1. Peer driven Portfolio Review and the Educational Achievement spec

2. Our question Can the Educational Achievement spec support peer-driven portfolio review for the ongoing assessment of clinicians, clinician educators, etc?

3. In some cases Can we track deliberate clinical practice? – Probably Not – Would require clinical log spec Can we track review of other work (ie work to change an educational program, etc). – I think so – The spec is designed to communicate the end result, not the individual judgments. You still need a system to bring together those individual judgments and roll them up into a single judgment.

4. Meet Carrie A residency program director in internal medicine Implementing milestones in her residency program Developing new assessment program She wants to be assessed on her work to reform residency education Her peers review and judge her work

5. Residency Reform Project (Event) Competencies or milestones Reference to portfolio or external document Assessment results 3/20/2012 (only one date allowed) Score: FrameworkScore: 4.2 Performance Framework reference : (pointer to the scale used for assessment, ie 1 novice, 5 expert) Assessment results 3/20/2012 (only one date allowed) Score: FrameworkScore: 4.2 Performance Framework reference : (pointer to the scale used for assessment, ie 1 novice, 5 expert) assessment method: peer assessment Note: the spec has learner notes on an assessment, but doesn’t have assessor notes. Are they needed?