1. Richard F. Friedman Neal & Leroy, LLC Chicago, Illinois

3.  Masterwork Crown Hall on IIT Campus – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe 1956 3

4.  Historic Site Site of Mrs. O’Leary’s barn Old Chicago Water Tower 4

5.  Ensemble Royal Street, French Quarter, New Orleans 5

6.  Future landmark Sharp Center for Design, OCAD University, Toronto, Will Alsop, 2004 6

7.  Identify common heritage  Honor  Innovation  Beauty  Accomplishment  Tangible example of past  Sustainability  Tourism 7

8.  International—UNESCO World Heritage Site  National—National Historic Landmark or listed on National Register of Historic Places  State—listed or designated  Local—Locally designated landmark Cahokia Mounds near Colllinsville, IL 8

9.  International—protection from Fed. action.  National—limited: “take into account” / Fed. involvement  State—not used  Local—protection against change or destruction Alta Vista Terrace 9

10.  Elimination or reduction of economic exploitation 10

11.  Elimination or reduction of economic exploitation 11

12.  Additional governmental involvement in private property  Designation  Review and permit process  Must be open to the public (not!) Madlener House 12

13.  No objective standard for designation or review of demolition or modification application. Prentiss Women’s Hospital, Bertrand Goldberg, 1975 13

14.  Early days – private preservation  George Washington’s estate, Mount Vernon, Virginia, purchased in 1858 by the Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association 14

15.  19 th and early 20 th Centuries – governmental Civil War veterans return to Gettysburg battlefield 15

16.  Urban renewal - -“With Heritage So Rich”  1960’s – local preservation laws  National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Schiller (Garrick) Theater, Dankmar Adler and Louis Sullivan, 1893-1960 16

17. Fifth Amendment: “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” Regulatory takings v. physical takings 17

19.  National Register of Historic Places  Submission through State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)  Listing by United States Dept. of Interior  Local Designation  Recommendation (after hearing) by Landmark Commission  Approval by City Council/Village Board 19

20.  National Register of Historic Places  National Register Districts  Contributing structures  National Historic Landmarks Sheridan Plaza Apartments, 4607 N. Sheridan 20

21.  Limited to Federal funds or permits  No prohibition against demolition  agency must “take into account”  Sec. 106 of NHPA  Stronger protection in transp. projects  Demol. only if no prudent and feasible alternative  Sec. 4f of Dept. of Transp. Act 21

22.  Analyze project for federal or state involvement, such as:  Federal  Section 404—Wetlands-U.S. Army Corps of Eng.  Public involvement or approval—HUD; University  Major projects—NEPA Environmental Impact EIS  State  Ill. Environmental Protection Agency ▪ Sewer permits 22

23.  Process delegated to the states  SHPO administers  In Illinois Ill. State. Hist. Pres. Agency (IHPA)  Consultation with federal funding or permitting agency  Consultation with Advisory Council (ACHP)  Consultation with “interested parties” 23

24. 24

25.  National Register of Historic Places  State Web site  HARGIS-Historic and Architectural Resources Geographic Information System  Local designation  City Web site and FOIA  Buildings recognized but not protected  Non-historic review ▪ Zoning ▪ Architectural review boards 25 Historic and Architectural Resources Geographic Information Sys Historic

26.  Determination of Eligibility for the National Register  By the SHPO  Orange-rated (Chicago) 26

27.  Individual structures  Historic Districts 27

28.  Building/demolition permits are reviewed by landmark commission  Inconsistent remodeling is not permitted  Designation does not include interiors (unless exceptional)  Private landmarks are not open to the public 28

29.  Certificate of appropriateness  Certificate of economic hardship  Owner must prove no economic benefit or return  Penn Central standard  It is insufficient to show a mere reduction in value 29

30. 30

31. 31

32.  Deductible as charitable donation to non- profit organization  Permanent surrender of right to modify or demolish protected element  National Register or local landmark district 32

33.  Better than a tax deduction  National Register or local historic district  Tax credit = 20% of rehab costs  Rehab must be certified as historic  Credits may sold to provide immediate funds  Commercial, industrial or residential rehab  Must be for-profit 33

34.  Not a landmark or listed on National Register  Tax credit = 10% of rehab costs  Rehab need not be certified as historic but must retain historic walls  Credits may sold to provide immediate funds  Residential rehab not eligible  Pre-1936 buildings only 34

35.  Single-family up to 6-unit (owner-occupied)  National Register/local designation or district  Eight-year assessment freeze, then four-year kick up  Certified rehab Charles N. Loucks House 35

36.  Class L  Available to Class 3, 4, or 5a or 5b (commercial)  Nat. Reg. property or local dist.  Approved by City Council  Tax rate reduced 60% for 10 years  Rehab must be certified by IHPA  Investment = 50% of assessed  value of improvement Chicago Board of Trade 36

37.  State tax credits  Fee waivers  Grants  Advice  Zoning bonus—Adopt-a-Landmark  TIF and other development assistance  Not specifically historic 37

38. Richard F. Friedman attorney at law Neal & Leroy, LLC 120 N. LaSalle St. Suite 2600 Chicago, IL 60602 312 641-7144 38