1. 1 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 A structured approach to support 3D User Interface Development Juan Manuel Gonzalez-Calleros, Jean Vanderdonckt and Jaime Muñoz-Arteaga Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), Louvain School of Management (LSM) Information Systems Unit (ISYS) juan.m.gonzalez@uclouvain.be jean.vanderdonckt@uclouvain.be Sistemas de Información Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes jmunozar@correo.uaa.mx

2. 2 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Outline 1.Introduction 2.State of the Art 3.A structured approach to support 3D User Interface Development 4.Conclusion

3. 3February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Introduction –Web more collaborative –Increase use of social networks –Web 2.0 It will be the future landscape of the internet places, not pages?

4. 4 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Introduction –Current methods: rarely provide the design knowledge are more focusing on the implementation –Available tools for 3D UIs are: Toolkits, interface builders, rendering engines

5. 5February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Introduction –Our goal: “to demonstrate the feasibility of a MDE- compliant method that is user-centered as opposed to contents-centric for developing 3D UIs” –We propose: a user-centered approach model-driven architecture separation of concerns

6. 6 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Outline 1.Introduction 2.State of the Art 3.A structured method for developing 3DUI 4.Conclusion

7. 7February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 State of the art –Methodological diversity –Not user centered approaches –Single entry and single output –Transformations are hidden

8. 8 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 State of the art –Lack of a methodology for developing 3D UIs –Lack of user task models –Lack of models independent to the final implementations –Lack of a toolkit for such work –Lack of genuine 3D UIs

9. 9 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Outline 1.Introduction 2.State of the Art 3.A structured approach to support 3D User Interface Development 4.Conclusion

10. 10 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Scope of the Method –Pure Reality –Augmented reality –Augmented Virtuality –Virtual 3D GUI –Digital 3D GUI –3D rendering of 2D GUI –2D GUI

11. 11February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Method Outline

12. 12 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Method Outline

13. Task and Domain Model 13 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Rule: A task manipulates a domain class Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

14. 14 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Step1. Consolidation of the task Model Each of the new sub-tasks will be mapped on the corresponding attribute of the class Rule: For each task that manipulates a domain class, a new subtask is created for each attribute. Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

15. Step1. Consolidation of the task Model 15 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

16. Step 2: From task to Abstract User Interface Model 16 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Each task is executed in an abstract container if the task is decomposed into subtasks Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

17. Step 2: From task to Abstract User Interface Model 17February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

18. Step 2: From task to Abstract User Interface Model 18 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Each leaf task is executed in an abstract individual component. Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

19. Step 2: From task to Abstract User Interface Model 19 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

20. Step 2: From task to Abstract User Interface Model 20 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

21. Step 3: From Abstract User Interface to Concrete User Interface Model 21 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

22. Concrete User Interface For each Abstract Container Step 3: From Abstract User Interface to Concrete User Interface Model 22 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 That contains an abstract individual component (AIC) And the AIC is composed of an input facet And the facet has an action type select Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Final User Interface

23. Step 3: From Abstract User Interface to Concrete User Interface Model 23 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 And the domain of the data is continuous Then concretize the AIC into a Slider contained in a graphical container (Box) The rule is applied to 6 AIC Concrete User Interface Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Final User Interface

24. Step 4: Adding behaviour 24 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Concrete User Interface Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Final User Interface

25. Final Result 25 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Task & Concepts Abstract User Interface Concrete User Interface Final User Interface

26. 26February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 Outline 1.Introduction 2.State of the Art 3.Model-based development of 3D user interfaces 4.Conclusion

27. Conclusion 27 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09 We introduced a 3DUI Engineering methodology articulated on three axes: models and their specification language, method, and tools that support the method based on the underlying models. All aspects are stored in UsiXML (www.usixml.org) files that can be exchanged, shared, and communicated between stakeholders (designers, developers, and end users). It has been demonstrated that the global methodology adheres to the principles of MDA and is therefore compliant, except for the standardization process which is ongoing.

28. Conclusion Advantages –Modifiability –Complexity –Rigorous. –Reasoning. –Processable. Model transformations of bigger systems will be more complex to discover and to apply, so it is not clear if the solution is computationally feasible considering the amount of operations needed to perform graph transformations. 28 February 1-7, 2009 - Cancun, Mexico ACHI’09

29. For more information and downloading, http://www.isys.ucl.ac.be/bchi http://www.isys.ucl.ac.be/bchi http://www.usixml.org User Interface eXtensible Markup Language http://www.similar.cc European network on Multimodal UIs Special thanks to all members of the team! Thank you very much for your attention