Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

E.N.Kioko P.M.Muthoka R.N. Kagali O.M.Kyambo PROGRESS: AMARANTH IN MERU COUNTY.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "E.N.Kioko P.M.Muthoka R.N. Kagali O.M.Kyambo PROGRESS: AMARANTH IN MERU COUNTY."— Presentation transcript:

1 E.N.Kioko P.M.Muthoka R.N. Kagali O.M.Kyambo PROGRESS: AMARANTH IN MERU COUNTY

2 Two Species:A.cruentus; A. dubius

3 NEEDS ASSESSMENT OF AMARANTH V. C EVALUATION OF FARMER ORGANIZATION GERMPLASM COLLECTION FARMER PARTICIPATORY SEED BULKING PEST SURVEY, IDENTIFICATION AND IPM AWARENESS AND INFO. DESSIMINATION FOCUS AREAS

4 PROGRESS Entry point: Ruiri KAPP Amaranthus SHG, Buuri District, Meru County (74F, 31 M) March/April 2012 seed from Simlaw Pilot plots established at Meru Museum Experimental plots established at MUCST Farmer field demonstrations

5 Progress continued Farmer workshop 20 th Sep. 2012 held to share experience on the amaranth value chain Participants included farmers from two locations, MUCST, traders, researchers, MoA

6 Amaranth Activities Progress Workshop resolutions: farmers to prepare land on time NMK/Simlaw to cater for seed

7 Progress October 2012 Seeds purchased from Incas Health International Limited. About 40 farmers planted in October 2012 NMK-Meru plots

8 Constraints…….. Poor seed processing and storage methods on- farm – plastic papers, open buckets, gunny bags

9 Constraints…….. Poor agronomic practices – land preparation, edge effects, uniform Research on optimum growth parameters lacking Extension services poor

10 Variation in seed quality on-farm compared to commercial sources (Table on germination) Collection date Sampled farms Locality Days to max. germination Germination % 21/9/12Joyce GakiiNchoroiboro3100% 21/9/12Joyce MathewNchoroiboro774% 21/9/12George MureithiRuiri3100% 21/9/12Mwongera GeorgeNchoroiboro779% 21/9/12Zachary MureithiRuiri774%

11 Table 1. Seed quality from commercial sources (Table on germination) Purchase dateSource% Days to germinate 12/10/2012 – A. cruentusIncas100 %2 11/10/2012 – A. dubiusSimlaw Seed Co.100 %3 01/10/2012 – A. cruentusSimlaw Seed Co.100 %7 01/10/2012 – A. cruentusNubian100 %3

12 Handling to enhance seed quality Maturity – harvest at the point, same height (cut/squeeze, seed colour) Select shoots with enough seeds At least 30 health plants - diversity Harvest seeds to make 1 kg Avoid infested or diseased plants Put in appropriate – sugar bags, cottons

13 Plant health – no pests

14 Processing – drying the key factor Spread as thin layer under shade conditions Turn seeds over every four hours Every evening put seeds in container Return seeds indoors overnight Remove pests manually Leave for at least 10 days or when seeds are dry enough

15 Storage =how long? Open absorbent containers – khaki bags, cloth bags Sealed containers -Jerry cans, glass bottles Partially sealed containers – guards

16 AN INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT APPROACH OF AMARANTH INSECT PESTS IN MERU COUNTY KENYA

17 INTRODUCTION  Amaranth belongs to the family Amaranthaceae  There are over 60 sp. and 6000 var of amaranth  It is consumed both as a vegetable and grain crop  Amaranth was registered in 1991 as a crop in Kenya  For the last one decade there has been a sharp rise in demand for African Leafy Vegetables.

18 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM Amaranth production is hampered by pest infestation. There is need to identify the pest complex of amaranth as well as develop a cheap and environmentally safe strategy to control/ manage pest in amaranth.

19 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 1.To collect and identify insect pests associated with Amaranthus sp. 2.To collect and identify natural enemies found on amaranth. 3.To determine the yield loss as a result of insect pest damage 4.To determine the effects of various control strategies on the population of insect pest of amaranth.

20 MATERIALS AND METHODS Study site: BUURI DISTRICT Location:leeward side of Mount Kenya Population: 276000 Total Area: 919 KM2. Economy : Agriculture and commerce Figure 1: Map of Buuri District

21 STUDY DESIGN  Stratified sample collection was used to study insect diversity and abundance  In the ex-situ research completely randomized block design was used

22 Sampling of insect pest and natural enemies Sampling for insect pests and natural enemies was done atleast twice every fortnight Insects were collected by hand, beating sheet, sweep nets and pit falls.

23 Sampling of insect Cont’ Healthy plants were uprooted and stems and roots dissected to examine the presence of phytophagous insects Plate 1a,b: Culturing of larvae for further identification (a)(b)

24 Sampling of insect Cont’ Insect pests were collected into vials, labeled and taken to the laboratory at NMK for identification, curation and archival. The specimens were killed and mounted on entomological pins for specific taxonomic identification

25 RESULTS & DISCUSION  A total of 21 species of insects have been identified so far  This were grouped into 16 families and further into five orders:  Coleopteran  Heteroptera  Hymenoptera  Lepidoptera  Orthoptera

26 Table 1: List of insect species found in the amaranth crop during the first growing season

27 RESULTS CONT’  The damaging species are found in four orders and can be further be grouped into: Stem/Root Pest Foliar Pest Grain Pest  Natural enemies of this pest found in 2 orders: Coleopteran – Coccinelidae Hymenoptera

28 RESULTS CONT’  Population of the natural enemies remains fairly distributed throughout the season. Figure 1: Populaion of important insects collected on amaranth

29 RESULTS CONT’  Grasshopper population is high when the plant is young and it decreases as the plant matures.  The major grain pest are: Cletus sp. and Nezera virudala  Herpetogramma sp. population increases as the plant matures.

30 RESULTS CONT’ (b)(c) Plate 2a,b,c: Galleries, exit holes bored by Herpetogramma spp. (a)

31 RESULTS CONT’  This causes lodging of the mature stems; numerous branching of roots. Plate 3a,b: Lodging of stems caused by Herpetogramma spp.

32 RESULTS CONT’ There was significant difference between the mean grain loss in all treatments (N: 18, p-value: 1.902e-06). The highest loss was observed during the second planting date. This can be attributed to build up of the pest from first planting date.

33 Work to be Done 1.Replicate the work done during first season in the next planting season. 2.Design another experimental plot to investigate the impact of the following treatments: Impact of companion cropping on pest diversity, population and damage. To investigate the impact of insect repellant crops on pest diversity, population and damage.

34 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Individuals God Almighty, my supervisors Dr. Esther Dr. Lagat, and Dr. Muya Institutions Kenya Agricultural Productivity And Agribusiness Project (KAPAP) Meru University College of Science and Technology National Museums of Kenya Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

35 Thank you !


Download ppt "E.N.Kioko P.M.Muthoka R.N. Kagali O.M.Kyambo PROGRESS: AMARANTH IN MERU COUNTY."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google