Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 16: Internet III (Net Neutrality) Copyright © 2007.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 16: Internet III (Net Neutrality) Copyright © 2007."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 16: Internet III (Net Neutrality) Copyright © 2007

2 Spring, 2007CTL2 What is “Net Neutrality” Many different players comprise the I-net Fiber Backbone, Cable, DSL, Wireless, ISPs Some provide other services over same layers  Voice, video, leased lines, propriety networks Many different services over the I-net WWW, VoIP, IPTV, P2P, ATM, VPN I-net suppliers want to prioritize services To guarantee Quality of Service in some cases I-net users don’t want to be de-prioritized They want NET NEUTRALITY

3 Spring, 2007CTL3 Quality of Service How delivered & assured Tiered (priority) services Higher throughput (broader pipes) Dedication pathways (proprietary networks) How priced? Metered telecommunications  Wireline & wireless telephony  Cable & satellite video Unmetered  Broadcast Why shouldn’t the Internet be metered like these other services, based on cost recovery? Users of broadcast don’t “consume” scarce resources

4 Spring, 2007CTL4 Arguments in favor of Metering “Bellhead” perspective I-net carriers incur traffic sensitive charges  Borne by the network (hardware & network layers)  Application and content layers are “free riders”  All-you-can-eat users impose network externalities QoS can solve network congestion  Allocation by market pricing of scarce resources  Vs. socialist economy (common sharing of expenses) Broadband replacing TS pricing & investment  Same telcos own the PSTN and I-net backbone  Should capture rents now going to content providers

5 Spring, 2007CTL5 Arguments Against Metering Nethead” perspective Network costs already built into access pricing  Backbone providers charge ISPs, who charge users Tiering destroys leveling effect of I-net  Exacerbates the digital divide QoS impedes, rather than promotes, innovation  Service & content providers now compete by innov. Violates layering and end-to-end principles  Price discrimination at TCP/IP level Impedes free speech function of I-net  Skews “marketplace of ideas”

6 Spring, 2007CTL6 Regulating Network Neutrality Legacy telecom networks Govt-mandated neutrality a traditional feature FCC AT&T/BellSouth commitment to net neutrality  Condition for merger approval (28 Dec 2006) Investigation into IP blocking by LEC Congress COPE ( Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006 ) [HR 5252]HR 5252  Passed House, fillibustered in Senate

7 Spring, 2007CTL7 Digital Divide Defined Differential access to the knowledge economy and advanced telecom services Broadband access & bandwidth  Only rich nations/consumers widely deploy b-band Functionality  I-net architecture favors developed world IPN space; English-language domain names Importance I-net / b-band contribute to econ development Social networking and democratization effects

8 Spring, 2007CTL8 Solving the Digital Divide Computing Affordable hardware: 1 laptop/child program Connectivity Regulatory subsidies (universal service?) IPv6; IDN Content Cultural & language accessibility Capacity ICT literacy


Download ppt "Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 16: Internet III (Net Neutrality) Copyright © 2007."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google