1. Alan F. Hamlet Ingrid Tohver Se-Yeun Lee JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Quantifying the Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Hydrologic Extremes in the Pacific Northwest

2. CBCCSP Research Team Lara Whitely Binder Pablo Carrasco Jeff Deems Marketa McGuire Elsner Alan F. Hamlet Carrie Lee Se-Yeun Lee Dennis P. Lettenmaier Jeremy Littell Guillaume Mauger Nate Mantua Ed Miles Kristian Mickelson Philip W. Mote Rob Norheim Erin Rogers Eric Salathé Amy Snover Ingrid Tohver Andy Wood http://www.hydro.washington.edu/2860/products/sites/r7climate/study_report/CBCCSP_ chap1_intro_final.pdf

3. The Myth of Stationarity: 1) Climate Risks are stationary in time. 2) Observed streamflow records are the best estimate of future variability. 3) Systems and operational paradigms that are robust to past variability are robust to future variability.

4. Image Credit: National Snow and Ice Data Center, W. O. Field, B. F. Molnia http://nsidc.org/data/glacier_photo/special_high_res.html Aug, 13, 1941Aug, 31, 2004 The Myth of Stationarity Meets the Death of Stationarity Muir Glacier in Alaska

5. Why a Focus on Hydrologic Extremes? Many human and natural systems are quite robust under “normal” conditions, but have the potential to be profoundly impacted by hydrologic extreme events.

6. Floods http://www.nps.gov/mora/parknews/upload/floodPP.pdf

7. Drought Evacuated Reservoir During the 2001 PNW Drought

8. Wildfire

9. Low Flow and Temperature Impacts to Fish Temperature/ Disease Related Fish Kill in the Klamath River in 2002

10. Dissolved Gas Management Tailrace below Bonneville Dam

11. Dam Safety Aftermath of the Johnstown Flood 1889

12. Dilution Flows for Industrial Pollutants

13. Stormwater Management

14. Sediment Transport and Mudslides

15. Nuts and Bolts: Traditional Methods for Estimating Hydrologic Extremes

16. Step 1: Select Extreme Event from Each Historical Year Streamflow (cfs) Day of the Water Year (1 = Oct 1)

17. Step 2: Rank Extreme Events for All Years and Estimate Quantiles Streamflow (cfs) Probability of Exceedance 1999

18. Step 3: Fit a Probability Distribution to the Data Examples of Commonly Used Probability Distributions: Extreme Value Type 1 (EV 1) Log Normal (LN) Log Pearson Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) For climate change experiments, GEV is a good choice since the true nature of the future probability distributions is essentially unknown. However it turns out that the choice of distribution is not very critical in terms of the evaluating the sensitivity to warming and/or precipitation change.

19. Step 4: Estimate Extremes Associated with Return Intervals Site NameRet. Int.Flow (cfs) SNOMO : 20 68660 SNOMO : 50 81332 SNOMO : 100 91145 Note that any return interval can be estimated. E.g. one could provide an estimate of the “5000 year flood”.

20. Step 5 (Optional) : “Regionalize” the Results In order to avoid the inherent “noise” that comes with using imperfect site specific data, a common approach is to “regionalize” the results. The idea is to pool as many sites as possible that have common hydroclimatic features (e.g. sites in western WA), and express the flood statistics as a simple ratio to the mean annual flood (MAF) averaged over many different basins. E.g. Q 100 = 2.7 * MAF This approach is used by Ecology in providing estimates of extreme events for the Dam Safety Program, for example.

21. Low flow analysis is essentially the same except we select the extreme low flow event from each year. 7Q10, for example, extracts the lowest 7- day running mean flow from each historical year, fits a probability distribution to the sequence of extremes, and selects the 90% exceedance value (i.e. a 10% probability of being at or below this extreme value)

22. Historical Perspectives: Changing Flood Risk in the 20 th Century

23. References: Niemann, PJ, LJ Schick, FM Ralph, M Hughes, GA Wick, 2010: Flooding in Western Washington: The Connection to Atmospheric Rivers, J. of Hydrometeorology, (in review) Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2007) Effects of 20th century warming and climatevariability on flood risk in the western U.S. Water Resour Res, 43:W06427.doi:10.1029/2006WR005099

24. Observed Characteristics of Extreme Precipitation Events

25. Evidence of Changing Flood Statistics

27. Role of Atmospheric Rivers in Flooding (Nov 7, 2006) Niemann, PJ, LJ Schick, FM Ralph, M Hughes, GA Wick, 2010: Flooding in Western Washington: The Connection to Atmospheric Rivers, J. of Hydrometeorology, (in review)

28. Role of Atmospheric Rivers in Flooding (Oct 20, 2003)

29. Niemann, PJ, LJ Schick, FM Ralph, M Hughes, GA Wick, 2010: Flooding in Western Washington: The Connection to Atmospheric Rivers, J. of Hydrometeorology, (in review)

30. Modeling Studies of Changing 20 th Century Flood Risk in the West

31. Snow Model Schematic of VIC Hydrologic Model Sophisticated, fully distributed, physically based hydrologic model Widely used globally in climate change applications 1/16 Degree Resolution (~5km x 6km or ~ 3mi x 4mi) General Model Schematic

32. Avg WY Date of Flooding VIC Avg WY Date of Flooding OBS Ln (X 100 / X mean ) OBS Ln (X 100 / X mean ) VIC Evaluating the Hydrologic Model Simulations in the Context of Reproducing Flood Characteristics Red = PNW, Blue = CA, Green = Colo, Black = GB

33. Zp X 100 GEV flood/mean flood Red = VIC Blue = OBS 5-yr 20-yr 10-yr 50-yr 100-yr

34. Tmin Tmax PNW CA CRB GB Regionally Averaged Temperature Trends Over the Western U.S. 1916-2003

35. Temperature Historic temperature trend in each calendar month 1915 2003 Detrended Temperature Driving Data for Flood Risk Experiments “Pivot 2003” Data Set “Pivot 1915” Data Set

36. X 20 2003 / X 20 1915 DJF Avg Temp (C) Simulated Changes in the 20-year Flood Associated with 20 th Century Warming X 20 2003 / X 20 1915

37. Freezing Level Snow Schematic of a Cool Climate Flood Precipitation Produces Snow Precipitation Produces Snow Precipitation Produces Runoff Snow Melt

38. Freezing Level Snow Schematic of a Warm Climate Flood Precipitation Produces Snow Precipitation Produces Snow Precipitation Produces Runoff Snow Melt

39. Regionally Averaged Cool Season Precipitation Anomalies PRECIP

40. DJF Avg Temp (C) 20-year Flood for “1973-2003” Compared to “1916-2003” for a Constant Late 20 th Century Temperature Regime X 20 ’73-’03 / X 20 ’16-’03

41. Summary of Flooding Impacts Rain Dominant Basins: Increases in flooding due to increased precipitation intensity, but no significant change from warming alone. Mixed Rain and Snow Basins Along the Coast: Strong increases due to warming and increased precipitation intensity (both effects increase flood risk) Inland Snowmelt Dominant Basins: Relatively small overall changes because effects of warming (decreased risks) and increased precipitation intensity (increased risks) are typically in the opposite directions.

42. Effects of ENSO and PDO on Flood Risk

43. DJF Avg Temp (C) X 100 nENSO / X 100 2003X 100 cENSO / X 100 2003X 100 wENSO / X 100 2003 X 100 nENSO / X 100 2003X 100 cENSO / X 100 2003X 100 wENSO / X 100 2003

44. DJF Avg Temp (C) X 100 nPDO / X 100 2003X 100 cPDO / X 100 2003X 100 wPDO / X 100 2003 X 100 nPDO / X 100 2003X 100 cPDO / X 100 2003X 100 wPDO / X 100 2003

45. Scenarios of Flood Risk in the 21 th Century

46. Mote, P.W. and E. P. Salathe Jr., 2010: Future climate in the Pacific Northwest, Climatic Change, DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9848-z 21 st Century Climate Impacts for the Pacific Northwest Region

47. Seasonal Precipitation Changes for the Pacific Northwest Mote, P.W. and E. P. Salathe Jr., 2010: Future climate in the Pacific Northwest, Climatic Change, DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9848-z

48. http://www.hydro.washington.edu/2860/

49. Smaller basins down to ~500 km 2 Monthly and daily streamflow time series Assessment of hydrologic extremes (e.g. Q100 and 7Q10) Columbia Basin Climate Change Scenarios Project 297 Sites

50. Available PNW Scenarios 2020s – mean 2010-2039; 2040s – mean 2030-2059; 2080s – mean 2070-2099 Downscaling Approach A1B Emissions Scenario B1 Emissions Scenario Hybrid Delta hadcm cnrm_cm ccsm3 echam5 echo_g cgcm3.1_t4 7 pcm1 miroc_3.2 ipsl_cm4 hadgem1 2020s109 2040s109 2080s109 Transient BCSD hadcm cnrm_cm ccsm3 echam5 echo_g cgcm3.1_t4 7 pcm1 1950- 2098+ 77 Delta Method composite of 10 2020s11 2040s11 2080s11

51. Hybrid Downscaling Method Performed for each VIC grid cell: Hist. Daily Timeseries Hist. Monthly Timeseries Historic Monthly CDF Bias Corrected Future Monthly CDF Projected Daily Timeseries 1916-2006 1970-1999 30 yr window 1916-2006 “Base Case”

52. Spatial Variability of Temperature and Precipitation Changes

53. Daily Precipitation (mm) Day of Month Monthly to Daily Precipitation Scaling SeaTac. Feb, 1996, hypothetical 30% Increase

54. Snow Model Schematic of VIC Hydrologic Model Sophisticated, fully distributed, physically based hydrologic model Widely used globally in climate change applications 1/16 Degree Resolution (~5km x 6km or ~ 3mi x 4mi) General Model Schematic

55. Watershed Classifications: Transformation From Snow to Rain Map: Rob Norheim

56. Flood Analysis: What’s In? What’s Out? Issue Affecting AnalysisYesNo Based on explicit daily time step simulations of streamflow? Yes Changing freezing elevation? Yes Rain on snow captured?Yes Increases/decreases in storm intensity? Yes (monthly statistics only) Changes in tails of probability distributions affecting extreme daily precipitation ? No Changes in size and sequencing of storms? No Changes in small scale thunder storms? No Includes water management effects? No

57. Low Flow Analysis: What’s In? What’s Out? Issue Affecting AnalysisYesNo Based on explicit daily time step simulations of streamflow? Yes Effects of changing snowmelt and soil moisture dynamics? Yes Effects of changing evaporation? Yes, but some potential factors omitted (e.g. changes in cloudiness) Changes in sequencing or duration of drought? No Includes shallow ground water? No, but typically captures relevant affects to low flows anyway (well correlated) Includes deep groundwater?No Includes effects of glaciers?No Includes water management effects? No

58. Simulate Daily Time Step Streamflow Scenarios Associated with Changes in Climate Fit Probability Distributions To Estimate Flood and Low Flow Risks Compare Flood Risks to Those in the 20 th Century

60. SNOMO Streamflow (cfs) Probability of Exceedance

61. 2040s Changes in Flood Risk Snohomish at Monroe A1BB1 Historical 10 Member Ensemble Using the Hybrid Delta Downscaling Approach

62. A1BB1 2040s Changes in 7Q10 Snohomish at Monroe Historical 10 Member Ensemble Using the Hybrid Delta Downscaling Approach

63. Chehalis at Grand Mound

64. Relationship Between Change in Q100 and Winter Temp

65. Changes in High Flows Q 100 values are projected to systematically increase in many areas of the PNW due to increasing precipitation and rising snowlines. http://www.hydro.washington.edu/2860/products/sites/r7climate/study_report/CBCCSP _chap7_extremes_final.pdf

66. 7Q10 values are projected to systematically decline in many areas due to loss of snowpack and projected dryer summers Changes in Low Flows http://www.hydro.washington.edu/2860/products/sites/r7climate/study_report/CBCCSP _chap7_extremes_final.pdf

67. Current and Future Research Additional VIC calibration to improve simulations, and comparison with DHSVM models (proposed) Estimate the effects of reservoir management (in progress) Incorporate more realistic effects to extreme precipitation from regional scale climate models (in progress) Incorporate the effects of sea level rise and high flows on inundation using hydrodynamic modeling (proposed)

68. Regional Climate Modeling at CIG  WRF Model (NOAH LSM) 36 to 12 km  ECHAM5 forcing  CCSM3 forcing (A1B and A2 scenarios)  HadRM 25 km  HadCM3 forcing

69. Extreme Precipitation Change from 1970-2000 to 2030-2060 in the percentage of total precipitation occurring when daily precipitation exceeds the 20 th century 95 th percentile Salathé, E.P., L.R. Leung, Y. Qian, and Y. Zhang. 2010. Regional climate model projections for the State of Washington. Climatic Change 102(1-2): 51-75, doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9849-y

70. Snohomish River Near Monroe, WA

71. Some Implications for Policy Response to Changing Flood Risk

72. Scenarios not forecasts! The current projections are an initial attempt to provide quantitative estimates of the magnitude and direction of changing hydrologic extremes across the PNW, but there are many missing pieces: More fully integrated modeling studies and summary products are needed to better support many policy and design decisions. Reducing the cost and increasing the frequency of updates will help keep key products and data sets current.

73. We need to move forward now with the best available information. We almost certainly will not have all of the data and projections that we would like to have before we have to make difficult decisions that materially affect future outcomes. Identifying “No Regrets” strategies may be the best approach for coping with these realities.

74. Improving Estimates of the 100 ‐ year Flood: Methodology and Applications to the Olympic National Forest USFS Team: Kathy O’Halloran Bill Shelmerdine Luis Santoyo Robin Stoddard Robert P Metzger UW Team: Alan F. Hamlet Ingrid Tohver Se-Yeun Lee Rob Norheim

77. Mote, P.W. and E. P. Salathe Jr., 2010: Future climate in the Pacific Northwest, Climatic Change, DOI: 10.1007/s10584-010-9848-z 21 st Century Climate Impacts for the Pacific Northwest Region

78. Snow Model Schematic of VIC Hydrologic Model Sophisticated, fully distributed, physically based hydrologic model Widely used globally in climate change applications 1/16 Degree Resolution (~5km x 6km or ~ 3mi x 4mi) General Model Schematic

79. Intercomparison of USGS and VIC Q100 Estimates

80. Intercomparison of Change in Q100 from USGS and VIC Models

81. Hybrid Product Based on USGS Baseline with VIC Change Map

83. Validation at HCDN Streamflow Sites

84. VIC

86. Validation at HCDN Streamflow Sites

87. Extensions and Next Steps Develop a decision support tool for assessing changing risk at any point or spatial scale (similar to the basic functionality of Streamstats in delineating the basin, etc.) Collaborate with design professionals in the Olympic National Forest to further develop and refine the tool Extend to other PNW National Forests and Parks

88. 1/16 th Degree Changes in Natural Flood Risk