1. Data Integration in Process Systems Engineering Status of the DEXPI and ENPRO projects Michael Wiedau PLT Sommerkolloquium, 26. Juni 2015 Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015

2. Status of the projects Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 DEXPI  Data Exchange in the process industry ENPRO  Energy Efficiency in the process industry

3. Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 DEXPI Data Exchange in the Process Industry

4. DEXPI – The Big Idea Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 General exchange standard for the process industry based on ISO 15926, implemented in the next CAE software generation Input from process industry (working party DEXPI ISO 15926): Open and international information model for the entire plant lifecycle Input from the CAE vendors:  general exchange standard for graphics  export and import functions based on the new information model and graphics standard Functional Requirements Functional DesignAsset in OperationAsset Specification

5. The DEXPI group Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 BASF SE Evonik Industries AG Bayer Technology Services GmbH - coordination - requirements conceptual model - best practice file - validator - home page - spec documentation AixCAPE e.V. RWTH Aachen Siemens Bentley - Proteus know-how - ISO know-how - implementation Research Owner Operator CAE vendors ISO community - model support - model extension Intergraph AVEVA Autodesk

6. DEXPI Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 International consortium Meeting regularly (every two month in Frankfurt + phone conferences) Activities directly related to ISO 15926 and Fiatech groups Specification publicly available  www.dexpi.orgwww.dexpi.org

7. DEXPI Tools … Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Online verification tools Graphics Engineering content DEXPI Sandbox

8. Phases and documents/objects in the life cycle of a plant Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Functional Requirements Asset in Operation Asset Specification Functional Design design and development of efficient chemical processes require chemical, physical,... data – including operational data from existing plants operation and maintenance require information from design and development phase information barriers due to insufficient integration of software tools (Images: ENPRO, Wikipedia, Wikimedia)

9. Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 ENPRO Energy Efficiency in the Process Industry

10. ENPRO Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 ENPRO- Connect Exchange platform for ENPRO EP3:Modularisation Modular equipment for energy efficient production EP4: Data-Integration EP2:SMekT Smart mini plants for the development of efficient continuous separation processes Improving Energy efficiency and process acceleration through information integration for conceptual design to production EP1:KoPPonA Continuous processes for polymer specialties with the help of new equipment concepts

11. Beispiel: Betriebspunkt einer Pumpe Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Betrieb Planung & Bau Simulation Auslegung auf Betriebspunkt Errichtung Messung mittels PIMS Tatsächlicher Betriebspunkt Tatsächlicher ≠ geplanter Betriebspunkt Inbetriebnahme

12. Phases of the lifecycle Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Time Functional Requirements Asset in Operation Asset Specification Functional Design Processes Streams Equipment types Instrumentation Detailed equipment specifications All disciplines Physical objects Not only operation phase focus P-4711 V-42 HEX-23 Exemplary structuring of phase-workflows plant operation ordering / purchase

13. Requirements for life cycle data integration Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Standards Meta Model Vocabulary Relations Decisions Activities

14. Data Exchange: Existing Approaches Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 PlantXML (Evonik)  Exchange format for various resources STEP  STEP = STandard for the Exchange of Product model data  ISO 10303: “Automation systems and integration — Product data representation and exchange”  Focus on 3D Information Exchange CAEX NAMUR Empfehlungen  NE 100 / NE 150 / IEC 61987 / …  Focus on specific purposes  Huge Lists of Attributes for Objects ISO 15926  Complex Meta Model (Part 2), Resource Library (Part 4), Templates (Part 8), …  ProteusXML – Focus on exchange of P&IDs and 3D …

15. Functional Requirements Asset in Operation Asset Specification Functional Design Complex Information Model 15 Functional Requirements Functional Design Simulation Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 1 Revision 2 Document

16. Functional Requirements Asset in Operation Asset Specification Functional Design Complex Information Model 16 Asset in Operation Physical Objects Data Internal Classification Hierarchy Measurement

17. Complex Information Model 17 Simulation Document Measurement Functional Requirements Asset in Operation Asset Specification Functional Design

18. Datenintegartion Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Standards müssen zusammenarbeiten!

19. Questionnaire on Data Integration Requirements 1.Usage as discussion guidance in meetings 2.Usage as an Online Survey Questionnaire Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015

20. Datenintegration Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Strukturen machen aus vielen Teilen ein Großes

21. Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015

22. Research work in progress and outlook Information Model Patterns  Decisions on design rationale and usage of knowledge  Documentation how to integrate other standards  Tools for automatic generation of models on template level  Application example for KoPPonA project on research level Questionnaire Software demonstrator in development  Import of exemplary documents in open formats  Powerful information retrieval functions 22

23. Conclusion Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 High progress in development of interfaces for information exchange of P&IDs - Software available in 2016 Major issues have been solved and all partners agree on roadmap Intelligent verification process of P&IDs based on semantic-web technologies Beyond P&IDs: ENPRO initiative for progress in innovative technologies as data integration

24. Current and future work Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Currently:  Scientific exploration  How to model activities?  How to model decisions?  the „WHY?“ answering problem  How to model document versions?  Glossary definition (definition of „phases“, „views“, „aspects“, …)  Separation from other standards (STEP, etc…)  Requirement specification by industry Future (next month, next years)  Transfer of models to RDF (resource description framework) for semantic reasoning  GUIs for information modelling with templates  GUIs for exemplary querying on information resources

25. CIB Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015

26. ENPRO – Expectation from industry Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Navigation & Visualisierung Konsolidieren Weitergeben Daten Modelle

27. SFB 476 – The Improve Project Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 „Information Technology Support for Collaborative and Distributed Design Processes in Chemical Engineering“ Transfer Project T1: CIB = “Comprehensive Information Base” Information Consolidation from different Software Tools Usage of “Semantics” Problem:  How to retrieve relevant information from proprietary software tools? Solution:  Usage of EVONIK’s PlantXML

28. ENPRO example: KoPPonA Miprowa ® Lab Number and type of channels Choice of inlay Source: Ehrfeld Produktkatalog 2012 Given Residence time τ  volume flow, reactor length Number and type of channels Type of inlays  Iterative process Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015

29. ENPRO example: KoPPonA Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Index COIPO = Class of Inanimate Physical Object COROT = Class Of Representation of Thing COIO = Class of Information Object SBR = Specialization By Role SBD = Specialization By Domain COPC = Class Of PartiCipation COIBR = Class Of Involvement By Reference COAC = Class Of ACtivity ACT = ACTivity PTRAD = ParTicipating Role And Domain RAD = Role And Domain

30. ENPRO example: KoPPonA Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Index COIPO = Class of Inanimate Physical Object COROT = Class Of Representation of Thing COIO = Class of Information Object SBR = Specialization By Role SBD = Specialization By Domain COPC = Class Of PartiCipation COIBR = Class Of Involvement By Reference COAC = Class Of ACtivity ACT = ACTivity PTRAD = ParTicipating Role And Domain RAD = Role And Domain

31. ENPRO example: KoPPonA Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Index COIPO = Class of Inanimate Physical Object COROT = Class Of Representation of Thing COIO = Class of Information Object SBR = Specialization By Role SBD = Specialization By Domain COPC = Class Of PartiCipation COIBR = Class Of Involvement By Reference COAC = Class Of ACtivity ACT = ACTivity PTRAD = ParTicipating Role And Domain RAD = Role And Domain

32. DEXPI & ENPRO evaluation Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 DEXPI ENPRO CriteriaNotes OpennessOWL, ISO 15926 ExtendibilityDefinition of own models, Templates, etc. ReusabilityDepends on documentation and examples ApplicabilityHigh abstraction level UniversalityCovers the most parts of lifecycle CriteriaNotes OpennessOWL, XML, ISO 15926, Tools OpenSource ExtendibilityOwn rules in JenaRL etc. ReusabilityIf tool export is implemented ApplicabilityBased on open standards UniversalityFocus on P&IDs Combination! Bottom Up Top Down

33. LifeCycle coverage of the different projects Status of DEXPI & ENPRO | Michael Wiedau | Juni 2015 Functional Requirements Functional DesignAsset in OperationAsset Specification CIB DEXPI ENPRO