1. Sexual Health Data in Leicestershire, Leicester City and Rutland Janet Hutchins and Liz Rodrigo

2. Rate of New STI Diagnoses in LLR and England, 2014 Data from routine GUM service returns

3. Rate of STI Diagnosis in Leicestershire, 2009-2014 Data from routine GUM service returns

4. Rate of STI Diagnosis in Rutland, 2009-2014 Data from routine GUM service returns

5. Rate of STI Diagnosis in Leicester City, 2009-2014 Data from routine GUM service returns

6. STIs in LLR - 2014 STI testing rate in Leicestershire, Rutland and Leicester is significantly worse than the national average. STI testing positivity in Leicestershire, Rutland and Leicester are similar to the national average. Diagnosis rates of syphilis, gonorrhea and genital warts in Leicestershire are all significantly better (lower) than the national average. Leicester City has a significantly better (lower) rate of genital warts diagnosis.

7. Number of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, genital warts and genital herpes in (i) MSM and in (ii) Heterosexual men in Leicestershire and Rutland (GUM diagnoses only): 2010-2013

8. Percentage of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis, genital warts and genital herpes in (i) MSM Leicester City (GUM diagnoses only): 2010-2013 Please note: some STI data is based on small numbers e.g Syphilis

9. HIV Diagnosed Prevalence Rate Aged 15-59 in LLR, 2010-14 Data from all those living with a diagnosed HIV infection and seen at NHS services in England

10. HIV in LLR

11. HIV Late Diagnosis: Leicestershire and Leicester City, 2009-11 – 2012-14

12. People Living with HIV in LLR, 2014 323 adult residents (aged 15 years and older) in Leicestershire County received HIV- related care: 199 males and 124 females 817 adult residents (aged 15 years and older) in Leicester received HIV-related care: 327 males and 490 females (i) Ethnicity (ii) Route of Infection

13. Reproductive Health

14. Emergency Hormonal Contraception

15. Teenage Pregnancy.

16. Trend in Teenage Pregnancy Rates, LLR, 1998-2014

17. Key points for Leicestershire In 2014, 22% of 15-24 population in Leicestershire had been screened for Chlamydia, significantly worse than the national average (24.3%) Leicestershire also has a significantly worse detection rate for chlamydia of 1616 per 100,000 aged 15-24 compared the PHE guideline. The national rate is 2012 per 100,000 population. In 2014, Leicestershire has a significantly worse STI testing rate (exc Chlamydia age <25) of 10,322 per 100,000 population compared to the national average (15,366 per 100,000 population). In 2014, 72.6% of abortions were under 10 weeks gestation in Leicestershire, this is significantly worse than the national percentage of 80.4%.

18. Key points for Rutland In 2014, 17.8% of 15-24 population in Rutland had been screened for Chlamydia, significantly worse than the national average (24.3%). Rutland also has a significantly worse detection rate for chlamydia of 1390 per 100,000 aged 15-24 compared the PHE guideline. The national rate is 2012 per 100,000 population. In 2013, Rutland has a significantly worse STI testing rate (exc Chlamydia age <25) of 9,921 per 100,000 population compared to the national average (15,366 per 100,000 population). In 2013, Rutland had significantly worse rates of HIV testing uptake and HIV testing coverage for men compared to the national average.

19. Key points for Leicester City In 2014, 19.5% of 15-24 population in Leicester City had been screened for Chlamydia, significantly worse than the national average (24.3%). Leicester City also has a significantly worse detection rate for chlamydia of 1,757 per 100,000 aged 15-24 compared the PHE guidelines. The national rate is 2012 per 100,000 population. In 2014, Leicester has a significantly worse STI testing rate (exc Chlamydia age <25) of 13,362 per 100,000 population compared to the national average (15,366 per 100,000 population). Leicester City has a significantly worse (higher) percentage of late diagnosis of HIV at 61.2% compared to PHE guidelines. The national percentage is 45.0%. In 2013, Leicester City has significantly worse rates for under 18 conceptions and under 18 births in comparison to the national average.