Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sham Efficacy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results From the SUmiT.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sham Efficacy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results From the SUmiT."— Presentation transcript:

1 Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sham Efficacy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results From the SUmiT Trial Kenneth M. Peters, Donna J. Carrico, Ramon A. Perez-Marrero, Ansar U. Khan, Leslie S. Wooldridge, Gregory L. Davis, Scott A. MacDiarmid The Journal of Urology Volume 183, Issue 4, Pages 1438-1443 (April 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036 Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Terms and Conditions Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 The Journal of Urology 2010 183, 1438-1443DOI: (10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036) Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Terms and Conditions Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 2 The Journal of Urology 2010 183, 1438-1443DOI: (10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036) Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Terms and Conditions Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 3 The Journal of Urology 2010 183, 1438-1443DOI: (10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036) Copyright © 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Terms and Conditions Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sham Efficacy in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome: Results From the SUmiT."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google