1. Town Hall Meeting MLK Community Center July 21, 2011 6pm

2. Purpose of the Meeting Information and Clarification Information and Clarification Review Timeline of Events, Current Efforts, and Next Steps Review Timeline of Events, Current Efforts, and Next Steps Zoning & Westside Specific Plan Review Zoning & Westside Specific Plan Review Nonconforming Land Uses Definition Nonconforming Land Uses Definition Amortization Ordinance Review Amortization Ordinance Review Examples of Implementation Examples of Implementation Public Comment Public Comment City Council Comment and Direction City Council Comment and Direction

3. Timeline of Events 1940s – City Leaders establish zoning that allowed for industrial/manufacturing businesses in residential area. 1940s – City Leaders establish zoning that allowed for industrial/manufacturing businesses in residential area. August 2004 – Council approves contract for EDAW to prepare a specific plan for Westside. August 2004 – Council approves contract for EDAW to prepare a specific plan for Westside. February 2005 –Community provides input on issues and opportunities at Workshop #1. February 2005 –Community provides input on issues and opportunities at Workshop #1. August 2005 - Community provides input on draft vision and guiding principles at Workshop #2. August 2005 - Community provides input on draft vision and guiding principles at Workshop #2. March 2006 – Community provides inputs on height limits and land uses at Workshop #3 March 2006 – Community provides inputs on height limits and land uses at Workshop #3

4. August 2006 – City Council adopt Amortization Ordinance (Code Section 18.102.230) August 2006 – City Council adopt Amortization Ordinance (Code Section 18.102.230) September 2006 – At request of residents, the City adjusts project boundary and authorizes Workshop #4. September 2006 – At request of residents, the City adjusts project boundary and authorizes Workshop #4. June 2007 – City Contracts Economic Planning Systems (EPS) to study implementation and feasibility. June 2007 – City Contracts Economic Planning Systems (EPS) to study implementation and feasibility. August 2007 – EDAW completes draft Specific Plan for review. August 2007 – EDAW completes draft Specific Plan for review. October 2007 – Council Workshop – EDAW and EPS present draft plan and economic study. City Council directs staff to work closer with businesses October 2007 – Council Workshop – EDAW and EPS present draft plan and economic study. City Council directs staff to work closer with businesses Timeline of Events

5. 2008 – City Council lead Code Compliance Committee to discuss compliance efforts and helps define acceptable substitution for nonconforming uses (criteria for businesses that would be acceptable to remain as good neighbors) 2008 – City Council lead Code Compliance Committee to discuss compliance efforts and helps define acceptable substitution for nonconforming uses (criteria for businesses that would be acceptable to remain as good neighbors) December 2008 – Key issues on business impacts identified by Code Compliance Committee December 2008 – Key issues on business impacts identified by Code Compliance Committee Air Pollution, Hazardous Materials, Parking, Outside Storage, Noise, SecurityAir Pollution, Hazardous Materials, Parking, Outside Storage, Noise, Security November 2009 – Draft Westside Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report are released to the public. November 2009 – Draft Westside Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report are released to the public. Timeline of Events

6. February 2010 – Sustainability Pilot Grant was awarded by EPA for Westside Implementation February 2010 – Sustainability Pilot Grant was awarded by EPA for Westside Implementation March 2010 – Westside Specific Plan is adopted by the City Council and new zoning and land use come into effect in August March 2010 – Westside Specific Plan is adopted by the City Council and new zoning and land use come into effect in August September 2010 – Community interviews were conducted by EPA team on ranking criteria and implementation September 2010 – Community interviews were conducted by EPA team on ranking criteria and implementation January-April 2011 – EPA and staff present criteria factors to community and receive input January-April 2011 – EPA and staff present criteria factors to community and receive input May 2011 – City Council adopts criteria factors and process for ranking nonconforming uses for amortization May 2011 – City Council adopts criteria factors and process for ranking nonconforming uses for amortization Timeline of Events

7. Continued Efforts Neighborhood Services continues to: Neighborhood Services continues to: –Verify business documentation including permits and licenses –Partner with other agencies on compliance (APCD, DEH, BAR, Fire) –Dedicate Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Officer to the Westside –Assigned Housing Inspector to Westside to address residential compliance and nuisances –Continue parking enforcement efforts

8. Next Steps Clarify and Inform Community Clarify and Inform Community Collect current data on criteria factors Collect current data on criteria factors Rank nonconforming uses per process and criteria approved by City Council Rank nonconforming uses per process and criteria approved by City Council Publish ranking to community by year- end (Entire list will be provided) Publish ranking to community by year- end (Entire list will be provided) Propose initiating amortization on 2-3 high ranking businesses Propose initiating amortization on 2-3 high ranking businesses

9. Zoning and Land Use Laws and regulations governing the use of land for specific purposes Laws and regulations governing the use of land for specific purposes Segregate uses that are incompatible Segregate uses that are incompatible Basic Types of Zones: Basic Types of Zones: –Residential –Industrial –Commercial –Mixed

10. Westside Specific Plan  Rezoning with new allowed uses Vision Statement: Reestablish the Westside as a safe, healthy, and vibrant neighborhood where people engage in community life.

14. Nonconforming Use Chapter 18.108 Lawful use Lawful use New zoning restriction enacted New zoning restriction enacted Use now prohibited Use now prohibited Use can continue indefinitely Use can continue indefinitely Cannot be enlarged, expanded or reconstructed Cannot be enlarged, expanded or reconstructed Termination: violation of code, discontinuance of use, nuisance Termination: violation of code, discontinuance of use, nuisance

15. Amortization Ordinance Legal (used throughout the U.S.) Legal (used throughout the U.S.) Adopted by City Council in 2006 Adopted by City Council in 2006 Rarely initiated in National City Rarely initiated in National City Focus is on unhealthy and incompatible business in the Westside Focus is on unhealthy and incompatible business in the Westside Will be implemented on 2-3 nonconforming uses in the near term and then uses will be ranked again for next phase of implementation Will be implemented on 2-3 nonconforming uses in the near term and then uses will be ranked again for next phase of implementation

16. Amortization Ordinance Affirmative termination of nonconforming uses Affirmative termination of nonconforming uses Use continues for a reasonable amount of time Use continues for a reasonable amount of time Applies to uses, structures, lots Applies to uses, structures, lots

17. Amortization Ordinance Weigh the public gain from the removal of the use against the private loss caused by the removal. Weigh the public gain from the removal of the use against the private loss caused by the removal. – Nature (significance) of the nonconforming use – Length of time the use has existed – Adaptability to a currently permitted use – Total cost of land and improvements – Compatibility with surrounding uses – Possible threat to public health, safety or welfare – Cost of moving and reestablishing elsewhere – Any other relevant factors

18. Ranking Process Detailed Equation with many fators (hypothetical examples will be provided) Detailed Equation with many fators (hypothetical examples will be provided) Rank all businesses on a consistent set of criteria Rank all businesses on a consistent set of criteria Neighborhood Impacts Neighborhood Impacts Business Operations Business Operations

19. Ranking Process Value of land and improvements Value of land and improvements Time the use has existed Time the use has existed Adaptability of the land and improvement Adaptability of the land and improvement Significance of the nonconforming use Significance of the nonconforming use Compatibility with existing use patterns and neighborhood densities Compatibility with existing use patterns and neighborhood densities Possible threat to public health, safety, or welfare Possible threat to public health, safety, or welfare Factors ValueTime in UseAdaptabilityNonconformance Compatibility Threat

22. Examples of Implementation Autobody A Autobody A Autobody Z Autobody Z Samantha’s Sails Inc. Samantha’s Sails Inc.

23. Clarification Questions? PUBLIC COMMENT

24. CITY COUNCIL COMMENT & DIRECTION