Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Name: Viktor Bereziouk Instructor: Dr. Sharon O’Connor –Petruso Course: CBSE 7201 T Fall 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Name: Viktor Bereziouk Instructor: Dr. Sharon O’Connor –Petruso Course: CBSE 7201 T Fall 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 Name: Viktor Bereziouk Instructor: Dr. Sharon O’Connor –Petruso Course: CBSE 7201 T Fall 2013

2 Research Design ………………………………………..1 Threats to Internal Validity…………………………..2 Threats to External Validity…………………………..3 Proposed Data ……………………………………………4 Pre-Test/Post -Test Results……………………………5-6 Sample Questions from Questionnaire…………..7 Survey Results and Analysis…………………………..8 References…………………………………………………..9

3 Quasi-Experimental Design. 10 participants are randomly selected and split into two groups. Pre-Test (O) will be administered to both groups (X1,X2). The experimental group (X2) will receive the treatment (X) and both groups will receive the Post- Test (O) to determine the experiment’s success. The symbolic design :OX1X2-XO.

4 History: Unforeseen events/ teacher or students absence. Maturation: I don’t think the students would lose interest in this experiment because they will know that they are in an experiment and that would keep them excited to keep interest. Selection Maturation Interaction: My participant will not have different maturation rates. They are from the same class. Instrumentation: Instrumentation would not be changed and I do not see any conflict.

5 Ecological Validity: Because my sample size will be small they cannot be generalized. However, if the treatment is successful, the study can be reproduced with a larger sample. Selection-Treatment Interaction: Participants may be placed in groups. For instance, the purpose of this study is to see if students can work better in a group completing an assignment on a Wiki page. Some students may be more willing to work and others may not. I would want to include those who do not like to work into a group with those who do and see if their attitude towards work changes. Reactive Arrangements/Participants Effects: With regards to the Novelty Effect, I believe that the group which will do an assignment of the Wiki page will feel excited and more willing to complete a Wiki assignment than a traditional way.

6 Pre/Post-Test results Students Survey

7 Pre-Post Test Results Average54.8333368.33333 Median79.587.5 Mode4055 Range5935 StudentsPre-TestPost-Test 11318 21115 31418 41217 51016 61514 71112 813 912 10

8 Pre-Post Test Results

9 I prefer to work alone Strongly Agree 5 Agree 4 Unsure 3 Agree 2 Strongly Disagree 1 I prefer to work with friends Strongly Agree 5 Agree 4 Unsure 3 Agree 2 Strongly Disagree 1 I work better aloneI work better with friends 5 = Everyday 4 = Four days a week 3 = Not sure 2 = Two or three days a week 1 = One days a week 

10 Survey Results & Analysis rxy = 0.93766 There seems to be a strong positive relationship between the students who like to complete their work using pen and paper and who work better when they complete their work using pen and paper.

11 O’Connor-Petrusso, O. (2013). Descriptive Statistic Threats to Validity [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://bbhos.cuny.edu/webapps/portal/frameset


Download ppt "Name: Viktor Bereziouk Instructor: Dr. Sharon O’Connor –Petruso Course: CBSE 7201 T Fall 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google