1. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Calibration values for dipole validations at new RF probe separation distance of 1.5cm PINS-C item 5.k Jagadish Nadakuduti EME Research Engineer, Motorola, Inc. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 28, 2006

2. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Outline Background –C63.19-2006 Amendment: Change the RF measurement position from bottom of probe element to the center of element and change the test distance from 10mm to 15mm FDTD simulations Updated Table 4.2 and Table D.4 Measurements Conclusion

3. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Background: PINS-C item 5.k The RF probe separation distance is 15 mm and the calibration values in table 4.2 were made at 10 mm. These calculations need to be redone at 15 mm distance. 15 mm

4. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 FDTD simulations: E- & H-field patterns Update field values from 10 mm to 15 mm distance

5. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 FDTD simulations: Results at 10 mm Created FDTD models as specified in “D.5.1.4 Dipole validation theoretical modeling”. Comparison of FDTD simulations results to those specified in Table D.4. Mod.Freq. (MHz) CW peak E (V/m) existing new CW peak H (A/m) existing new |Zo| (Ω) Return loss (dB) VSWRGain (dBi) CW813.5268270.90.680.665174.7, 75.8-10.0, -10.11.925, 1.92.25, 2.235 CW835265261.40.6730.684775.3, 76.3-12.0, -12.11.67, 1.662.32, 2.29 CW898.5262264.70.6750.682075.5, 76.9-11.9, -11.81.68, 1.692.33, 2.3 CW1880211211.60.6450.648287.1, 89.7-10.6, -10.31.837, 1.872.52, 2.55 Table D-4. Results of FDTD modeling for ‘Thick dipoles’ (existing values vs. new simulation results)

6. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 FDTD simulations: Results at 10 mm contd. CW peak E- and H-field values taken from table D-4 are converted into RMS values. These values are incorporated into Table 4.2. Table 4.2 – Illustrated dipole calculated values (existing and new simulation results) “D.5.1.4 Dipole validation theoretical modeling” section describes simulations for ‘thick dipoles’ and has no information on modeling parameters for ‘planar dipoles’. The relatively high difference between values specified in table 4.2 and those from new simulations in case of ‘planar dipoles’ might be because of using different simulation parameters. DipoleFreq. (MHz) E-field values (V/m) existing new differenceH-field values (A/m) existing new difference D.5.1 thick813.51901921.1%0.4760.48421.7% D.5.1 thick835187185-1.1%0.4810.4703-2.2% D.5.1 thick898.51851871.1%0.4770.48221.1% D.5.1 thick18801491500.7%0.4560.45840.5% D.5.1 planar813.5224.6 - 236.4257.28.8%0.5139-0.52260.579.1% D.5.1 planar835214.9 - 232.22507.7%0.4954-0.51640.55237% D.5.1 planar898.5213.2 - 220.9248.412.4%0.5032-0.50050.562211.7% D.5.1 planar1880153.6 - 149.3182.318.7%0.4478-0.40350.509113.7%

7. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Measurements: At 10 and 15 mm of probe separation distance with 100 mW of input power Frequency (MHz) E (V/m)H (A/m) 10 mm15 mm10 mm15 mm 813.5171108.30.45970.3146 835185.9116.60.46920.3253 1880156.296.10.44330.3192 Frequency (MHz) E (V/m)H (A/m) 10 mm15 mm10 mm15 mm 813.5211.9131.10.4970.3391 835213.5131.50.49870.3412 898.5202.7126.40.49630.3423 1880153.493.050.47480.3289 Thick dipoles Planar dipoles *898.5 MHz thick dipole is not available in the lab

8. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Updated Table D.4 at 15 mm Mod.Freq. (MHz) CW peak E (V/m) (dB V/m) CW peak H (A/m) (dB A/m) |Zo| (Ω) Return loss (dB) VSWRGain (dBi) CW813.517945.10.493-6.1475.8-10.11.92.235 CW83517244.70.48-6.3876.3-12.11.662.29 CW898.517444.80.492-6.1676.9-11.81.692.3 CW188013942.90.472-6.5289.7-10.31.872.55 Table D-4. Results of FDTD modeling at 15 mm

9. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Table 4.2 at 10 mm with measurement results Table 4.2 – Illustrated dipole calculated and measured values DipoleFreq. (MHz) E-field values (V/m) calculated measured differenceH-field values (A/m) calculated measured difference D.5.1 thick813.5192171-10.94%0.48420.4597-5.06% D.5.1 thick835185185.9-0.49%0.47030.4692-0.234% D.5.1 thick898.5187--0.4822-- D.5.1 thick1880150156.24.13%0.45840.4433-3.29% D.5.1 planar813.5257.2211.9-17.6%0.570.497-12.8% D.5.1 planar835250213.5-14.6%0.55230.4987-9.7% D.5.1 planar898.5248.4202.7-18.4%0.56220.4963-11.7% D.5.1 planar1880182.3153.4-15.85%0.50910.4748-6.7%

10. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Updated Table 4.2 at 15 mm with measurement results Table 4.2 – Illustrated dipole calculated and measured values DipoleFreq. (MHz) E-field values (V/m) calculated measured differenceH-field values (A/m) calculated measured difference D.5.1 thick813.5127108.3-14.72%0.3490.3146-9.86% D.5.1 thick835122116.6-4.43%0.3390.3253-4.04% D.5.1 thick898.5123--0.348-- D.5.1 thick18809896.1-1.94%0.3340.3192-4.43% D.5.1 planar813.5156.3131.1-16.12%0.390.3391-13.05% D.5.1 planar835151.5131.5-13.20%0.37870.3412-9.90% D.5.1 planar898.5150.2126.4-15.85%0.38530.3423-11.16% D.5.1 planar1880106.893.05-12.87%0.34750.3289-5.35%

11. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Conclusion ‘Planar dipole’ FDTD simulations need to be repeated with the correct parameters. The following sections in C63.19-2006 need to be updated with calibration values at 15 mm distance –In Section 4.4: Table 4.2 –In Annex D: Table D.4 Figures D.3 - D.6, D.10 Equations D.1 & D.2 Include ‘Planar dipole’ simulation parameters in section ‘D.5.1.4 Dipole validation theoretical modeling’. All of the above tasks can be completed in a time frame of 1-2 months.

12. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Thank you

13. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Table 4.2 at 10 mm

14. C63.19 SC8 WG3 meeting, March 26, 2007 Table D-4 at 10 mm