Download presentation
Published byBethanie Malone Modified over 8 years ago
1
Transport Measurements in Superconductivity and DC Magnetization
Adrian Crisan National Institute of Materials Physics, Bucharest, Romania
2
CONTENTS I. Transport measurements II. DC magnetization
III. DC magnetization relaxation
3
I. Transport measurements
Contacts: rather easy for wires/tapes (soldering with low temperature soldering alloys based on Indium), quite easy for bulk and melt-textured (Silver paste), and quite difficult for films Need to use photolitography (photoresist S1818, UV400 Exposure Optics, Karl Suss MJB3 Mask Aligner, Microsposit MF-319 developer ) and etching (Diluted Nitric acid 0.1% ) to produce micron-sized bridges
4
An overview of 4 bridges after etching
Karl Suss MJB3 Mask Aligner system
5
Patterned sample with 4 wires connection on sample broad
6
Rotator part of the PPMS with transport option
7
Scheme of rotation measurement of YBCO bridge
Quantum Design SQUID MPMS Q.D. PPMS looks rather similar
8
Resistivity vs. temperature: Tc(H), magnetoresistance
Resistivity transition of 1μm BZO-doped YBCO film in magnetic fields of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 T with H//c Resistivity transition of 1μm BZO-doped YBCO film in magnetic fields of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 T with H//ab
9
Phase diagram of High-Tc superconductors
The vortex lattice undergoes a first-order melting transition transforming the vortex solid into a vortex liquid [Fisher et al, PRB 43,130, 1991]. At low magnetic fields (approx 1 Oe in BSCCO [A.C. et al, SuST 24, , 2011), there is a reentrance of the melting line [Blatter et al, PRB 54, 72, 1996]. The flux lines in the vortex -liquid are entangled resulting in an ohmic longitudinal response, hence the vortex liquid and normal metallic phases are separated by a crossover at Hc2. Low enough currents VL- linear dissipation: E ≈ J VS (VGlass)- strongly nonlinear dissipation: E ≈ exp[-(JT/J)m]
10
Vortex melting from transport measurements
I-V curves of [(BaCuO2)2/(CaCuO2)2]×35 artificial superlattices in three magnetic fields. The dashed lines represent power-law fits at the chosen melting temperatures: a) B=0.55 kG, T between 57 and 79.8 K, Tm=72.8 K; b) B=4.4 kG, T between and 78.1 K, Tm=70.9 K; and c) B=10.8 kG, T between and 75.4 K, Tm=68.1 K. YBCO single-grain [A. C. et al, Physica C 313, 70, 1999] [A. C. et al, Physica C 355, 231, 2001]
11
Above Tm(B), the I–V curves crossover from an Ohmic behaviour at low currents to a power-law relation at high currents and every I–V curve displays an upward curvature. Below Tm(B), the I–V curves show an exponential relation at low currents and a power-law behaviour at high currents, with a downward curvature, suggesting that the system approaches to a truly superconducting phase VG for J exponentially small. At Tm(B), where the crossover between downward and upward curvatures occurs, the whole I–V curve displays a power-law relation, which takes the form: V (I, T=Tm) ≈ I(z+1)/(d-1) , where z is the critical dynamical exponent of VG, and d dimensionality of the system (3 in this case). Above Tm(B) and for low currents, the Ohmic region in the I–V curves, the linear resistance Rl(T) can be scaled as: Rl ≈ (T/Tm-1)n(z+2-d) , where n is the static critical exponent.
12
Fisher, Fisher, Huse scaling
(PRB 43, 130, 1991)
13
Angle dependence of critical current
(15Ag/1mm BZO-doped YBCO)x2
14
Dependence of Ic on the field orientation for (Ag/(YBCO+BZO))x3, showing a small anisotropy for intermediate fields.
15
II. DC magnetization Jc=Ct.DM Depends strongly on sample geometry
thin films; m=DM/2; d-thickness; a,b-rectangle dimension:
16
Field dependence of the critical current at 77 K for some quasi-multilayers grown in Birmingham in comparison with some results of other EU groups (green and black symbols)
17
Fp=BxJc Bulk pinning force 2.33h1/2(1-h)2+1.5h(1-h)2+0.63h(1-h)
Surface normal (65%), point normal (22%), volume Dk (13%) 3.15h1/2(1-h)2+0.57h(1-h)2+0.19h3/2(1-h) Surface normal (90%), point normal (8%), surface Dk (2%)
18
III. DC Magnetic relaxation
U(J, B,T) = (Uc/p)[(Jc/J)p 1] = Tln(t/t0) Uc – characteristic pinning energy, J(t) m(t) Jc is the creep-free critical current density Vortex creep exponent, p m(t) = m(t0)[1 + pTln(t/t0)/Uc]1/p Elastic (collective) creep, EC, p = 1.5 2.5 Plastic creep, p < 0 Single creep, p = 1
19
Columnar tracks, heavy ion irradiation
0H ≤ B, the matching field J-dependent vortex excitations in the presence of columnar defects (T < Tdp): half-loops (HL), double vortex kinks (DK), variable range vortex hopping (VRH) vortex-creep exponent p HL p = 1 VRH, p = 1/3 DK p < 0 J(t, T)/Jc = [1 + pTln(t/t0)/Uc]1/p
20
YBCO films with nonsuperconducting nanorods
J. L. MacManus-Driscoll et al. Nature Mat.3, 439 (2004) B. Maiorov et al., Nature Mat. 8, 398 (2009) “thin”, below ~400 nm, small nanorod splay P. Mele et al., SUST 21, (2008) YBCO on STO or STO buffered MgO 4 wt% BZO (left) or BSO (right) nanorods YBZ0.3 YBZNPYO0.4 P. Mele et al., SUST 21, (2008) YBCO + 3 wt% BZO nanorods + 2 at% Y2O3 NP YBZND1 P. Mikheenko et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21, 3184 (2011), ~1100 nm YBCO with 4 wt% BZO on Ag-nanodot decorated STO
21
Normalized magnetization relaxation rate and the normalized vortex-creep activation energy
(Uc/p){[m(t0)/m(t)]p 1} = Tln(t/t0) Normalized magnetic relaxation rate S S = dln(m)/dln(t) S ~ T/[Uc + pTln(tw/t0)] tw – relaxation time window ’Effective vortex-creep activation energy’ U* = T/S U*(T) ~ Uc + pTln(tw/t0) U*(J) = Uc(Jc/J)p S = ln(m)/ln(t)
22
Standard DC magnetization relaxation results in the low-T range
S = T/[Uc + pTln(tw/t0)] HL VRH EC p = 1 1/3 1.5 2 1) S(T) maximum at low T Tdp ~ 0.5Tc 2) 3) S(T) maximum around 30 K is generated by thermomagnetic instabilities, TMI
23
DC magnetization relaxation results over an extended T range: Ta >Tdp is located at high T
BZ, BZ + Y2O3 NP, thick with BS, DK inhibition T. Haugan et al., Nature 430, 867 (2004) U* = T/S, U*(J) = Uc(Jc/J)p YBZ0.3, B ~ 2 T 30 K ÷ 45 K, HL, p ~ 1 45 K ÷ 62 K, DK, p ~ 0.07 62 K ÷ 77 K, VRH, p ~ 1/3 T > 77 K, SVC, p ~ 1 YBZNPYO0.4 S = T/[Uc + pTln(tw/t0)] L. Miu, PRB (2012)
24
Inhibition of DK formation in thick YBCO films with
nonsuperconducting nanorods U*(T) Uc + pTln(tw/t0)] U*(Tcr) = Uc Uc ~ 2.5103 K L. Miu et al., PRB 78, (2008) D. Miu et al., SUST 26, (2013) thin, YBZ0.3 thick + ND, YBZND1
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.