1. Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users With Significant Residual Hearing: Implications for Selection Criteria in Children Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):575-581. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.575 Median (A) and lowest-quartile (B) scores for 3 groups of adult implant users on 4 tests of speech perception performed approximately 3 months after implantation. Groups are described in the "Grouping of Adult Implantation Candidates" subsection of the "Methods" section. SNR indicates signal-noise ratio. Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users With Significant Residual Hearing: Implications for Selection Criteria in Children Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):575-581. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.575 Distribution of postoperative open-set sentence scores for 109 postlingual-onset hearing-impaired adult cochlear implant users who had preoperative speech perception scores exceeding 10% in their best-aided preoperative condition. Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users With Significant Residual Hearing: Implications for Selection Criteria in Children Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):575-581. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.575 Scatterplot of actual vs predicted phoneme scores for 262 adult cochlear implant users. Scores were predicted on the basis of the following 4 variables: duration of bilateral profound deafness, age at implant, prelingual/postlingual onset of bilateral hearing loss, and preimplantation open-set speech perception. The solid line represents the line of best fit to the data. The dotted lines define a prediction interval containing 80% of the data points. The prediction interval is ±20% around the predicted score. Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users With Significant Residual Hearing: Implications for Selection Criteria in Children Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):575-581. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.575 Individual comparisons of postoperative open-set sentence perception scores using a cochlear implant alone with preoperative scores using a hearing aid in the ear that underwent implantation (A) and the ear that did not undergo implantation (better-hearing ear) (B). Data are shown for 45 adults with significant preoperative auditory skills. Postoperative scores were obtained approximately 3 months after implantation surgery. CUNY indicates City University of New York. Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Outcomes for Cochlear Implant Users With Significant Residual Hearing: Implications for Selection Criteria in Children Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):575-581. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.575 Preoperative median speech perception scores obtained in the best-aided condition compared with postoperative scores obtained with the cochlear implant for 45 adults with significant residual hearing. SNR indicates signal-noise ratio. Figure Legend: