Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

LAKOS vs Other Filters. Agenda 1.Review of latest LAKOS Separator Technology 2.Puroflux, PEP, and Griswold Separators and how they perform 3.Review of.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "LAKOS vs Other Filters. Agenda 1.Review of latest LAKOS Separator Technology 2.Puroflux, PEP, and Griswold Separators and how they perform 3.Review of."— Presentation transcript:

1 LAKOS vs Other Filters

2 Agenda 1.Review of latest LAKOS Separator Technology 2.Puroflux, PEP, and Griswold Separators and how they perform 3.Review of Media Tanks 4.Sub-Micron Technology 5.Accountability

3 Review Current LAKOS Separator Technology eHTX Separator Efficiency  99% Efficiency 2.6SG at 25 Micron (550 Mesh) in a recirculating system  98% Efficiency 2.6 SG at 44 Micron (325 Mesh) Single Pass

4 Low STEADY Pressure Drop 2-15 PSI Very Important when protecting heat exchangers (will not affect flow) Review Current LAKOS Separator Technology

5 Continuous operation No backwashing Un-Interrupted operation Choose between automated purging with ball valve (low water loss) or continuous purging to SRV (no water loss) Review Current LAKOS Separator Technology

6 Our “Black Box”Their “Black Box” Separators: What are the REAL differences?

7 Review Current LAKOS eSolutions Technology

8 Review: Other Separators Puroflux PEP Griswold Wingert Yardney Bernoulli

9 Closer Look at Competitors: Puroflux Strength: Well known, low price Weakness: Design, Field Support

10 Design Efficiency 3 rd Party Testing Closer Look at Competitors: Puroflux

11 Puroflux Separator: How It Works Video Puroflux animation – Separator YouTubeYouTube

12 Closer Look at Competitors: PEP

13 Lack of internal method for acceleration Efficiency Lack of field support

14 LAKOS vs PEP Efficiencies Now 98%

15 LAKOS vs PEP Efficiencies

16 Closer Look at Competitors: Griswold

17 Lack of internal method of acceleration Design Lack of efficiency rating

18 LAKOS vs Griswold Efficiencies Now 98%

19 Sand Media Tank Filters

20 CTS TWO MODELS Carbon Steel 42”, 48” Standard Side Shell 54” thru 96” Extended Side Shell Media Filters STS 15” thru 48” Stainless Steel

21 How Media filters work Input Filtered Water to System

22 Sand Filters: Back Wash

23

24

25 Separator has a smaller footprint/less “real estate” required Separator has no moving parts and is maintenance friendly Separator has little or no water loss Sand Filter is not effective as a basin sweeping solution without a booster pump Sand Filters VS. Separators

26 LAKOS Quality Advantages Stainless Steel and Carbon steel are industry standards Unique Underdrain Design Reliable Valve Linkage (for backwashing) that is considered more robust than other designs – See in our video library.

27 Plus System Comparison

28 Sub-Micron Filtration

29 Vortisand/Sonitec WEBSITE CLAIMS

30 Sub-Micron

31 LAKOS MediaGem Tank System (MTS)

32 Accountability It is important that the customer understands the differences in design and efficiency Very rare that we see competitors separators in the Industrial market Make sure that we completely understand the application and what the goals are

33 Two Things To Remember When Dealing With Other Separators: 1.Ask customer if the other separator companies can provide 3 rd party testing 2.Ask customer if they were provided an actual efficiency chart Review- Key Learning Objectives

34 Thank You


Download ppt "LAKOS vs Other Filters. Agenda 1.Review of latest LAKOS Separator Technology 2.Puroflux, PEP, and Griswold Separators and how they perform 3.Review of."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google