/9/06 – submit draft Business Case 6/12/06 – disseminate draft to agencies for comment 6/19/06 – agency comments due Early Aug. ‘06 – final business case ready

18. 18 Next Steps Immediate Next Steps –4/6/06 Develop and submit RFI to industry, government and non-profits –4/18/06 Practitioner’s Day –Event will be held at: JW Marriott 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20004 –Scheduled for 10AM-Noon –Mid April to Mid May – request agency information –Developing FAQs –Organizing CS/TA and JBC Subcommittees LoB managing partners need to engage the participating agencies immediately to develop the spend plan, finalize the LoB vision, and to develop the RFI.

19. 19 Questions ??????????