Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEugenia Richards Modified over 8 years ago
1
What Economists Really Know, and What They Don’t
2
Richard Adelstein Wesleyan University radelstein@wesleyan.edu
3
Briefly, they know a lot about
4
Economic theory, especially the general equilibrium (GE) theory
5
Briefly, they know a lot about Economic theory, especially the general equilibrium (GE) theory The statistical analysis of numerical information, or econometrics
6
They know much less about
7
How real economies work, and what they will do next...
8
They know much less about How real economies work, and what they will do next... in large part because of their infatuation with statistical data
9
Adam Smith (1723-1790)
10
Professor of Moral Philosophy University of Glasgow
11
Order Without Design
12
Complex, beneficial social structures
13
Order Without Design Complex, beneficial social structures arise spontaneously, without conscious purpose or design,
14
Order Without Design Complex, beneficial social structures arise spontaneously, without conscious purpose or design, from the self-interested behavior of individuals following rules of general application.
15
In nature
16
Markets
17
Languages
18
Craft knowledge
19
Moral codes
20
Common law
21
And on the roads...
22
Not always benignly
23
The division of labor
24
Who does what, how, and with what tools?
25
The division of labor Who does what, how, and with what tools? How is their activity coordinated?
26
How is this order achieved?
27
By plan
28
How is this order achieved? By planBy contract
29
Knowledge made manifest
31
‘The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market’
32
The qualitative details of the spontaneous division of labor are determined in part by a complex, changing environment...
33
Natural
35
Technological
37
Social
39
‘The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market’ The qualitative details of the spontaneous division of labor are determined in part by a complex, changing environment...
40
‘The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market’ The qualitative details of the spontaneous division of labor are determined in part by a complex, changing environment, and in part by novel responses to it by people pursuing their own ends.
41
Rose Rush, Belfast, 1919
42
‘The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market’ The qualitative details of the spontaneous division of labor are determined in part by a complex, changing environment, and in part by novel responses to it by people pursuing their own ends. And they adapt quickly and nimbly to change.
43
An evolutionary process
44
much like the theory of natural selection Charles Darwin (1809-1882)
45
An evolutionary process Continuous dialogue between the system and its environment
46
An evolutionary process Continuous dialogue between the system and its environment Strongly indeterminate and unpredictable
47
An evolutionary process Continuous dialogue between the system and its environment Strongly indeterminate and unpredictable Adapts to change by generating novelty through human imagination and action
49
Political economists
50
Political economists, scientists rather than philosophers
51
When you cannot measure what you are speaking about, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind. William Thomson First Baron Kelvin (1824-1907)
52
‘Social physicists’
53
To ‘model’ the economy mathematically,
54
‘Social physicists’ To ‘model’ the economy mathematically, just as Newton had modeled the physical universe Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727)
55
Theory from the ground up
56
Theory of the consumer
57
Theory from the ground up Theory of the consumer Theory of the firm
58
Theory from the ground up Theory of the consumer Theory of the firm Supply and demand
59
Theory from the ground up Theory of the consumer Theory of the firm Supply and demand General equilibrium
60
Two kinds of theories
61
General EquilibriumEvolutionary
62
Two kinds of theories General EquilibriumEvolutionary Theory of process Theory of outcomes
63
Two kinds of theories General EquilibriumEvolutionary Theory of process Search for qualitative patterns Theory of outcomes Search for mathematical laws
64
Two kinds of theories General EquilibriumEvolutionary Theory of process Search for qualitative patterns Tested by interpreting shapes and forms Theory of outcomes Search for mathematical laws Tested by measuring quantitative data
65
Two kinds of theories General EquilibriumEvolutionary Theory of process Search for qualitative patterns Tested by interpreting shapes and forms Aspires to use science to explain the past Theory of outcomes Search for mathematical laws Tested by measuring quantitative data Aspires to use science to predict the future
66
The GE theory has prevailed...
67
... and made econometrics its queen...
68
The GE theory has prevailed...... and made econometrics its queen...... despite the regime’s repeated empirical failures
69
When you can measure what you are speaking about, when you can express it in numbers, your knowledge is still of a meager and unsatisfactory kind. Frank Knight (1885-1972)
71
Welfare Economics
72
A hundred year search for an objective moral science...
73
Welfare Economics A hundred year search for an objective moral science... ends in failure...
74
Welfare Economics A hundred year search for an objective moral science... ends in failure... but produces the theory of efficiency
75
Efficiency
77
Yerevan, Armenia c. 2004
78
Efficiency Yerevan, Armenia c. 2004 Moscow 2008
79
Aesthetics
85
The prestige of science
86
The prestige of science springs from the success of engineering
87
Wesley Mitchell (1874-1948) In economics as in other sciences, we desire knowledge mainly as an instrument of control. Control means the alluring possibility of shaping the evolution of
88
economic life to fit the developing purposes of our race. It is this possibility, of which we catch fleeting glimpses in our sanguine moments, that grips us.
89
If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble, competent people on a level with dentists, that would be splendid. John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946)
90
Economists as powerful technocrats
93
Control has proven elusive
96
‘End on a happy note!’
97
Four evolutionary thinkers
98
Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992)
99
Four evolutionary thinkers Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992) Herbert Simon (1916-2001)
100
Four evolutionary thinkers Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992) Herbert Simon (1916-2001) Ronald Coase (1910- )
101
Four evolutionary thinkers Friedrich Hayek (1899-1992) Herbert Simon (1916-2001) Ronald Coase (1910- ) Edith Penrose (1914-1996)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.