Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission UL MU Response Scheduling May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 1 Date: 2016-05-16 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail.

Published byRodger Rodgers Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission UL MU Response Scheduling May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 1 Date: 2016-05-16 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission UL MU Response Scheduling May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 1 Date: 2016-05-16 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Liwen Chu Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 408-222-2500 liwenchu@marvell.com Lei Wang Leileiw@marvell.com Hongyuan Zhang hongyuan@marvell.com Jinjing Jiang jinjing@marvell.com Yan Zhang yzhang@marvell.com Rui Cao ruicao@marvell.com Sudhir Srinivasa sudhirs@marvell.com Bo Yu boyu@marvell.com Saga Tamhane sagar@marvell.com Mao Yu my@marvel..com Xiayu Zheng xzheng@marvell.com Christian Berger crberger@marvell.com Niranjan Grandhe ngrandhe@marvell.com Hui-Ling Lou hlou@marvell.com

2 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 2 NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Ron Porat Broadcom rporat@broadcom.com Matthew Fischer mfischer@broadcom.com Sriram Venkateswaran Zhou Lan Leo Montreuil Andrew Blanksby Vinko Erceg Robert Stacey Intel 2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA +1-503-724-893 robert.stacey@intel.com Eldad Perahia eldad.perahia@intel.com Shahrnaz Azizi shahrnaz.azizi@intel.com Po-Kai Huang po-kai.huang@intel.com Qinghua Li quinghua.li@intel.com Xiaogang Chen xiaogang.c.chen@intel.com Chitto Ghosh chittabrata.ghosh@intel.com Rongzhen Yang rongzhen.yang@intel.com Laurent cariou laurent.cariou@intel.com

3 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 3

4 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 4 NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail James Yee Mediatek No. 1 Dusing 1 st Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan +886-3-567-0766 james.yee@mediatek.com Alan Jauh alan.jauh@mediatek.com Frank Hsu frank.hsu@mediatek.com Thomas Pare Mediatek USA 2860 Junction Ave, San Jose, CA 95134, USA +1-408-526-1899 thomas.pare@mediatek.com ChaoChun Wang chaochun.wang@mediatek.c om James Wang james.wang@mediatek.com Jianhan Liu Jianhan.Liu@mediatek.com Tianyu Wu tianyu.wu@mediatek.com Russell Huang russell.huang@mediatek.co m Brian Hart Cisco Systems 170 W Tasman Dr, San Jose, CA 95134 brianh@cisco.com Pooya Monajemi pmonajem@cisco.com Joonsuk Kim Apple joonsuk@apple.com Aon Mujtaba mujtaba@apple.com Guoqing Li guoqing_li@apple.com Eric Wong ericwong@apple.com Chris Hartman chartman@apple.com

5 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 5

6 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 6Bo Sun ZTE #9 Wuxing duan, Xifeng Rd, Xi’an, China SubSub.bo1@zte.com.cn Kaiying Lv lv.kaiying@zte.com.cn Yonggang Fang yfang@ztetx.com Ke Yao Yao.ke5@zte.com.cn Weimin Xing Xing.weimin@zte.com.cn

7 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 7

8 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 8

9 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Authors (continued) May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 9

10 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Recap of UL MU Response Scheduling He Control field is variant of HT Control field. Currently UL MU response scheduling is carried in HE variant HT Control field. ‒ 2-bit HE variant HT Control indication, 4-bit Control ID field, 9-bit UL PPDU Length field, RU Allocation TBD, TBD other field. HE Control Control 1Control NPadding …… B2B31 Control IDControl Information 4 bitsvariable B0B1 HE Control Indication Control IDControl Information 4 bits UL PPDU Length RU Allocation 9 bitsTBD Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 10

11 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Analysis of UL PPDU Length 9-bit UL PPDU length can indicate as long as 512us with 1us granularity, 1024us with 2us granularity. With indicating OFDMA symbols of the Data field, 6-bit UL PPDU length can indicates as long as 64*(12.8us+0.8us) + legacy PHY header length + length of HE SIG-A + HE LTF length > 870us, and 5-bit UL PPDU Length can indicates as long as 32*(12.8us+0.8us) + legacy PHY header length + length of HE SIG-A + HE LTF length>435.2us. ‒ So 5-bit/6-bit UL PPDU field is enough. Control IDControl Information 4 bits UL PPDU Length RU Allocation 9 bitsTBD Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 11

12 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Analysis of UL MU Acknowledgement Response RU Allocation: ‒ Option 1: Being same as RU Allocation in Trigger frame, e.g. 8-bit RU field, ‒ Option 2: 7-bit RU where the DL MU transmission in one 80MHz channel will not be acknowledged by Ack/BA/M-BA in another 80MHz channel. When the number of the users in one 80MHz are much larger than the number of the users in another 80MHz, e.g. 1 user vs 8 users, option 2 is not good. However Trigger frame can be used in this case. ‒ Other optimization is not preferable. 20MHz 26 52 106 242 484 996 7 bits indicesMessageNumber of entries 0000000 ~ 0100100Possible 26 RU cases in 80MHz 37* 0100101 ~ 0110100Possible 52 RU cases in 80MHz16 0110101 ~ 0111100Possible 106 RU cases in 80MHz8 0111101 ~ 1000000Possible 242 RU cases in 80MHz4 1000001 ~ 1000010Possible 484 RU cases in 80MHz2 1000011Possible 996 RU cases in 80MHz1 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 12

13 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Analysis of UL MU Acknowledgement Response The UL MU response can be in UL OFDMA or MU MIMO: ‒ Option 1: Spatial stream information should be defined for MU MIMO. If one SS is only allowed in MU MIMO, start spatial stream (3 bits) is the only field. ‒ Option 2: HE Control field doesn’t support UL MU MIMO acknowledgement response. ‒ Option 3: HE Control field supports separate format of UL MU MIMO acknowledgement and UL OFDMA acknowledgement. ‒ We prefer option 2 or 3. TX power: –Recap: Trigger frame carries TX power of the trigger frame and target RX power of UL transmission from each STA. each STA uses Trigger frame’s TX power to get path loss, and uses the path loss and target RX power to calculate the TX power. –The target RX power of the STA will be carried in HE A-Control field. –Path Loss Option 1: The newest path loss from the AP calculated through received Trigger or Beacon will be used by the STA to calculate STA’s TX power. Option 2: TX power of DL transmission is carried in HE A-Control field. We prefer option 2. –In unit 2db, 5-bit TX Power filed and Target RX Power can describe 64db difference respectively. Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 13

14 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Analysis of UL MU Acknowledgement Response (Cont’d) MCS: ‒ Option 1: each STA figures out the MCS of its UL MU transmission per DL MU MCS based on MCS selection rules, e.g. the maximal mandatory MCS which is less than the DL MU MCS. ‒ Option 2: The most robust MCS that can fit in UL RU width, PPDU length. This option may not work since AP may not be able to figure out the length of the responding acknowledgement frame when some MPDUs in the A-MPDU get lost: AP think M-BA includes 2-TID’s block ack and STA think one TID BA, AP thinks BA bitmap of a TID is 256 and STA thinks the bitmap of the TID is 64 etc. ‒ Option 3: HE Control field indicates the MCS of UL acknowledgement. ‒ We prefer option 3. One SS is used for UL acknowledgement. One HE LTF is used for UL MU acknowledgement. The CP+LTF Type is TBD. –Fixed value or using one reserved bit to indicate two value The other parameters for UL acknowledgement are same as DL MU transmission that solicits the UL acknowledgement or have some default value. ‒ If those parameters of UL acknowledgement are different from the DL soliciting MU PPDU or default value, Trigger frame is used. Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 14

15 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Proposal for UL MU response scheduling Based on the analysis, HE A-Control field for UL acknowledgement through OFDMA (acknowledgement through MU MIMO and MUMIMO in OFDMA are not supported) is defined as following: 5-bit UL PPDU Length indicates OFDMA symbols of the Data field. 5-bit DL TX Power indicates the transmission power of the Trigger frame in unit of 2db. 5-bit Target UL RX Power indicates the target RX power in unit of 2db. 8-bit RU Allocation is same as Trigger frame. 2-bit MCS indicates the MCS of the UL acknowledgement, MCS 0 to 3. One SS is used for UL acknowledgement The STAs that are the receivers of HE A-Control don’t do CCA sensing before sending UL MU acknowledgement. One HE LTF is used for UL acknowledgement Spatial reuse is disallowed. The CP+LTF Type is TBD. The other missed parameters are same or derived from related parameters in DL MU transmission or some default value. Control IDControl Information 4 bits UL PPDU Length RU Allocation 5 bits8 bits DL TX Power Target UL RX Power 10 bits MCS 2 bits Reserved 1 bits Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 15

16 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Straw Poll 1 Control IDControl Information 4 bits UL PPDU Length RU Allocation 5 bits8 bits DL TX Power Target UL RX Power 10 bits MCS 2 bits Reserved 1bits Do you support to add the following text to 11ax SFD: –The HE A-Control field for UL acknowledgement through OFDMA (acknowledgement through MU MIMO and MUMIMO in OFDMA are not supported) is defined as following: 5-bit UL PPDU Length indicates OFDMA symbols of the Data field. 5-bit DL TX Power indicates the transmission power of the Trigger frame in unit of 2db. 5-bit Target UL RX Power indicates the target RX power in unit of 2db. 8-bit RU Allocation which is same as Trigger frame. 2-bit MCS indicates the MCS of the UL acknowledgement, MCS 0 to 3. One SS is used for UL acknowledgement The STAs that are the receivers of HE A-Control don’t do CCA sensing before sending UL MU acknowledgement. One HE LTF is used for UL acknowledgement Spatial reuse is disallowed. The CP+LTF Type is TBD. The other missed parameters are same or derived from related parameters in DL MU transmission or some default value Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 16

17 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission Straw Poll 2 Do you support to add the following text to 11ax SFD? –HE A-Control field for UL acknowledgement is optional in RX Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 17

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0643r0 Submission UL MU Response Scheduling May 2016 Liwen Chu, Marvell, et. al.Slide 1 Date: 2016-05-16 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail."

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date: 2014-09-15.

Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
Liwen Chu et al. (Marvell)

Liwen Chu et al. (Marvell)
Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA

Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA
Submission 802.11-15/0615r3July 2015 UL OFDMA Bandwidth Slide 1 Date: 2015-07-12 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Liwen Chu Marvell 5488 Marvell.

Submission /0615r3July 2015 UL OFDMA Bandwidth Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Liwen Chu Marvell 5488 Marvell.
Submission 802.11-15/1123r1Sept 2015 Slide 1Liwen Chu et al. (Marvell) Acknowledgement to DL MU Date: 2015-09-14.

Submission /1123r1Sept 2015 Slide 1Liwen Chu et al. (Marvell) Acknowledgement to DL MU Date:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:

Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0580 Submission 11ax Coding Discussions Sept, 2015 Slide 1 Date: 2015-09-12 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Hongyuan Zhang.

Doc.: IEEE /0580 Submission 11ax Coding Discussions Sept, 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Hongyuan Zhang.
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0813r0 July 2015 CP Indication for UL MU Transmission Date: 2015-07-13 Slide 1Zhigang Rong, Huawei, et., al. Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0813r0 July 2015 CP Indication for UL MU Transmission Date: Slide 1Zhigang Rong, Huawei, et., al. Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0580 Submission 11ax Coding Discussions July, 2015 Slide 1 Date: 2015-07-10 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Hongyuan Zhang.

Doc.: IEEE /0580 Submission 11ax Coding Discussions July, 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Hongyuan Zhang.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1058r0September 2015 SubmissionSlide 1 CCA consideration for UL MU transmission Date: 2015-09-13 Kiseon Ryu et al. (LG) NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /1058r0September 2015 SubmissionSlide 1 CCA consideration for UL MU transmission Date: Kiseon Ryu et al. (LG) NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1066r0 September 2015 Kaushik Josiam, SamsungSlide 1 HE-SIG-B Contents Date: 2015-09-13 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1066r0 September 2015 Kaushik Josiam, SamsungSlide 1 HE-SIG-B Contents Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Submission 802.11-15/0841r0July 2015 Slide 1David Xun Yang et al. (Huawei) Cascading Structure Date: 2015-07-12 NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail David.

Submission /0841r0July 2015 Slide 1David Xun Yang et al. (Huawei) Cascading Structure Date: NameAffiliationAddressPhone David.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0066r0 Submission Views on UL-MU features Jan, 2016 Date: 2016-01-15 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Joonsuk Kim Apple 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission Views on UL-MU features Jan, 2016 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Joonsuk Kim Apple 1.
Submission 802.11-16/0054r0Jan 2016 UL MU CCA Response Slide 1 Date: 2016-01-18 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Kaiying Lv Kaiying Lv (ZTE) #9.

Submission /0054r0Jan 2016 UL MU CCA Response Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Kaiying Lv Kaiying Lv (ZTE) #9.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0034 Submission Beamforming with HE-LTF Compression Jan, 2016 Slide 1 Date: 2016-01-18 Authors: Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, et. al.

Doc.: IEEE /0034 Submission Beamforming with HE-LTF Compression Jan, 2016 Slide 1 Date: Authors: Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1121r0 Submission HE A-Control field Slide 1 Date: 2015-09-12 Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.

Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission HE A-Control field Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1301r1 NAV Rule for UL MU Response Date: 2015-11-07 Slide 1 Authors: Nov 2015 Huawei Technologies NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1301r1 NAV Rule for UL MU Response Date: Slide 1 Authors: Nov 2015 Huawei Technologies NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Submission 802.11-15/0831r2July 2015 Broadcast and Unicast (Trigger) in DL MU Slide 1 Date: 2015-07-12 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail Liwen.

Submission /0831r2July 2015 Broadcast and Unicast (Trigger) in DL MU Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Liwen.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0611r0 SubmissionSameer Vermani, Qualcomm et. al.Slide 1 Mandatory/Optional Issues for 802.11ax Date: 2016-05-16 Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhoneEmail.

Doc.: IEEE /0611r0 SubmissionSameer Vermani, Qualcomm et. al.Slide 1 Mandatory/Optional Issues for ax Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/0875r1 Submission July 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, et al. (Intel)Slide 1 Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA Date: 2015-07-13.

Doc.: IEEE /0875r1 Submission July 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, et al. (Intel)Slide 1 Random Access with Trigger Frames using OFDMA Date:

Similar presentations

Ads by Google