Presentation on theme: "LAKOS vs Other Filters. Agenda 1.Review of latest LAKOS Separator Technology 2.Puroflux, PEP, and Griswold Separators and how they perform 3.Review of."— Presentation transcript:
Agenda 1.Review of latest LAKOS Separator Technology 2.Puroflux, PEP, and Griswold Separators and how they perform 3.Review of Media Tanks 4.Sub-Micron Technology 5.Accountability
Review Current LAKOS Separator Technology eHTX Separator Efficiency 99% Efficiency 2.6SG at 25 Micron (550 Mesh) in a recirculating system 98% Efficiency 2.6 SG at 44 Micron (325 Mesh) Single Pass
Low STEADY Pressure Drop 2-15 PSI Very Important when protecting heat exchangers (will not affect flow) Review Current LAKOS Separator Technology
Continuous operation No backwashing Un-Interrupted operation Choose between automated purging with ball valve (low water loss) or continuous purging to SRV (no water loss) Review Current LAKOS Separator Technology
Our “Black Box”Their “Black Box” Separators: What are the REAL differences?
Separator has a smaller footprint/less “real estate” required Separator has no moving parts and is maintenance friendly Separator has little or no water loss Sand Filter is not effective as a basin sweeping solution without a booster pump Sand Filters VS. Separators
LAKOS Quality Advantages Stainless Steel and Carbon steel are industry standards Unique Underdrain Design Reliable Valve Linkage (for backwashing) that is considered more robust than other designs – See in our video library.
Accountability It is important that the customer understands the differences in design and efficiency Very rare that we see competitors separators in the Industrial market Make sure that we completely understand the application and what the goals are
Two Things To Remember When Dealing With Other Separators: 1.Ask customer if the other separator companies can provide 3 rd party testing 2.Ask customer if they were provided an actual efficiency chart Review- Key Learning Objectives