Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Putting Health Metrics into Practice: Using DALYs for Programmatic Decision-Making Authors: Kim Longfield, Steven Chapman, Warren Stevens & David Jeffries.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Putting Health Metrics into Practice: Using DALYs for Programmatic Decision-Making Authors: Kim Longfield, Steven Chapman, Warren Stevens & David Jeffries."— Presentation transcript:

1 Putting Health Metrics into Practice: Using DALYs for Programmatic Decision-Making Authors: Kim Longfield, Steven Chapman, Warren Stevens & David Jeffries Population Services International CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS Creating models is resource-intensive, and they must be updated as new evidence becomes available Data – and especially high-quality data – can be lacking When new epidemiological data become available, estimates of health impact change, which can be confusing to stakeholders Sales and distribution figures are used as proxies for product use/behavior Coefficients are not exact and accuracy depends on model parameters Capturing health impact through communications and targeting has proven more challenging than expected NEXT STEPS Quantify coefficient uncertainty Calculate cost-effectiveness in real time Develop models to include co-morbidity and target populations at elevated risk for multiple adverse health outcomes Develop tools to guide optimum investment strategies Measure market strengthening and growth For a copy of this poster go to www.psi.org BACKGROUND In 2006, Population Services International (PSI) adopted the disability- adjusted life year (DALY) as its key performance metric to inform programmatic decision-making and to estimate the health impact of its products, services, and behavior change interventions. While international standards exist to calculate DALYs at the national level, PSI has pioneered the application of DALYs to individual health interventions. THE DISABILITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR The DALY was developed by the World Bank and WHO in 1993 to measure the burden of disease by region. It combines the value of lives saved and illness and disability prevented. The DALY allows PSI to: Measure the impact of interventions in relation to the global burden of disease Compare impact across health conditions and countries Compare the cost-effectiveness of interventions and compare costs to other NGOs and global standards 1 Current models include: HIV, Family Planning, Maternal Health, Malaria, Diarrhea, Acute Respiratory Infection, Tuberculosis, Nutrition, STI Kit, Basic Care Package for PLWH, Naloxone, Male Circumcision (neonatal & adult), 6 communication models for HIV METHODS DALY model creation PSI creates DALY models 1 for its interventions. Parameters for models include: epidemiology, demography (including sub-population level), product/service efficacy, utilization data (e.g. wastage, adherence), intra-country variance (e.g. weights for urban vs rural, risk stratifications, etc.), and delivery mechanism Coefficients are created for each country based on stochastic modeling DALY calculation Each month, country offices report sales/distribution and service utilization figures Survey data are used to estimate the impact of PSI’s communication activities on non-product behaviors and the use of non-PSI brands (Coefficients * sales/distribution/service) + communication DALYs = estimate of health impact Cost-effectiveness Annual expenditure and output activity data are used to calculate cost per DALY estimates across interventions, health areas and for each country Pakistan National burden of disease measured in DALYs Communicable, maternal, perinatal and nutrition conditions (CMPN) DALY (000s) Share of burden Potential PSI interventions Perinatal conditions 6,51516.06%  Contraception, clean delivery kit, iron folate, multivitamins Respiratory infections 3,2958.12%  Pneumonia pre-packaged therapy, zinc, community case management Diarrheal diseases 2,1155.21%  Water treatment, diarrhea treatment (oral rehydration salts & zinc) Childhood-cluster diseases 1,8204.49% Tuberculosis 1,4463.57%  Directly observed therapy (short course) Maternal conditions 1,4113.48%  Contraception, clean delivery kit, iron folate, multivitamins Nutritional deficiencies 1,0972.71%  Micronutrient & macronutrient supplementation, exclusive breastfeeding STDs excluding HIV 6981.72%  STI treatment kits & condoms Meningitis 2860.70% Tropical-cluster diseases 1260.31% Intestinal nematode infections 1050.26% HIV/AIDS 1020.25%  Condoms, voluntary counseling & testing, male circumcision, PMTCT Hepatitis B 670.16% Malaria 660.16%  Insecticide-treated bed nets, malaria pre-packaged therapy, case management Hepatitis C 260.06% Dengue 200.05% Leprosy 190.05% Trachoma 40.01% Other CMPN 1,0182.51% Total CMPN 20,23549.89% Non-communicable diseases and injuries (NCD) Cervical cancer 0.00% Respiratory cancer* 0.00% Cardiovascular diseases0.00% Other NCD 20,32650.11% Total NCD 20,32650.11% Total all causes 40,561100.00% * Mouth, oropharynx, trachea, bronchus, lung cancers Source: WHO 2009 PSI uses graphs like this to track DALYs averted. Health impact has grown each year at a rate of 13-41% This graph depicts the proportion of disease burden averted due to current programs and identifies strategies that should either be scaled up or diversified to increase health impact Burden of Disease tables are used to identify which interventions to launch or scale up. They present country-specific burden of disease and rank the importance of each health area in which PSI works


Download ppt "Putting Health Metrics into Practice: Using DALYs for Programmatic Decision-Making Authors: Kim Longfield, Steven Chapman, Warren Stevens & David Jeffries."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google