Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Janet Werth, Sarah O’Donnell, Lucien Teig, David Lamensdorf, Aleksandra Markina, Jim Marshall MITRE Sponsored Research Carbon Nanotubes for Small Antennas.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Janet Werth, Sarah O’Donnell, Lucien Teig, David Lamensdorf, Aleksandra Markina, Jim Marshall MITRE Sponsored Research Carbon Nanotubes for Small Antennas."— Presentation transcript:

1 Janet Werth, Sarah O’Donnell, Lucien Teig, David Lamensdorf, Aleksandra Markina, Jim Marshall MITRE Sponsored Research Carbon Nanotubes for Small Antennas © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Approved for Public Release Distribution Unlimited Case # 09-1881

2 Problem Statement and Objectives CNT = Carbon Nanotube n Problem –There is a great need for small efficient antennas n Electrically small antennas have significant loss in matching n Wideband antennas are less efficient, do not provide spectral filtering, and antenna coverage varies with frequency Objective: Exploit the unique properties of CNTs to advance the state-of-the-art in small efficient antennas 2 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

3 What is a Carbon Nanotube? n Single Wall Carbon Nanotube (SWNT) –Graphite sheet seamlessly wrapped to form a cylinder typically 1 nm in diameter n Properties –Higher electrical current density and thermal conductivity than any metals –BALLISTIC ELECTRON TRANSPORT – i.e., no backscattering of electrons, which is the a source of electrical resistance n McEuen (Cornell) measuring conduction vs. length of SWNT show ballistic length limited to ~1.2 microns –Mechanically stronger than most if not all other materials Multiwall CNT SWNT Bundles R. H. Baughman et al, “Carbon Nanotubes – the Route Toward Applications”, Science, vol. 297, 2 Aug. 2002, p787-792 3 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

4 FY0 Work Program Exploit the unique properties of CNTs to advance the state of the art in small antenna design Efficient Electrically Small Antennas Efficient Electrically Small Antennas Reconfigurable Antenna Development Reconfigurable Antenna Development Photovoltaic 1 2 Electronically Reconfigurable Dual Band Monopole Electronically Reconfigurable Dual Band Monopole Electrically Short Monopole Electrically Short Monopole Hardware Prototype CNT based Switch CNT based Switch Extend Lossless Length of CNTs Extend Lossless Length of CNTs CNT Inductor Theoretical Analysis 4 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

5 Application CNTs for Small Antenna Matching Networks n Concept - minimize resistive loss in tuning networks –Benefit from high conductivity and high current density of CNT n Application – Enable efficient electrically very short antennas -Resistance of regular inductor is much higher than antenna radiation resistance –Smaller batteries required for sensors or longer battery life n Challenges –Ballistic transport length –Current density inversely proportional to CNT length –Connection to RF circuitry –Bundling and associated behavior 5 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

6 Functionalization to Enhance Conduction Property of CNT’s n Objective: –Increase (>1.2 um) ballistic (lossless) transport length for SWCNTs –Chemically bond ligands to specific locations on sidewalls of CNT to modify low energy phonon spectrum –Analyze applicability to proposed RF applications (e.g., bending for toroid, helical inductor) n First Principles Quantum Mechanics – Professor Marzari of MIT –Efficient calculation of CNT band/ligand structure Bonding along individual or bundle of CNT Courtesy of Prof. Marzari of MIT 6 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

7 Application - Reconfigurable Apertures n Electronically tune antenna in “real time” using switches –Multiple band operation using one antenna –Minimize footprint and physical connections to platform n Nanoswitch attributes –Optical activation – no wire to control switch –Overcomes size, and power consumption challenges with existing FET and MEMs switches. Similar to MEMs switch, but smaller –High reliability (no moving parts) –Low loss (negligible power consumption) –Resistant to extreme temperature variations, magnetism Lockheed Sanders Georgia Tech Research Institute 7 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

8 Motivation - Reconfigurable Apertures n Platform Challenge –Limited Real Estate –Aerodynamic drag –Installation costs are high n Concept –Single electronically tunable aperture n Frequency n Polarization n Spectrum management over wideband antenna Enabling Technology is CNT-Based Optically Activated Switch Switchable dual band monopole Z 25 cm 18.8 cm 18.7 cm High Band Low Band Tunable Monopole Example 8 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

9 Switch Design Methodology/Accomplishment n Switch design (Complete) –CNT parameters (density, length, contacts, metallic vs. semiconducting,..) –Photovoltaic COTS designs n Prototype development (In process) –Based on Univ. of Illinois (Prof. Rogers) developed CNT growth technology with minor modifications –Equivalent circuit (lumped circuit elements for antenna studies) n Antenna analysis –Monopole with ideal gap (complete) –Monopole with equivalent circuit across gap n Monopole integration and test at 250 and 400 MHz design frequencies 16.8 cm 13 cm 2 mm 3.5 cm diameter 9 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

10 Antenna Analysis: Sample Monopole Antenna n Whole (“connected”) and cut tube monopole antennas were simulated using the MoM code Patch –Finite ground plane –Connected antenna approximates a configuration with a closed switch (250 MHz) –Cut antenna approximates a configuration with an open switch (400 MHz) –Simulate antenna performance with circuit model 3.5 cm diameter 30 cm 16.8 cm 13 cm 2 mm 3.5 cm diameter Ground Plane 3.5 cm diameter 10 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

11 Antenna Analysis: Monopole on Circular Ground Plane 250 MHz400 MHz Impedance = 199.08 Ohm Mismatch = -2.58 dB VSWR = 5.05 Impedance = 48.48 Ohm Mismatch = -0.08 dB VSWR = 1.31 Impedance = 51.55 Ohm Mismatch = -0.01 dB VSWR = 1.11 Impedance = 65.54 Ohm Mismatch = -5.64 dB VSWR = 12.59 Uncut Cut Tuned antenna patterns between and 30 and 90 degrees Provide nearly the same gain when the antenna is tuned 11 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

12 Switch Design: U of Illinois FET Measured in MITRE Lab Gate Source Drain Aligned CNTs ~1 mm Solar Cell Gate Source Drain COTS Solar Cell 12 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

13 Electrical Resistance Elements n R= h/4e 2 +R i +R c1 +R c2 –R i is intrinsic differential resistance caused by phonon scattering, lattice impurities in CNT –R c is contact resistance caused by transport barrier at CNT- electrode junction –R c =h/(4e 2 T) where T ≤ 1 is the transmission probability across the junction –h/4e 2 is ohmic loss due to conservation of energy n McEuen experiments use contacts and measure conductance versus length 13 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

14 Switch Design: Parasitic Coupling Analysis Source to Drain capacitance calculations using FastCap n Vertical dimension of conductors greatly exaggerated (~100 times) n In this version, gap is 2 x 5 microns and 1 micron wide gate is present Gate Drain Source Trade space: CNT density, CNT length, capacitance and loss. CNT resistance increases with gate and gap width. Resistance decreases with increasing CNT density. 14 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

15 Switch Design: Impact of Contact and CNT Resistance n Design: –Minimize contact resistance and maximize nanotubes density n Device Resistance (at 0 CNT length) with 5 CNTs per µ on two gaps of 600 µ length –16  for 100k  contact resistance –5  for 30k  contact resistance CNT length (m) 1k  10M  1M  100k  10k  n For 100k  contact R, we double R at ~10 µm n For 30k  contact R, we double R at ~ 3 µm n For 10k  contact R, we double R at ~ 1 µm CNT Resistance (contact + tubes) The final switch parameters will be determined as CNT processes evolve to meet our design specifications 15 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

16 Switch Design and Prototype Methodology 1 st passBaseline Design 5 tubes/um w all tubes Measurement Methodology and equivalent circuit 2 nd passContacts/Tube Density increased 10 tubes/um Device Impedance, low contact impedance ~30 kohm/contact 3 rd passEliminate Metallic TubesOn/Off Ratio September 2008Final DesignDelivery Delayed University of Illinois CNT growth technology based upon our design layout Minimize contact resistance Maximize nanotube density Eliminate metallic tubes 16 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

17 Switch Design – Work Remaining n Complete Device Demonstration Steps with final device –Steps have been demonstrated with interim unit –RF measurements with final device –Develop circuit model for our switch design –Insert circuit model into antenna model to obtain antenna pattern and efficiency Monopole250 MHz Mismatch Loss 400 MHz Mismatch Loss Tuned to 400 MHz (short) 5.64 dB0.01 dB Tuned to 250 MHz (long) 0.08 dB2.58 dB Losses that can be theoretically overcome with electronically tunable design Example of Equivalent Circuit Model 17 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.

18 Impact n Antennas –Build the foundation for efficient electrically small antennas –Enable reconfigurable apertures suitable multi-function applications n Mechanical structures –Computational techniques extensible n CNT based application maturity –Knowledge base will allow future application of CNTs as electrical elements for JTRS, FAB-T, MP-CDL, ESAs, etc. –Self healing fiber resin composite –Apply CNT expertise to address other CNT applications such as biosensors given their sensitivity to gases and oxygen Enables new classes of antennas Electrically small antennas and reconfigurable apertures Functionalization will extend use of CNT ballistic transport behavior 18 © 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved.


Download ppt "Janet Werth, Sarah O’Donnell, Lucien Teig, David Lamensdorf, Aleksandra Markina, Jim Marshall MITRE Sponsored Research Carbon Nanotubes for Small Antennas."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google