1. April 14, 2016 GASB STATEMENT NO. 68 – PREPARATION (INCLUDING PBC) AND AUDIT Sheralin Klinthong, Associate Director SFSR, CO Liezl Sangalang, Senior Audit Manager, KPMG LLP Karla Farrington-Weddle, KPMG LLP

2. Learning Objectives Assess the financial statement impact of GASB No. 68 to CSU Understand the process of determining “proportionate share” Apply the lessons learned during implementation Understand the timing, scope and audit approach specific to net pension liability and related accounts Identify the required PBC items (SW and campus) Define the supporting documentation/information required for each PBC item APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 2

3. GASB 68 – Impact to CSU Financial Statements Effective FY14-15, the CSU implemented GASB Statement No. 68 (GASB 68), Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions, and GASB Statement No. 71, Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date. The Standard is designed to improve transparency regarding pension liability by requiring recognition of pension liability in the financial statements. APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 3

4. GASB 68 –Impact to CSU Financial Statements Below are the F/S impact of GASB 68 implementation: ($438.6) million  Restatement of beginning net position from $5.7 billion to ($438.6) million ($175.7) million  Net position, ending of ($175.7) million (vs. $5.8 billion without GASB No. 68 impact) $5.5 billion  Net pension liability of $5.5 billion at 6/30/15 $603 million  Deferred outflow of resources of $603 million $1.1 billion  Deferred inflows of resources of $1.1 billion $418.7 million  Pension expense of $418.7 million APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 4

5. GASB 68 – Determining Proportionate Share proportionate share Net pension liability of $5.5 billion is CSU’s proportionate share of the State of California’s net pension liability for the following defined benefit plans: a) Miscellaneous Tier b) State Peace Officers & Firefighters CSU’s proportionate share is based on the percentage of pensionable compensation which is considered a practical, systematic and rational approach. APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 5

6. GASB 68 – Determining Proportionate Share APRIL 2016YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 6

7. GASB 68 – Determining Proportionate Share APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 7 CalPERS State of California CSU

8. GASB 68 – Determining Proportionate Share APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 8 CalPERS State of California CSU Key drivers in computing pension liability: Actuarial assumptions – Actuary certified Actuarial methodology – Actuary certified Employee census data – Audited by MGO Plan assets – Audited by MGO

9. GASB 68 – Determining Proportionate Share APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 9 CalPERS State of California CSU Key drivers in allocating to State agencies: Pensionable compensation by Plan – audited by California State Auditors Pensionable compensation by Agency – audited by Agency’s Auditors

10. GASB 68 – Determining Proportionate Share APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 10 CalPERS State of California CSU Key drivers in allocating to campuses: Pensionable compensation by campus – audited by KPMG Retirement contribution by CSU fund (legal-basis) – audited by KPMG Employee census data in PIMS*: Accuracy – audited by KPMG *PIMS – Payroll Information Management System

11. GASB 68 – Difficulties Encountered APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 11 A. Delays in getting GASB 68 pension allocation package from the SCO B. Delays in getting the audit report from the California State Auditor C. Revisions to the GASB 68 pension allocation package were provided late D. KPMG’s audit approach was not well defined pending release of AICPA guidance E. New PBC requests made towards the end of audit F. No training on preparation of supporting documents G. Difficulties in coordinating with HR personnel H. Confusion in handling confidential information

12. GASB 68 – Lessons Learned and Action Plan Agree on a timeline Comprehensive list of deliverables Monitor timeline and submission of deliverables Improve Coordination with SCO/CSA Comprehensive PBC list (SW and Campus) Describe the required supporting documents Move timing of testing to interim Improve Audit Process Identify a contact person in the HR department Communication line should be defined between GAAP coordinators and HR personnel Request access to secured FTP site in advance Improve Internal Coordination APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 12

13. GASB 68 Audit Support Pensionable Wages - FY14/15 PIMS listing of pensionable and non-pensionable wages Agreed to financial statements Agreed to pensionable wages per SCO PBC support details: 1. Appointment letter or employee transaction form 2. Payroll transaction form 3. Verification of retirement code from Technical Letter or equivalent APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 13

14. GASB 68 Audit Support, cont’d. Census Data – FY13/14 PIMS listing of pensionable and non-pensionable employees 1. Employee information (i.e. name, date of birth, hire date, employee class etc.) 2. Employee eligibility 3. Eligible compensation 4. Service credits APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 14

15. Employee Information APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 15

16. PIMS History and Eligible Compensation APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 16

17. Service Credits APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 17

18. Questions and Answers APRIL 2016 YEAR-END GAAP TRAINING 18