Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH STUDENTS Megan Schmid and Adrianna Guram.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IN PARTNERSHIP WITH STUDENTS Megan Schmid and Adrianna Guram."— Presentation transcript:

1 IN PARTNERSHIP WITH STUDENTS Megan Schmid and Adrianna Guram

2 3 Assumptions  Knowledge is complex and socially constructed: participants encounter challenges through multiple interactions, ambiguity, and the need to negotiate what to believe with others  Self is central to knowledge construction: internal sense of self  Authority and expertise are shared in the mutual construction of knowledge among peers: participating as equal partners in mutually constructed knowledge models interpersonal growth, or ability to function interdependently with others.

3 Wisconsin Experience The idea that, together, we create and apply learning inside and outside the classroom to make the world a better place.  Substantial research experiences that generate knowledge and analytical skills  Global and cultural competences and engagement  Leadership and activism opportunities  Application of knowledge in the “real world”

4 Essential Learning Outcomes  Knowledge of Human Cultures and the Physical and Natural World  Intellectual and Practical Skills  Personal and Social Responsibility  Integrative Learning

5 Perry’s Model of Intellectual and Ethical Development  Dualistic Thinking  Students generally believe knowledge is certain and unambiguous: black/white, right/wrong  Questions have immutable, objective answers  Students generally believe authorities possess valuable wisdom that contains eternal truths  Certainty yields to uncertainty and ambiguity  Multiplicity  Students come to believe that where uncertainty exists, knowledge and truth are essentially subjective and personal  Students come to recognize that mere opinion is insufficient because specific criteria helps evaluate the usefulness and validity of knowledge claims: methodology empirical evidence explanatory power predictive power logical consistency positive vs. normative conclusions http://www.lib.uconn.edu/~mboyer/burcha2.html

6 Perry, cont.  Contextual-Relativism  Students come to believe that even where uncertainty exists, people must make choices about premises, frameworks, hypotheses, and theories to apply; policy conclusions are not self-evident  Students may come to recognize that even in a world of uncertainty, they must make choices (whether about ideas, hypotheses, theories, or policies). These choices require methods of critical thinking.  Context-Appropriate Decisions  Students may come to acknowledge that choices require analysis and values.  Knowledge, theories, and methods are imperfect and uncertain, thus personal choices require acknowledging personal responsibility that follows from personal values. http://www.lib.uconn.edu/~mboyer/burcha2.html

7 VIDEO HERE Transition Music

8 Wisconsin Experience The idea that, together, we create and apply learning inside and outside the classroom to make the world a better place.  Substantial research experiences that generate knowledge and analytical skills  Global and cultural competences and engagement  Leadership and activism opportunities  Application of knowledge in the “real world”

9 Essential Learning Outcomes  Knowledge of Human Cultures and the Physical and Natural World  Intellectual and Practical Skills  Personal and Social Responsibility  Integrative Learning

10 Learning Partnership Challenge Portray knowledge as complex and    internal belief system socially constructed Validate learners Self is central to knowledge     internal identity capacity to knowconstruction Learning Partnership Situate learning inShare Authority  Mutual learner’s experience and expertise relationships Define learning as mutually constructing meaning Support

11 Assumptions and Principles  Assumptions, revisited  Knowledge as complex and socially constructed  Self is central to knowledge construction  Authority and expertise are shared in the mutual construction of knowledge among peers  Principles  Validate learners’ capacity as knowledge constructors Helps students realize they can go back to the “potter’s wheel”  Situate learning in learners’ experience (rather than experience of authority) Gives students a context to bring their identity to learning  Define learning as mutually constructing meaning Supports learners’ participation in the construction of knowledge

12 Wrap Up and Questions  Take home material  Conversation Guide  About Campus article  Journal of College Student Development article  New Directions for Teaching & Learning article Opportunity to continue the conversation: Wednesday, January 28 th, 2009 from noon-1:30 PM CFYE “Brown Bag” on Self-Authorship Visit www.ohrd.wisc.edu to register Questions???


Download ppt "IN PARTNERSHIP WITH STUDENTS Megan Schmid and Adrianna Guram."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google